Zillow’s Chief Operating Officer Jeremy Wacksman virtually appeared this September at a conference held by investment banking company Piper Sandler, and proclaimed, “The strength and the appeal for Zillow Offers just continues to grow. And we’re even more confident now that this is going to be a service really in all-weather markets.”

Six weeks after Wacksmans’ remarks, Zillow said it was winding down an iBuying program responsible for the majority of the company’s revenue and operating expenses. Zillow CEO Rich Barton stated Zillow Offers’ price forecasting model was too volatile.

A pair of lawsuits on behalf of Zillow investors cite this statement by Wacksman – and similar rosy claims in 2021 by Barton and Allen Parker, the company’s chief financial officer – as illegally misleading investors.

Shareholders routinely file lawsuits if a company’s stock price plunges, and these cases are no different. Zillow had a market value of $48 billion on Feb. 10 following a company earnings report; its market cap was $13.8 billion at the close of Nasdaq trading Monday.

But the Zillow lawsuits raise the question of whether executive’s upbeat pronouncements were not mere self-promotion but “materially false and/or misleading statements” in violation of the federal Securities Exchange Act.

Zillow has not yet filed a reply to the cases, and the company declined to comment on them, besides a statement that, “We are aware of the lawsuits filed recently and we are currently reviewing them. As a general practice, we do not discuss pending litigation.”

The first shareholder lawsuit was lodged Nov. 16 in federal court in Seattle on behalf of Dibakur Barua, and the proposed class action does not describe who Barua is other than someone who “purchased or otherwise acquired Zillow securities between February 10, 2021, and November 2, 2021.”

Besides the company, Barton, Parker, and Wacksman are each named as co-defendants. Statements, like those from Barton repeatedly calling Zillow Offers a “durable” service, “created in the market an unrealistically positive assessment of the company and its financial well-being and prospects, thus causing the company’s securities to be overvalued,” the lawsuit reads.

The Barua case has been assigned to Thomas Zilly, the judge presiding over real estate brokerage Rex’s lawsuit against Zillow and the National Association of Realtors.

The second lawsuit was filed Nov. 19 in Seattle federal court on behalf of Zillow investor Steve Silverberg. The Silverberg lawsuit also proposes a class action to collect monetary damages on behalf of plaintiffs who bought Zillow stock between Feb. 10 and Nov. 2.

Other lawyers, meanwhile, are on the hunt to find a plaintiff so they can file a lawsuit of their own against Zillow. A New York law firm, Brager Eagel & Squire, fired off a press release Monday that it “encourages investors to contact the firm.”

Besides lawsuits, Zillow is also contending with TRC Capital Investment Corporation, a Canadian company that on Monday offered to buy up to two million shares of Zillow’s Class C capital stock for $55 a share.

The offer to Zillow shareholders stands until Dec. 15, TRC Capital announced, and it is known as a “mini-tender offer.” A tender offer is when shareholders are solicited to sell their stock at a certain price during a particular time window. A mini-tender offer is when the soliciting investor looks to buy less than 5% of the company’s shares.

The Securities and Exchange Commission warns that mini-tender offers trigger little regulatory scrutiny, with a 2008 SEC note stating, “Some bidders make mini-tender offers at below market prices, hoping that they will catch investors off guard.”

(Zillow’s stock was actually trading at $54.26, or a hair less than $55 a share, at close of business Monday.)

Invoking this SEC language, Zillow advised its shareholders to reject TRC Capital’s solicitation.

A TRC Capital mini-tender offer appears common for companies in transition. A similar ask was made of Snap shareholders earlier this month, as the social media company’s stock price tumbled.

And General Electric also told its investors to reject a TRC Capital mini-tender offer in early October. Five weeks later, GE announced a split of its operations into three separate companies.

The post Zillow hit with multiple shareholder lawsuits appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


Since 2009, US Congress has passed 38 infrastructure-related bills that went on to be signed by the president. The biggest one, however, was signed earlier this month by President Joe Biden.

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, better known as the “bipartisan infrastructure bill,” is worth about $973 billion spread across fiscal years 2022-2026 — with the majority of the funds being directed towards investments in transportation, water, power and energy, combating environmental issues like climate change, a massive investment in broadband expansion, and public lands.

As a whole, the bill has been well received by many trade associations and the public. A poll conducted by ABC News/Washington Post found that 63% of Americans supported the infrastructure package just before it landed on Biden’s desk.

And, the bill is widely supported by the real estate community, too. National Association of Realtors® President Charlie Oppler released a statement just after its passage, which states: “NAR is encouraged by the bipartisan support for the infrastructure bill. We supported many elements of this legislation, including significant investment in the power grid, managing climate risks, and repairing and replacing aging roads, bridges, ports, airports, and railways. These improvements will make communities more resilient and sustainable.”

So, while the bill made it through a heavily divided Congress and is now law. But how much of an impact can we expect on real estate?

The effects on housing markets and prices

It’s hard to determine how much home prices could shift, if at all. For starters, home prices are where they’re at now due to a severe shortage in housing supply. While the infrastructure deal pushes funds toward affordable housing and expansion, that won’t be nearly enough to close the gap.

However, something unique about this package is the inclusion of about $65 billion that is appropriated toward broadband expansion. Broadband, in simple terms, is just high-speed internet.

As we are well aware, the digital world requires internet access at just about any moment of the day. Remote work is widespread, communications are almost entirely internet-based, and students do the vast majority of their assignments behind a computer screen.

It’s hard to imagine that some areas lack internet connections, but it’s a real problem. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reports that there are still about 19 million Americans who lack high-speed internet access —most of whom are located in the most rural regions of the country.

With the expansion of broadband to these regions, there’s the possibility of more upward pressure on home prices. For example, a study conducted by researchers at the University of Michigan and Carnegie Mellon University found that fiber-optic connections can add nearly $5,500 to the price of a standard three-bedroom single-family home.

The study also found that homes without access to high-speed internet are less likely to receive offers. While not receiving an offer on a home in such a strapped housing market is an unlikely scenario these days, as investors, that’s something to take note of.

Another major aspect of the package is investments in transportation. A total of $273 billion, the largest slice of the bill, has been appropriated towards transportation-related items.

Improvements and expansions to roads, interstates, and bridges attract investments and bring forth appreciation. Small towns can transform into bustling suburbs once new roads are laid out and cities become more interconnected. Furthermore, commercial investments bring jobs and attention to an area, fueling residential construction and home appreciation.

Beyond roads and bridges, public transit is a major aspect that some lawmakers view as key to reducing emissions, traffic, increasing access, and improving the economy. Transit authorities such as the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority have progressively made investments and improvements into their infrastructures. With the new bill, they will have more funds to allocate towards improvements.

But does the demand for these projects meet expectations — and, more importantly, match the appropriations?

Washington DC Metro Ridership 2010-2021

The chart above shows the number of daily rail entries for the Washington D.C. Metro. One important point illustrated by the chart is that the pandemic has played a drastic role in decreasing the number of entries. However, ridership had been falling prior to the pandemic. In 2018, the Authority landed an expansion contract to improve rail infrastructure. Consequently, 2019 saw a 20,000 net increase in riders.

But demand has been way down since then. While COVID-19 plays a major role, is there enough evidence to justify large investments from this infrastructure deal into public transit? If so, how much will that affect real estate, if at all? We’ll find out soon enough.

Final thoughts

America has been long overdue for a rehaul to its infrastructure. Whether this package is actually worth its weight and cost isn’t clear yet — and the debate will continue. We know that the country needs improvements in many of its areas.

That said, it’s hard to predict how any of these massive bills will affect real estate. The other major item on Biden’s agenda is the social spending bill, which is supposed to include more sweeping provisions geared toward real estate. However, that bill is stalled in Congress and has a lot of uncertainty regarding its future.

But for now, investors should take a serious look at the infrastructure bill. Infrastructure packages present real opportunities that should be taken advantage of. While funds will roll out over time and will be unevenly distributed across the country, investors should keep an eye on new projects that are announced or under development in their markets.

You may find a ripe deal that will pay off in the long run.



Source link


HW+ housing bubble

Today, pending home sales came in as a big beat of estimates — up 7.5% in October — and since we are days away from December, we can officially label the 2021 housing crash bears as even worse than the 2020 housing crash bears. Like I have often said, professional grifters have plagued the housing sector for many years and shouldn’t be looked to as fundamental economic sources of information. This is a big reason why I always have my two staple sayings.

Economics done right should be boring

Trust me, in this day and age of the seven-second attention span, promoting doom and gloom, housing crashes and vast economic conspiracies is the best way to get clicks. I do understand that my economic takes and charts might not be the sexiest thing on the internet. However, I still believe that economics is a story best told by numbers and not ideological takes. Believe in people who believe in economic models, even if they’re not exciting.

“Always be the detective, not the troll

As you can imagine, being a very pro-American economic person, especially during this crisis, I have a target on my head. People like myself understand that it’s part of the business. Who is crazy enough to write an American economic recovery model on April 7, 2020, and try to explain to people why housing isn’t going to crash due to demographics, good credit profiles and low mortgage rates? What person would be so confident in 2020 that forbearance wasn’t going to crash housing in 2021 that they would create the term Forbearance Crash Bros to be ready to mock this group in 2021?

Whatever the future brings for the U.S. economy, know that I won’t lie to you for clicks; it will be based on boring economic models that are back-tested in time and adjusted for new variables 24/7. You can glimpse my mindset in this podcast, which covers the entire COVID-19 crisis and housing. The title I do believe is fitting: Bear Crusher.

From the National Association of Realtors: “The Pending Home Sales Index (PHSI), a forward-looking indicator of home sales based on contract signings, rose 7.5% to 125.2 in October. Year-over-year, signings fell 1.4%. An index of 100 is equal to the level of contract activity in 2001.”

One of the themes that I wanted to give to my readers is that housing data had surged toward the end of 2020, which created a high that couldn’t be sustained. Home sales had a big gap from trending sales to where total sales closed in 2020. So, what was always going to happen was that housing data would moderate. That moderation will be viewed as housing crashing because I have seen people use this line repeatedly during the last eight years. This is why I recently wrote about what real housing or economic weakness would look like so you don’t get suckered by housing and economic crash addicts.

Whatever the future brings for the U.S. economy, know that I won’t lie to you for clicks; it will be based on boring economic models that are back-tested in time and adjusted for new variables 24/7. You can glimpse my mindset in this podcast, which covers the entire COVID-19 crisis and housing. The title I do believe is fitting: Bear Crusher.

From the National Association of Realtors: “The Pending Home Sales Index (PHSI), a forward-looking indicator of home sales based on contract signings, rose 7.5% to 125.2 in October. Year-over-year, signings fell 1.4%. An index of 100 is equal to the level of contract activity in 2001.”

One of the themes that I wanted to give to my readers is that housing data had surged toward the end of 2020, which created a high that couldn’t be sustained. Home sales had a big gap from trending sales to where total sales closed in 2020. So, what was always going to happen was that housing data would moderate. That moderation will be viewed as housing crashing because I have seen people use this line repeatedly during the last eight years. This is why I recently wrote about what real housing or economic weakness would look like so you don’t get suckered by housing and economic crash addicts.

As we can see below, housing moderated, found a base and moved higher toward the second half of 2021. I stress this as many people had sent me examples of YouTube videos with people touting a second-half housing crash. I can tell you that these people don’t have the training to read housing or economic data correctly. If they did, then the notion of a sales collapse in 2021 — when trend demand data was always showing stability — is ludicrous. Remember, be the detective, not the troll.

Last week, I wrote about how the existing home sales markets outperformed my peak sales range in the past two sales reports. As long as the final two reports of the year are above 6.2 million, you should see that as a beat. Of course, total sales are above my critical level of 6.2 million when adding new home sales. So far, 2020 and 2021 have come in as a noticeable beat in my eyes. Mother Demographics and low mortgage rates are two very hard competitors to go against when advocating an epic housing crash.

From NAR: “Motivated by fast-rising rents and the anticipated increase in mortgage rates, consumers that are on strong financial footing are signing contracts to purchase a home sooner rather than later,” said Lawrence Yun, NAR’s chief economist. “This solid buying is a testament to demand still being relatively high, as it is occurring during a time when inventory is still markedly low.”

Has anyone noticed that over the last eight years everyone blames low inventory when we miss estimates, but they keep quiet about it when sales are beating estimates, while inventory is still falling? Over the years, I have never believed in the premise that low inventory is holding sales back, which was expected whenever sales get weaker. 2020 and 2021 are at pre-cycle highs in demand, with total inventory levels at all-time lows for both years.

Remember, a seller is typically also a buyer, so inventory should fall when demand picks up and that seller finds another home to buy. When inventory rises and more supply is on the market, this means demand is fading. Total inventory levels have been falling since 2014, while sales have been rising. Please don’t forget this in the future, as sales will slow at some point when mortgage demand fades.    

From the NAR: “The notable gain in October assures that total existing-home sales in 2021 will exceed 6 million, which will shape up to be the best performance in 15 years.”

One aspect of housing that doesn’t get enough attention is that mortgage purchase application data has had a nice run for 12 weeks. Earlier in the year, I wrote an article saying that purchase application data was going to be negative year over year in the second half of 2021, and we shouldn’t overreact to this, because the housing crash people will.

It’s the nature of the beast, as I have seen this behavior a lot. The lack of training and not making COVID-19 adjustments to data creates a false sense of reality for housing crash people, and some were pushing the negative year-over-year data as a legit premise for sales to collapse.

Well, as we can see, sales didn’t collapse, but something else happened. The purchase application data was getting better because the year-over-year declines were improving so much that we have a shot to report even a flat or positive print, which will explode my head. Not even I thought that could be possible with such high comps, as we can see below with mortgage demand getting firm.

From July 14 to Sept. 8, purchase application data year over year was trending at roughly negative 18%-19%. The higher comps in 2020 were always going to result in negative year-over-year data this year. However, just taking the last eight weeks, still using high comps, the average decline is roughly 8%-9%. The last three weeks combined is down only 4.6% on average, and this data line looks out 30-90 days.

Yes, seasonality kicked in a while ago, but the firming of this data line is a big deal. Consider this in the context of the focus on iBuyers, which might not even account for 1% of total home sales. The focus has also been on investors because the premise was that without investors, housing would crash. This idea misses out on the real data trends that matter because the biggest homebuyers in America are always mortgage buyers, not investors. We don’t have a Wall Street moat around housing: when mortgage demand fades, so will housing.

Hopefully my work this year can make you understand that sexy ideological headlines might get the press time, but good old boring economic work gets the job done with satisfaction. Today’s pending home sales is just another affirmation of what we’ve seen over the last two years: it’s the Revenge of the Nerds. 

The post Pending home sales shock 2021 housing crash bears appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


HW-LO-mortgage

The supply-chain bottleneck afflicting the global economy has its own counterpart in the world of residential mortgage-backed securities, also referred to as RMBS.

One group of industry players — loan underwriters — are the chief cause of the logjam. They are in high demand for each stage of the mortgage process, yet they are in seriously short supply in a still-booming mortgage market. 

Underwriters are needed at the beginning of the process to conduct due diligence on mortgage originations, and they are in demand on the back-end of the pipeline to conduct due diligence on the loans being pooled and securitized in RMBS issuances sold to investors. 

With record mortgage production in recent years — some $8 trillion in total origination volume over the past two years, industry estimates show — and a resurgent private-label market this year, the pool of available underwriters has been stretched razor thin, according to executives with third-party due-diligence review (TPR) firms and bond-rating agencies interviewed for this story. 

About a half-dozen RMBS issuers also were contacted for this story, including J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Redwood Trust and United Wholesale Mortgage, as well as loan aggregator MAXEX, and all either declined comment or did not respond. The same was the case with industry groups and regulators like the Mortgage Bankers Association, the National Association of Mortgage Underwriters and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The private label market share of U.S. mortgage securitizations reached 5% in 2019, then declined to 2.44% in 2020, largely because of the pandemic-spawned economic slowdown. In 2021, however, it has come roaring back, representing 3.53% of all securitizations over the first eight months of the year, according to a report by the Urban Institute’s Housing Policy Institute.

“Non-agency securitization has been rampant in the first eight months of 2021 [and continuing], totaling $89.79 billion, compared to $49.69 billion in the first eight months of 2019,” the report states.

Government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, along with Ginnie Mae, collectively known as the agency market, account for the balance of residential mortgage-back security (RMBS) issuances. Prior to the Great Recession some 15 years ago, however, private-label securitizations were approaching 60% of the entire U.S. RMBS market.

The problem created by the current underwriter shortage is that, in some cases, it is creating backlogs for issuers seeking to have their securitization deals reviewed by bond-rating agencies who require that the loans in the pools for those transactions first be vetted by arms-length TPR firms.

“Many participants have said there’s been a problem [because of the underwriter shortage],” said Roelof Slump, managing director of U.S. RMBS at New York-based Fitch Ratings. “They can’t bring [securitization] deals to market as quickly. We certainly hear that as a concern in the market.”

Slump adds that it is not a new problem and “didn’t suddenly happen in October or November” of this year.

“It’s been an ongoing thing,” he said. “It’s like everybody is on the same highway and going the same speed, but we just recognize that it’s going to take longer to get there.”

John Toohig, managing director of whole loan trading at Raymond James in Memphis, described the dilemma as “a tremendous bottleneck,” adding that “it has to do with the third-party due-diligence providers who are the ones who have to kind of bless these deals, and there’s not enough underwriters out there [with those firms] to kind of push these deals through.”

“Over the course of the year, I’ve actually gotten a lot of phone calls from originators and issuers saying, ‘Listen, you know our deal is being held up by a third-party vendor, or underwriter, and it’s going to take them three months before they can bless our deal, so can you turn these loans faster [in the whole-loan trading market]?’”

The problem with delays, according to Joseph Mayhew, chief credit officer for Frisco, Texas-based Evolve Mortgage Services, which provides TPR services, is more acute for smaller or newer security issuers who don’t have established relationships with TPR firms that ensure due-diligence staff is dedicated year-round to handling a lender’s securitization volume.

“It depends on who you are,” Mayhew explained. “I’ve heard timeframes of up to three months [delay], but that might have been back in January to March of this year.”

He added that large issuers, such as big investment banks, “have a dedicated desk at their TPR firm [via contract], and they will sit there and wait for the loans, but they will not put anyone in front of them.”

So, the delays vary, with an average now of four-to-six weeks for smaller RMBS issuers that don’t have an ongoing contract relationship with a TPR firm. For those that do, it may take as little as two or three weeks, Mayhew said. 

“That’s from the time they submit a loan for TPR review to the time it comes out [of the review process],” he explained.

Michael Franco, CEO of SitusAMC, which is one of the larger TPR firms providing due-diligence services for private-label transactions, stressed that assessing the extent of the impact of the underwriter shortage and resulting delays falls into the realm of being “an unknown unknown, because you don’t really know who would have done a deal had the capacity been available.”

The underwriter shortage is even affecting the secondary market for mortgage-servicing rights (MSRs), Tom Piercy, managing director of Denver-based Incenter Mortgage Advisors, said. 

“They don’t underwrite every loan in an MSR trade,” he explained. “But they will go through anywhere from 5% to 10% of the bulk pool. … 

“There’s absolutely been cases where you’re hoping to close by a certain date, and it gets pushed out 30 days because of due diligence [needs]. …It is impacting every aspect of the market.”

Quantifying the nature of the underwriter shortage, beyond anecdotes from players in the industry, however, is not so simple. There is no entity tracking the shortage across the industry.

In fact, many firms have added staff over the past few years and still can’t keep up with the demand from a resurgent private-label market.

“If you simply look at the number of [RMBS] issuances that have been out there, the TPR firms have reviewed more loans this year than they did in prior years since the [global financial] crisis,” Fitch’s Slump said. “So, it may seem like they have reduced capacity, or reduced their ability to handle it, but they’ve actually ramped up.”

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics does not have a job category set up solely for mortgage underwriters, but it does track job growth, or lack of it, in a category it calls “loan officers,” which includes underwriters as a subset. 

“Employment of loan officers is projected to show little or no change from 2020 to 2030,” the BLS’ Occupational Outlook for that job category states. “Despite limited employment growth, about 25,000 openings for loan officers are projected each year, on average, over the decade. Most of those openings are expected to result from the need to replace workers who transfer to different occupations or exit the labor force, such as to retire.”

The BLS outlook, among other factors, places the blame for the employment shortfall on “productivity-enhancing technology in loan processing [that is] expected to slow employment growth” despite increasing demand for “loan officers … to evaluate the creditworthiness of applicants and determine the likelihood that loans will be paid back in full and on time.”

Charlotte-based Canopy is a relative newcomer to the TPR market. The startup firm started doing business in the second quarter of this year. Despite that, its CEO, John Levonick, said “our phone has been ringing off the hook.”

“We’re all seasoned pros, but we’re still a brand-new company,” he said. “And for our phone to ring, presenting us with the opportunities that have been presented to us, reflects the state of the marketplace. Normally it would take a new due-diligence firm a year two or three to prove themselves.”

TPR firms are coping with the underwriter shortage in a number of ways, including recruiting, when possible, from local universities; expanding their use of automation and technology to reduce the need for human labor; and rethinking the division of labor in the underwriting process to improve efficiencies. And there has been an increased acceptance and reliance on statistical sampling methods for conducting due diligence on loan pools.

The practice of performing underwriting reviews on only samples of a loan pool slated for securitization is not knew, but Toohig of Raymond James says it’s increased use is linked to the underwriter shortage, “no doubt.”

“To do 100% due diligence on RMBS [private-label] securitizations is a lot of work that takes time and costs money for the issuer,” Slump said. “And things like loan sampling as opposed to 100% loan due diligence have been considered by issuers. 

“…There’s been a couple of issuers who have done that, but it’s not something that’s been universally used,” he added. “In certain cases, it can make a lot of sense — for example, with prime high-quality production, where the types of loans being originated and securitized are very uniform; the issuer has a history of their performance; the guidelines are very clear; and they [the loan pools] don’t have a lot of exceptions.”

Evolve’s Mayhew said he believes sampling is “reasonable.” 

“So somewhere in the 50% to 75% percent range [of loans sampled] is what most people I think are doing, but some of the smaller companies — the ones dealing with a lot of unique loan products — are doing 100%,” he added. “Sampling is really about when you think your data mostly looks the same, right? It’s not about when you think you’re going to have these weird outliers.”

Still, it’s an evolving market, and pressures build over time, creating new release valves to let some steam off the deadline and cost pressures. Jack Kahan, senior managing director of RMBS at New York-based Kroll Bond Rating Agency, points to “an example, and not the only one, of how RMBS issuers have been affected” by the underwriter shortage.

That example is from a presale report Kroll published for an RMBS nonprime RMBS transaction sponsored by Blue River Mortgage II LLC, which is backed by a pool of 610 non-qualified mortgages valued at $348 million. Blue River, according to the Kroll report, is owned by a fund managed by Angelo, Gordon & Co. LP — an asset-management firm with some $44 billion in assets under management.

“While 100% of the loans in the transaction are subject to third-party due-diligence review, 19% of the loans will not have such a review completed until up to 89 days following the closing of the transaction,” states the presale report, published in late September. “The sponsor will make representations and warranties that require the sponsor to repurchase any post-closing review loans that ultimately receive a grade of “C” or “D” — or do not receive a final grade. 

“The sponsor indicates that the post-close review mechanism is designed to mitigate the third-party review backlog being experienced at the time of launch of the transaction,” the report continues, “and should that TPR capacity improve, this mechanism may be discontinued for future issuance.”

Chris Guidici, managing director of business development at Wipro Opus Risk Solutions, an Illinois-based TPR firm, said normally the due diligence is done prior to a transaction closing, “but we have seen a shift with some [issuers] going to a post-diligence [review].”

Toohig of Raymond James added: “I don’t see much of that. I don’t even know how you can do that.”

This is the first story in a three-part series on the market-wide consequences of an underwriter shortage. The next two stories will drop later this week, so be sure to check back. 

The post Underwriter shortage slowing the pace of private-label deals appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


It takes a leap of faith to leave a W2 job and wander through the hills and valleys of self-employment. With the right skill set, time management, and perseverance, you can come out more profitable (and happier) than you were originally at your old job. But, once you succeed, it may be hard to slow down the self-employment train, and your side-gig could become a full-on business, with the need for employees.

TJ has put herself in a phenomenal position, both financially and income-wise. She left her job to become a full-time consultant but knows she won’t be able to expand without hiring her first employee. Her business would need an employee to bring in more revenue, BUT she needs more revenue to bring on an employee. What would you do in this situation?

Scott and Mindy have both spent time outsourcing and hiring before. They help TJ develop a roadmap to getting her first hire on board while keeping crucial revenue in the business. This episode also dives into self-employed health insurance, project management, and hiring a junior position that can grow into a senior in little time.

Mindy:
Welcome to the BiggerPockets Money Podcast, show number 252, Finance Friday edition, where we interview TJ and talk about setting up your business to scale in the future.

TJ:
Yeah, I think that’s the main reason I haven’t hired anyone right now, is that I don’t want to hire someone and have them dependent on my income when I don’t personally feel like it’s stable. When it’s just me, I don’t have any dependents that are looking to make use of my money, then it’s not a big deal. If I lean on my emergency fund here and there or I decide to take December off, those are all great. But when I’m looking to hire somebody else, they either have to not also be depending on the income themselves, or I need to have enough coming in the door steadily to be able to give them that assurance.

Mindy:
Hello, hello, hello. My name is Mindy Jensen. And with me as always is my growth-minded business master co-host, Scott Trench.

Scott:
I’m just thrilled to be your CE co-host, Mindy.

Mindy:
Oh my goodness, that was awful.

Scott:
I thought it was great.

Mindy:
They’re always awful. It was clever though. Clever and awful can be at the same time. Scott and I are here to make financial independence less scary, less just for somebody else, to introduce you to every money story, because we truly believe financial freedom is attainable for everyone, no matter when or where you are starting.

Scott:
That’s right, whether you want to retire early and travel the world, go on to make big time investments in assets like real estate, start your own business, or hire your first employee, we’ll help you reach your financial goals and get money out of the way so you can launch yourself towards those dreams.

Mindy:
Scott, I’m excited to talk to TJ today. She has a very fun problem. She is in the, “I’m about to grow really big,” portion and of her company, and she just needs, I think a little bit of guidance for where she wants to go. And once she puts her feet running, I’m imagining like the Road Runner where his feet go like this and then they finally hit the ground and they take off. Once her feet hit the ground, she’s going to take off and fly.

Scott:
Yeah. She’s in this awesome position where her expenses are low, she’s dual house hacker, she’s got a business with all this kind of stuff. And now, it’s a matter of, do we want a turbocharge And go forward, or we want to take a more methodical approach? She has all the options in the world because the status of her financial foundation is one of inevitably moving forward towards wealth and abundance over the next five to 10 years. So it’s just fantastic to see. It’s a higher income, but not a crazy high income with that. So kudos to her for building such a strong position.

Mindy:
Yeah. Before we bring in TJ, let’s hear a note from today’s show sponsor.
A great, big thanks to the sponsor of today’s show. And, my attorney now makes me say, the contents of this podcast are informational in nature and are not legal or tax advice. Neither Scott, nor I, nor BiggerPockets is engaged in the provision of legal, tax, or any other advice. You should seek your own advice from professional advisors, including lawyers and accountants regarding the legal, tax, and financial implications of any financial decision you contemplate.
TJ is 30 years old and targeting a work-optional life within the next 10 years. She’s recently purchased a new-built home and has her expenses dialed in. She’s looking to optimize her finances and is actively growing her business, consulting businesses on their business practices. I’m actively growing the use of the word business in the introductions here. TJ, welcome to the BiggerPockets Money Podcast.

TJ:
Thank you for having me.

Mindy:
I’m so excited to talk to you today, because I think you have an interesting set of circumstances, and I think you’re not the only one in this set of circumstances. So let’s jump in and see where your money’s going. What are you bringing in and where are you sending it out?

TJ:
Great. Coming in the door, I recently just transitioned from working full-time as an IT project manager to full-time as a consultant. So this year, my finances are a little wonky, but I’m looking at bringing in a little under 150K this year based off of the leads I have right now. And after taxes, that’s about 9K a month.

Mindy:
Awesome. And is there any additional income?

TJ:
Yes. I have a couple, and they’re really just small. I do have one PPM or a syndication, and that’s bringing in about $125 a month. And then I’m actually part of a research study that gives me like $25 a month.

Mindy:
Well, that’s cool. I like those research studies. Yes. When you’re in college, you can generate a lot of income like that.

Scott:
Well, let’s get a picture of net worth. So what are your assets and liabilities, and however you want to present those.

TJ:
Sure. So from an asset perspective, I’ve got several retirement accounts and all sorts of fun things. On the traditional retirement side, that’s about 95K on the Roth side that adds up to about 55K. And then I’ve got a 529 plan that just sits there because I thought I would get my MBA at some point at about 16K. And then after tax, investments is at 66K. And then I do own, I just moved from a two bed, two bath condo into this new build home, and I hung onto that one. So right now that is a rental property that is worth about 171. And I do have a HeLOC out on that, which is about 62K. So a little bit of debt there, but that’s really just because I like to have the line of credit to have that flexibility.
And then this property, I’m actually house hacking it, so I have a roommate.

Scott:
Awesome. What’s the mortgage? Do you have a mortgage in addition to that HeLOC? And do you have a mortgage on your primary?

TJ:
The condo is paid off. I basically just got the HeLOC and took the HeLOC funds and paid off the mortgage, so it reduced my monthly expenses there. And then the mortgage on the single family home I’m in right now is at 235 with a 2.99% interest.

Scott:
And what’s the asset value of the house hack?

TJ:
The house hack, that is-

Scott:
How much is it worth?

TJ:
Oh, 171, that’s what it was.

Scott:
So, you have a mortgage for 235. So the condo’s worth 171.

TJ:
Oh, sorry, yeah.

Scott:
And you have the $66,000 HeLOC. And then you have a mortgage of 235. How much is the property worth?

TJ:
The single family is 350.

Scott:
350. Okay.

Mindy:
Oh nice.

Scott:
And how much does this all boil up to for total net worth?

TJ:
About 450K

Scott:
Awesome. One more question before we get to where you want to get to, what brought you to this point? How long have you been thinking about fi or personal finance or this kind of stuff? Can you give us a quick overview of your story in the past? A couple years.

TJ:
Sure. Yeah. I would say, a lot of it comes from just having strong fundamentals. My parents are immigrants. They came to America to do their masters and then stayed. And they’ve all always been super frugal. It’s just an immigrant mindset where you’re trying to fast track your way to the American dream. My mom’s amazing at finances. So she taught me a lot of things. She actually doing swing trades stocks right now. I look at her portfolio, I’m like, “What? How?” I really picked up a lot of that, and just knowing it was possible and having a female role model show me that this is how to do finances.
And then I learned about fi in 2017, and I was already in a good position. I already owned my condo at the time, and I was not enjoying my job. So I went to my boyfriend at the time and went, “I want to do this. Will you support me?” And he gave me that mental space and emotional support to really decide that this was something I wanted to do. And that’s really just the jumping off point. Since then, I’ve soaked up a lot of information, purchased several classes on real estate investing, stock trading, all sorts of other things, just to get myself to this point.

Scott:
Awesome. And did you ever have any debt or were you able to just pay off and build this position? Did you have a pretty good launch pad for that journey?

TJ:
I had a good launch pad. I did recently tell a salesperson that my family doesn’t take out financing for things, the only debt that we ever had in the house was the mortgage. So it actually was not a part of my world of possibilities that I could take out a loan for college, that just wasn’t a thing. So I got a scholarship that paid for most of it. My parents paid for the difference because they already had a 529 plan, so they wanted to use the money without the penalties. And then I did work internships and part-time jobs during college to pay for anything else I wanted.

Scott:
Awesome. Okay. So what’s the best way we can help you from this position?

TJ:
Right now, my main focus and passion is in growing my business. So I’m doing, how I describe it is, project and operations management and organizational change management consulting. So I help medium to large businesses optimize the way that their businesses run, and if they need a particular project to just hand off to somebody so that they don’t have to worry about it, that’s where I come in.

Scott:
Okay. Awesome. Do you have any representative types of projects you could share with us to give us a little bit more of a picture?

TJ:
Yeah. So my background is in IT, so I don’t currently work with an IT client right now, but a lot of spaces where you need any software implementation, upgrades, things like that, that’s where I have my bread and butter. So things like Salesforce, the most recent large one that I completed was in implementing their Field Service Lightning module. It was basically when a store like the container store deploys a contractor to your house to do a job, then that’s the technology they’re using behind that. And actually, right now, I’m helping marketing department optimize their operations. They don’t have any internal project managers, so I’m helping them figure out how to leverage the tools they have at hand, things like Microsoft Office 365, Teams, SharePoint, and really just get the most out of what they already have.

Scott:
Okay. Awesome. And how many hours a week is this taking you currently?

TJ:
It really depends on the phase of the project. The unfortunate part and the reason why going consulting was a big deal to me is that, some of it depends on how available the client is. So if the client doesn’t have any time to share with me what their current process is, then I actually have a decent amount of downtime. So that’s where I come in as a fractional consultant to help them win. They need the help, and bill them hourly and then I can juggle up to three clients at a time.

Scott:
Okay. And what would three clients at a time lead to in terms of total income?

TJ:
Three clients at a time? I actually haven’t projected that. With just the one client right now is where the 9K a month is coming in right now, and that’s at 40 hours a week.

Scott:
Okay. But you think your maximum capacity would be three clients juggling at a time?

TJ:
Yeah. Hypothetically, if I phase them correctly so that I’m not starting all three at the same time, then yes.

Scott:
Okay. So if you are able to do three clients at a time, if you’re able to juggle that and schedule that, then your theoretical income would go from 9,000 to 27,000 per month, which would be about a little over 300K a year. Is that how you’re thinking about the income potential for your business?

TJ:
Yes, though I would end up hiring some support staff. I would probably get a personal assistant, add a couple of expenses to really optimize that.

Scott:
And is that where you want to go? Is that the best thing we could help you with, is thinking through how to make that happen and build the business on that trajectory?

TJ:
Yeah. I think that long term, if I were thinking big about the business and it won’t necessarily get to this point, but dreaming big, what I love to do is have a staff of other consultants, not necessarily in my space, but my roommate is an industrial engineer and I’m not as versed in organizational change management as I would like to be. So if I had a specialist in that space, I’d really love to have a suite of offerings to my clients.

Scott:
I love it. So to me, I actually think that the game is very, very simple in the immediate and short term future, which is, you just don’t have enough revenue for your business to hire an employee with this. And to get to that level of revenue, you need to bring on two more clients, and that sounds like a brutal amount of work, but I think that is the price to pay to be able to get to a position where you can hire someone in this particular line of work, or at least that’s my immediate observation. That said, I don’t know what I don’t know, but I’m just going to float that out there and see how you react to that. Does that sound generally along the right trajectory?

TJ:
Yeah, I think that’s the main reason I haven’t hired anyone right now, is that I don’t want to hire someone and have them dependent on my income when I don’t personally feel like it’s stable. When it’s just me, I don’t have any dependents that are looking to make use of my money, then it’s not a big deal. If I lean on my emergency fund here and there, or I decide to take December off, those are all great. But when I’m looking to hire somebody else, they either have to not also be depending on the income themselves, or I need to have enough coming in the door steadily to be able to give them that assurance.

Scott:
I think that that makes perfect sense, and I think that that’s… That’s where I’m like, okay, it’s almost remarkably simple. It’s not easy, but it’s simple in the sense that like, okay, you’ve got to complete this job in 35 or 40 hours and crush it and then moonlight to get the second job and get that going, and that’s 18,000 per month. That’s good. That’s a good individual income. That’s a higher end individual income, but it’s still not like the ability to comfortably hire somebody at that point, I think, unless you have a backlog of business with it. So it’s getting that second one and then having the third one in the books, and that’s when the hire comes in place. At least that’s one way to think about it.
Mindy, I see you making some faces. Do you agree to disagree?

Mindy:
I want to throw on a different option, but first I want to make fun of you because you said, “Oh, $18,000, that’s a good income. Yeah, I’ll take that.”

Scott:
Yeah. It’s a very good income.

Mindy:
That’s okay. That’s not bad. So I’m just using you about that. But you keep using the word higher, Scott. She’s a consultant. I would encourage her right now in her “downtime,” and I’m making air quotes, in her “downtime,” start reaching out to other people. You said something about organizational change management or something that isn’t a strength that you have, start looking for somebody who has that strength, who can supplement your business when you need them, but you’re not hiring them as an employee because that’s not… It doesn’t sound like you putting in a lot of time to learn that is worth your while. It sounds like that’s the thing you can bring somebody in on.
Is that the sort of thing that your company needs to have somebody on staff, or can it be a hire out when you need to? If you could find a rockstar organizational change management person to come in and consult with you for the beginning of this project… Clearly I don’t know what that is, I don’t know if I’ve done a good job of hiding that.

TJ:
No, it’s good. Typically, best practice would be to keep them on for the duration of the project, but that is definitely something that a possibility to not have to hire them as part of my org. I think it’s more part of the vision that I would love to at some point, but certainly, as a middle ground, getting somebody to come in as like a subcontractor is definitely an option. I think my main challenge is less so in the change management space, but more in project management, which is where my bread and butter is, is that convincing a project manager to jump away from a W2 job is actually really difficult.

Mindy:
So it sounds like the personal assistant or the project manager would be the first hire that you do?

TJ:
Yes.

Mindy:
And you said that you have several leads on jobs, but you’ve got one client right now. When is the next job supposed to start?

TJ:
I actually have a short engagement about two weeks worth of work starting next week when that client comes back from vacation. So I’ll be working two jobs in November, in addition to all the other fun things I get to do in November. So it’s not actually a lack of demand, some of it’s just time timing or having some of that foresight into what my workload is going to be, things like, “Hey, do I want to just take December off? Or does it make sense for budgets for people to wait until 2022?” So there’s not really too much of a challenge in getting somebody in my sales pipeline, but it is more about kneeling down the actual timing.

Scott:
We had Joel Esparza on a few weeks ago, and Joel is building a video editing business. With that case, the use of a contractor or a set of subcontractors makes a lot of sense because you can boil down each unit of work product into something very tangible, complete it, decide if it’s satisfactory, and then begin scaling up to a large degree. It’s not always that easy, but it’s going to attend more towards that type of work product. What I’m reading into in your business is you need somebody for months on end, maybe in the short side, two weeks, to complete a contract to the satisfaction of the client with that. And that seems like it’s just going to be a lot more expensive or harder to subcontract out.
It doesn’t mean you can’t do it, and I think Mindy’s point is great. It may be a lower risk option in the next year or two to think about that, but you’re going to probably spend much more. It may be the same percentage difference as if Joel was hiring out each video individually, but the dollar amount’s going to be way bigger. If the contract is 40 grand, you’re probably going to have to pay somebody 30 of it or something, something substantial in order to be able to then subcontract it.
It’s still good, you’re arbitraging, I’m making that up 10 grand in that fictional example, but I think your business doesn’t scale, it scales much better with somebody being paid hourly and you arbitraging the $40,000 contract for $20,000 in employee expense. That’s interesting and I think that that’s the challenge. And again, that’s where I come back to, there needs to be a huge gap between that income and expense, and probably for some period of time in order to pull that off, unless you’re willing to give up much more of the contract, which could be an economy of scale, if you can get 10, 20 contracts, that could be a really good business-

TJ:
Yeah. And I want to be careful there because there, there’s definitely a space in the industry where it’s really just being a staffing agency, looking for project managers and pairing them up with a client. And that’s not the space I want to go to, because first of all, it’s oversaturated, it’s ridiculous. The number of LinkedIn messages I get looking for a project manager, it’s not something that I want to join the party for. A certain amount of the challenge is expanding my network and finding people who are in a position in their career where they may not feel like they have enough experience to be fully independent, where I can fill in some with my experience, and things like that.
And right now, a lot of my network is either people who are about at my level of experience or higher. So some of that is, I just need to put some more leg work into finding younger professionals.

Mindy:
Well, where would you find a younger professional? When we’re talking about real estate, because of the BiggerPockets aspect of this, we suggest going to local meetups. Are there local business meetups?

TJ:
There’re actually. Project managers have an organization that certifies them, the Project Management Institute. We do have a chapter in my area that I could start attending. I hadn’t attended since I was a student because it’s really just a bunch of people looking for jobs.

Mindy:
Oh, wow. Is it really just a bunch of people looking for jobs who may not have a ton of experience?

TJ:
Sure. Last time I checked, yes. So I guess I need to go back to doing that. It does come at an expense. Every single event costs money, so it’s something where I have to find out which ones are really going to be worth my time and money to be doing that. So that is one avenue. And then I’m still in the town where I went to college, and I do have professors that I’m keeping in touch with. SO if they have somebody who would be willing to take on… And at this point, I only need like five hours a week for a personal assistant. So if they have the ability to get to my place and they want to learn from a project manager, that’s what I’m looking to do. So I’m expanding my network in that space as well.
What I don’t want to do is convince somebody to do that when I either don’t have the income to pay them or that I don’t have a lot of work to give them either. So it’s a little bit of a balancing act.

Mindy:
When you’re in this space, it sounds like you’ve got some downtime coming up in the form of taking off all of December. When you’re in a space that has a bit of a lower demand on your time, start looking for things that you can put off on somebody else’s plate. How much time are you spending on the menial tasks? That sounds snotty, but the menial tasks like email and calendaring and all these things that don’t need TJ to do, as opposed to the business processes that does need TJ to do. What can you take off your plate? What can you put on somebody else’s plate? And do you have a system in order to pass that off easily, but it takes time to set up those systems.

TJ:
Yeah, definitely. And this is actually something I do a lot for my clients as well. It’s a funny space where I’m like, “I do this for my clients, but now I’m going to offload some of the stuff for my business to somebody else.” So it’s a little bit of letting go of control, a delegate thing as well, but I do think one of them-

Mindy:
I didn’t say it was easy.

TJ:
One of the main things I do want to do, because right now I’m operating in like three different calendar softwares, is to have somebody just sit there and sync them all up because that’s just the way the invites come in. And there is a purpose to having them separated. But in order for me to know where I need to be next, I do need them to sync up a little bit more.

Mindy:
Well, that sounds like more than five hours worth of work to do.

Scott:
What’s like a three year target for the business? What would you’d be like, “I’m super happy with my business,” in three years?

TJ:
Three-year target is definitely to have that personal assistant, and then maybe one other consultant at that point. And I’m not picky about in which space their specialty is in, but that would be the ideal space in three years.

Scott:
Okay. Your business currently generates, it looks like 110 to $120,000 a year in revenue. Is that right?

TJ:
Yeah.

Scott:
So I just want to point out, if you’re hiring a… What would be the salary range of someone that you’d be wanting to hire?

TJ:
So for a personal assistant, I’d probably do 20 to $30 an hour just because the demand for talent, especially type of talent that I want to mentor is going to be at that price range. For a project manager, that’s where it gets expensive. My starting salary coming straight out of college was somewhere around 60K. So we’re starting to really eat into the revenue there, unless that person can independently handle a client all by themselves.

Scott:
Great. Let’s say it’s 75K for the persons one or two years out of college with that. When I think about employee expense, I fully burden it, I say, “Okay, the bonus, the benefits, all that kind of stuff.” That’s going to be an incremental 50% on top of the base salary. So that would give you 37,500 on that. So that’s 112,500 that you’re going to be paying this person, I think I did that right, in compensation, that’s how much cash is going to leave your business on an annual basis to pay that person’s salary.
Let’s say the personal assistant, say it’s 50K. So same deal. 75K, maybe 80 in that case because you still have to pay the health insurance and all that kind of stuff, is going to come out on that particular one. So that’s 80. So that’s $200,000 in cash costs that are leaving your business in order to pay for just those two employees, not to mention your software and all the other stuff. How much do you want to make?

TJ:
That’s a good question. At the bottom of it, what I need to live off of is about 55K a year. What I’d like to make is at least 150 to make all of the rest of this worth it.

Scott:
So you need 150 in base plus bonus or plus some wiggle room, or is that the profit the business needs to be at the end of the year?

TJ:
Let’s say plus a low wiggle room, because I’ll probably do an S-Corp election and do an owner’s draw.

Scott:
Okay, great. And then you’re going to have benefits and all that kind of stuff that you’re going to want from the business, like health insurance and all that kind of stuff. So you say 150. Let’s add another 37,500 to be consistent with your top employee there. So that’s going to put you at 200. So now we’re now we’re fully loaded at 400,000 to $450,000 in cost to get to your future target. So you need to be able to generate business that does, I guess we can pull 150 out of that target, that generates about 450 to $500,000 annually in revenue in order to get to complete that picture. And the point I’m trying to make here is that, I like the systems and all that kind of stuff, but this is a revenue game right now.
You need to bring in more business and build that book of business. At first, I don’t know how much that scales. I think Mindy’s absolutely correct that you should write out all those tasks, the calendar syncing, that’s perfect. You’re certainly in a position to outsource some of that work that’s lower skill that anyone else can do that doesn’t need to do that, the project management, that is your professional thing. But I think, you’re saying three contracts, I can juggle three at once. You need to do six at once in order to justify this or fewer that are bigger or more that are smaller. I don’t know, with that, but that’s the name of the game that I see.
Do you think I’m framing the challenge appropriately with that? And is that sparking any ideas or thoughts on this vision?

TJ:
I like the way you laid it out, it definitely helps me quantify what the goal is. At this point, I’d say towards the end of the three years, that might be a bit of a stretch to really get to that point. And I only say that because the whole just trying to hire just a part-time person right now is a little bit slow going, more because of the networking aspect that goes into it. So some of it is like, I know what I need to do, but either I don’t have the network to do it yet. I don’t have everything set up, or I’m just waiting until the appropriate time to make those overtures.

Mindy:
What I’m hearing you say is, or what I am getting from this conversation is you need to hire a personal assistant. The ideal personal assistant is coming from a professor that you’ve been in touch with, is a junior or senior in college, is hungry and would work for 20 or $30 an hour, part-time your five hours, but they’re studying to be a project manager or that you have aspirations to be a project manager. So as they’re learning with you, learning your company on a part-time while I’m in school basis, they graduate, and now you’ve got a project manager who’s already familiar with all the aspects of your company and can hit the ground running and then you have to go and find another good personal assistant, but you can find a good personal assistant.
It sounds like project management is more of a difficult task. So that’s the first thing that I would do is really focus on reaching out to all of your professors and saying, “Hey, I’m at a position where I need somebody five hours a week, but I’m thinking it’ll grow.” And having a conversation with them, “Oh, midterms are coming up, great. You can take time off this week. And finals are coming up. Great. I want you to focus on that too.” But having this back and forth with your employee can be really, really beneficial to your business.
Another thing I want you to do is get a new client, it’s called TJ’s business, and look at TJ’s business from 50 miles up and say, “If TJ’s business was my client, what would I tell them to do?” And it’s very much Cobbler’s children have no shoes kind of thing where you know what you have to do, but it’s so easy to not do it. Let me tell you all the things that I know I have to do and I just keep finding reasons not to. So it’s not TJ’s business, it’s Mindy’s business. Mindy’s business just happens to run exactly the way TJ does. What would you tell Mindy to do in your exact position and start implementing that?
But I really think the assistant who can, like your calendar, that’s really important. If you miss a meeting, that’s going to be horrible. I don’t want to do all that moving calendar thing either. So I would love to have an assistant who could do all that. But that’s a great task that you can easily check on, “Oh, they messed this up. Forget it, I don’t want to hire this person.” But starting off on a project basis and then asking them, do you want to come on as a part-time and then as a full-time?

TJ:
Yeah, for sure. I think an answer to your, what would I tell you? If I was looking at my business as the consultant, it really is just to get a job description out there and just throw it out there and see what comes back. I’m totally definitely the introvert that doesn’t want to talk to anybody, so it doesn’t happen. I even drafted it and everything, and actually, I didn’t think about just sending it to my professors, I was thinking I’d have to put it on some kind of job board and things like that. But I think the professor route probably is the better way to go.

Mindy:
I would start with the professors and then start with, are there any project management institute? Do they have any like Facebook groups or LinkedIn? There’s a lot of technology in our fingertips, are there any college groups and clubs that talk about project management? I’m just throwing stuff out here, but maybe something like that could spark what heck is this.

TJ:
It’s a little tough coming out of the pandemic that people basically shuttered all their events and stuff. They are coming back, and I did just talk to a student on Friday. Where I do want to be careful though, is that if they have particular career aspirations that don’t line up or just isn’t a good first step for them, I don’t want to convince them that it’s better to work for me than whatever else they have going for them.

Mindy:
I think that’s fair.

Scott:
What would be a good outcome in the next year for you?

TJ:
You in the next year would probably be to feel stable in my business operations. Right now, I’m enjoying the whole like eat when you kill thing where you get to do the sales thing and all of that and having those conversations, but especially if I’m thinking about bringing on people that will depend on income from me, I do want to be stable enough where I don’t have to worry about whether or not I’m going to have a tough conversation with them six months down the line.

Scott:
Well, what does stable mean?

TJ:
Stable would be probably signing a client before I’m done with the current client that’s bringing in whatever the profit, because in the next year, I don’t think I’ll be juggling three at a time, maybe two at a time. So basically knowing when my next engagement is going to start, when I already know that the current one is going to end, and having that visibility into the future of what’s going to happen so that I can plan for it. And clearly as a project manager, I’m a big planner. So that’s what that means to me really, because I’m very flexible in a lot of other spaces, but I don’t want this business endeavor to be something that just falls apart because I stop paying attention to it.

Scott:
Okay. I love the focus on the personal assistant because there’s clearly opportunity to go there, but I think we’re missing a huge piece of what being in a future state that actually checks all these boxes means. And the personal assistant is one component of that overall approach with that. So what I’m hearing is you want to sign a client prior to the engagement ending. That means you need a sales and lead management pipeline. So there needs to be, there’s traditional sales funnel, here’s the amount of leads, here’s where they are in the sales cycle, here’s where they’re falling. I have my pricing figured out and I have all of that kind of stuff.
So that’s an easy to-check-the-box component of the business plan that only you can achieve, only you can construct for at least for now at that, and you can hire a consultant or something like that, but that would be really high-value work. Then creating some forecast with that or some schedule that compiles those and has those end dates figured out with that kind of stuff, and that making it into your calendar where you’re like, “Okay, my engagement’s at the end and I worked 40 hours, too bad, I got to do another five hours this week because I need to manage that pipeline and get that next lead into the business with it. Otherwise, I’m going to be increasingly anxious over the next month while this engagement is ending with that kind of stuff.”
And I think the tool for that would be helpful is the business plan. So it’s a bit back to basics college, dig up one of those things, but putting together a very simple two-page, three-page business plan may be very powerful for you because, again, I don’t think the personal assistant is going to solve as many problems as you think. I think it will solve some of them, but you’re attempting to build a business with an employee with all this, you need to have those traditional sales and marketing operations, finance, and forecasting, roles defined and filled.
It doesn’t mean you’ve hire people to do all of that, they just need to get done, probably by you in the short term with this. And so that’s where I think-

TJ:
I will rest for something.

Scott:
Yeah, go ahead.

TJ:
I was going to say actually, because my major was from the business school, it actually isn’t too much of a stretch to ask the personal assistant, if they were to come from my major or an adjacent major to do a practice run of it. They’re definitely parts of marketing that I don’t want to do, things like social media and stuff like that. I’m like, “I’m sure I could figure it out, it’s not like so much of a stretch, but it’s not where I want to spend my time.” So there is definitely opportunity if I could find a student that was interested in those spaces to have them stretch into those spaces as well.

Scott:
Absolutely. But I think if you start with what needs to get done in order to move the business forward and then fall back, and then outline that like, “Okay, somebody needs to post to my Instagram with this type of content with it.” Or, “Somebody needs to run a Facebook ad campaign with this kind of stuff. Here’s how much I’m willing to spend.” If you start by mapping out what needs to get done and then putting in place the pieces that move that get that forward, I think you’re going to find that more powerful than just saying, “Okay, well, all of this is a catchall. The personal assistant will take care of all of it.”
It is possible to hire that incredible assistant who can just take on all of these things and do them all well, but you may find on the marketing function, I’m making this up, I don’t know. You may find on the marketing function that outsourcing to a social media firm for 100 bucks a month is going to be much more powerful because they’re going to know what they’re doing than giving that as additional task to the personal assistant with that. You may find that an outsource bookkeeping firm can keep the books much better than the personal assistant can. The inverse of that may be true, I don’t know.
What I’m hearing is the next step is the personal assistant. That’s surely the case, some of the work with that, not doubting that, I just don’t think it’s the only tool in your toolkit to help you get to that stable position in a year from now. And it’s going to create a lot of dependency on this particular individual as well if we go down that route. And that’s why I’m just encouraging you to think about it from a business planning perspective and say, “What actually needs to get done? Who is the optimal person to do that? What’s a good short-term solution? What’s a good long-term solution with that? And mapping it out like that. That’s just, I think, a more powerful approach.

TJ:
Yeah. I think that makes a lot of sense that I do need to just write out the individual tasks that are easy to say, “Yes, this is done.” Or we can move the owner around as necessary because it might be the personal assistant, it might have to go somewhere else, it might have to be me, but there’s no way to determine that until I have a list and we stare at it and go, “What are you willing to do? Or what do you feel strong in doing?” And then delegate those out appropriately.

Scott:
And just so you’re aware, at BiggerPockets, we do this kind of stuff all the time. Let’s talk about this podcast. Mindy and I both work at BiggerPockets. The podcast is produced by an employee, but it’s edited by a contract firm in the Philippines. Then the video is edited by a firm in Spain. Then we have a contractor who listens to the show and comes up with titles. So there’s certainly somebody who’s managing that flow, but there’s also bits of work product that are best done by certain individuals out there. And it’s much cheaper, more cost effective or better outcome to structure it, we think that way than to do all of that in house with one all-rounder on that front.
And that’s our business that’s completely different, but just a framework to help think through.

TJ:
That’s a great point. And I think what I’m learning through this conversation is that because of where I come from as a project manager, what actually happens when you said, “Hey, there’s somebody managing the flow,” that’s what I do. And then typically at large enterprises, what they also don’t do is hire the correct people to do all those like, “This is the best person to do X, Y, Z.” So since enterprises don’t hire those people, it actually falls to the project manager to fill in those gaps.
And that’s been a big part of why I’ve been successful in project management is because I will jump in when we don’t have a body to do a particular piece of work. And that’s something I have to unlearn in order to run my business.

Scott:
Yeah. That’s more eloquently phrasing. What I’ve been trying to communicate with this is like, I love it. Your biggest problem is you need to drive revenue growth. You have a large body of work that needs to get done to drive the revenue growth, inclusive of operations, which is taking over most of this. And I think that another, replicating yourself is great, but continues to avoid the scalability, the long term scalability problem of mapping out each process with it.
I think you should definitely have the personal assistant with all this, again, at least on a part-time basis with all that. I just, again, encourage you to use that tool of the business plan, or don’t write a 20-page business plan, it’s a waste of time. But if you just jot your stuff down on a few pages, that may be very powerful for you to refer back to. And there’s a lot of templates out there. If you’re looking for the easiest or simplest one, Traction has a really good one. It’s meant for businesses that are larger than yours with that, but they have a two-page business plan called the Vision/Traction Organizer, which will force you to collect all of those thoughts on two pages.
It can take you away from an hour to a day to fill that in or months, depending on how long you want to spend on core values and that kind of stuff. But that may be an easy one for you.

TJ:
Yeah. I’ll definitely look into that.

Scott:
Okay. Well, do you have anything else we want to talk about on this particular subject? Or do you have any other questions about your financial position that would be helpful for us to discuss?

TJ:
A couple others maybe. The one that pops out at me, if I’m looking at my notes, is really in the healthcare space, because I’ve jumped off of working W2, and right now I’m on Cobra, but we’re also approaching open enrollment. So that’s top of mind for me right now, is figuring out healthcare as an independent consultant.

Mindy:
We have in the past suggested if you are relatively healthy, you don’t have any chronic conditions, the high deductible plan is the best option for you, but if you have chronic conditions, it may not be. I said this out loud on a show and somebody reached out to me and said, “I have run the numbers, this is like my thing. I ran all the numbers and there is this very teeny-tiny space where even with the chronic condition, even with great health, poor health, there’s a very tiny space where the HSA isn’t the best plan, the high deductible option, isn’t the best plan.”
So I would say if you were going out on the exchange trying to find this for yourself, the options aren’t great. Mostly they seem like high deductible plans, I would set up an HSA to make sure that you are able to invest the funds if you’re going with the high deductible route. But honestly, I think the exchange is going to be your best option, which isn’t a great option. It’s more of a catastrophic plan. If you have your appendix out, that’s going to be… I had my appendix out in ’96, then it was $27,000 back then. So it’s going to be more now because everything goes up.

TJ:
Actually, I’ve had my gallbladder removed. That was a tax year that I took advantage of a lot of things. So yeah, I definitely am a big fan of the HSA, and it’s great to know that somebody’s run the numbers and figured out that there’s actually long term more effective to stay in the HSA even if you have health concerns. So that’s definitely something I’m looking at, I think something that will mitigate the whole health concern thing, considering that I’ve already had major operations is probably just picking one that has a lower out of pocket max or a lower deductible.
And I actually looked at the exchange, there’s one that was 1,400 was the deductible, and I was like, “How does this exist?” But I also don’t recognize the network it’s in, so that some of my concern is more of like, how good is this network?

Mindy:
And that’s another thing to consider. I knew somebody who did not like a specific provider network because when she went in, she didn’t see the same doctor all the time. My kids don’t know their doctor because they go in once a year and then it’s a whole another year before they go in again. So we don’t have a relationship with our doctor, when we ended up with that insurance, it didn’t bother us because we didn’t have a relationship with our doctor anyway. So what it all boils down to is there’s no easy or cheap all-encompassing answer for healthcare in America.
It is expensive, it is going to be expensive, and it can be a business expense. Scott, her company TJ’s Business Consulting can provide health insurance to you 100% paid, right?

Scott:
I think that may be the case, but I want to caveat that where that is definitely going to be the case once you have employees. If you’re acting as an independent contractor, for example, I don’t know the structure of your business and how you’ve set things up.

TJ:
Actually, I’ve looked into it. Right now, I’ll probably stay sole proprietor. And just because of what a reasonable compensation is for a project manager, is on the higher end, I’ll be able to deduct off of my personal taxes, the premiums, but I won’t be able to have the business pay for all, I can’t do like a health reimbursement plan or anything like that yet. So until I’ve got other employees and I’m running as an S-Corp, that’s not an option.

Scott:
Okay. Thank you. I did not know that. So thank you for educating us on that particular one. That makes sense. It’s 601 half a dozen the other if it’s tax deductible versus a pass due to your business. So for now, that doesn’t seem like a high stakes problem for you.

TJ:
Yeah. I get this question a lot, how am I going to pay for health insurance after financial independence? How am I going to pay for health insurance as a small business? And I wish there was a great answer like, “Oh, go to Abc.com and they’re totally going to take care of you. Insurance is a dollar.” But there’s not. Insurance in America is expensive. So if that is something that you are going to be responsible for, it just needs to be a line item in your budget.

Scott:
I want to put out a little dangerous shout-out here, arm for this. I’ve considered in the past maybe creating a benefit for BiggerPockets Pro members of a healthcare plan or access to a healthcare plan that is reasonably competitive. So if anyone listening knows how to potentially help with that, that’s an exploration phase, probably not something coming in the next year, not in the 2022, but would be something that I would love to provide downstream because a lot of full-time real estate investors or flippers, etc, have this type of problem in the early stages of building a business and I would love to be able to offer a reasonable solution to that.
So if anyone has ideas, please send it my way, [email protected], I’d love to explore that, probably something for 2023 or 2024 BiggerPockets roadmap for that.

TJ:
Yeah, perfect, perfect.

Mindy:
Yeah. That’s [email protected] Email him.

TJ:
Nobody else.

Mindy:
Scott’s no longer inbox zero.

Scott:
That’s a tough one. I think the answer is, there’s no good answer right now. So there’s only list of bad options and you’re probably as informed as we are on those list of bad options for you through the research that you’ve already indicated in the portal there at healthcare.gov, I imagine. Is that right?

Mindy:
Did Warren Buffett connect with Jamie Diamond, and who’s the Amazon, Jeff Bezos and tried to disrupt the system and then decide they couldn’t?

TJ:
I think they went into pharmaceutical. That’s where I understand Amazon tried. And I don’t know if they’re still working on it or not.

Mindy:
Yeah. That’s the thing, I don’t know if they’re still working on it. I wish they would. I wish that somebody would figure this out. Warren’s really smart. Come on, Warren, step it up.

Scott:
Well, I’m sorry we don’t have a wonderful, helpful answer for that one on yet, but if anyone does, we’d love to collect notes and maybe we can post about this as well in the BiggerPockets Money Facebook group and just rehash if there’s any new or exciting news in that front about what are some good healthcare options for somebody who is self-employed or sole proprietor or has a small business that is not eligible for employer plans.

TJ:
Yeah, for sure. I kind of figured.

Scott:
Yeah. Then we’ll send you a link to that.

Mindy:
Link to episode 94.

Scott:
Yeah, show 94. She had a list of like 25 options or something like that that were applicable. There’s a couple of edge cases that you could qualify for. So it’s probably worth to listen because there might be some golden there, but I would say the odds are that it’s probably going to be something along the lines of what you’ve already researched.

TJ:
I’ll take a look and see.

Mindy:
Okay, awesome. TJ, is there anything else that we can talk to you about today?

TJ:
I think that’s about it.

Scott:
Well, I just want to compliment you on the fact that you’re doing really well with your I position with all this. You’re spending very little, you’re house hacking, you’re building a business, all this kind of stuff. You’re thinking about scale. I love it. You’ve got the two properties now with it. It just seems like you’re off on incredible trajectory with building wealth, with all this kind of stuff. And I’m excited to see how things go with your business.

TJ:
Thanks, Scott. It’s great talking to you guys.

Mindy:
Thank you, TJ. We’ll talk to you soon.
Scott, that was TJ. What did you think of her story?

Scott:
I thought there were some interesting financial decisions to contemplate. What’d you think, Mindy?

Mindy:
I really liked where she’s at. And I think she’s in that almost to the point where she’s… She’s in that position of business growth, where she could probably hire somebody on a very part-time basis, but I think very soon is going to be a little bit farther than when she should have hired. You know what I mean? You always wait a little bit too long to hire your first employee, I think she’s thinking about it, and I think you in particular gave her some really great things to contemplate, and I’m super excited for her business growth in the next couple of years.

Scott:
Yeah. Look, I feel like when a business line or area has that level of revenue one $60,000 employee on $110,000 in revenue is going to eat up 90 grand out of 110 in profits, if you pay anything else, rent or whatever, you’re at break even with that. So the plan has to involve aggressive growth projections, not just to protect your own business interests, but also the interests of continued employment for that employee with that. And so that’s where I think my challenge to her come from, where if you want to hire and get people in full time, that’s great, but you need to have the revenue to back it up, or you need to have aggressive path to getting to that revenue that your future employees can reasonably believe.
And so I think that’ll be your challenge. There’s a lot of ways, there’s a lot of betweens here and there, part-time assistant, hourly contract, all of that kind of stuff that can de-risk that, but that’s I think the big challenge there where last thing you want to do is have to eliminate the position because the revenue projections didn’t pan out.

Mindy:
You know, Scott, I think that you gave her some really great things to think about and consider that maybe she hadn’t quite gotten to yet herself. So I think this conversation is really helpful for TJ to start thinking about growth patterns. And when you get really busy, it’s really easy to say, “Oh, I want to hire somebody,” but hiring them in an intelligent manner is the best way to go. And of course, you have to have the revenue to back it up. That’s always, always the top. Okay, Scott, should we get out of here?

Scott:
Let’s do it.

Mindy:
Ooh, ooh, before we do, I want to make a plea to our listeners. If you would like your finances reviewed, Scott and I would love to look over your financial situation. Please apply at biggerpockets.com/financereview. We don’t need to use your name, your video, we’re not here to out you, we’re not here to catch you in lies. We’re just here to review your finances and see what we would do if we were in your same situation. So if you would like us to talk, let’s talk, biggerpockets.com/financereview. Okay, Scott. Now, should we get out of here? And you say, “Let’s do it.”

Scott:
Okay. Let’s do it now.

Mindy:
From episode 252 of the BiggerPockets Money Podcast, he is Scott Trench, and I am Mindy Jensen saying, don’t be a punk skunk.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds. Thanks! We really appreciate it!



Source link


HW+ mortgage rate question

Life comes at you fast. During this Thanksgiving week, we went from higher yields and the first Fed rate hike storyline to a big drop in bond yields and scary headlines on a new COVID variant, Omicron. How do we make sense of all this? In this type of economic environment is it even possible for mortgage rates to get to 4% and can the Federal Reserve really hike rates in an aggressive fashion?

Let’s take a look at all these topics together.

Federal Reserve first rate hike?

Those who follow me on social know of my take on the first Fed rate hike and what needs to happen for this conversation to really take place. My rule of thumb has always been when working from a zero interest rate policy, the 2-year yield needs to be above 0.56% to have an honest discussion about this. Recently, that milestone was finally reached — only to be taken off the table with this new news about Omicron.

Here is the 2-year yield before the headline on the new variant:

Currently, the 2-year yield has fallen and is 0.50%. Expect a lot of volatility with bond yields. However, if the 2-year yield is above 0.56% and can rise toward 80 basis points, the first rate hike is on. The other data line to know when the first rate hike is legit is that typically the U.S. dollar makes its biggest percent move higher within the new economic expansion before the first Fed rate hike and it is making a move currently.

The dollar has been making a move higher, but nothing too spectacular yet. I know some are in the camp that would believe that if the dollar gets too strong then it can crush commodity prices, much as it did in 2014-2015 with oil prices.

As we can see below, oil prices got rocked as the dollar was getting stronger before the first Fed rate hike. The reality is that world economies don’t like the U.S. dollar getting too strong. 

Currently, oil prices are down roughly $15 from the recent peak. For me personally, I wouldn’t put any weight on the first Fed rate hike until we can clearly get above 0.56% and stay above there with duration.

10-year yield and mortgage rates

Regarding the 10-year yield and mortgage rates, this is where the conversation gets interesting for housing. My 2021 forecast was that the 10-year yield should be in a range between 0.62%-1.94%, with an emphasis that I made going back to April 7, 2020, that when the economy is OK, we should have created a range between 1.33%- 1.60%. Before the new variant news hit us just as hard as that third serving of pumpkin pie, the 10-year yield was trading at 1.64%.

Let me remind everyone that even In 2021, we had the hottest economic and inflation data in a long time, along with the most flaming year-over-year inflation data. Also, even with the talks about the taper, near $30 trillion in federal debt and rate hike discussion; the 10-year yield has not had a day in 2021 even to attempt to challenge my critical 1.94% level yet. I recently wrote an article about why rates have been hard to get to 4%; the trend is your friend, son! 

In a recent podcast with Sarah Wheeler — called The Rundown, it will be a weekly event — I talked about how I might be the one person in America talking about lower rates in 2022. It’s a bit of a tease of my 2022 forecast, coming at the end of December. Listen here.

Currently, the 10-year yield is at 1.48%. With one virus headline, bond yields that weren’t trading above 1.60% are back in between that range of 1.33% -1.60%. If you believe that the downtrend since 1981 is your friend, then this shouldn’t be a surprise.

Two things I’m keeping an eye on that haven’t happened concern the financial markets and the 10-year yield.

1. We still haven’t had a stock market correction of 10% plus in the S&P 500.

This typically would lead money into the bond market and send yields lower. We have had times when the market does pull back because of higher yields. However, to this point, we haven’t had a market correction, which was common in the previous expansion, which was the longest economic and jobs expansion in history. The markets will eventually act normal at some point, so money can still go into bonds and even take it below 1%.

2. The St. Louis Financial Stress Index has been bored out of its mind, and this also can’t last forever.

The black line of zero is considered normal stress. We have had times that the markets acted up and got us above zero without a recession. However, as you can see, not much is happening lately. 2021 reminds me a lot of 2017 when the financial markets were fine, only to get a lot of drama in 2018-2019 due to the trade war tap dance discussions.

We have one more month left in 2021, but you get where I am going with this. We just had the best economic growth in a very long time, the hottest inflation data in a very long time and no real market drama as well. Even with all that, the 10-year yield has not been able to even test 1.94%. The economic rate of growth has peaked in 2021 and inflation data won’t stay this hot unless wage growth takes off and we consistently have supply issues for a long time. Knowing this, do you still believe rates are going to go significantly higher in 2022?

The economy with a new COVID wave and omicron variant

One thing that I have stressed during the U.S. economic recovery is that we have learned to consume goods and services with an active virus infecting and killing us. This is might sound very strange, but it’s an important factor to remember. The initial fear of the virus can no longer be replicated because we went from a normal calm state with the longest expansion ever into a free-fall dive because as an economy we froze. The multiple surges in cases, while not optimal for a full fluid economy, did not stop the recovery from happening.

As you can see below, retail sales have taken off in a fashion that not even I thought could be possible for this long duration without moderation.

While I still expect to see a moderation in this data line, the fact that retail sales are still on fire shows how well the U.S. consumer is doing. I touched on this recently in an article on why mortgage debt in America is great again. The cash flow of American homeowners with the nested equity built-in is the best ever on record. 

The American consumer is in good shape and household formation demographics mean we have enough people to keep this expansion going. However, two things are different going into 2022 than what we had in 2020-2021:

1. Personal savings:

While the personal savings data is still very healthy currently, the excess savings have been drawn down, and as you can see with retail sales, people have been spending. The excess dollars in the economy from disaster relief are no longer in the system.

2. Disposable personal income

Also, while disposable personal income is at very healthy levels as well, the excess from the disaster relief is also gone from this data line. It doesn’t look like there is any more appetite for additional disaster relief with midterms just around the corner.

It’s evident that Americans’ excess savings have been spent; however, don’t forget that millions of American jobs have returned. The jobless claims data is now back to levels we last saw in 1969.

With over 10 million ob openings!

We are still working our way back to get all the jobs lost to COVID-19, which I still believe we can get back to by September of 2022 or earlier. 

As you can see above, even though the disaster relief has already been spent in the economy, we are on much better footing today than what we experienced in March of 2020. When the economy is getting noticeably weaker we do have way to track this, I wrote about this recently on HousingWire.

For now, enjoy your Thanksgiving holiday weekend, be smart and have fun! When the 2-year yields get above 0.56% with duration heading toward 0.80%, then we can have a real first Fed rate hike talk. The 10-year yield hasn’t been able to go above 2% for a very long time and mortgage rates over 4% seem like a distant memory. We will cross all these bridges together, one day at a time, and now with a weekly podcast on HousingWire, I can provide weekly updates.

The post Will Omicron variant stop first Fed rate hike? appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


if(typeof(jQuery)==”function”){(function($){$.fn.fitVids=function(){}})(jQuery)};
jwplayer(‘jwplayer_bqZh4ok8_5xQXXB63_div’).setup(
{“playlist”:”https://content.jwplatform.com/feeds/bqZh4ok8.json”,”ph”:2}
);

HW Media CEO Clayton Collins recently spoke with Ernie Graham, CEO and Co-founder at Homebot, to dive into what it really means for mortgage professionals to create clients for life, and how Homebot is doing that through the entire home-buying process, starting with home search.  

“It means keeping the loan officer connected with their past clients after the transaction,” Graham said. “And specifically, we do that by helping the lender provide content to those clients, content that has intrinsic value. So we’re tracking home value, loans, equity, and then we’re helping the consumer understand all of their financial optionality with their home.”

For the consumer, this means being kept aware of the best time to sell, rent, remodel or refinance. Graham said Homebot is able to provide this information in real-time. 

“We have over 7 million people that are connected to over 10,000 loan officers with this tool, and they truly are becoming clients for life,” he said.

While consumers often look to homeownership as a means of building wealth, Graham explained that it doesn’t start at the purchase of a home. In light of this, Homebot is extending its insights to where it all begins: The home search. 

“We are launching Homebot Home Search, a completely new home search experience that lenders can give their past clients. They can even put it on their website as a portal.”

Graham describes the feature as “home search with a twist.” That twist, he explained, is providing financial insights for every listing potential home buyers look at, with the goal of helping them understand the affordability and investment value. And this isn’t the only new thing coming out of Homebot. The company has also built a plugin for the Chrome browser. It’s called Homebot for Chrome, and it even works on Zillow.

“All of those financial insights that we are building into Homebot Home Search now go with the client when they go to Zillow. So lenders now are effectively sitting in the backseat with their clients, even when they’re searching on Zillow,” Graham explained. “This is such a powerful way for them to stay connected.”

The post How one company aims to put lenders at the forefront of online home search appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


Gates_Cathleen Schreiner

If you added up the impact that HousingWire’s Vanguard winners have had on the industry, you’d likely have a comprehensive list of the initiatives that have moved markets forward. These are the leaders who have dreamt, shaped and molded a better way to execute the home-buying journey. From injecting technology into the mortgage process to redefining the real estate agent and home shopper relationship, these leaders have laid the foundations for millions of homeowners. HousingWire sat down with three of these leaders: James O’Bryon, RE/MAX Gold Nation CEO, Cathleen Schreiner Gates, SimpleNexus CEO, and Phil Shoemaker, Homepoint president of originations, to learn more about the housing trends they’re closely watching, what they think will define 2022 and what they hope people remember them for when they retire. 

Brena Nath: First off, congrats on being named a 2021 Vanguard. Who would you want to thank for helping you get where you are today?

Cathleen Schreiner Gates: I have to go with two people. The first one is Jonathan Corr, who was the executive that hired me at Ellie Mae and brought me into the mortgage business. He had a technology background similar to mine, and he saw in my background what he felt was needed at Ellie Mae. That just kind of got me into the space, and you know the old adage, “Once you’re in the space, you never leave the space.”

So, giving me the opportunity to lead and empowering me to do the things I knew we needed to do to grow as a company, that’s really what I think was the springboard for me to be where I am today. And then the second one would be Ben Miller and Matt Hansen, the co-founders of SimpleNexus, along with John Aslanian, who I had worked with at Ellie Mae for years. John said, “She can help us. Let’s talk to her. She can help us grow.” And I met them and was sold immediately. So having the opportunity I’m in today is clearly due to the co-founders of SimpleNexus.

Brena Nath What’s one accomplishment in your career that you’re really proud of?

Cathleen Schreiner Gates: Right now, I’d really have to list the work that I did at Ellie Mae to drive the incredible growth when I was there. When I joined, they had just IPO-ed earlier that year. They had closed the year in the low $50 million range, and over six or so years, we got it to half a billion in revenue, completely organizing ourselves for growth. So, I’m pretty proud of that because it allowed me to use everything I’d ever done or learned in my entire career. I got to apply it and see the results. Along with that, the most satisfying things are always helping leaders grow and mature into becoming leaders they want to be and giving them the empowerment to make the changes that they’re so skilled to make.

Brena Nath: How are you helping move markets forward?

Cathleen Schreiner Gates: You know, I’m tech biased. I’ve always believed that technology for technology’s sake is useless. But if you use technology as an enabler to disrupt and move an industry forward, that’s super powerful. So, I always look at how technology can actually change the game in a market, allow the stronger players in that market to be even stronger if they adopt and apply technology solutions in the right ways. So, I always look at that first. There are three sides to the triangle. So, I look at the technology enablement, and then, I look at the talent mix. And if you’ve got the right talent and the right technology, the third one would be the right sort of processes, looking at the way you’re going to operate. Those are a pretty killer trifecta. So, I look at everything through those three lenses.

Brena Nath: What are two trends in the mortgage and real estate industry that you’re closely watching?

Cathleen Schreiner Gates: I would say there’s a convergence going on of two markets that have historically been separate verticals but sort of collide in positive ways and that’s the real estate market and the mortgage market. I think those markets are converging because to the borrower, they want a seamless journey from their point of thought. Like, maybe I’m going to buy a house and then start looking through the real-estate alternatives and then need to flow straight into their mortgage process.

Historically, these have been two separate plays that are now coming together and integrating and weaving together into a seamless borrower experience. And guess what the enabler for that is? Technology. I think the other thing is just the speed with which the manufacture of a mortgage is happening. There will be a point in time where the mortgage will happen before you can organize for the movers to come move your stuff. So, I’m looking at all the different emerging technologies and these small companies that are playing with a piece of the process and automating it just a little bit more, bringing intelligence to it a little bit more, taking eyeballs off of things that automation can help with. I think that’s the other significant trend — investments in technology to speed up and take cost out of the process. The convergence of a lot of these. Those are the trends we’re looking a lot at.

Brena Nath: The past two years have been filled with a lot of uncertainty; what factors do you think will define 2022?

Cathleen Schreiner Gates: I think everyone’s talking about this to be honest and the reason is it’s real. The lenders out there have to compete for the borrower more than they’ve ever had to do. We have this massive bubble of borrowers coming into the market, and a lot of these homeowners coming into the market are what I call digital natives. They grew up in a digital world and so some of the conventional ways that lenders might’ve attracted borrowers are going to fall a little bit to the wayside. And the refis are going away, so it’s sort of how do you attract that borrower? How do you differentiate yourself from the digital natives to the millennials, and frankly, all the different demographics out there who are actually adopting more and more of a digital approach to their lives? So how do you compete for the borrower? I think that is massively important to the lenders.

And then coming out of the kind of year that the lenders have had, they had to really staff up to accommodate the volumes. So how fast do they staff down? How fast do they get efficient again and sort of reading the tea leaves and figuring out, “You know, the profitability on a loan is going down. Our costs are going up. Are we overstaffed?” Some lenders will be far better equipped to deal with it than others because they’ve been through these cycles before. And they have a sense of how to burst resources and then contract and then burst again and contract. A lot of the smartest lenders look for ways they won’t have to burst again the next time if they can automate, streamline and get smarter about the process.

Brena Nath: After you’re finished with your career, what do you hope people remember you for?

Cathleen Schreiner Gates: I had the opportunity to sort of retire two years ago and then I kind of got pulled back into SimpleNexus, so I’ve seen a little bit of what this is about. I was blown away by the sentiment coming from people who felt that I helped them build their career and be at a place where they could contribute and feel good about their career growth. Because we’re spending a lot of time doing this thing called our career. So absolutely, the most satisfying thing for me throughout my whole career has been helping people develop into strong leaders, watching them blossom, watching them have an impact and them feeling good about it.

Brena Nath: To wrap, what’s one piece of advice you would give people in this industry?

Cathleen Schreiner Gates: To me, in this industry and having been in other industries, I think the industry is still at the discovery stages of what technology can do to move the industry forward. So other vertical industries kind of grabbed on to tech a little bit earlier and maybe are a little bit further up the maturity curve. I think the mortgage industry, being as massive as it is, has an unlimited opportunity to really embrace technology and do fun things for it. We’re just at the beginning. So, the thing I would say to every leader is to sharpen your mind and learn about what technology enabling capabilities are out there that can help you with your business. Don’t put it in a box and let somebody else be the expert. Develop some knowledge of it.

Brena Nath: Is there anything else you would like to add?

Cathleen Schreiner Gates: Be curious. Look what’s out there. And the other thing I would say is to look through the lens of sustainability. In other words, I’ve been advocating looking at tech, but a lot of these ideas come and go very quickly. They’re like a fast burn. So, the layer I would add in there would be to look hard at the sustainability of anyone you partner with for any approach you take because you’re going to maybe make a decision and then that’s going to disrupt the way people operate inside your organization. And so, you pay a little bit of a price to disrupt. That’s change management. So, make sure this thing’s going to be sustainable for you, and it’s going to be a decision you’re going to be comfortable living with for a few years, not a few months.

To read the full October/November Issue, click here.

The post What does mortgage tech disruption actually look like? SimpleNexus’ Cathleen Schreiner Gates answers appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


The housing market remains on solid footing heading into 2022, but there are some threats to property prices that investors should pay attention to. 

When I look at the data, the single most significant threat that I see looming for investors is rising interest rates. 

Interest rates play a huge — and often underestimated — role in housing prices because they dictate the price of a mortgage, which then impacts affordability. When rates are low, as they are right now, housing becomes more affordable and prices tend to rise. When rates rise, property values can be negatively impacted due to lower affordability and less demand. 

So what happens to today’s red-hot housing market when interest rates start to climb, as they almost certainly will do in the near future? 

I’ll give you the answer to that question below while walking you through everything you need to know about interest rates in today’s market: where we are right now, how interest rates impact the market, and what to pay attention to in the coming years as interest rates begin to climb. 

Where we are today

Over the last year, mortgage rates have either been at or near historic lows. Just look at the crazy chart below! 

As is clear, the pandemic has accelerated the decline in mortgage prices — but rates have actually been on an extended downward trend since the early ’80s. The pandemic just kicked it into high gear. 

80u9kyMkccF uUaDB0Kq0l f3VZ74nu10k8u34 TWHd0yVRStFwVxnSZRoD1QzQxWL1wqY1kFiugIKuptifbhL Bsvs 0N3fpKRdx 7X4smmMei92Y3 EEB5CNTdpztZOBBkYd1

Note: in this article, when I reference mortgage rates, I am referring to the average rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage — as that is the mostly commonly tracked and reliable data. This may not be the exact type or mortgage you use, or the rate you get— but the lessons are applicable to nearly any type or mortgage or loan amount. 

So, rates are low. But if you’ve been paying attention, you have likely noticed that they are starting to creep up, albeit very slowly. Rates recently hit 3.16% — which is still low, but up nearly 20 basis points over the last few months. 

While I do believe this is the start of a long term trend of rising rates, keep that chart in mind. We’re still close to all-time lows for the time being. 

I’ll touch on more about why interest rates are going to rise and what is going to happen when they do below. But first, let’s review how this era of low interest rates has helped fuel the rapid price appreciation we’ve seen over the last 18 months. 

Why mortgage loan interest rates matter 

To make a long story short — interest rates are what dictate the cost of a mortgage. 

When interest rates are high, the borrower pays more in interest to the bank. This means that their monthly payments are higher, and borrowers have to shell out more money from their pockets to service their mortgage. 

When interest rates are low, the borrower pays less in interest on the money they have borrowed. This lowers their monthly payments and allows the borrower to keep more money in their pocket. 

To demonstrate just how large of an impact interest rates have on your mortgage payments, I created an Excel calculator and ran a few different scenarios through it. 

The first scenario we’re going to look at is a property with a purchase of $375,000 with 20% down and a loan with a 5% interest rate. 

lFkw bvC3yCVjETA0r1gV 8QI671Ex7J1TAMCj02sgdoIcPcIneCHfr w2PC6k4bD4HVqFZgj0EzQwqLgVNiDMNLM30Ww6BCSuqxlFp5StLQrgThtlrxTboGnV 7 SBwlFW1Tj19

As depicted above, this scenario produces a monthly payment of about $1,610 — with the borrower paying nearly $280,000 in interest over the life of the 30-year loan. 

But what happens if we drop that interest rate to today’s rate, which averages about 3%? 

jfvr wJWrujoOQnKmM5EIqurV66Fp 3kYNK U09JpQ074sEhys42oE6RZvIhYfTstaEcFzqISJhUKYFFQB2iIY2WRRuY12uQcVgP26vIZWl9j3O8kOQWT5pDe0B8m6dTXWuE7Ocy

With the decrease from 5% to 3%, the same property will only cost the borrower $1,264 per month — and just $155,000 in interest over the lifetime of the loan. 

That’s crazy! 

By decreasing the interest rate by 2% — from 5% to 3% — the borrower has reduced their monthly payment by 21%. They have also cut down on the total interest they pay the bank by 45% — which equals very significant savings. 

Let’s imagine for a minute that I, Dave, was comfortable with the first scenario at 5% interest and could afford a $1,610 monthly mortgage payment. Well, when interest rates drop, I can now afford a house that is nearly $100,000 more. 

yqvCniWqmysVB8xUyLZtEIlYm cSyXQO0bLSXr4w ZS9z0B94XXlY Kl5HifZzxinsuYseK4fLKBJLDuzzQaOpAhB

Note that in the graphic above I have changed the purchase price to $475,000 — and my monthly payment of $1,602 is actually lower than it was when I was purchasing a $375,000 property at 5% interest. I would have to come up with a larger down payment, of course, but my monthly carry would actually be less. 

So, if you want to find a single reason as to why home prices have skyrocketed in the last year, interest rates are it. People can afford more expensive properties because rates are so much lower. 

Conversely, rising interest rates have the potential to hurt the housing market. Rising rates make mortgages more expensive, and in turn, properties are less affordable. Fewer buyers will be interested in purchasing a property that has a higher interest rate.

And, higher rates increase the debt-to-income ratio of the loan, too. Therefore, fewer buyers will qualify for mortgages based on the new higher debt-to-income ratio that comes with higher rates. 

Will mortgage loan interest rates rise? 

There are two primary indicators to look at regarding mortgage rates. The first is the federal funds target rate and the second is yields on the 10-year Treasury Note, which are a very common form of bond issued by the U.S. government. 

Let’s first talk about the Federal Funds Rate, which currently sits near 0. 

The Fed dropped interest rates at the start of the pandemic, which is a common tactic to stimulate the economy. Low interest rates make it cheaper to borrow money, which then gets more money flowing into the economy. This is also known as increasing monetary supply, and it helps grow the economy during recessions, like the brief one we saw in 2020. 

In an ideal world, the Fed would probably keep interest rates low for a year or two before raising them gradually. This is what happened the last time rates were near 0, which was during the Great Recession. At that point, they raised rates gradually over a number of years so that the economy had time to adjust to higher rates while avoiding any shocks to the system. 

This time around, inflation is on the rise — which is unfortunate for everyone. And now the Fed has inflation to factor in, too.  

The Fed targets about 2% inflation annually, but we’re at about 6% right now. If you’re wondering why the Fed wants any inflation at all, there’s a simple reason for it: If people expect prices to stay flat or decrease in the future, they have less incentive to spend money. So, having a little bit of inflation in the mix actually stimulates economic activity. 

But, let’s be honest here. No one is happy about where inflation sits today. I don’t believe it’s time to panic about inflation just yet, but the Fed will likely have to act to curb inflation more quickly than they want to — and the way they do that is to raise interest rates. That’s because rising interest rates lower the monetary supply, which helps to curb inflation. 

For now, though, the Fed has signaled they won’t raise rates until late 2022. Still, it’s something to keep an eye on. 

The second indicator for mortgage rates is the yield on the 10-year Treasury Note — one of the more common types of bonds issued by the federal government. 

Yields have been going significantly, and when yields go up, so do the interest rates. This is a complicated topic, but the simple explanation is that treasury bonds are very safe investments. Therefore, if a bank can invest in a bond at 2% and earn an essentially guaranteed return, originating a mortgage at 3% — which is a lot riskier — looks less appealing. 

As such, when bond yields rise, banks will typically raise interest rates to balance the risk vs. reward profile of originating a mortgage. 

Right now, however, yields are very low. That said, they are starting to inch up for a few reasons — but I believe the main reason is the Fed’s announcement regarding how they are starting to taper asset purchases. This announcement sent yields up and is also likely the cause for the modest increase in interest rates of late.

And, with yields near historic lows, as well as the Fed reducing stimulus and the ongoing issues with inflation, it seems likely that bond yields will continue to rise — albeit relatively slowly. 

So, just to recap, the two main indicators for mortgage interest rates are the Fed’s target rate and bond yields — both of which are likely to rise over the coming years. This will send up mortgage prices. 

With an increase in interest rates all but guaranteed, the real question is: How quickly rates will rise and what the impact will be on the housing market?

What happens when rates rise

To understand what happens when rates rise, let’s take a look at some historical data. 

Zgruimz44Jv8ikZnY9ibj7IRUvb61ue41SoFfOjoHaHg4YVoFz4c IEtHLfh4tYOe9MxYsqXPkAMdkQZE8pXXHoQmiIPQSneiLOiiw 4 pXrDimuSloCm4Kn1ZlBFkGBal ZJEiD

Housing prices and interest rates are negatively correlated. This means that they have a relationship — but when one goes up, the other goes down, at least historically speaking. 

But to be clear, this doesn’t always happen. Look at what happened between 2011 and 2017. Look at what happened in 2019. Look at what happened in the late ’70s and early ’80s, when interest rates were at all-time highs! It’s not a perfect correlation. 

That imperfect correlation is precisely why we don’t really know for sure what will happen when rates start to rise. Still, we can make some informed conclusions about what investors should do in this economic climate:

  1. If you haven’t yet secured a refi on a property you intend to hold on to for a while, it’s time to do so right now. That’s a no-brainer.
  2. While the market outlook is unclear for the next five years, locking in a 30-year rate at historic lows is likely a good idea for investors who are in it for the long game. I think 2022 will be strong, but it’s too early to tell what will happen in 2023 and beyond.
  3. Keep an eye on how quickly rates rise to understand the potential impact on property values. If rates rise quickly, it could cause a shock to the system, and housing prices could slide backwards. But, the Fed is not likely to do that. They will likely try to raise rates as slowly as possible to allow economic expansion and wage growth to counteract the impacts of rising rates. This is what happened post-Great Recession, which was one of the strongest periods of property price growth in American history — despite rising rates. That said, if inflation stays high for too long, or even starts to accelerate, the Fed could be forced to raise interest rates faster than they want to, which could hurt housing prices. 

Final thoughts

Before wrapping up, I want to make one thing clear: When I say rising rates could hurt housing prices, I am not necessarily saying that this would be a housing crash. In my mind, a crash is a drop in asset values of 20% or more. 

I think it’s very unlikely that interest rate hikes alone would cause that kind of decrease. Rather, I think rapidly rising rates could lead to a period of flat growth or modest price declines in the coming years. 

That said, if rising rates were to be coupled with a sharp increase in housing supply or a big drop in demand, that could certainly cause a crash. But if you watch any of my videos, you know I think that is pretty unlikely. So, my outlook remains the same. I believe in 2022 we will see solid price appreciation because interest rates won’t rise too rapidly. 

Once mortgage rates rise to about 3.75% to 4%, which I believe will be in 2023, I think values could be negatively impacted, but we’re still a ways off from that. Right now, I don’t think anyone has enough data to accurately predict what happens beyond the next 12-18 months. 

The best thing to do is focus on what we do know: rates are low, demand is high, and the 10-year outlook for the housing market is extremely strong. 



Source link


Shoemaker_Phil

If you added up the impact that HousingWire’s Vanguard winners have had on the industry, you’d likely have a comprehensive list of the initiatives that have moved markets forward. These are the leaders who have dreamt, shaped and molded a better way to execute the home-buying journey. From injecting technology into the mortgage process to redefining the real estate agent and home shopper relationship, these leaders have laid the foundations for millions of homeowners. HousingWire sat down with three of these leaders: James O’Bryon, RE/MAX Gold Nation CEO, Cathleen Schreiner Gates, SimpleNexus CEO, and Phil Shoemaker, Homepoint president of originations, to learn more about the housing trends they’re closely watching, what they think will define 2022 and what they hope people remember them for when they retire.

Brena Nath: First off, congrats on being named a 2021 Vanguard. Who would you want to thank for helping you get where you are today?

Phil Shoemaker: I’d have to say my wife. I definitely would not have been able to do a fraction of what I’ve done without her support. I’ve been really lucky along the way. Outside of my wife, there’s a long list of people who really took an interest and invested in me and they all know who they are, and I very much appreciate all of them.

Brena Nath: What’s one accomplishment in your career that you’re really proud of?

Phil Shoemaker: Honestly, I think the biggest thing is that I’ve never sacrificed who I want to be. I feel like success can change people, and I’ve seen that. I’ve been around a lot of people who have found success. And I think that what I’m most proud of is, despite my success, is that I feel like I’ve stayed consistent with my values and who I want to be. It’s really all about me. I really find a lot of joy in helping other people and being a part of a team that wins together, as opposed to my own personal accomplishments.

Brena Nath: How are you helping move markets forward?

Phil Shoemaker: The No. 1 thing would be that I think this industry as a whole has become a little too focused on the wrong thing, specifically technology and automation. Just to give you context and background, I’m a technologist, and so I started out my career as an electrical engineer. That’s what I got my degree in. And then, I got into technology and built two loan origination systems. So, I actually came into the industry with a very heavy focus on technology. I think technology and process are extremely important because efficiency really does matter in this industry.

But this is still very much an industry that’s about relationships. It’s a people-centric industry. I believe what we’re doing at Homepoint is unique, and we’re coming at it with a people-first mentality. Our goal is to kind of double down on that. If you think about what we’re doing, putting people in homes, it’s a very noble thing, and it’s oftentimes one of the biggest transactions that a person ever does.

It’s stressful, right? And so, creating a company that recognizes it’s not just about profit and making money, it’s about something bigger than that, which is we are putting people in homes. Oftentimes, I think that gets lost in the industry. I think that you can win and do both. You can make money and you can also take a people-centric approach, and you can be efficient from a technology standpoint. One doesn’t have to trump the other.

Brena Nath: What are two trends in the mortgage and real estate industry that you’re closely watching?

Phil Shoemaker: The number one trend is that I do believe that there’s going to be a persistent migration between from retail to wholesale. And let me back up and give you the perspective there. Physical distribution in this industry is still very important. Having originators in the market that have access to referral sources, like real-estate agents, who are familiar with borrowers, communities, and the different nuances of the market is really important. And there are two ways you can get that.

You can build a company with distributed retail where you’re employing those LOs, or you can engage in wholesale lending where you are a lender but you’re leveraging this network of originators around the country. And I’ve had deep experience in both. I’m not saying an originator in retail or wholesale is better. But I do believe that the overall platform that wholesale offers an originator is superior, and the reason is that in wholesale, there’s more alignment with the originator and the lender.

The originator is able to focus on what they do best, which is originating loans, and the lender is able to focus on service and building scale and efficiency, opposed to trying to manage the originator, which is very costly and time-consuming in retail. It got muted a little bit in 2020 because when rates go down, everyone’s pipelines get full, and people stop moving. As rates go up, which they undoubtedly will, refis will go away and capacity’s going to start to become more constrained.

You’re going to see more and more originators take that leap and move to wholesale because they’ll give their borrowers better rates, and I think they’re also going to be able to give their borrowers a better experience. The second thing I’d point out is that there is a severe issue in mortgage with diversity. You could also broaden that to other industries, but since this is the industry we’re in, I’ll focus on mortgage. There needs to be more minorities in leadership positions and owning businesses. It’s the same thing with women. The industry has been dominated by one class for far too long. That’s why last year we did a $1 million grant to help minority- and women-owned brokers start.

Brena Nath: The past two years have been filled with a lot of uncertainty; what factors do you think will define 2022?

Phil Shoemaker: First, it is pretty certain that rates are going to up. If you look at every single data point around where rates are going, it’s up. And if you look at what that means in terms of forward forecasted volumes, there’s a heavy shift towards a purchase market, which is why I think physical distribution will matter and why you will see wholesale start to grow. With that same concept, when you see that shift with refi s going away, you’re also going to see a pretty healthy amount of consolidation. And that’s something that, honestly, I do struggle with because I think consolidation is good since you do have to have it to some degree.

If you can create a company that has more scale, you’re able to bring down costs, that ultimately benefits the end consumer. But there’s a degree issue there. Too much consolidation is bad. You don’t want three companies because then you lose all the optionality and that’s bad. That is one thing that I’m hyper-aware of. The industry will consolidate, but I do think that collectively as an industry, we should be concerned about how much it consolidates.

Brena Nath: After you’re finished with your career, what do you hope people remember you for?

Phil Shoemaker: This might sound a little cliché, but I just want to be remembered as a good person. Look, I am very competitive, and I like to win. But for me, winning is not about getting a certain number on the ranking tables. It’s about achieving a goal and the process you go through along the way, and the people you impact and having a positive impact in the world. That would be number one — that I was a good person. It really is about the process and who you impact as you go through it. That’s what’s important. Not the destination.

Brena Nath: To wrap, what’s one piece of advice you would give people in this industry?

Phil Shoemaker: It’s not about you. If I’m focused on making other people successful, I win. It’s not about you. I think the people that are most successful are the ones that actually find their success in helping other people as opposed to helping themselves. And oddly enough, I think you end up getting further that way.

This Q&A was originally featured in the Oct/Nov issue of HousingWire magazine. To view the whole issue, go here.

The post Homepoint’s Phil Shoemaker: Lessons from a tech-based mortgage leader appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link