Sometimes you buy a house only to have to sell it sooner than you thought. Whether the property didn’t perform the way you thought it would or something else happens in your life that makes it impossible to afford the home, if you’re in a hurry to sell, you need to think outside the box.

The traditional way to sell a home may take longer than you have to solve your financial issues, or you may just be in a hurry to sell and move on with your life. Fortunately, there are many ways you can sell your house fast.

How Long Does It Take to Sell a House?

Today, homes are selling faster than usual because of the shortage of inventory and high buyer demand. COVID changed the real estate industry in a big way since it provided many people with an opportunity to work remotely and live almost anywhere.

Investment homes often take longer to sell because your audience is other investors. 

Factors that Affect How Long It Takes to Sell a House

Like anything in real estate, many factors affect how long it takes to sell your house. Even if you have the most desirable home in the neighborhood, these factors could affect how long it takes to sell.

  • Price – This is the most significant factor. If your house is priced too high, it will turn buyers off, but if it’s too low, people may wonder what’s wrong with it. The right pricing strategy may help to sell a property quickly. A professional appraiser or real estate agent can help you figure out how much to list your home for. Roofstock Marketplace, for example, offers services to help sellers who need to sell their homes fast, including key market insights to help with pricing. 
  • Livability – Homes that are ready to be moved into immediately may sell faster than homes that need work. Even if your home is livable but needs work, it might sell slower because many buyers want a home they can move into right away. If your home is more of an investment home, investors often want a home already outfitted with tenants or an underpriced home, so there’s room in the pricing to cover the cost of renovations. If your home falls in between these two areas, it may take longer to sell.
  • The economy – No one can control the economy. It may be a seller’s market for a while, but then switch to a buyer’s market, or the market could come to a halt altogether. There are many moving pieces to the economic part of the real estate industry that are unpredictable and uncontrollable.. 
  • The real estate agent – The wrong real estate agent could slow down the selling process. If you don’t work with someone experienced in the industry or with the audience you’re trying to reach, it could take longer to find the right buyer. This often happens with investment properties. Most real estate agents deal with primary homeowners and homebuyers, so they may market an investment property to the wrong audience, delaying the sale.
  • Home condition – The better shape your home is in, the more likely it is to sell quickly. If it looks unkempt from the outside or the inside is cluttered and not staged, it could take longer, even if the layout and overall condition of the home are good. Clutter and disorganization can make it harder to sell a home.

7 Ways to Sell your House Fast

No matter the market conditions, your house, or the home’s livability, there are ways to sell a home fast. You just have to know how to think outside of the box and use your resources.

Here are the top ways to sell your house fast.

1. Sell to a Wholesaler

Wholesalers are marketers who know which homes will sell fast and have the audience to sell them to. You don’t sell your home to the wholesaler; the contract gets transferred to a buyer the wholesaler finds for you.

One downside is that wholesalers look for deals because they want to convince a buyer to pay more for the property than is paid to the seller and profit from the difference. This works well with undervalued properties in need of work that you aren’t willing to do or don’t have the money to manage.

The upside, however, is wholesalers often have a vast network of buyers available so they can help you sell your home faster. It may be a tradeoff – you may get a little less money for the home but sell it fast. 

2. Consider a Short Sale

If you’re in over your head in debt and can’t find your way out, your mortgage company may approve a short sale. This means you sell the home for less than the amount you owe on the mortgage, but the lender accepts it as payment in full. It damages your credit, but it’s better than a foreclosure. The mortgage company will report your debt paid as agreed.

You can’t make a short sale without getting bank approval first. The process often takes as long as 6 to 9 months, so start early. Once you get approval, short sale offers usually come in rather quickly. The speed of the sale itself depends on how fast the lender moves, but if it means you can walk away from the house without paying the difference between the sales price and mortgage, it may be worth it.

3. Sell to Other Investors Using Roofstock Marketplace

When you market to the wrong audience, it can take a long time to sell an investment property. Roofstock Marketplace was explicitly created for investors to buy and sell investment properties, helping both sides of the transaction.

It’s easy to sell your house on Roofstock. It starts with you deciding if you want an iBuyer offer from Roofstock or if you want to list on the Roofstock Marketplace. To obtain an iBuyer offer, you will provide the property address and some key details. Roofstock will notify you within 48 hours whether the home meets their criteria for iBuyer offers. You may also provide Roofstock with information to post a listing of your home. Include all the features of the home, measurements, and plenty of pictures. Roofstock will list the home for you and charge only 3% of the purchase price or $2,500, whichever is greater.  

The nice thing about using Roofstock is you can sell the home with tenants in it. This means if you’re done with the home but don’t want to displace your tenants, you can sell the property to other investors who want to become instant landlords.

4. Hire a Real Estate Agent

Real estate agents can make or break your sale. If you hire the wrong agent, it could take a long time to sell your house. But if you hire the right one – an agent with experience in selling investment homes and who knows where and how to market to investors, you may meet with more success.

Real estate agents negotiate on your behalf and ensure you get the most money for your home. Since they work on commission, they have a particular interest in how much you get for your home.

Keep in mind: Real estate agents charge a commission based upon the sales price. Commissions are often negotiable. Traditionally, it’s the seller’s responsibility to pay the commission, so it comes out of your profits.

5. Sell to All-Cash Buyers

Cash buyers buy homes as is. This means you don’t have to do any renovations or even very much negotiating. Cash buyers want to buy a house and close within a week or two. Because there isn’t much paperwork and there aren’t any banks to wait for, it can be done quickly.

The key is in the price. Cash buyers typically look for a deal. They don’t want to pay as much as they would if they went through a real estate agent or used bank financing. They look for undervalued properties, and if you’re in a hurry to sell your home, you may be willing to offer that discount so you can get the home off your back.

6. Sell to Your Tenants

Before you market your home to outsiders, consider asking your tenants first. If you have long-term tenants who have settled into the area, they may be willing to buy the house from you.

If you sell to your tenants, there may be less work to do since they already know the home. You’ll have to draw up a sales contract and work out a price, but it shouldn’t take too much work if you have a good relationship.

You may be able to skip a real estate agent if you sell to your tenants, but make sure you use an attorney, so you ensure everyone’s rights are taken care of during the process. 

7. Price Your Home Right

No matter which method you use to sell your home, the bottom line is that pricing matters. You should price the house to sell if you’re in a hurry, but don’t cut your profits short. If you price it too low, people may wonder what’s wrong with it and not look at it. But if you price it too high, people will avoid viewing it because the price is too high.

Working with professionals is the only way to ensure you price it right. A licensed real estate agent, appraiser, or firm like Roofstock is the best way to ensure you’re asking the right price for your home. With the right price, you’ll find you get more people viewing it and possibly more offers. 

The Bottom Line

Selling your investment home doesn’t have to feel impossible. With the proper steps, you can sell your house fast. Whether you’re trying to get out because you need the money or you’re just tired of playing landlord, the steps above may help you sell your home fast.

The post Need to sell your house fast? Here are 7 great options appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


House flipping is a very potent form of investing. After just one fix and flip, many investors find themselves hooked, leaving their stable jobs for the profit (and rush) or finishing another flip. This happened quickly to Jason Pritchard, flipper and rental property investor in central California. Jason was working at a sales job he hated and after watching one of the many famous HGTV flipping shows, thought, “Hey, I could do that!”

He gave it a try, using his life savings and retirement funds available to him. It was a success, so he decided to scale up. One flip grew to a few, and now, Jason’s team does over seventy-five flips and wholesale deals per year! This incredible volume didn’t happen overnight—it took Jason seven years to go from W2 worker to one of the best flippers in the state! And it’s not just flipping Jason is after. He’s been able to grow a massive rental property portfolio, some eighty-three units, at the same time!

You’re probably wondering how Jason did this so fast. Worry not, as he details every step from how he finds leads, builds a team, pays the taxman, and even compensates employees. If you’re trying to get your foot into the flipping door, Jason’s story should inspire you to do almost exactly what he did.

David:
This is the BiggerPockets podcast show 611.

Jason:
If you would have told me that seven years ago, when I started that I’d be doing what I’m doing right now, I wouldn’t have believed that it was even possible. What was sad would be, I wouldn’t even believe that I was the kind of person that was capable of doing it, which was even more sad for me, right? I had to get into this space where we proved to ourselves, and we had proof of concept like, “Wow. This works. Wow, I am capable of doing it.” That confidence, that self-confidence is like a muscle that you build over time.

Jason:
Now, when I say that I’m going to do something, I know that it’s going to happen because for the last seven years, I’ve been doing everything that I’ve been saying that I’m going to do, right? It doesn’t start out that way but you can get there and it doesn’t need to take a lifetime.

David:
What’s going on everyone? My name is David Greene and I’m your host of the BiggerPockets Real Estate podcast, the best real estate investing podcast in the entire world. Here at BiggerPockets, we believe in helping you find financial freedom through real estate so that you can live life on your terms and do what you were meant to do, instead of what you have to do. We do that by bringing on different guests who tell their stories of how they found financial freedom, as well as industry experts that share advice, opinions and information that can help you become more successful.

David:
If you’re looking to get plugged in with over two million other people on the same journey, I highly encourage you to check out biggerpockets.com. Our website where there is a forum that you can ask any question you could think of when it comes to real estate investing, a blog where you can read articles written by other successful investors, as well as this podcast and others all designed to help you find financial freedom through real estate. I am joined today by my amazing, mysterious, captivating, and now athletic co-host, Rob Abasolo. Rob, how’re you feeling today?

Rob:
Lactic acid is building everywhere I mentioned right before this I went on my first run in three years. I thought I could do it. I did it. I ran five miles.

David:
You ran five miles your first time?

Rob:
Yeah, yeah, but you know.

David:
What the heck?

Rob:
Yeah, but they are 12 minute miles. I mean, it’s offensive to even call it running. I’ve been known actually. I’ve actually run three half marathons without training every single time. I was like, “Yeah, I could do five miles.” I’m paying for it today, my friend.

David:
You got a little bit of delayed onset muscle soreness?

Rob:
Yeah. Isn’t it supposed to be worse on the second day, though? I think tomorrow is going to be the bad one for me.

David:
I always feel it right around 22 to 24 hours after I worked out. That’s where it starts to hit me.

Rob:
I’m going to be healing up pretty good, though. I’m really simultaneously nervous and excited because a friend of mine sent me two A5 Wagyu steaks, and two oxtails and I’m going to be eating that right after this. I got to get a load up on the protein to heal up [inaudible 00:02:48].

David:
You need that protein to rebuild those muscles. That’s right.

Rob:
Yeah.

David:
Today’s podcast is brought to you by Rob DOM’s, Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness. It’s real.

Rob:
It’s real. I’m really excited about today’s episode with Jason Pritchard. We talked about a lot of good stuff, man. He basically scaled from, he started out doing a couple of deals and now he does about 75 deals a year, which is a really, really, really, really crazy feat. He gives us a really honest look at the growing pains of that business model and scaling up a team and the financing involved with flipping that many houses and just really, really easy to talk to and made it feel very digestible, I feel like.

David:
Yeah, and he did a great job of explaining sort of the entire process, how we’re getting leads, how we’re talking to those leads, how we’re wrapping them up, who we pass it to, to work on the rehab, how we decide if we’re going to wholesale it or we’re going to flip it. It’s a really good overview of what a successful business could work like.

David:
In addition to flipping all these houses, he’s got 83 rental properties. Jason is, I mean, this is the archetype of what you want to scale your business look like if you’re a flipper. He’s got income from flipping. He’s got passive income from rentals. He has six short term rentals that he’s working on. I mean, he’s kind of doing it all.

Rob:
Oh, yeah. Man. There were a lot of selfish questions are like, “Yeah, but how exactly do you do this because that seems very hard?” He was very, very gracious with his answers, I feel like.

David:
All right, moving on to today’s quick tip, Jason makes a comment in today’s show. You want to make sure you stick around for it, where he talks about his W2 job was in sales, and he took his skill from his W2 job and applied it into his real estate investing business. Because he was so good at sales, he did very well with convincing sellers to sell him their off market deals. The point to pull out of this is that if you’re not happy at the job that you currently have, if you’re just phoning it in and going through the motions and waiting for some new inspiring opportunity to crash your path, and then you’ll give it your best, it’s not going to happen.

David:
You have to do your best with where you’re at before your next opportunity is going to present itself. If you do a good job developing skills where you are, you will have those when the next opportunity comes. BiggerPockets wants to help you with that. We want you listening to more content that will help prepare you for the opportunity that will be coming your way. If you feel like you don’t know enough about business or finance or living within your means, you can check out the money podcast, which is all based on building financial independence.

David:
We’ve got the rookie podcast if you’re a brand new investor, and you’re afraid about asking silly questions, or you don’t even know where to get started, that caters to your demographic but the point is, there are resources out there that will help get you ready for the next step where you can take charge of your life and you don’t leave it up to fate. That was today’s not so quick tip. Rob, any thoughts before we get into the show?

Rob:
Mm-mmm. Man, I’m excited to jump in.

David:
All right. Well, let’s bring in Jason. Welcome to the BiggerPockets podcast. First question for you, if you were so independently wealthy that you could hire someone to announce you every time you arrived at a party, at an event, even maybe to work, what would you have them announce you as?

Jason:
Thy Jason Pritchard. I love the ring of thy before. It’s strong. It’s elegant. It’s classic.

David:
Very strong, very.

Jason:
Classic never gets old.

David:
Yeah, it rings of old school masculinity and value.

Jason:
That’s right.

David:
I can see that sort of emanating from your person as we speak here. Well, thank you for being here. I think we’re going to have a fantastic show today. Before we get into the nitty gritty of what you got going on, can you tell me a little bit about what your portfolio looks like or your business looks like right now?

Jason:
Yeah, yeah. We’ve been fixing and flipping in central California for the last seven plus years. We’ll do about 75 deals this year, on average. That’s about what we’ve been doing the last two or three years. We’ve got 83 rentals as of right now. Most of those are single family, small multifamily, small apartments in California. Then, we’ve got a handful of out of state rentals in Cleveland, and also in Northern Indiana.

David:
That is fantastic.

Jason:
Yeah, yeah. It’s a mix of fixing, flipping right now because with the market what it’s doing, we’re more flipping and less wholesale but we do a little bit of both. Then, we cherry pick the best ones to keep for ourselves. We also have six Airbnb, three that are live right now, kind of wading into the short term rental market as well, which has been a very pleasant surprise for us with how they’ve performed.

David:
Who is the we?

Jason:
Myself and my wife.

David:
Okay.

Jason:
Yeah, yeah. When I [inaudible 00:07:14].

David:
No business partners?

Jason:
I have a formal business partner through our nonprofit but that’s kind of a separate arm. I had mentioned that in some of the notes that I have but I have my own private real estate business. That’s mine and my wife’s, and then through our nonprofit, we do some affordable housing stuff and I do have a business partner with that.

David:
This is amazing. The reason I ask because I often hear people say, “We,” and then they go on to you drop these huge numbers like 83 rentals, and tons of fix and flips and 75,000 units and then you find out that their part of the we was like 1/10 of one half of that whole enterprise.

Jason:
Yes. Yeah.

David:
This tells me that you’re the real deal. It also tells me that no doubt, you are very good at finding off market opportunities…

Jason:
Yes.

David:
… if you have all these different exit strategies. Maybe we should start there. Tell me a little bit about how you built your business and how you’re finding all these opportunities.

Jason:
I built my business originally by just going off market. I got started in the end of 2014, completely self-educated, never had a coach mainly because I didn’t have the money to hire a coach or mentor go through that type of program. I started by listening to BiggerPockets podcast, Sean Terry how to podcast out. That’s how I learned the business. I found out very quickly in 2014 that there were just not a lot of opportunities that were listed on the market at that time. I spent a few months at the beginning, just beating my head going on like realtor and Zillow, and just trying to pencil out deals with the cheapest properties that were listed. We just could not make the numbers work.

Jason:
I found out very quickly that we had to shift and adapt. I dove headfirst into direct to seller marketing. We started with direct mail. I mean, I’ve done everything: direct mail, cold calling, bandit signs, door knocking. We just kind of cut our teeth doing that. I’d say 99% of the deals that we’ve done have been off market. I’ve actually only ever bought one property that was listed with an agent and that’s because I had a working relationship with that agent.

David:
All right. I’m assuming you started off with fixing and flipping for the most part, maybe you had a couple rentals and then sort of just started to pour more marketing dollars and resources into looking for off market opportunities and hit some kind of a rhythm where now you’ve got the same sources that are providing a decent number of leads.

Jason:
That’s correct. Yeah, it was all fix and flip for the first two years. I was mainly just looking to replace my income from my old corporate job. I mean, I’d worked in corporate America 15 years prior to getting into the real estate market and real estate field. If you would have told me back in 2014, ’15 that I could just replace my W2 income with income from my real estate business, I would have been happy camper just because I was so miserable and unhappy with what I was doing at that time.

Jason:
I just wanted to fix and flip. It sounds cliche but we used to watch all the flipping shows on TV, my wife and I, and we were always entertained by it. I always thought to myself, if these guys can do it, I know I can too and let’s just start there and figure out everything else after that. I didn’t really understand what wholesaling was at the beginning. I just knew that I needed to buy deals below market value in order to make all the numbers work out.

Rob:
Just for clarity, I’m kind of curious, to what did you do? What was your corporate job before you got into the real estate stuff?

Jason:
My corporate job, I’ve always been in sales and sales management. I worked for two large companies in my early 20s and all through college, and after I graduated. The first company, was a technology retailer. We did all outside sales. It was all business to business. That’s where I really learned the value of marketing lead generation and understanding how a sales process works. I excelled at that, honestly. I did really well. I was paid very well at an early age. I thought that that’s what was going to be, my life was going to be working as like a mid-level executive, climb the corporate ladder, make a couple 100 grand a year, and just kind of do that life.

Jason:
I found out after being at my first company for about seven or eight years that my heart just was not in what I was doing. I felt like I was just getting burned out. I thought it was the company. I moved to another organization where I worked in sales and sales management there. I went through the same basically seven-year cycle there where I thought I was going to climb the ladder.

Jason:
I was doing well, and I found myself at this transitionary period in my early 30s where I was just miserable and I was looking around and I was like 32, and I could see my future with some of the older employees that I worked with. I said, “This can’t be the rest of my life, man. I am not going to do this for another 30 plus years.” I’d always been drawn to real estate. I’d always just kind of talk myself out of it for different reasons. I finally just said, “You know what? We’re going to go all in and try this and if it doesn’t work out, I could always come back and get another job.”

Rob:
Would you say it’s been pretty applicable to use your sales acumen and knowledge kind of in the wholesaling in real estate business?

Jason:
It has been invaluable. I talked to so many people that are interested in getting into the type of business that I’m in, fixing and flipping houses or buying rental properties. They don’t understand how much of a sales job I think it is at the beginning. They don’t understand that the purpose of sending out direct mail is to get the phone to ring. When the phone rings, you got to answer it. You got to be on top of your game. You’ve got to be willing and able to build rapport and go out and negotiate.

Jason:
It’s very much a numbers game. There’s a lot of rejection, especially at the beginning. I had basically been doing that for 15 years. All the rejection, realizing that it’s just a numbers game, you’re not going to close every deal that you go out there on. I was just focusing on understanding the language of real estate. Once I understood that, all my old sales instincts kicked in.

Jason:
For me, I think it was my big competitive advantage getting into the industry. It just took me a little bit of time to understand how a real estate transaction worked. Then, once I understood that, I just hit the ground running.

Rob:
Is there a skill within that, that you feel like you mastered just to the nth degree that you’re able to actually execute every single deal or in your business?

Jason:
I think for me, the way I equated and this is the example or the analogy that I would use, I think we’ve all been in experiences where we’ve purchased something, a car or a house or a vehicle or a product and we’ve walked away from that interaction feeling very good about the person that we worked with, right?

Jason:
Just like, “Man, that guy, Jason, he was nice. He was really good. I really liked him. I liked doing business with him.” I learned very early on that people make decisions, and they do business with people that they like and trust. I think I was just really good with my interpersonal communication skills. I’ve always been good at that. That’s been something that is a strong suit for me. I honed that in my time in corporate America, and it was directly applicable towards the real estate business.

Rob:
Can you give us a little bit of an idea when you were first starting out, I think, you might have mentioned this, but were you wholesaling first and then that went into flipping? Were you doing them both at the same time? What was that progression like?

Jason:
It was only fixing and flipping because in my head, the deals were a lot further, fewer and further between when I first started, right? I didn’t have 5 deals, 10 deals consistently in my pipeline, right? Every deal that we bought, my thought process was we just need to maximize the amount of money that we can make from this and I thought fixing and flipping was the way to do that.

Jason:
We started out, our first deal was in 2015. We maybe did four or five houses that first year. Second year we doubled up and then after that second year where I really kind of got my feet underneath me and I understood that, okay, I’ve got a little bit of momentum. I understand how this works. I had no construction background, no real estate background. I barely understood what an agent did. I didn’t know how everything worked. I needed a couple years of just managing projects and penciling deals out and understanding what things cost.

Jason:
Once I got that under my belt, I eventually got connected with some other investors in my area that were more buy and hold investors. They were the ones that really encouraged me to start keeping some of these properties. They basically told me, “Listen, you just have another high paying job. That’s all that you’ve got right now with this business and until you can start investing in stuff that you can keep long term, you’re always going to be on that hamster wheel.”

Rob:
For sure. Well, I guess I got questions here because for me, I think the idea of going out and doing a flip, that’s pretty achievable for most people. I think most people, if they save up a little bit of money, they can do a hard money loan, they can get into a flip, but how many deals are you doing right now, consistently at a time?

Jason:
We always have about 18 to 20 projects on our books at any given time. Here’s what I mean, when I say that, I mean, we’ve got three to five projects that we purchased that we’re getting ready to start construction on. We’ve got another five to seven projects that we’re actively rehabbing. Then, we’ve got another three to five projects that we’ve got completely rehabbed, and were in escrow or on the market listed to sell.

Jason:
We typically stay right about that range. That’s about the capacity that my team has with the relationships with the contractors, and just, that’s about the max that I want to do as far as properties that we’re rehabbing. Then, anything else that comes in above and beyond that scope, then we’ll look to just assign it or do some type of quick exit strategy, maybe wholesale it or something like that, to just to monetize it and just move on.

Rob:
I got to imagine, probably in this then, if you’re doing the level that you’re doing 75 flips or so or deals every single year, can you tell me a little bit about, because I think the big question that comes through here is, obviously, you’re going to be making a lot of profit here, do you have to kind of stash away a significant portion of your funds for taxes or is your buying and holding and your rental strategy sort of helping to offset that side of things?

Jason:
It’s a mix of both, man. I feel like it’s tough because if you don’t show any money, and you’d really aggressively depreciate your rentals, then you’re not as bankable when you want to go get a big bank loan, right? Your borrowing profile maybe doesn’t look as sharp as if you show a bunch of money. We’re constantly finding the balance between those two things.

Jason:
I’m very fortunate that my wife is still a high school counselor. She’s W2. We leveraged a lot of her credit profile at the beginning when we initially started buying rentals until we were in a space where we could borrow just kind of on our own and we’re making lending relationships where we could get the loans that we needed without necessarily showing that income.

Jason:
It’s a balance. I don’t love writing a big check to the IRS. We just did that a couple of times already this year. That always is painful when you do it, but there’s a purpose behind it because you know you’re setting yourself up to maybe leverage some financing on some future deals.

Rob:
Well, it’s really hard to think of it this way. Someone that I talked to one time, put it very simply and they said if you’re paying taxes, it means you’re making money. I’m always like, “Okay, you’re technically right about it.” I would still rather not pay the taxes but that doesn’t make sense.

Rob:
Honestly, I don’t really hear a lot of people that come in and say that kind of what you’re saying, you want to do a good balance of both because I think the kind of the popular thing, that’s going around a lot right now is cost segregation. Obviously, it’s not new, but more and more people are learning about it. A lot of people are trying to effectively just nix out the entire tax bill but that’s not something that you necessarily are looking to do.

Jason:
It depends on the person’s situation. I mean, it really does. My wife and I just purchased, I don’t want to say it’s our forever house, but we purchased a house that we’re going to be very happy in for, I would say, the next 8 to 10 years. We’re in a really good place with our rental portfolio. I could probably get more aggressive with the depreciation on our rentals now and have less tax liability if I wanted to, because we’re in a really good spot, I think, for the midterm future, right?

Jason:
But if you’re in a position where you want to be really bankable, then you’ve got to show some money. I mean, I feel like I’ve had my mentors that I look up to when I’m very vocal and open on my social media about just the different things that I’m doing with my businesses and some of those guys will reach out to me and they’ll say, “Hey, I just wrote a $1.5 million check to the IRS for this year. I agree with your thought process. If you’re writing a check that big, then you’re making the income obviously to offset it. There’s a give and take there for sure.

David:
You know something? Jason, you just have such an impressive business so far. I want to commend you for that.

Jason:
Thank you.

David:
This is probably more than we’re going to be able to get into in one podcast because I’m thinking how did you build a team to get these leads? What does that structure look like? How did you build a team to manage the rehabs? Then, how are you managing all of your rentals? This is not something any one person can do by themselves.

Jason:
No.

David:
There’s that and then there’s the actual sales techniques that you’re using, which I think could be really good. We might have to have you on again to dive into that because I just can tell there’s a lot people can learn from what you’re doing. Before we get into any of that, I sort of wanted to highlight an issue that I can see that happens with someone like you that has so much success so quickly, is it’s sort of, this is probably not the best analogy, but it’s like you’re a bodybuilder and you’re becoming tremendously fit, but you have certain areas that you like working out more than others. When you’re good at working out, they become much more unproportionally big than the areas that you don’t like, right?

David:
You’re probably making a ton of money. You’re investing it very well. You’re probably cash flowing very strong. There’s even more money coming in. You’re very strong in that area but like you mentioned, you haven’t taken advantage of enough depreciation with some of what you’re buying and that’s why your tax bill is so high.

David:
At a certain point, you’re going to have to shift your thinking from okay, I’ve got this thing on autopilot. Now, I have to buy bigger property so I can take advantage of accelerated depreciation. You’d have to get some apartment complexes or luxury real estate, something like that. It’s very common to see this happen. It’s okay. I don’t think if you’re paying taxes, there’s no one that should be critical and say, “Oh, he’s paying all those taxes.” Well, yeah, that’s because he’s making all this money. He doesn’t have time to figure out how to save all the taxes.

David:
Ultimately, as we’re growing, we’re trying to build this balanced, well balanced approach to where we’re making good money, we’re investing good money, and then we’re saving in taxes. I see this all the time. There’s some people that do really well saving in taxes, but they don’t make that much money, right?

Jason:
Yup.

David:
They brag about, “My tax bill is so low.” Yeah, well, you make less than somebody does with their W2 job.

Jason:
That’s right.

David:
It’s not as impressive when it comes to your approach where you know, “Hey, I could be doing some stuff to save money,” but that would take away from what I’m doing over here. What’s your perspective on how you sort of handle that problem?

Jason:
I’ll be honest with you, I’m an analytical person, but I don’t make every decision based on does it fit this exact formula or whatever. I think I have learned to trust my gut and my instinct. I also have a lot of people that I surround myself with that I trust to take advice from, right? That’s one of the things that I’ve learned that has really moved the needle in my businesses that I didn’t know about finances, financial literacy, and education.

Jason:
My upbringing and my parents, and everything, that was great but this was stuff that we did not openly talk about. I was just unfamiliar and I had a lot of bad financial habits, even into my mid-30s when I started in the business. I had to relearn and retrain the way that I thought about money. Then, I’ve learned that I just need to be around other people that are have done or are doing the things that I want to do and get their advice, kind of pool that information together, sit down with the people that are closest to me, my wife, and we have to make the best decision for ourselves. That’s it.

Jason:
There’s no right or wrong answer. I don’t know that there’s just shades of gray when it comes to, especially to something like this because everybody’s situation is going to be different. Our tax strategy has changed. I think when we were at the beginning, I did want to depreciate more, because I was just not used to writing that check, but as we’ve made more money, and I’ve become more mature investor, and I’ve gotten around, I think older, wiser people that I like and trust and have taken their advice, they’ve kind of guided me and schooled me on to more long term thinking when it comes to this but I’m still learning, man. I’m still very, very brand new to this, you know what I mean? I feel like we’ve got a lot of runway left to go.

David:
I just figured it out last year. Last year was the first year where I’m like, “Okay, I’m taking all this information. I’m putting it together. I’m making it somewhat of a priority. I bought a property I normally wouldn’t buy, but it worked out great. The tax benefits were insane. I’m like, “Okay, I get it now.”

Jason:
Get it. Yeah.

David:
Actually, it covered me for two years, so I won’t have to pay taxes for those two years. I make my money in the way that won’t be taxed, which is different than, like how you make your money matters also. Now, moving forward. I’ve got it. I’m probably not going to pay taxes anymore. If you want me to connect with my CPA, I’m happy.

Jason:
I love what you said, you got it. I think we all have these light bulb moments that happen throughout our journey, where something happens and it just clicks, everything clicks, and you’re like, “Okay, now I get it, right?” I know and trust and have faith that those things will just come. As long as I keep my head down and do the work, eventually, we’ll get to a point where that light bulb moment comes for me and it may be this, right? Hey, just having this talk, having getting on the show and then talking to your people and then that’s it. That’s really cool. I think people just [inaudible 00:24:22].

David:
That’s what I wanted to highlight, right? Because there is an approach that would say, I don’t want to put my pedal to the metal until I’ve built the road in front of me perfectly. I know exactly what all the plans are. It’s just not practical. I don’t know any successful person that made it happen that way. It’s more like riding a motorcycle, you hammer the throttle and you hang on. You adjust your balance as it’s going and you start to get yourself under control and then a sharp turn comes up and you got to figure out what to do there.

David:
Rob’s business has exploded. Then, last year, maybe two years, there’s no way he’s going to have all these details perfectly outlined, but would you trade that to go back to where you were when you weren’t making money? No. You clearly made the right call, right? It’s not going to be a perfect blueprint with a foundation that’s laid beautifully. Then, the framing goes up.

David:
That’s what something looks like when you’ve done it thousands of times, but in the beginning, it’s not that. You’re sort of going, figuring out as you go. That’s perfectly fine because you’re obviously very successful. Once now you’ve got all these pieces in place, when you do figure out the tax component, it’s just going to be icing on the cake, but I mean, 83 rentals, six short term rentals, all the houses that you’re flipping, you’ve clearly done a lot of things well.

David:
If we’re going to sort of carry on from there, tell me in the building of the teams that you had to do, which I, just from hearing your story, I’m pretty sure this has been the most challenging part is getting the people that you want to work with you. What challenges did you face? How did you overcome those team building challenges?

Jason:
I think there’s so many limiting beliefs that we have. I think the first challenge that I faced was just changing some of those belief systems and developing a mindset and a self-image that actually, I believe that I was capable of doing some of these things because I literally had no money. I had nothing when we were getting started. I was bootstrapping everything, which is good because it makes you become very resourceful at the beginning, but then, you’re also coming from a place of scarcity when it comes time to start growing and reinvesting in the business, right?

Jason:
I was very worried about, can I afford? I mean, it’s funny to say now, but $15 an hour or $12 an hour or whatever minimum wage was at the time when I hired my first in person assistant and I was doing everything myself. I mean, I went from flipping one house at a time to flipping three to four properties at a time. I think we’re up to about a dozen rental properties.

Jason:
I was doing all the direct mail myself. I was answering all the calls myself. I was going out and meeting the contractors in the Home Depot parking lot and cutting checks myself. I was doing all the bookkeeping. I was negotiating all the deals. I was managing all the properties. I just reached this point a couple years in, where I just did not have the capacity to do any more. I was a one man army and that’s all that I knew that if I don’t do something soon, then this was going to change.

Jason:
I originally started hiring out virtual assistants. That was a big game changer for me. I looked for virtual employees first because I knew I could just save money and I had so many repeatable tasks that could be done from a phone or a computer that I figured, “Hey, you know what? I see other people utilizing Vas. Let me try this.” I started with that.

Jason:
Then, I hired my first in person, it started as a personal assistant, and then became my property managers, then my project manager, and then that role has kind of splintered out and grilled into individual roles. Now, we’ve got six people on the team, not including my wife, who also is kind of right there with me on the top. I guess seven people that helped kind of run and manage day to day operations.

David:
How did you find the people that you ended up wanting to hire?

Jason:
Social media, believe it or not. It’s funny how, not funny, it’s been amazing to me how powerful of a tool social media has been for me. I was not a social media person before I got into real estate. I had MySpace and then I was dark on social media for eight years. Then, when I started flipping houses, I didn’t know anybody. It forced me to build a network online because I literally did not have anybody that I could tap into locally in the real estate field.

Jason:
I said, “You know what? I might as well just post what I’m doing and maybe it can motivate and inspire some people, and maybe it will lead to something.” I was always very consistent with my social media and just being authentic and open about the things that I was doing. It resonated with people, especially locally. That was what turned into, now, eventually I just started saying, “Hey, I need an assistant for my business.” I had a few people reach out. The first person that I hired came from that. For the most part, the best hires that I’ve had, believe it or not, have been from social media or either referrals from people that I know and trust.

Rob:
Yeah, let me ask you this a little bit because if I’m being totally honest here, I think one of the more daunting things, like you hear a lot of people talk about scaling up, building a team, all that type of stuff, but it’s really hard to put some tactical steps here because when it comes to hiring a team, that means you got to pay people.

Jason:
Correct.

Rob:
In the very beginning of your business, you’re in the throes, it’s really tough to know, well, for a lot of people starting out, they may not be tracking their expenses or cash flow, having profit loss statements for everything. I’m kind of curious, as you started embarking on this and hiring people, what was your thought process for paying them? Were you paying them per project? Were you paying them a salaried role? Has that changed from sort of where you stand now?

Jason:
Yeah, at the beginning, I was just paying a base hourly. No bonus. No anything. I just didn’t understand. I come from a background in corporate America where I knew about payroll and these other different things, but it’s just a different animal when it’s your own business, right? Again, I was coming from a place of scarcity. I was trying to extract the most value that I could and pay the least frankly, right?

Jason:
I was just doing base. Then, I started to realize, as my company was growing, and as these responsibilities started piling up, there was no way that I could afford the level of talent that I needed just paying a base hourly wage, and then that’s it. Then, we started incorporating bonuses for our projects based on profitability. Then, we started incorporating bonuses to people that were helping us with property managers for getting our rentals turned in a certain amount of time. We do the same thing now for our Airbnb’s.

Jason:
I tried to do, I try to supplement my payroll in a way where instead of having one big salary and paying everybody 75 to 100 grand, we keep a reasonable base, and with the different bonuses, it allows them to make significant amount of money. My top person in my company should be making well over six figures, but we do a base salary, project management bonus, and she’s also a licensed agent. She gets a portion of the commissions of a lot of the flips that we sell.

Jason:
I like doing it that way. My explanation to my team is we are not a company that has consistent predictable top line revenue every single month where I can just say, “Hey, listen, we’re going to make X amount of dollars every month. It’s very easy for me to reverse engineer and project where we’re going to be at as far as expenses.” Some months we’re closing multiple deals, and we have a ton of money coming in, and then another couple of months, we don’t have anything and we’re just spending money, right?

Jason:
I want to reward you and pay you financially in a way that’s aligned with my company. As profits and revenue are coming into the business, I’ll tie your bulk of your compensation to that. That’s worked very well for me.

Rob:
That’s really smart. Yeah. Was this the process? Was it something that you kind of figured out along the way?

Jason:
Yeah. It sounds great now. You know what I mean? At the beginning, I was literally just flying by the seat of my pants, literally, I am a big believer in, I like to stay outside of my comfort zone and just not pushed so hard that we get to a point where we’re being reckless. I’m constantly pushing the envelope. Sometimes that can be scary and sometimes it can feel like you have no idea what’s going on. Some days it feels like the wheels are just going to completely come off.

Jason:
Then, sometimes things just click and it feels like, “Wow, this is working well.” It’s just been a constant process of progression and leveling up year after year that’s gotten us to this point now.

David:
How closely tied together are your, like the rehab crew and the people that focus on selling the property, getting it ready, versus the acquisition side where you’re sort of filtering through leads, and then setting someone up to go close on it? Are they the same people? Are these two different departments?

Jason:
No. They’re separate departments but we’re all integrated. The right hand does know what the left hand is doing. My operations manager, her name is Morgan, she also oversees a lot of the construction that we do on our rehab projects, and she’s reselling them. She’s helping me underwrite deals. She’s helping me understand what the resale value is going to be. I have final say so on what we’re going to buy and what we’re not going to buy, but she knows and understands. We’re on the same page and aligned with what those values are. Then, those numbers are then passed down to our acquisitions team.

Jason:
The way that it works is our leads come in. We do lead intake. We qualify them for motivation, all these other things. We send the property over to Morgan or myself to help with underwriting the deal. Then, we give them back an offer range that we think we could work, and we let them close that deal.

Jason:
Then, it just goes on the assembly line. Depending on what the exit strategy is, if it’s going to be a rehab or a burr property, then we’ll just get it scheduled with our contractors. We’ll get our bids in and we just hit the ground and start running and gunning.

David:
Do you have one person who’s sort of overseeing all the projects and they’re delegating things out or is that your role right now?

Jason:
No. I do not. That’s one of the things that I delegated out very early on, because I did not have a construction background. It was cool at the beginning. I still do like to see a really rundown house turned into a nice pretty house and hand that to somebody that’s going to live in there for a while. That makes me feel good but I don’t get any real joy or excitement in the process of doing it anymore. I delegated that out years ago.

Jason:
We do have a pretty good system in place now where we can buy, fix and sell a house and a lot of them, if I didn’t want to, I would never have to go out to them, which is good. We’ve systematized our design aspect. It makes it easier on us and it makes it easier on our contractors. We have two or three color schemes that we go with. We make a final decision on which one it goes. We send that list of material to our contractors. It’s got all the vendors where they go to buy it. Our prices are skews. We do phone sales for everything.

Jason:
We try to put out the best quality product that has kind of a custom look and feel without totally breaking the bank and it’s that balance between those two things that I have found has gotten us the really, really profitable deals, the things that sell for top dollar where it’s not just a carpet and paint, quick and easy rehab but also not over improving the property because we’ve over improved a lot of properties and left a lot of money on the table. You just kind of learn those things the hard way as you’re starting out.

David:
I found that in most businesses, like someone starts it and then you start hiring people to do parts of the job, the owner tends to move towards the front of the funnel and delegate the stuff that comes later on in the process.

Jason:
That’s true.

David:
I’m not surprised to hear that you’re still in acquisitions and you sort of delegate out the things that happen after the thing is acquired. At a certain point, you may even have one of your employees or hire someone out to be the one that negotiates and puts it in contract and you will move higher into how do I get more leads coming in for us to qualify? It always just seems to be-

Jason:
We have that now. It’s very interesting. Acquisitions and sales has been the thing that’s been the hardest for me to let go because deep down in my heart, I do feel like I’m still kind of a deal junkie. I always enjoy the hunt of doing a deal. I still get a little bit of a charge right now, even closing deals out. I’m good at it. At the beginning, I always had limiting beliefs because I said, “Well, if I’m the best person on my team to do it, and we could make 40 or 50,000 on this deal, I’m handing over this opportunity to somebody that may not be ready to close it and we’re leaving 50 grand on the table if the deal doesn’t get done, right.

Jason:
I had to overcome those beliefs and realize that in order for me to go to the next level, I needed to be a good enough coach and leader to be able to take the skill sets that were in me, download them into somebody else and make them stick. Now, we’ve got an acquisitions rep. We’ve got a followup specialist. We’ve got cold callers. I oversee that piece still, and I’m almost kind of fully extracted out of there. I like to interject myself. My coach says that I like to steal the ball from my team, and then dunk it and tell everybody how good I am by dunking. You know what I mean? I’ve got to stop doing that. I’m getting better at it but I’m not there yet right now.

David:
When it comes to these, finding these off market deals you’re talking about, I know you’ve talked about investing being a linear process. Can you describe what you mean by that?

Jason:
Yeah. When I say a linear process, what I mean is that you have a very clear and laid out process that you have to follow. There are steps and you can’t skip step one to go to step two or step three. One of the questions that I get all the time, especially for new investors is, if I had to start all over with no money, no resources, just the experience that I have, what would I do? I always tell them focus all of your time, effort and energy on step one. Step one to me is marketing and lead generation. That’s it. In this business, at least the niche that I’m in, if you don’t have your marketing setup and you don’t have leads coming in, you don’t have a business.

Jason:
That was one of the big things that was ingrained into me in corporate America was just the value of those leads. We knew exactly how much the company was spending every single month on our marketing budget. We were grilled. If leads came in, and we didn’t live answer or we didn’t call them back within a certain amount of time, our sales manager or my manager was all over us, right? Then, I was all over my guys. I just took that mindset and my thought process to this.

Jason:
I think most people, they skip the sales, marketing and lead generation because there is a lot of dirty work that’s involved with that process. Nobody likes to get on the phone and make 500 calls a day and get beat up on the phone by all these random sellers. Nobody likes to go out on appointments and get told no hundreds of times before they get a yes.

Jason:
Instead of just leaning into that and getting great at that, they want to skip that process and jump to how do I find the money to do a deal? Then, they want to jump to how do I find a contractor? Where do I interview contractors? What title companies are the best title companies in town? I tell them, “Listen, it doesn’t matter. If you had a $10 million and a construction company, if you don’t have deals coming in, it doesn’t matter, you have no projects to work on. You’ve got to focus on step one. I was just fortunate that a lot of my experience and background prior to breaking into real estate really taught me that and that was directly applicable towards the business I got into.

Rob:
I have a question in regards to sort of the financing of this operation because, this kind of gets back to what I was talking about earlier, one or two deals very digestible for people starting out. I sort of want to talk about, if you’re doing three to four deals at a time, I think you said you had 18 projects or 18 to 20 projects on the books.

Jason:
Eighteen to 20 approximately on the books all the time. Yeah.

Rob:
How does one really approach the financing aspect of that because if you’re doing one and you go in hard money, a lot of the hard money lenders out there will require 20% down, there are some that will do 10% down, I think it’s possible to find some that’ll just do the whole thing, but it’s very expensive, and it’s very manageable for one, but if you want to go from 1 flip to 10 flips, what is that financing approach and then is there a difference between going from 1 to 10 and then 10 to 75?

Jason:
Yes. For me, I started using all my own money because I was afraid to ask anybody else for money because I didn’t really know what I was doing. I mean, the conversation that my wife and I had at the beginning was, at least if this gets totally screwed up, it’s our money and we’re not borrowing money. I cashed in my life savings. I borrowed against my 401k. We took a second mortgage out on our house, and we use that along with maxing out all our credit cards and everything else. That, along with hard money, is what we did to initially start doing our first, maybe dozen deals, right?

Jason:
We would just borrow as much money as we could, get a hard money loan to cover the difference. Then, we would just fund the deal, sell it off, pay everything down, take that profit and reinvest it in the next deal. We did that over and over again until we start to get to two then to three. Then, it reached a point where cash management became a big deal. When you’re flipping at volume, that’s something that I don’t see a lot of people talking about is how to properly manage your cash within your company in order to be able to cover your overhead every single month and your payroll and the mortgages that you take in.

Jason:
What I eventually started doing, through just networking and building a community out, is making relationships with private lenders. That’s how we fund everything now. Depending on the deal, we may use hard money from time to time, but 95% of the deals are funded from different private lenders. I like that, because it’s easy. The terms are negotiable. I can get all the money that I need. I typically borrow 100% of the purchase price, the rehab costs and my holding costs. I’m borrowing all the money that I need.

Jason:
You have some people that want to get paid every month, but my preference would be to pay them at the end of the project. Then, that way, we don’t have cash crunches during on but cash management is a very important component of that business.

Rob:
Yeah, it seems like it could get pretty, pretty, I don’t know, like tough to keep track if you’re talking about three, four flips, you’ve got a few credit cards, if you’re using your home equity line of credit, and running the books on those different properties and breaking it all up. I mean is that-

Jason:
Accounting was a nightmare for us. It was a nightmare and especially once we got into like year three and four, where it was like, “Okay, now we’re flipping 30, 40 houses a year. We’ve got a dozen rentals. We’ve got a lot of things happening at once. We can’t just keep a separate Excel spreadsheet for every project. It doesn’t work like that anymore, right?

Jason:
We had to mature. We worked with our CPA, and eventually found an accounting team that basically handles all of our books. Now, they’ve got a custom built out of QuickBooks for us where there’s job costing, we have individual P&Ls on every single project. They pay all of our bills every single month. It’s one team where the finances kind of funnel in and funnel out. I just oversee, along with the people on my team, our key KPIs and those reports that get fed into us so we can make sure that we’re in a good space financially to make sure we’re managing everything.

David:
It’s a nice business model, man. That’s actually probably the most impressive thing.

Jason:
It sounds good me saying it but it was a lot of hard work. It’s, even now, it’s not perfect, man. The analogy I use with my team is we’re building the airplane while we’re flying the airplane in midair. That can be fun. It can also be really scary at the same time. [inaudible 00:43:13].

David:
I think that’s everyone’s business, though. You go to a workshop or you go to some seminar, and they get up there and they sound just like you. Here’s my flowchart. Here’s what this person does. It gives us impression that everything’s clean and nice. Then, you get in there and it’s actually complete chaos, and you are more or less trying to just keep this thing from crashing. What you’re describing is what you’re striving for, but it’s okay to be messy.

David:
That’s what I want to say is like, I think, we get compliments on my real estate sales team that we are the most organized, structured, best systems in place. It is constantly just, who’s doing this, why do I have to do it, how come they’re not doing it? This person messed up. It’s affected… There’s no way to have this happen without it being messy because there’s people involved. There’s emotions involved. You’ve got sellers that have, maybe want to sell, maybe don’t want to sell, right?

David:
You’ve got, I thought we were going to do it this way. Well, someone else does give me another way. I guess what I’m saying is it is okay to be messy as long as it’s successful, right? With time, it does get smoother and then someone quits or leaves or has a baby and doesn’t want to work and you got to throw a new person in there and it’s right back to messy. Has that been your experience?

Jason:
A 100% and I think that piece of advice that I would give to the people that are going through some of those growing pains is don’t be too hard on yourself. I had to take that lesson very early on. I was my own worst critic. I was so hard on myself.

Jason:
Even though we were doing great, I would always just beat myself up because we did not fit this image of what you see about that guy on stage with the flowcharts and everything’s dialed in. It took me a while to realize that nobody’s business is completely dialed in. It’s all just a progress, our process and we’re just progressing each and every day.

Jason:
I’ve learned to balance being grateful for where we’re at, and also just not being satisfied and knowing that we’ve got so much more left to do. That’s been a good space for me, because if you would have told me that seven years ago, when I started that I’d be doing what I’m doing right now, I wouldn’t have believed that it was even possible. What was sad would be, I wouldn’t even believe that I was the kind of person that was capable of doing it, which was even more sad for me, right?

Jason:
I had to get into this space where we proved to ourselves, and we had proof of concept like, “Wow, this works. Wow, I am capable of doing it.” That confidence, that self-confidence is like a muscle that you build over time. Now, when I say that I’m going to do something, I know that it’s going to happen because for the last seven years, I’ve been doing everything that I’ve been saying that I’m going to do, right? It doesn’t start out that way but you can get there and it doesn’t need to take a lifetime either.

David:
It’s such a good point. I think about that all the time. If you look at like, use a weightlifting analogy, or something, that just works so easily because you have to do it in increments, but you see someone bench pressing 400 pounds, and you look at where you are now and you’re like, “I could never do that. That’s impossible.”

Jason:
No. Yeah.

David:
It’s impossible yet at this stage, but the person that’s going to be doing it is not you right now. It’s going to be years of you adding five pounds onto that bar incrementally. And when you have that frame, that’s not going to be impossible. We all have a mental frame or a business frame or an emotional frame, something that will allow us to be capable of leading other people, managing other people, handling complex problems.

David:
As you’re listening to the podcast, and you’re like, “I’m just trying to get my first house or my second house,” yes, what Jason is doing would be impossible. That weight would crush you if we tried to load up the bar, but you’re not going to start off where Jason’s at. You’re going to start off where you’re at and just keep working out. You end up at where Jason is. It sounds like what I hear you saying is you’ve embraced, that’s just the reality of how life works. Quit worrying about if I could do it right now. Just have faith. You’re going to get there if you keep pushing.

Jason:
Yes, worry, doubt, and fear, those are emotions that don’t serve us. I learned a long time ago that I’ve got to be self-aware enough that when I feel myself going through some of those emotions, acknowledging them, but also reverting back to my prior experiences and realizing like, “Listen, every time you’ve been worried about something, you’ve overcome it.” 99% of the time, the problem doesn’t even manifest itself and the 1% of the time that it does, you figure out what you need to do. You overcome it and you move on so at least you learned something from it.

Jason:
I think most people are so caught up in those three emotions: worry, doubt, and fear that they just stop themselves from doing everything. You’ve got to work on your mindset along with the tactical real estate stuff that you’re going to learn in your day to day business. Those two things for me just go hand in hand.

David:
Good deal. We are going to move on to the next segment of the show. It is the famous deal deep dive. In this segment of the show, we are going to dive deep into a deal that you’ve done. Do you have one in mind we can dive into?

Jason:
I do. We just sold our most profitable deal ever in February. That would be a great one to unpack.

David:
Let’s talk about it. Rob and I will fire questions at you. If you could just answer that question, we’ll fire the next one. First question is very simple, what kind of property is this?

Jason:
It’s a single family house.

Rob:
Okay, how did you find it?

Jason:
We found it via trustee sale. We bought it at auction.

David:
Nice. How much did you buy it for?

Jason:
1.72 million.

Rob:
Okay, how did you negotiate it?

Jason:
We just ended up having to come up with a bid that we thought was good for the property. With these trustee sales, there isn’t direct negotiation with the seller. It’s basically house has been foreclosed on. We had to put in a bid that we felt we could make money on that.

David:
You’re flying blind. That’s tricky.

Jason:
Flying blind. Flying blind.

David:
There’s no baseline to go off.

Jason:
That’s right.

David:
All right. How did you fund this deal?

Jason:
We funded it with money from one of our private lenders and because of the amount of money that was required to buy, fix, and sell it, we ended up giving them an equity portion in the deal because there was no other way to structure it.

Rob:
What did you do with the deal? Did you flip it, rent it, burn it?

Jason:
The plan was to flip it. We were going to work with a construction partner, do a full blown rehab. This property was in 17 mile drive on Pebble Beach. It’s one of the most desirable neighborhoods in California. We thought we were going to buy it for 1.72, put about 5 or 600,000 into it and then sell it for 4 but about 45 days after we bought it, a broker from that area cold called us and said, “I have somebody that will buy it as is right now. They’re just going to tear the house down and build a mansion.” We ended up selling it to his buyer and we made about $825,000 in 60 days.

David:
All right. We know what you did with it there and we know what the outcome was. Last question is what lessons did you learn from this deal?

Jason:
This is what I would tell anybody that is following along, everybody sees the money on that and they get caught up in the money, but you need to understand what was involved in even getting us to a space where we could buy a $1.7 million deal that we thought we were going to get to 4 million. There’s so many different obstacles and hurdles that came up. I’ve got a whole big post on my social media account. You can go to my Instagram and you can read all the different things.

Jason:
To condense it, we basically talked ourselves out of buying this deal. We waited until five days before the bid was due to even ask about raising the money. We got the money basically the day that the bid was due. I missed all the commercial flights to San Diego where I needed to go drop the check. I had to pay $8,000 to book a private plane…

David:
Wow.

Jason:
… to get me to San Diego, to drop the check off at the trustee without even knowing whether or not we were going to win that bid. There were so many different mental obstacles and objections that we had to overcome before we even got there. We found out couple days later that we won, 60 days later, we sold it and made 825 grand. I mean, it was one of the most wild and amazing experiences that I have. I would focus less on the money and more on just what it took to get there mentally. It was seven years of work and building a foundation that got us there.

David:
Well, congratulations on that.

Jason:
Thank you.

David:
That’s wild. I mean, I can only imagine how fast your mind was would racing. We don’t want it. We don’t want it. We don’t want it. I want it. Then, boom, everything is just chaos. Can we get there? I mean, that have been a cool thing to video and turn into a YouTube video or even, it sounds like a TV show.

Jason:
I was gone. I was on my Instagram story the whole time. Maybe, I’ll go download my stories and send it to somebody and they can edit it and they can see everything. It was the wild… I was literally scared to swipe the $8,000 to charter the plane. Had I not done that, we wouldn’t have done the deal, right? I was negotiating. There’s all these steps where I was negotiating in my mind where I was like, “Nah, this is too risky. You’ve never done a deal this big. You’ve never done this.”

Jason:
Going back to that conversation that we had about building the muscle of self-confidence, I was able to tap into that experience and just say, “You know what, you got this dude. All the indicators are there. This feels right. Let’s go and see what happens.” It worked out.

David:
Congrats on that. That’s a very cool story.

Rob:
That’s crazy, man. That’s so good.

Jason:
Thank you.

David:
We’re going to move on to the last segment of the show. It is the Famous For. This segment of the show, we ask every guest the same four questions every episode, and we’re going to fire them off to you, Jason. Question number one, what is your favorite real estate book?

Jason:
My favorite real estate book, I would say as the Go Giver. It doesn’t apply directly towards real estate, but it helps people understand that if you come from a place of abundance, and if you help other people, you’re not taking away opportunities from yourself. The momentum that you get by helping somebody else actually gets the two of you where you want to go faster. That is my favorite book I applied towards real estate. It’s also the most gifted book that I’ve ever given out as a gift.

Rob:
What is your favorite business book?

Jason:
I would say Think and Grow Rich, even though it’s kind of a mindset book, I think the lessons in there can be applied directly towards a business. It taught me the value of networking. It taught me the value of visualization, masterminding with other high level people. There’s some universal laws in there that directly apply towards any business.

Rob:
When you’re not out there growing your empire and flipping 75 houses a year, what are some of your hobbies?

Jason:
Travel. My wife and I love to travel. One of the fringe benefits of flipping all these houses is we rack up a ton of credit card points. We were in Italy two weeks ago. Basically, we’re able to stay in every hotel for free, fly for cheap.

Rob:
Nice.

Jason:
We travel once a quarter. That’s basically our goal is to take one big trip once a quarter. Yeah, travel is definitely our thing.

David:
In your opinion, what sets apart successful investors from those who give up, fail, or never get started?

Jason:
Mindset for sure. I think if anybody’s going to take anything away from this podcast is that you can be great at negotiations, you can have great people skills, but I think if you have a losing mindset or a losing mentality, you’re going to self-sabotage. For me, everything is built off the foundation of self-improvement and mindset. If you can get your head screwed on straight every day and show up and be consistent, it’ll be much easier to find the success that you’re looking for over the long term in the real estate field.

Rob:
That’s awesome, man. Well, lastly, can you tell us more about where people can find out about you on the interwebs?

Jason:
Sure. I think the easiest place to find out about me would be just on social media. Instagram and Facebook is where I’m most active. It’s just my first and last name, Jason Pritchard. If you type those things in, that’s the easiest place to connect with me. If you’re in the Central California market, we do monthly meetups. We get 200 plus people that come to those. I love giving back to the community. That’s been a great way for me to build my network out here. In person, in this area, you can do that but if not just hop on social media. Shoot me a message.

David:
That is awesome. Jason, I love your story. I hope that we can get you back on here again to dive into it a little bit deeper. I don’t know how we haven’t crossed paths already. We’re both in California and you’re doing something pretty awesome down there. It’s probably because you live in no man’s land. Fresno is like the Bermuda Triangle of California. Fly over it. You hope your plane doesn’t crash and then you end up in Southern California and all of a sudden you’re in California again, but it’s like the wild, wild, west out there. Is that where you’ve lived your whole life?

Jason:
Basically, we bounced around for a little bit until I was five and then my dad got a teaching job at Fresno State. He’s a professor at Fresno State and Fresno has been home base since first grade for me, man. I really love it out here. Roots run deep. I’m bullish on the Fresno market. I actually think that we’re going to see a lot of growth in the valley and I’m very happy where we’re at. Everybody talks about the prices in California, but there’s still some affordability and some good deals where we’re at.

David:
I agree with you, especially in that Bakersfield Fresno area. That’s where people are going to be moving into because prices are just getting crazy in other parts.

Jason:
That is correct.

David:
I think you got a lot of room to run there also.

Jason:
I think so.

David:
Rob, where can people find out about you?

Rob:
You can find me on YouTube at Robuilt, Instagram @Robuilt, TikTok @robuilto, and I’ll have to resurrect my MySpace. I’m sure that’s still out there somewhere, [inaudible 00:55:40]. What about you?

Jason:
I don’t know if I want to resurrect my MySpace. Hopefully, my MySpace stays [inaudible 00:55:45].

David:
Someone will. I’m telling you [inaudible 00:55:47] play.

Jason:
Oh Jesus. I need to go looking out. Oh, no.

David:
Someone’s going to make MySpace cool again but bell bottom jeans keep coming back all the time, right?

Jason:
Oh yeah.

David:
Remember those slap bracelet things.

Jason:
Mm-hmm.

David:
Maybe you guys don’t remember those.

Jason:
No. I remember. Yeah.

David:
They’re very popular. They made a comeback, right? How many iterations of Transformers and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles have we’ve seen? Someone’s doing that to MySpace. Mark my word. If I could buy stock in MySpace, I would right now because it’s going to come back. It’s also ridiculous.

David:
Thank you, Jason. This has been great. You can find me online on all social media @DavidGreene24. Please look very careful at the screen name that the newest iteration of this garbage is David with two eyes. They’re faking my account and messaging people. If you get a follow request from me, look very carefully before you accept it. Makes sure it’s the right one. This is going around on social media quite a bit. I don’t have the blue checkmark yet. You don’t know that it’s me.

David:
You can also find me on YouTube at David Greene Real Estate, not as exciting of a name as Robuilt but pretty easy to remember, if that’s what you’re thinking. All right. I’ll get us out of here, Jason. This has been great. This is David Greene for Rob, the most interesting man in the world, Rob Abasolo, signing off.

 

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!



Source link


HW+ new home sales

The National Association of Realtors reported Thursday that existing home sales for April came in at 5.61 million, with double-digit home-price growth driving a housing market that is still savagely unhealthy.

However, this year has seen one big game-changer: the 10-year yield finally cracked over 1.94%, which drove mortgage rates over 4%. This is something that I said would change the tone of housing, and we are seeing that result this year as sales decline and inventory picks up.

The real story in housing has been the price boom that we have seen since 2020. I was adamant about the price growth rule of 23% from 2020 to 2024. As long as prices only grew by 23% during these five years, we would be OK. Of course, that didn’t happen, in fact, median home price growth today was 14.8%. 

From NAR Research: In April, the median existing-home price for all housing types was $391,200, up 14.8% from April 2021 ($340,700), as prices increased in each region. This marks 122 consecutive months of year-over-year increases, the longest-running streak.

Wait, what? How are home prices up 14.8% year over year? We were told that population growth is slowing, we were told that Americans would panic sell and that massive inventory would hit the marketplace once rates got to 4%. Spoiler: If you haven’t realized that the housing market since 2012 has been trolled out by professional grifters who don’t ever forecast sales, that is on you. Economics done right should be boring, and you always want to be the detective, not the troll. It’s May 19, mortgage rates are over 5.5%, and the mass exodus of 7-8 million Americans selling their homes to cash out at any price has never happened.

Inventory is always seasonal. It rises in the spring and summer and fades in the fall and winter. My rule to get the housing market out of the unhealthy stage is that we need total inventory back between 1.52 million and 1.93 million. Today inventory levels are at 1.02 million.

I use the 1.52-1.93 million range because it brings us back to 2018-2019 levels, the last time we had a balanced housing market. The last time we had total inventory growth was back in 2014 when we tried to get back to 2.5 million units and six months of supply; we couldn’t do that then, even though purchase application data was down on trend 20% year over year.

Because we had a housing credit bubble from 2002 to 2005, the credit demand push on exotic loan debt structures was a setup for future forced credit selling. What I mean by forced credit selling is that the homeowner’s credit financials didn’t allow them to have the capacity to own the home any longer, so they were forced to sell their home. This created an abnormal amount of foreclosures and short sales, which exploded the supply levels for the existing home sales market. As we can see below clearly, the market worsened before the job-loss recession happened.

This was a big reason why we saw the monthly supply data pick up in 2006, 2007 and 2008 — all before the job-loss recession happened late in 2008. The job-loss recession added more forced credit selling into the mix.

We have been through a lot of drama since 2012, especially the drama in 2020, 2021 and 2022. We are sitting with just 2.2 months of supply. Now supply should pick up with higher rates — we had our first weekly positive print. We are not taking the unhealthy housing market theme off this marketplace.

NAR Research: At the end of April, the total housing inventory amounted to 1,030,000 units, up 10.8% from March and 10.4% from one year ago (1.15 million). Unsold inventory sits at a 2.2-month supply at the current sales pace.

In February of 2021, when I was saying that we need higher rates to cool housing, my mindset was that there were two things higher rates could do: They could cool down price growth and create more days on the market. More days on the market is the number on the short-term data line that I want to rise to above 30 days. Currently, it’s at 17 days; anything that is a teenager with this data line is exceptionally unhealthy.

NAR Research: First-time buyers were responsible for 28% of sales in April; Individual investors purchased 17% of homes; All-cash sales accounted for 26% of transactions; Distressed sales represented less than 1% of sales; Properties typically remained on the market for 17 days.

Currently, the housing market is reacting just like you would expect when we have higher rates. When have seen higher rates cool down sales before, and right now, it seems the same to me. I kept that target level of 1.94% going on during 2020-2022 as an inflection point for housing. This is sticking with my theme in the past that when rates rise, it cools down housing. Even though mortgage rates are historically low, they still always matter because mortgage buyers are the biggest homebuyers in America. We still have some legs to move lower in sales. Hopefully, this chart gives you some context to previous times when rates have risen post-2010.

The one aspect of higher rates that I have gotten wrong so far is that I was anticipating a bigger hit to mortgage demand by now. Because the home-price growth level broke my model, higher rates at this stage mean a bit more to me than most. So, I was anticipating purchase application data to be down 18%-22% year over year by now. That level would be a traditional decline with a noticeable hit from demand working from a higher base than in the previous expansion. I like to use a four-week moving average on this data line on a year-over-year basis only, and as of today, this hasn’t happened. By October of this year, we will have more challenging comps to with worth, and that might be when the four-week moving average gets to 18%-22% declines year over year.

The purchase application data is down 12% week to week, ending the two-week positive streak, and it’s down 15% year over year. The  four-week moving average is negative at 12.75% year over year, which is about 5.25%-9.25% better than I thought with rates this high.

Obviously, from my housing work, you can tell I haven’t been a fan of this housing market once it became apparent the housing shortage was getting worse in 2021. I talked about needing higher rates to cool things down and the cool-down is happening, but not fast enough. I am more concerned that the economic data, which is getting softer, will send bond yields lower and take rates down with it before we have a real shot to get real inventory growth.

Again, I know this is a first-world problem to have. However, I am just staying consistent with my economic work model for the years 2020-2024: the only thing that can make total home sales fall below 6.2 million is if home-price growth is over 23% and then rates rise. We have that happening currently, so the need to create more inventory and days on the market has to benefit here. A balanced market is the best housing market and we don’t have one today; it’s still a savagely unhealthy housing market.

The post This savagely unhealthy housing market needs higher rates appeared first on HousingWire.





Source link


Blockchain-based real estate platform Parcl is betting people want a piece of the real estate pie so badly customers are willing to invest in an emerging, small slice of the market: a digital square foot of real estate. Not only are customers investing in Parcl’s product, but the company itself also recently secured funding of $7.5 million from new and existing investors, which will help Parcl expand its customer base while bolstering partnerships with software and real estate companies, its co-founder said. 

Existing partners led much of the funding, including Archetype, Dragonfly Capital and Solana Ventures. Fifth Wall, one of the largest venture capital firms focused on technologies for the global real estate industry, and JAWS, the family office of Bary Sterlicht, were among the new investors that helped raise funding. 

Parcl’s business model is based on a price index that tracks the price per square foot in any city or state. The platform gives users exposure to markets and allows the blockchain to trade. The price index reflects eight different data points, including listing transactions, satellite imagery and property tax records, according to Trevor Bacon, co-founder of Parcl.

Currently the firm profits from transaction and starting fees; there are also plans to monetize its data in the long term.

“We’re the first blockchain-based real estate platform,” Bacon told HousingWire. “We’re not touching the physical asset. There’s been tokenized or factionalized real estate attempts, but those models don’t scale because you need to own the underlying properties.” 

Because it does not require any liquidity in real estate to invest, Parcl targets all types of investors, including those who are priced out of the housing market and those who fear a potential recession.


Blockchain today vs. yesterday – What’s different?

Akin to advent of the internet, DTL platforms, DeFi, blockchain and related crypto tech are opening avenues to manifold business models that simply were difficult to imagine just a few years ago.

Presented by: Tavant

“The housing market is very robust and … it prices a lot of people out of the market. That’s the kind of community we’re at least initially targeting – people who have been unfavorably impacted by the housing market because institutions are buying houses where there’s too little supply and inflation is driving the price up way too high for them to buy a home.” 

Tech startups are capitalizing on the crypto boom to offer people to buy stakes in rental homes through blockchain-based tokens.

Several startups, such as Lofty AI, allow people to invest as little as $50 to buy a digital token equivalent to a stake in a property rental business. Industry observers say the emergence of new real estate marketplaces reflects a hot housing market that attracts more investors while pricing out many people seeking to buy homes. 

As Desiree Fields – an assistant professor of geography and global metropolitan studies at the University of California, Berkeley – put it in an interview with NBC: “You can’t afford to buy a home yourself, but maybe you can become 1/50th of a landlord.”

The post Proptech Parcl offers real estate investing without liquidity appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


With the cost of living on the rise, many older homeowners are looking for financial solutions that allow them to age in place. HousingWire recently spoke with Christian Mills, head of Financial Advisor Relations at Reverse Mortgage Funding, about the ways a reverse mortgage can create a stable cash flow for homeowners in the midst of a volatile housing market. 

HousingWire: As interest rates rise and borrowing becomes more expensive, how can offering reverse mortgages help lenders provide clients with a stable cash flow in an otherwise volatile market?

Christian Mills: Even in the face of market volatility or high inflation, there are many ways lenders can help clients improve their financial stability and secure their wealth in retirement by offering reverse mortgages:

Mills-Christian-_Yext
  • Fund retirement with income-tax-free* funds — one of the most cost-effective, alternative sources of funds for retirees
  • Utilize a reverse mortgage to refinance existing mortgage debt, consolidate high-interest credit cards, or pay for home renovations and large purchases
  • Create an emergency fund for unexpected medical expenses or in-home services/long-term care
  • Sustain cash flow while delaying Social Security benefits by utilizing monthly tenure payments as an alternative to annuities
  • Maintain an investment portfolio while potentially growing their nest egg
  • Create a potentially greater legacy of wealth for heirs by leaving investments intact

HW: How can a reverse mortgage allow older Americans to take advantage of their existing equity without selling at a loss?

CM: Firstly, reverse mortgages, whether government-insured or proprietary, are non-recourse loans. This means that the homeowner (or their heirs) won’t owe more than the home is worth when the loan is repaid.

Also, an independent appraisal during the loan process locks in the property’s market value at the time the reverse mortgage loan is funded. This can serve the borrower in two ways: it protects against a market decline, and it allows the loan to be refinanced when market conditions (such as home appreciation, interest rates, and/or change in spousal status) warrant.  

HW: Some borrowers are under the impression that reverse mortgages are a last resort. What can lenders do to dispel this common misconception with their clients?

CW: This is a common misconception that has plagued the industry for years. Fortunately, reverse mortgages have come a long way over the last decade and are no longer considered a loan of last resort. In fact, many financial researchers and scholars have identified it as a strategic tool that should be considered part of a holistic financial strategy for retirement. Take a look at some of the most recent press – The New York Times published an in-depth article in April 2022: “Reverse Mortgages Are No Longer Just for Homeowners Short on Cash.”

The article quotes multiple financial scholars who cite the numerous ways homeowners can use a reverse mortgage proactively. And I think it’s important for lenders to frame the product that way with borrowers – as a proactive tool designed specifically for older homeowners and one that can help them retire with more financial freedom and peace of mind. And now, with the advent and continued improvement of proprietary reverse mortgages, there are more innovative products available to borrowers aged 55 and older, making it easier for lenders to offer clients customized solutions.

HW: How does Reverse Mortgage Funding help lending professionals educate themselves and their clients on the benefits of reverse mortgages in our current housing market?

CW: At Reverse Mortgage Funding, education has always been a number-one priority. We know that this product is not for everyone – it is not a one-size-fits-all solution for retirees. That’s why we do everything we can to help lenders—first, understand the product complexities and second, its application across a myriad of unique borrower scenarios—before we approach the value-add of the product for their businesses.

We provide lenders with best-in-class training (including live and on-demand opportunities) and comprehensive educational materials on the federally insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) and our proprietary Equity Elite suite of products before engaging with borrowers.

We also offer a dedicated support team and credit help desk to address specific questions throughout the life of each loan. Furthermore, we provide our partners with user-friendly technology to streamline their work and expedite loans and do-it-yourself marketing collateral that they use to market to prospective borrowers effectively.

Of course, we want lenders to see the value of reverse mortgages for their businesses and how it can help propel them forward – especially in the face of market instability and rising interest rates. But we also strive to provide thorough product education and arm them with the knowledge and tools they need to help more older Americans find financial stability in retirement.

Our partnerships with lenders also serve as an invaluable lifeline to help dispel popular reverse mortgage misconceptions amongst borrowers and further the industry as a whole.

To learn more about RMF and reverse mortgages visit reversefacts.com/HW


*Not tax advice. Consult a tax professional.

As with any mortgage, the borrower must meet their loan obligations: keeping current with property taxes, homeowners insurance, and maintenance.

The post How reverse mortgages could improve financial stability for older homeowners appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published a report this week looking at how servicers fared in the second half of 2021. The report said that on average, servicers improved their call metrics, but that some servicers continue to lag behind in assisting borrowers.

According to the report, which examined data provided from 16 undisclosed servicers, call metrics, including the average time it took for servicers to answer and abandonment rates, varied greatly from servicer to servicer.

From May 2021 to December 2021, servicers reported that the average speed to answer a borrower’s call after it entered the servicers’ interactive voice response system was 2.95 minutes.

However, some servicers struggled to answer calls in anywhere near that time. One undisclosed servicer saw their time to answer spike to 18.3 minutes in September 2021, while another servicer saw their average time to answer spike to 25 minutes in December 2021.

The average abandonment rate during this seven-month period was well below 10%, the report said. Though, again, there were outliers. The government watchdog said that servicers that reported spikes in answering times saw corresponding spikes in abandonment rates.

Per the report, the same servicer that saw a large spike in answering calls in September 2021 saw abandonment rates exceeding 22% that month. Meanwhile, four undisclosed servicers in December 2021 reported large abandonment rate spikes ranging from 16% to 40%.


Mortgage servicers: If you’re not obsessed with customer service, you’re falling behind

In a world where disparate physical spaces are steadily merging in the central hubs of mobile devices, consumers consider their mortgages one more digital service in need of perfecting. To take full advantage of the current market conditions, lenders and servicers must obsess over customer service. 

Presented by: TMS

Rohit Chopra, director of the CFPB, said that he is seeing improvement among servicers, but that there is room for growth.

“Servicers have done a much better job than they did 15 years ago,” said Chopra, speaking at the Mortgage Bankers Association‘s annual secondary markets conference in New York. “[In the report] we do find that there are some servicers that are really lagging behind their peers and we need to make sure that they are being responsive to homeowners.”

The report found that close to 330,000 homeowners with delinquent loans exited forbearance at the end of last year with no loss mitigation solution in place. Of that sum, 274,000 were federally backed loans.

The government watchdog said that the data shows “progress” but that borrowers exiting forbearance without a loss mitigation in place face a heightened risk of foreclosure. The report stressed that servicers should prioritize borrower outreach.

Overall, from May 2021 to December 2021, servicers reported that the rate of loans exiting forbearance with a status of foreclosure has been relatively low. A mere 11,386 loans had a status of foreclosure during the seven-month period, while 322 loans had an exit status of a short sale.

Of the 8 million borrowers that opted for forbearance, close to 90% have exited, the report stated. And as of March 2022, only 743,000 borrowers remained in active forbearance plans.

The CFPB noted another pain point: servicers struggled to provide information about limited English proficiency borrowers. Servicers could not provide data about the total number of LEP borrowers in their servicing portfolio, the number of LEP borrowers who were delinquent, nor their exit status after forbearance.

From the limited data provided, there seems to be a trend of delinquent LEP borrowers exiting forbearance without a loss mitigation option in place, the CFPB said. This could point to challenges in obtaining in-language information about how to access loss mitigation options, the report noted.

The bureau urged servicers to collect data about a borrower’s language preference to provide improved service to LEP consumers.

The watchdog reiterated in the report that it is prioritizing oversight of mortgage servicers “with special attention to servicers’ management of forbearance exits and the loss mitigation process.”

It’s at least the sixth time the CFPB has issued a similar warning to servicers as they navigate the end of forbearance and loss mitigation. However, it’s not clear if any enforcement actions have resulted from the promise of increased scrutiny.

The post CFPB report highlights outliers doing a poor job servicing appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


Mortgage and home equity fintech FirstClose received a $35 million investment from Lateral Investment Management on Tuesday. This is FirstClose’s first institutional equity investment round: The company has been self-funded since its founding in 2000.

The fintech firm currently provides underwriting workflow automation technology, point-of-sale software, and data services for the U.S. home equity and mortgage markets. Its customers include more than 400 banks and credit unions.

FirstClose said it will use the investment to accelerate its product and growth strategies, including expanding its financial services footprint by better utilizing property data intelligence, partnering with top lenders and technology providers.

“Our mission has always been to improve the way that banks and credit unions serve consumers by accelerating loan closing times, increasing loan volumes and reducing costs,” Tedd Smith, the co-founder and CEO of FirstClose, said in a statement. “This year, as interest rates continue to rise and home equity lending volumes skyrocket, this funding will allow us to continue innovating faster and provide a superior customer experience, while delivering end-to-end solutions that are in high demand in today’s constantly changing lending environment.” 

According to FirstClose, lenders who use the FirstClose EquityIQ solution have seen a 35% increase in online applications, a 25% increase in pull through, and a 77% reduction in time to close from application to funding.

“The demand for a simple and easy way to get instant feedback on a home value, available home equity, and instant loan decision while applying for a HELOC has become a business imperative,” Tim Smith, the co-founder and chief revenue officer of FirstClose, said in a statement. “We are expanding our sales and customer success teams to serve more customers across the home loan market.”

The firm has also recently announced the nominations of Pat Carney as chief technology officer and Kathy Mantych as the senior vice president of sales. Carney has more than 20 years of experience and has previously served as the chief innovation officer and senior vice president of strategic partnerships at ClosingCorp, while Mantych is an experienced leader in the mortgage banking and financial services industries.

The post FirstClose secures $35 million investment from Lateral appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


The year was 1999. An exclusive group of multi-billionaires gathered in Sun Valley, Idaho, just like they do every year.

As usual, no reporters were allowed within miles of their gathering. This was a safe place for the wealthiest Americans to freely share ideas, strategize, and break from the rigors and pressures they faced the other 51 weeks in 1999.

But something was different this year.

People were whispering about one of their most revered members.

“Do you think he’s senile? He is almost 70 [years old], after all.”

“He’s lost his touch. He had a great run for about four decades, but he’s clearly fading into irrelevance.”

“The market has left his returns…and his old-fashioned thinking…in the dust. My high school grandson’s returns are three times higher than his.”

They were talking about Warren Buffett. And they were gloating about their massive wins from the run-up in tech stocks. Newer attendees like Jeff Bezos were celebrated while Buffett was discounted.

Buffett wasn’t ruffled. He knew what he believed, and he wasn’t about to trade decades of expertise and success through value investing principles to join yet another fad.

For Buffett, the issues surrounded the lack of actual value in the tech firms exploding in price. Companies like Amazon, Pets.com, and Webvan were the darlings of the S&P 500, yet, they had little to no profits driving their popularity.

Their popularity can also be called speculation.

Taxi drivers and college students were becoming overnight millionaires. Of course, many investment titans like Buffett were discarded as outdated relics of a soon-to-be-forgotten generation.

Time Magazine mocked Buffett that summer. It reportedly stated: “Warren, what went wrong?”

So how did Buffett respond? In his usual dry humor, he addressed the audience of doubters.

Buffett began by saying, “In the short term, the stock market is a voting machine, but in the long run, it is more like a weighing machine. In the end, the weighing opportunity wins, but in the short term, it will be determined by the voting chips. However, its voting mechanism is very undemocratic. Unfortunately, as you know, it does not certify voting qualifications.”

Elsewhere, Buffett said he preferred investing in Wrigley’s over tech. He said he had no idea where technology would be in a decade. But he knew how people would be chewing gum.

“Our approach is very much profiting from lack of change rather than from change. With Wrigley chewing gum, it’s the lack of change that appeals to me. I don’t think it is going to be hurt by the internet. That’s the kind of business I like.”

Of course, we all know what happened. The tech bubble burst, about $5 trillion was lost, and Buffett landed on top, again.

When everyone is mutually rewarded from the market’s rise, expertise is no longer celebrated.

This is a phenomenon that raises its head late in boom cycles. This is not new. There are many examples in the past century:

  • As reported by Time: “There is a famous story, we don’t know if it’s true, about how in the late summer of 1929, a shoeshine boy gave Joe Kennedy stock tips, and Kennedy, being a wise old investor, thought, ‘If shoeshine boys are giving stock tips, then it’s time to get out of the market.’ So the story says Joe Kennedy sold all of his stocks and made a killing, and maybe that’s the beginning of the fortune that made JFK president three decades later.”
  • The stock market fell out of favor in the early 70s when I was a kid. The world ran away from the markets and shunned former experts. But this same world was quite different in the late 90s. Barnes & Noble’s shelves were bursting with books on trading stocks. I sold my company to a publicly-traded firm for a ridiculous multiple. Who needed experts when everyone was getting rich from the market’s bull run?
  • Barnes & Noble’s shelves switched to millionaire landlord books from 2004 to 2007. Real estate experts with years of knowledge were ignored, and “Newrus” (my fun term for New Gurus) became celebrities. (Who didn’t know a fix-n-flip guru?) Then 2008 hit.

The Death of Expertise in 2022

So, what is going on now? Is this happening again?

I will say yes.

I know many people making a killing–millions of dollars–in real estate right now. Many of them were in high school, college, tech jobs, or engineering as recently as 2015. I applaud them!

I just spoke with a prospective investor who told me he’s made over $5 million in buying random parcels of land and reselling them a few years later. He’s a tech genius but only invests in real estate on the side.

Yesterday I spoke to one of our investors in Southern California. He told me the story of his family’s industrially zoned land near Los Angeles. He bought other family members out a few years ago when the land was worth $4 to $5 million. He just got an offer for $25 million, and his broker said he might be able to get $27 million. I’m so happy for him!

I applaud all of these investors! But there’s a problem.

Expertise is discounted late in cycles. When everyone is being rewarded relatively equally, it is hard to tell who the experts are. Therefore, it’s hard to know who to listen to and who to invest with.

How did this sound last time around? For those of us who were investing in real estate leading up to 2008, this is what we were hearing:

  • “It’s different this time.”
  • “This boom has now become the new norm.”
  • “People are moving here for the lifestyle.” (Where was “here”? Everywhere. From Las Vegas to Buffalo, New York.)
  • “Buy land! They’re not making any more of it.”
  • “Everyone needs a place to live.”

In the Summer of 2005, the soon-to-be-nominated Fed chair, Ben Bernanke, said: “We’ve never had a decline in house prices on a nationwide basis. So, what I think is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize, and might slow consumption spending a bit. I don’t think it’s [going to] drive the economy too far from its full employment path, though.”

In mid-2007, U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulsen told Fortune Magazine: “This is far and away the strongest global economy I’ve seen in my business lifetime.” His brother, John, a true expert, was shorting the housing market and made a fortune in the next few years.

P.T. Barnum said, “Nothing draws a crowd like a crowd.”

Where is the crowd rushing right now? And are we living and investing in a time where true expertise is devalued, and hype is the operating principle of the day?

Howard Marks said the top of a bubble is reached just after the crowds think the bull run will go on forever.

But trees don’t grow to the sky.

Marks, a true expert, made much of his fortune in late 2008 at the other end of the spectrum: buying distressed assets when the crowds thought markets would decline forever.

In the autumn of 2008, a reporter interviewed Marks about his strategies during the free-falling market. He said their firm, Oaktree Capital Management, was buying up to half a billion dollars in assets per week. The reporter said, “Wait, you mean you’re selling, right?” Marks said, “No! We’re buying. If not now, when?”

True experts like Buffett and Marks are often busy going against the herd.

How Can You Get Burned When Expertise is Declining?

There are probably many ways. Just look online. Check out the thousands of “news stories” and opinions regurgitated as facts.

The internet has caused people to think they are more informed than they are. Users think they understand a topic by quickly searching and skimming often misleading headlines. Before the internet, rigorous study and deep research were required to develop a strong opinion on a matter.

Part of the problem is a society that has produced today’s education system. When everyone is rewarded equally, people don’t have to think critically and research deeply to get an A. But this lack of judgment doesn’t play well in the real world, and it can result in us treating non-experts as gurus.

When I was a boy…no, I’m not going to tell you how I walked six miles uphill in waist-deep snow!

We didn’t have rubber mats on playgrounds when I was a kid. Our incentive to master the monkey bars was to avoid a skinned-up knee or a broken arm.

When we increase comfort, we kill aspiration. I fear that a society that has protected our kids from potential pain (I’m guilty as a dad!) may have also protected them from the ability to reason deeply and clearly delineate risk and return.

(Some of the comments in this six-paragraph rant came from a review of Tom Nichols’ book The Death of Expertise.)

Rant complete.

I can see at least two obvious ways this could hurt your real estate career.

First, we all need to be lifelong learners. But I’m warning everyone to be careful who they are listening to. Look for true experts rather than Newrus.

Second, be careful who you invest with. You may passively invest in direct deals, turnkey homes, debt for house flippers, syndications, or funds. I applaud you. But I would warn you to do everything in your power to find the real experts. Put your money on them.

So, how can you tell if your “guru” is a real expert or just another Newru?

Identifying experts

Have typically weathered multiple up and down cycles.

Pay the price when they’re wrong. (They put skin in the game and don’t make a killing from non-performance-based fees.)

Anticipate change. They don’t assume the future is the same as the past. (Just look at interest rate declines over several decades, for example. Do you really believe that will continue?)

Look bad when novices soar but shine brightly when the crowds are in turmoil.

Invest in boring deals in times when others chase shiny assets.

Are comfortable with chaos.

Experts who play the long game will win in the end. Don’t yield your common sense and experience to Newru-Gurus.

Epilogue

There will come a day when expertise is celebrated again. We’re in a late-cycle phenomenon, and the current situation could signify a coming reversal.

Then expertise will be celebrated as it should be, and true experts will shine as they always do.

Many of the fallen will lick their wounds.

Some will vow to never invest in real estate again. Others will look for the next guru.

recession proof 1

Prepare for a market shift

Modify your investing tactics—not only to survive an economic downturn, but to also thrive! Take any recession in stride and never be intimidated by a market shift again with Recession-Proof Real Estate Investing.



Source link


HousingWire recently talked with Chris McEntee, vice president of ICE Mortgage Technology about the latest updates to the MERS eRegistry and what they mean for the industry.

HousingWire: The MERS eRegistry is the only registry of its type in the industry. What kind of impact does this have on lenders?

MERS

Chris McEntee: For over 25 years MERS has been integral in the mortgage industry’s evolution of moving from paper to eMortgages. As the legally proven common agent serving as a mortgagee in the public land records, eliminating the need for mortgage assignments, lenders save up to $125 on every loan when servicing is transferred. The addition of the MERS eRegistry endorsed by lenders, investors, and stakeholders more than a decade ago showcases the scalability of its business model. The industry benefits immensely from having this single System of Record to establish ownership of electronic promissory notes (eNotes) which given its nature, can be reproduced many times over. The MERS eRegistry brings additional value by eliminating guess work, operational expense, and unnecessary counterparty risk when a lender, investor, or stakeholder wants to ensure the validity and authenticity of an eNote or a specific mortgage document.

HousingWire: How does the MERS eRegistry increase the efficiency of recording mortgage transactions, and why is this important?

Chris McEntee: The MERS eRegistry as the System of Record identifies the holder of the eNote and by facilitating the transfers of sales creates an efficient legal mechanism for transferring the right to collect and enforce the loan.  Due to lower costs of handling and greater access to information, loans represented by eNotes can be more valuable to investors than the equivalent loans using paper notes. Lenders can reduce costs with eNotes by streamlining the post-closing and certification process, eliminating transportation costs, and reducing costs associated with lost, destroyed, and missing paper notes. The utilization of MERS as the mortgagee and the MERS eRegistry saves millions of dollars a year for the industry, not to mention eliminating the operational complexity of tracking paper documents.

HousingWire: MERS now offers RON video storage. Can you give us more insight into how it works and what this means for lenders?

Chris McEntee: Remote online notarization (RON) has emerged as a key component of digital mortgage production, and it is natural for MERS to play a role in supporting adoption. In many cases, an eNote is part of a mortgage loan where closing documents are being notarized via the RON process, so it makes logical sense to link the mortgage and the eNote to the video that memorializes the closing ceremony. It also links the video to the MERS Mortgage Identification Number, or MIN, which is widely adopted across the industry as a unique loan identification, or “ULI,” data point. This builds and extends on proven scalable infrastructure that the industry has benefited from for more than two decades. This is the first repository of its kind for RON video storage; allowing lenders to reliably identify that a loan was a RON transaction.

It’s important to mention that non-eNote transactions are also able to be tracked. Supporting all RON transactions within MERS provides an opportunity to further extend a single source of truth for the entire industry. All while capitalizing on what MERS does best by providing a standardized repository.

HousingWire: ICE reports a 46.5% year-over-year increase in the number of companies transacting on the MERS eRegistry as of April. What implications does this hold for the future of digital mortgages?

Chris McEntee: What we are seeing is a broad-based adoption of digital mortgage infrastructure across the industry. As the industry makes this transition from analog to digital, the promise is immense with respect to less friction, lower costs and more responsiveness to the consumer, lender and investor. What is encouraging is the industry made its investment in MERS years ago, and it is now paying off with more diverse usage. We have built the launching pad for the digital future.

The post Here’s a look at the latest updates to the MERS eRegistry appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link


As banks and non-bank lenders recently released earnings for the first quarter of 2022, two things became clear: Origination volume plummeted across the board, but those that managed to muster up a good quarter benefited from servicing portfolios. As refinancing became less appealing, lenders also sold off a large portion of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), cut costs and diversified revenue stream to survive the mortgage storm.

Rocket Companies ($1 billion), United Wholesale Mortgage ($453.2 million) and Homepoint ($11.9 million) are among the non-bank lenders that benefited from the sale of MSRs, offsetting the decline in closed loan volume in the first quarter of 2022.

UWM, the nation’s largest wholesale lender, sold MSR on loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of about $56.6 billion for processes of about $656.7 million, according to the firm’s first quarter filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  

With mortgage rates surging, MSR prepayment speeds drop, a byproduct of diminished refinancing activity. That, in turn, amplifies the value of MSRs because they pay out over a longer period of time.

UWM’s first quarter earnings were led by a $172 million increase in the fair value of MSRs. UWM had $303.4 billion in the unpaid principal balance of MSRs as of March 31, 2022 compared to $221 billion exactly a year earlier.

Proceeds from the sale of MSRs for Detroit-based Rocket Companies, the parent company of Rocket Mortgage, totaled $254 million in the first quarter of 2022, up from $10.2 million during the same period in 2021. 

Rocket posted a 17% year-over-year increase of $546 billion in unpaid principal balance as of March 31 regarding its servicing book. Rocket has 2.6 million clients in the servicing portfolio and generates $1.4 billion annually in recurring servicing fee income, according to the firm. 

Homepoint reduced its servicing portfolio and completed sales of MSRs of single-family mortgage loans of about $434.5 million in the first three months of 2022. The firm said it generated $83.2 million from servicing mortgages during that period, up $64.8 million from the same quarter in 2021 and $74.4 million from the previous quarter. 

Other firms achieving a profitable first quarter by leaning on their servicing portfolios include California-based nonbank lender Pennymac ($173.6 million), nonbank mortgage lender and servicer New Residential Investment Corp. ($690 million), Mr. Cooper ($658 million) and Ocwen ($58 million). 

Without an abundance of refis, lenders also have been tasked with increasing purchase mortgage volume. Mortgage executives, consultants and loan officers had forecast that players who perform well with purchase mortgages – or in other words, get closer to the borrower – are better positioned in the downmarket.

Rocket posted $54 billion in closed loans from January to March, down from $75.8 billion in the previous quarter and $103.5 billion in 2021. The company’s purchase volume grew 43% year over year, but it represented only 16.7% of the lender’s total mix last year. 

“I’ve been very confident about our ability to grow purchases organically,” said Jay Farner, vice chairman and chief executive officer of Rocket Companies, during its earnings call. “That said, there are opportunities that may allow us to lean into the purchase market.” 

Analysts say Rocket has advantages in the purchase market as it does most of its business through consumer direct retail and is also the second-biggest lender in wholesale. Rocket originated about $113.5 billion in the broker channel last year, according to Inside Mortgage Finance. 

UWM originated $38.8 billion in mortgage loans in the first quarter of 2022, a 29.7% decrease compared to the previous quarter and a 20.8% decline year-over-year. Purchase loans grew 49% of the total origination volume in the first quarter of 2022 to $1.9 billion from 24.9% in the same period last year. 

Refi-heavy loanDepot had a tough three months reporting a net loss of $91.3 million in the first quarter; it expects to be in the red for the remainder of 2022.

Loan origination volume dropped 26% to $21.6 billion from the previous quarter, bringing the company’s market share down to 3.1%. The decrease in rate lock volume and gain-on-sale margin were responsible for the massive quarter-over-quarter decline, according to the firm.

“The increase in mortgage rates during the quarter happened much more quickly and sharply than anyone anticipated when the quarter began and resulted in significant and rapid decreases in profit margins,” said Anthony Hsieh, loanDepot’s founder and executive chairman, to analysts.  

Rate lock volume in the first three months of 2022 dropped 13.7% to $30 billion from $34.8 billion in the previous quarter. Gain-on-sale margin was down to 1.96% in the first quarter from 2.23% in the previous quarter.

The firm’s net loss of $68.4 million on the change in the fair value of its servicing rights didn’t help its first quarter performance. The unpaid principal balance of the servicing portfolio dropped to $153 billion as of the first quarter this year from $162 billion in the last quarter 2021. 

Two of the nation’s largest banks, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo & Co., reported double-digit declines in origination volume and net earnings, partially offset by strong performances in their respective servicing portfolios. 

Wells Fargo, the fourth-largest U.S. mortgage lender by volume, originated $37.9 billion in the first quarter of 2022, down 21% quarter over quarter and 27% year over year. The share of refinancings declined from 64% in the first quarter of 2021 to 56% in the same period of this year.

At JPMorgan, the fifth-biggest mortgage lender in the country, origination volume totaled $24.7 billion from January to March, a decline of 41% compared to the prior quarter, and down 37% in comparison with the first quarter of 2021.

“The mortgage origination market experienced one of its largest quarterly declines that I can remember, and it will take time for the industry to reduce excess capacity,” said Charlie Scharf, CEO of Wells Fargo, during its earnings call. 

While both banks saw about a 20% decline of revenue in home lending business, higher servicing revenue offset the decline in origination revenue. Wells Fargo’s mortgage servicing rights rose 13% to $8.5 billion in the first quarter of 2022 from $7.5 billion. JP Morgan’s servicing rights increased to $7.2 billion in the first quarter of 2022 from $4.4 billion in the same period last year. 

To manage business during the storm, headcount reductions were inevitable for some lenders. 

Finance of America Companies, which reported a $64 million loss in the first quarter, cut 598 jobs between March 2021 and March 2022. With refis expected to drop more in the second quarter, it will keep the headcount aligned with the volume of business, although specific details were not released. 

Pennymac announced layoffs of 236 employees in six California offices in March. Most of the reduced positions were specialists in home loans, including those with expertise in refinancing. 

Layoffs also were imminent at loanDepot, which did not offer details regarding a timeline or positions affected. 

“We are aggressively managing our cost structure to return to profitability by the end of the year,” said Patrick Flanagan, loanDepot’s chief financial officer. “We expect to achieve this goal by further reducing marketing expenses and personnel expenses through the addition of headcount reductions,” Flanagan added.

Navigating the downturn in a cyclical industry also meant lenders rolled out new products and services. 

In the third quarter of this year, loanDepot is rolling out its new home equity line of credit (HELOC) product for which customers can apply and be approved in as few as seven days. The product is within its mello business unit, which was launched in 2017 and operates side-by-side with loanDepot’s mortgage origination and servicing division.

In January, loanDepot announced it is bringing the servicing of the Federal Housing Administration, Department of Veterans’ Affairs and United States Department of Agriculture-funded Ginnie Mae loans in-house. The move leverages “ongoing investment in the firm’s servicing platform, allowing the company to scale for operational efficiency and enhanced customer service,” loanDepot execs said at the time. 

FoA is diversifying its portfolio beyond traditional mortgage products with the best performance in reverse originations for the quarter. The product’s funded volume increased from $1.32 billion in Q4 2021 to $1.47 billion in Q1 2022, up 12%. Compared to the same period in 2021, when the volume was $769 million, it increased 92%.

“Our reverse and commercial originations businesses faced pressures in the first quarter as rates and spreads rose at the fastest pace in decades; however, the pipeline for reverse and commercial originations continues to be strong,” said Patti Cook, CEO of FoA. “Our reverse pipeline has never been bigger, driven by strong home price appreciation over the past couple of years.”

The pandemic delivered banner years for the mortgage industry, which originated more than $4.3 trillion in volume in 2020 and $4.4 trillion in 2021, according to Black Knight. While purchase lending posted an all-time high of $1.7 trillion in 2021, the $2.7 trillion in refinance lending was below 2020 levels. 

The post Snapshot of lenders’ Q1 earnings: Profitable players leverage servicing portfolio against origination drop appeared first on HousingWire.



Source link