Multifamily real estate investing was almost impossible to break into over the past few years. Even those that had been in the field for decades were finding it challenging to get offers accepted or deals underwritten. Investors were throwing in almost unbelievable amounts of non-refundable earnest money, going well over asking price and analyzing deals at lightning speed, which often led to mistakes, not more money. But the tables have turned, and now, thanks to high interest rates, the buyer is in the driving seat.

And how could it be a multifamily episode without Andrew Cushman and Matt Faircloth? These two expert multifamily investors have been buying apartments for decades and helping others do the same! In this episode, Andrew and Matt break down what has gone on in the multifamily markets, why cap rates haven’t kept pace with interest rates, and what buyers can do now that sellers have lost most of their bargaining power. You’ll also get to hear their multifamily predictions for 2023, how far they expect prices to fall, and what you can do to start or scale your multifamily investing this year!

Then, Andrew and Matt take questions from the BiggerPockets forums and live Q&As with new multifamily investors. These topics range from property classes explained to raising private capital from investors (who aren’t your mom) and the risks and rewards of investing in smaller markets. Whether you’re interested in duplexes, triplexes, or two-hundred-unit apartment complexes, Andrew and Matt have answers for you!

Matt:
This is the Bigger Pockets podcast show number 711.

Andrew:
I feel like we’re going to see opportunities we haven’t seen in 10 years. When I look back at 2012, 2013 and 2014, my only regret is I didn’t buy more. I didn’t have the capability. My mom wrote my first check as a syndicator and then it took a long time to get everybody else to join in. So I’m looking at this now as this is coming up, probably starting mid 2023 is going to be the time to scoop up deals that otherwise were unobtainable for the last five, six, seven years. And for those listening who the last three years have been frustrating because you can’t get in the market because there’s no deals out there, the deals are coming. And then also, not to be morbid, but you’re going to have a lot less competition.

Matt:
Welcome everybody to the Bigger Pockets podcast. My name is Matt Faircloth and I am the co-host of the Bigger Pockets podcast. And I want to bring in one of my besties, one of my friends, the host of the Bigger Pockets podcast today. Not really the host, but you and I stole the microphone didn’t we Andrew? We stole the mic and we are now running the Bigger Pockets podcast. Who knows what’s going to come out of our mouths today, right?

Andrew:
Yeah. David went off to Mexico and left his link live and you and I are going to jump in and see what we can do.

Matt:
Oh, what could go wrong? It’s great. But quick Andrew, tell me how you are today.

Andrew:
I am good. I am staying positive and testing negative.

Matt:
Can I steal that?

Andrew:
Yeah, give me credit the first time and the rest of the time it’s yours.

Matt:
Okay, cool. If we’re going to be stealing the microphone, do you promise me you’ll have lots of awesome Andrew Kushman analogies and cool straight faced humors and David Greene analogies as well we can use throughout the show?

Andrew:
Yeah, I’ll do my best. I’m a little nervous filling in for the Green and I forgot to put on my tank top so I’ll channel him as best as I can.

Matt:
No way I’m filling those shoes but I’m happy to hold his microphone for him just for a second here.

Andrew:
Sounds like a good plan.

Matt:
Andrew, before we get going, there is an awesome thing that happens at the beginning of every Bigger Pockets podcast. You and I know because you’ve probably listened to 710 episodes of it, you and I both. So let us get going with the quick tip.

Andrew:
Quick tip. I’m actually going to go rogue on you and give you two, right? Since I’m not wearing my tank top, I’ll have to make up for it.

Matt:
Hey, it’s our microphone today man. Give it.

Andrew:
So first of all, we’re going to reference an article that Paul Moore wrote for Bigger Pockets on the blog. If you’re listening and you haven’t read that article, go back to November 15th and read it. It’s going to give a lot more background on what we’re talking about and then lots of other important stuff for today’s market. Second of all, some of the stuff we’re going to talk about might sound a bit gloomy, but that’s really not the case. That’s the farthest thing from the truth. We’re going to talk about risks and how the markets are shifting and is our pricing going down? That’s all stuff that should be exciting for you if you’re getting started in 2023 or looking to scale your business. So now is the time to be greedy when others are fearful. So don’t let what we’re talking about scare you off. Use it to get excited about diving into all the resources that Bigger Pockets has so that you can learn and scale and grow your business.

Matt:
Double the tip. There it is. Thank you so much Andrew. I appreciate that man. Let’s get into the market man. Let’s talk about the current market status. What do you think, you want to go?

Andrew:
Yeah, let’s do it. There’s lots to talk about.

Matt:
I’m in, following you.

Andrew:
All right, Matt, welcome to 2023. We are in a rapidly changing market. It’s funny, Paul Moore put out a great article back in November addressing some things that we’re seeing now. What are your thoughts on what’s going on out there?

Matt:
I didn’t get a chance to read the article yet and you and I are both friends with Paul Moore and I’ve heard a lot of great things about the article. I’ve actually seen some people referencing it. And yes, absolutely things are changing it seems like daily as well. So what did you get out of the article? Tell me about it.

Andrew:
There’s a lot in there. We could spend a whole hour on it, but I’d say the most important if I were to condense it into one sentence is that interest rates are higher than cap rates. And for those who are listening, it’s like okay, well so what? That’s a big problem, and that’s a huge problem. We haven’t seen that in the last 10 years and maybe even for multiple decades. The reason that’s a problem is it creates negative leverage. So what it means is if you’re buying, let’s say a million dollar 10 unit property and it produces a net operating income of $50,000 a year, that’s a 5% cap rate, a 5% yield, and you go borrow money at 6% in order to do that, you are losing money by borrowing to obtain that asset.
So let’s pretend you bought it all cash and you’re getting a 5% yield and then let’s pretend, to make it simple, you get 100% financing instead at 6%. Your annual debt service is 60,000, but your yield is 50,000. You have a built-in operating loss just on your debt of $10,000 a year. That’s a problem. If interest rates are higher than cap rates, it screws up the market big time. And just for the listeners who are like, whoa, hold on, slow down Andrew. NOI cap rates, you’re tossing these terms around. Cap rate stands for capitalization rate. It is basically the unleveraged yield on a property. So I mentioned buying it all cash. A cap rate is you buy a million dollar property, it produces a $50,000 net operating income. 50,000 divided by a million is 5%, the cap rate is 5%. Net operating income is basically kind of just what it sounds like. It’s your gross revenue minus your operating expenses. And then that is what is left over to pay the debt. And so when that NOI is less than the debt, that creates a huge problem.
So how does this resolve? There’s a handful of things that can resolve it. Number one, interest rates would have to go back down. They peaked a couple of months ago at four and a quarter and then dropped 80 basis points. Who knows where they’re going to go now? I left my crystal ball in my pocket and it went through the wash so it’s permanently foggy. I’m not going to pretend that I can predict where interest rates are going to go. So interest rates could go back down. NOI could go up. If you can increase rent and increase that NOI, then you can overcome to some degree the fact that the cost of debt is higher, or prices could come down. My personal thought, Matt, is that it’s going to be a combination of all three of those things, but I would like to toss it to you and see where you think we’re headed here in 2023.

Matt:
I also put my crystal ball in the shop and I can’t seem to get it out. They won’t give it back to me. So what the future will hold, I don’t know, but I’ll tell you what investors like you and I can control. We can control an OI. We can control pushing revenue on properties. That’s one factor that’s in our favor. Okay, what I know is going to happen, I don’t know, but what I think is probably something different. So what I think is going to happen is something like… Rates have gone up drastically, a lot more than a lot of people thought. Are they going to go up at that rate of acceleration again? I don’t think so. I think we maybe are getting towards the top of the ceiling. I don’t think they’re going to come back down. And so I think that if rates stay up like this Andrew, it’s going to force cap rates to go up a little bit.
And so cap rates are going to come up, rates maybe creep down a little bit but it’s still going to be in the five, six, seven range, somewhere in there to borrow money I think for the foreseeable future. I just think that is what it is. So that’s what I predict is going to happen. And I think that on both sides, the buyers and sellers and investors, because you and I both work a lot with investors, limited partner investors, all three are going to have to get more realistic and everybody’s going to have to take a deep breath and settle down and realize that this is no longer a seller puts a for sale sign on the front of their property and they get 10 bids.
This is likely not going to be the future of what we’re going into. I think that sellers are going to have to get realistic, buyers are going to get a little more strength in their voice in what they can command from a seller, and thirdly Andrew, I think investors are going to learn to get more patient. I can tell you that the scenario you gave on cap rates and interest rates is all valid. But what the truth of the matter is people likely don’t buy a property either free and clear or 100% financed. What they do is they buy it with some sort of an equity check that gets left in there. And if cap rates are lower than interest rates, as you said, there’s no money left in the property and most importantly, there’s no money left to go to the equity side, whether that’s LP investors or folks writing a check out of their own pocket to go to the property.
So the property’s either not going to cash flow very much, talking like low single digit rates of return either for investors or for the owner direct. And that means that the equity’s going to need to be a little more patient if you’re buying a big value add property that is going to cash for a little bit in the beginning and then make more money in the long term. I believe the world of producing a six to 7% guaranteed aka preferred rate of return for investors right under the gate when you buy a property may go away all completely or it may change drastically. Because if you’re going to buy a property today, likely it’s not going to produce any cash flow at all if a little bit, but certainly not enough to pay a six or 7% preferred return.

Andrew:
Yeah, you’re absolutely right. All these changes and shifts are affecting different market participants in different ways. So like sellers that I talked to, or I mean, Matt, you and I are both in different multi-family masterminds and we either know or have heard stories of sellers who they’re having trouble making the mortgage payments because they had an adjustable rate loan that has gone from three and a half to seven and a half. And yes, some people have caps on it, meaning it hits a certain level and it doesn’t go up anymore. But lots of others don’t, and they have watched their mortgage payments double or even two and a half sometimes triple in the last six months, and that’s creating financial stress for sellers. Also on the flip side, sellers who aren’t having trouble paying the mortgage or have fixed rate debt, it’s slowing volume down because they’re just sitting back going, well, I’m not going to sell in this market. I want to get the price I got in January of 2022 and no one’s offering me that so I’m not going to sell my property.
It’s kind of like the kid at the playground who’s just like, that’s it, I’m taking my toys and I’m leaving. They’re out of the game. They’re going to sit there and wait and they’re not motivated to sell because operations are still really good. That’s another kind of weird aspect of this market is the distress out there is financial, it’s not operations. Now some select sub-sectors in some markets could see operational distress going forward, especially if we get into a real recession with real job losses. But at the beginning of 2023, the distress is being caused by the financial markets, not operations. And as an investor evaluating potential acquisitions, that’s a key thing to look into.
Why is the property distressed? Is it because the market here is terrible or is it because the owner made a mistake, put the wrong kind of debt on there and now they’ve got to get out of this and it’s an opportunity for you as a new investor to get started by picking up a killer property in a killer location that otherwise would not have traded if the debt markets hadn’t shifted? So if you can’t tell, this stuff is getting me excited because I feel like we’re going to see opportunities we haven’t seen in 10 years. When I look back at 2012, 2013 and 2014, my only regret is I didn’t buy more. I didn’t have the capability. My mom wrote my first check as a syndicator and then it took a long time to get everybody else to join in. So I’m looking at this now as this is coming up, probably starting mid 2023 is going to be the time to scoop up deals that otherwise were unobtainable for the last five, six, seven years.
And for those listening who the last three years have been frustrating because you can’t get in the market because there’s no deals out there, the deals are coming. And then also, not to be morbid, but you’re going to have a lot less competition. I already know of sponsors who are closing up shop because their deals have imploded and the equity is gone and they’re out of the business. The beauty of starting out now is you don’t have that baggage. You can come in at a fresh bottom, low point in the cycle, take advantage of these opportunities, not have 27 people bidding against you and build the foundation of a great business. Wealth is made in the downturns. In five to seven years from now, anyone who accumulates properties the next two or three years is probably going to be sitting pretty.

Matt:
Love it. It’s a great time to get started. It’s a great time to be a new investor in this market and it’s a great time to be established as well if you made the right decisions coming into this place.

Andrew:
So looking forward, Matt, I’m curious as to what you’re seeing this year. To me, I think the Feds, they’re going to at least pause, right? And I think just doing that will open up the market a little bit because right now when the Fed’s raising rates 75 basis points every other month, no one knows how to underwrite. What’s my exit cap going to be? What’s my interest rate going to be? So at least when it pauses, everyone can kind of take a breath and say, okay, what are the rules now? How do I underwrite? I think that’s going to loosen up the market. Two, we already talked about. There’s going to be motivated sellers, people who can’t make their mortgage payments, unfortunately. So that’s going to bring some deals to the table. And by the way, those deals aren’t going to go to the highest bidder, they’re going to go to the buyer or the investor who can offer the most surety of clothes.
So again, that’s something else we’re looking for is not paying the highest price but being the most savvy buyer, that’s going to get deals going forward. And that’s another thing that’s been really tough lately. So we talked about competition’s going to drop, there’s going to be more motivated sellers because people can’t make the payments. We’re unfortunately already seeing that. And then my guess is going to be we will probably see pricing off anywhere from 15 to 30% from the peak, and I would call the peak maybe January of 2022.
So I’ll give you a perfect example. We put in an offer on a property this week that when we first started talking to the seller at the beginning of 2022, they wanted 220 a unit and at the beginning of 2023, we’re now talking 165 a unit. The property is still running really well and it’s in a great market. However, the pricing expectations have come down and could they come down a little bit more? Yes they could. Can any of us perfectly time the bottom? No we can’t. So the key is to go buy properties that are in great locations and cashflow well so that five to seven years from now we look like stinking geniuses. So that’s kind of my thought and my plan for 2023. Matt, you disagree or what would you add to that?

Matt:
Well, I’m not sure if I want to look like a stinking genius. I mean, that’s just not-

Andrew:
Maybe a regular genius.

Matt:
Yeah, just a regular. Can I be a good smelling genius? You can be the stinking genius. Is that okay? Your [inaudible 00:16:02].

Andrew:
All right, fine.

Matt:
Yeah. Okay good. So I agree. I don’t know if I agree with the 30% and that’s only because I think that a lot of properties out there that are legacy holds that have been out there forever, a lot of multi-families been held for generations by people. So I think that those that bought properties in the last say three to five years are going to be in a position to need to sell because of debt that’s graduating or debt that’s gone up or because they just can’t refinance anymore or whatever it may be. But I don’t think that it’s going to be blood in the streets like it was in 2007, 2008. I don’t correlate the two things. I think what you’re going to have is sellers are going to need to get more realistic with their numbers.
And I think that for the longest time, Andrew, it’s been this seller’s market. That’s it. And when you go to buy a multifamily property, it’s like you’re going to prom. You’ve got to get your best suit on, you got to do your hair and everything. You’ve got to wave your hands in the air to get the attention and everything like that, and it’s you and 17 of your best friends bidding on a multifamily property. Some buyers may get a little skittish and go away, but I think that the buyer conversation between buyer and seller is going to become more give and take. We’re looking at a property right now. Believe it or not, we’re actually looking to buy a multi-family property right now, Andrew. We’re looking at a deal and for the first time that I’ve ever seen it in the last five years anyway, there’s no concept called money hard day one. I’ll explain what that is.

Andrew:
Oh, beautiful thing that’s going away.

Matt:
It is, it’s going away and that never should have been a thing. Again, you had said before, you get two things in real estate when you’re making an offer, you get price or you get terms. Money hard day one is a term that gets negotiated in the purchase of real estate. What it means is if I’m buying a property and it’s a million dollar 10 unit multi-family property or something like that, I may lay down, say 50K is my earnest money deposit and they’re going to go get a mortgage beyond that or whatever. So I’m going to have to bring more to closing, but that earnest money deposit is something that goes along with a contract that shows I’m serious and here’s my money and if I do something wrong that’s outside of this contract, the seller may have the right under certain terms to claim that money. Likely through a court action, but they may have the right to claim that money.
And this happens in small real estate transactions and buying a three bedroom, two bath, you might write a check for $5,000 as your earnest money deposit or something like that. Bigger multi-family properties have bigger numbers that go for earnest money deposit. What money hard day one means is that a certain percent of that money, and sometimes in more aggressive markets all of it, is nonrefundable the day you sign the contract. Here’s the problem with that, Andrew. You don’t know what you’re getting yourself into. And that’s why there’s a concept called due diligence. Like Andrew’s got a 10 unit apartment building or a 30 unit or a 300 unit for sale, the buyer needs to have time to get their head around this thing to make sure that what I’m buying is what this seller told me it is, meaning seller says, yeah, my roofs are in good shape, all my sewer lines are in good shape, all my tenants are paying their rent and there’s only this much vacancy or whatever it is.
All the factors that the seller states, the buyer should have a period of time to go and validate those things. It’s called due diligence and the buyer should have the right to confirm. What money hard day one means is that, say it’s a $50,000 deposit, 10k of that or more is, oh, you found that my sewer lines were crushed or that my roof was leaking or that my vacancies was higher than I said it was. So sorry, I get to keep that money hard. And it was there in more aggressive seller markets to hold that seller and buyer to closing and to make the transaction happen. But as we’re normaling out the playing field, it was never a fair thing to begin with. Do you agree Andrew? It never should have been in the contract to begin with, but it’s been the way the game was played so we had to do it begrudgingly. But now I believe it’s going to go away personally.

Andrew:
It’s starting to, and for everybody listening, rejoice that the risk of hard money should hopefully not be something that you have to worry about anymore. And I love all of what you said, Matt. And something else I would add for those who are starting to evaluate properties, and this is again, not something we had to worry about as much in the previous 10 years, but look at your debt service coverage ratio. And Matt, I’m going to push back on you just a little because I think this, unless rates change dramatically, I think this is one of the things that’s going to lead to probably a temporary decline in prices is that when the cost of debt goes from let’s say three and a half to six or six and a half percent, the income coming off that property is no longer there to make the mortgage payment.
And so the lender’s going to say, well at 3%, at three and a half percent, I could have given you a million dollar loan, but at six and a half percent I can only give you 550,000. Sorry. It is what it is. And so then as a buyer, you go to the seller and say, well look, my lenders only going to give me 550. I’m only going to offer you 700 instead of a million. So I think that is going to be a piece of what’s going to lead to some decline in select properties in markets. Again, people who have had generational properties with low leverage, they’re not going to accept that. They’re just going to hold on. But there’s going to be some motivated people that have to sell.
And speaking of generational properties, Matt, I want everyone listening, keep in mind, this is a long game. It’s been a really, really popular business model, especially with syndicators for the last five years to do the whole two to three year buy it, do a quick fix up, flip it out and sell it in a short period of time, two to three years. That business model isn’t dead, but I’d say it’s going into hibernation for the short term. That is not going to be anywhere near as easy as it was in a rapidly rising market. When we’re looking at properties now, we’re looking at five, seven, 10 year hold times. And I would add on top of that, if you’re buying for your own portfolio and you’re going to hold for 15 or 20 years, what’s happening today, you’re not even going to remember it when you get 15 to 20 years down the road.
That property is going to be worth a whole lot more than it is today and you’re going to be glad that you bought it, especially if you buy the right property in the right location, good demographics, some of the things we’ve talked about in previous episodes. And then Matt, just to clarify, you’re talking about hard money. You’re referring to the non-refundable deposits, right? So the minute you put that into escrow, even if you find out that the seller is lying to you, the roof’s bad and half the place is vacant, they get to keep your deposit.

Matt:
They can try to, yeah. And remember, it’s a court action. The check actually doesn’t get written to them. It goes to a third party escrow and that escrow company can’t release it without both parties permissions and if both parties don’t get permission, then it’s got to go through court action. So it’s not as simple as it sounds, but yes, in the contract it will say that that money becomes the property of the seller if for any reason the buyer decides that they don’t want to do the deal. But just I think that things sway back towards the middle and I think that that’s what I believe the pendulum is going to swing towards. And you’re right about properties being debt yield restricted where you used to be able to borrow 80% loan to value for a multifamily. You did, even 75, 80% loan to value if you wanted to.
Now the best you’re going to get because rates are higher is 55, 60, 65% loan to value. That means you’ve got to raise more equity to go into your deal and that means you can borrow less, which is maybe a little conservative way to look at it, but if your equity investors are looking for a six or 7% rate of return on a deal that’s selling at a 4.5% capitalization rate, guess what? You can’t give them that rate of return. It’s just that the money, just the numbers aren’t there to pay a rate of return on properties. We’ve looked at deals that are producing like one to 2% cash on cash return for us and me and the investors have to split that, right? We have to carve that up from there. There’s just not enough yield to pay investors a reasonable rate of return. So I think that, as I said before, that everybody’s got to get more reasonable, buyers, sellers and our investors.

Andrew:
All right. So Matt, you mentioned you’re out making offers, you’re in the thick of it, you’re not on the sidelines. What are you doing that the rest of us and that everybody listening can duplicate or learn from or do to prepare to either start from scratch or start scaling in 2023?

Matt:
Well, the worst thing that somebody could do right now, Andrew, is sit on their hands and wait for things to change, right?

Andrew:
Yeah, agreed.

Matt:
I have young kids as you do and I read them the Oh, the Places You’ll Go! sometimes. And that book talks about a place called the waiting place where you’re waiting on a phone to ring, waiting on a train to come, waiting on this, waiting on that. Life continues to pass you by if you wait. Those that want to make things happen are going to get ahead of the curve and get out there and maintain relationships with brokers. Don’t just wait for prices to drop before you start calling brokers. What you can do now is to initiate, build or even just maintain broker relationships. Call brokers up. Hey, I’m Joe, I’m Jane, I’m looking to buy and I’m waiting on the right deal and this is what I’m looking for. Whatever it is.
Obviously don’t tell me you’re waiting on the market to crash before you buy a deal. They’re not going to want to hear that. But you can use the time now to build and deepen relationships with brokers and also with investors. Stay in communication with your investors. Your investors are going to forget about you if you don’t communicate with them on a regular basis. Even if you don’t have a deal, that’s okay. Call them, check in, call them and wish them a happy holidays. Send them a holiday card, send them a newsletter as we do. Stay in regular communication with people so they know that you’re there and that when a good deal comes up from that broker that you’ve maintained or built a relationship with, you’ve got an investor pool that’s there to hop in. The last thing you want to do is to have to rebuild your business.
When the great deal that Andrew and I are talking about shows up in three or four months, you don’t have to rebuild or restart your airplane engine to get it off the ground again. You want to be rip roaring and ready to go with investors lined up with debt that you’ve been maintaining relationship with and position and with brokers that are willing to give you the first look at those great deals when they show up.

Andrew:
Yeah. And I mean, that’s a whole other episode that we could spend diving into that. And for everyone listening, I want to reiterate what Matt said about not sit around and waiting. Waiting and sitting on the fence does nothing for you but hurt your crotch. I mean, now is the time to streamline your systems, build your team, add investors, and that’s what we are doing in our business. It’s slow right now. So we’re going back through, we’re cleaning up simple things like cleaning up our file systems so our team spends less time going, wait, wait, where’d that document go? We’re getting ready to hire another person, add to the team. Like wait, you’re hiring in a downturn? Yes, now is the time to find the best people and get them trained so when the deals come, you’re ready to jump on them like Matt said. And we’re still out there looking at a lot of deals and we’re talking with new lenders, we’re looking at new markets and we’re evaluating new… Well, not new but creative or different ways to buy properties, right?
BRRRR is coming back. When I started this in 2012 or 2011, we’d buy properties all cash, we’d get them running great and then we’d refinance it and give investors 100% of their money back. The last five years, we’re lucky to give investors 25% of their money back at refinance because we had to pay so much in the beginning. In this market, one way to eliminate interest rate risk is to go find a 10 unit for 500,000, raise 700,000, buy it all cash, fix it up, and then two or three years from now when the debt markets are hopefully improved, refinance it, give your investors all their money back and now you’ve got an asset that you can just sit there in cash flow with basically no risk. Those kind of opportunities are coming back.
We’re also looking at seller financing. That’s coming back. Assumptions are coming back, longer term holds. There’s no such thing as a bad market, just bad strategies. So think beyond the quick three year I’m going to buy this, fix it and sell it. Look at alternate ways to buy, alternate ways to finance and longer hold times and that can make for great deals to be found. And that’s kind of the quick version of what we’re doing in 2023.

Matt:
I love that. We’re hiring too and we are cautiously making bids on deals that makes sense to us. And I’m kind of having to straight face offer somebody 80% of what they’re asking and it is what it is. And I find that properties are still in the market. There’s one that the guy was asking 125,000 a unit on and he laughed at us when we offered them 115, and then they came back to us, they said, “Hey, is that 115 number still good?” And we looked at it and guess what? Rates had gone up a little bit since then. So we’re now talking to a manager at 105. And so there are still deals to be made, there are still conversations to be had in that. And one more thing that we’re doing on top of everything Andrew said, we’re doing a lot of that as well and I love the BRRRR is back stuff. That’s awesome.
The one thing we’re doing as well, and I know we’re talking multi-family today Andrew, but guess what? There are actually other real estate properties you can buy. They’re, believe it or not, Andrew, not multi-family apartment buildings.

Andrew:
That’s blasphemy.

Matt:
There are other kinds of real estate. So we’re looking at diversification for us and our investors in other asset classes such as Flex Industrial. Believe it or not, we’re looking at hotels. And not like swanky, boujee, boutique hotels. I’m talking about a courtyard Marriott like I’m standing in right now. Those kinds of things. We’re looking at that. We’re looking at unanchored retail. Not that we want to lead multi-family. Multi-family is where my heart and soul is, but I also want to be able to offer things to our investors that make fiscal sense. And while I’m waiting a bit for multi-family to start making more fiscal sense, we’re going to keep making bids, but we’re also going to be looking at other asset classes to diversify a bit so that our investors can diversify so that we can diversify too.

Andrew:
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense and I see a lot of operators doing that. And especially if you can kind of dovetail things together. A lot of times self storage right next to a multi-family, there’s a lot of cross pollination there that can work really well. And we’ve actually acquired apartment complexes that had some self-storage onsite and that’s a whole other revenue stream. And so if you’ve got that self-storage skill or tool in your tool belt, there’s ways to bring those two things together and like you said Matt, diversify a bit.

Matt:
Absolutely. Absolutely. And not that multi-family is not the core in that, but it doesn’t have to be the end, it doesn’t have to be the everything.

Andrew:
All right Matt, well that was a fun market discussion. I always love diving into that, especially with you. So I want to throw out a couple of my goals for 2023 and then I’d love to hear what yours are and then maybe we can see if we can help out some listeners and talk about some of theirs. So I know what I’m looking to do in 2023 is hopefully make four to eight significant acquisitions. That’s market dependent, they have to be great deals. But assuming the market shifts like we talked about, we’re looking to pick up hopefully four to eight.
We’re also looking to add a team member or two because if we add that many deals, we’re going to need more bandwidth to do a good job asset managing them. And then we’re looking to actually expand markets. Right now we’re in Georgia in North Florida and whenever people ask me where do you invest? I say Georgia, North Florida in the Carolinas, but we currently don’t own anything in the Carolinas. We’ve sold everything we had in Texas a couple years ago. We’re going to refocus that energy on the Carolinas and try to expand into markets and put some of the principles that we talked about into play and execute on those. So curious, Matt, are you similar or what are you up to?

Matt:
Yeah. Well, just as you said, we’re hiring. We’re going to hire two key folks this year. We’re going to be hiring a marketing director whose job is to get us eyeballs and get us attention and do super creative stuff and whatnot on online socials and things like that. Also, we are lucky enough to own a few multi-family properties in North Carolina so we want to expand there as you do as well. So come on and be my neighbor, it’s great. The water’s fine, come on in. We also want to hire an asset manager in North Carolina that can be regionally focused in the state that can go to the properties we have on a regular basis and make sure business plans being upheld in that. It’s great to have acquisition and capital goals and marketing goals, but above all else we want to take what we have performing and keep it performing and tighten up.
And as the market changes and things like that, it becomes more important to make sure the boats you have are floating properly. And so we are installing KPI programs and performance metrics and things like that into what we own already, which is already thousands of units of multi-family. But we’re going to keep that running well and it’s important whether you own thousands of units of multi-family or you own one property, it is very important to keep what you have running well. Too many times people focus on acquisitions goals and you and I just talked about that too, so we’re just in the same boat. But you should also talk about setting goals about performance of what you currently have. And so we’re going to be setting performance metrics and goals for our current portfolio just to keep it running healthy because that’s really what matters the most is what you already own, not what you’re going to buy but what you own already.

Andrew:
You know what? Man, that’s my mantra. I actually forgot to mention that. So that’s what we’re doing while things are slow. We are getting better at implementing EOS, we’re becoming better asset managers, we’re putting those systems in place, we’re doing additional training for everybody involved and as you said, making sure that the boats you already have are in really, really good shape.

Matt:
EOS, traction, quick plug. You and I are both raving fans of that book and it’s important for small and large sized businesses as well. And we’ll throw one more thing out about goals up by the way Andrew. If someone just happens to be listening to this episode and it’s not January and it’s like, oh okay, it’s not New Years so I don’t have to set goals, guess what? There’s actually not a rule. There’s not a law that says that you can only set goals on January 1st. You’re actually allowed to set a goal anytime. You can set a goal on December 31st, December 1st, or on your birthday, whatever it is. Anytime is a good time to make a goal or to set a hurdle for yourself. Go pick up Brandon Turner’s 90-day intention journal and use tools like that to help you meet that goal over a 90-day program whenever you decide you want to plant that flag and make it. You don’t have to say, oh, I can’t set a goal today because it’s not New Years yet. You don’t have to do that.

Andrew:
I thought once you hit February 2nd and it was Groundhog Day, you were doomed to just repeat that year for the rest of the year and then you couldn’t set any new goals.

Matt:
Right. If you haven’t taken [inaudible 00:36:06] on your goals by February 2nd by Groundhog’s Day, then you’ve got to be like Bill Murray and live that day over and over again. That’s the rule, right? So Andrew, listen, talking about mine and your goals, we need to help people achieve what they’re looking to manifest for their goals as well. So lots of folks have pumped in tons of questions on multifamily on the awesome Bigger Pockets forum. Quick plug by the way, quick tip, put questions in the Bigger Pockets forum because you never know where those questions are going to go, including right here on the Bigger Pockets podcast. So there are awesome questions here on the Bigger Pockets forums that I’d like to take a minute and go through with you. Are you down? Are you ready?

Andrew:
Oh, I love answering questions. Let’s do it.

Matt:
All right, let’s speed round some of these. Ready? Let’s go.

Andrew:
I’m going to pull a couple of questions and if you haven’t gone in there and posted questions yourself, please go do that. Let’s see, we’re going to start with this one right here. Question is, how do I confidently assess property class from out of state and how do I align my business strategy to the property class? Quick definition, when somebody is talking about property class, they’re often referring to A, B, C, and D. A is kind of the nice new shiny stuff. B is kind of more your working class people who can either rent or buy but are choosing to rent. C tends to be someone who might be a renter for life. They can’t afford to do anything but rent. They’re employed, they have good jobs, but they’re kind of in that workforce housing. And then D is often kind of referred to as if you’re going to be collecting rent in person, you might want to pack heat to do that. So it tends to be kind of the higher crime, much rougher, much older properties.
So that’s what they’re asking about when they talk about class. How do you assess that from out of state and how do you align your business strategy with it? Well, the first thing is go read David Greene’s long distance real estate investing. It is geared towards single family investment businesses. However, the same principles apply to multi-family in terms of how to operate a long distance real estate business. Building teams, selecting markets, doing due diligence, all of those kind of things. Now, when I am looking at a new market or even a sub market that I haven’t owned in, there’s a long checklist of things that I go through to do this very thing, to figure out, well, what class property is it and what’s the class of the neighborhood?
So one of the main things that I check is the median income, right? Higher median income is going to lend itself to more A and B class properties. Lower median income is going to be more C or possibly D. And you might ask, well Andrew, what’s the cutoff? That’s going to vary depending on what state you’re in. Some parts of California, $120,000 a year is poverty level. In Georgia, that’s an A class neighborhood. So you need to look at all the areas around your property, get a sense of what the spectrum is, and if you’re on the high end of the spectrum, you’re probably A, B. If you’re on the low end of the spectrum, you’re probably C and D. Also, look at year of construction. If it’s built in 2000 or newer, it’s probably B or A. If it’s built 1980 to 2000, that’s probably a solid B. If it’s 1960 to 1980, you’re probably looking at a C class property and if it’s older than that, it could be C or D depending on the neighborhood.
Look at relative rent levels. We talked about earlier, if you’re looking at a suburb of Atlanta, for example, and the median income ranges from 40,000 to 75,000, you’re going to see a similar pattern with rent. If you look at all of the apartments in that market, you’ll see, well, some two bedrooms are renting for 800 and other two bedrooms are renting for 1600 or 1800. Well, odds are the ones at the bottom of that spectrum that are renting for 800, that’s probably your class C property. And then if you look the property up, oh, it’s built in 1975, oh, okay, that’s another data point, probably a C class property. Then you’re going to look at the amenities. If it doesn’t have a pool, if it doesn’t have a playground, if it doesn’t have a dog park, that’s probably C or B because most A class properties are going to have fitness centers and grilling stations and pools and are going to be highly amenitized. So the more amenities, the more likely it’s class A. The less amenities, you’re getting down the spectrum, B, C, possibly D.
I would also evaluate the neighbors. So if you look at your property and then you jump into Google Street View and you take the yellow man and drive around and you see brand new retail or a nice new Sprouts or Whole Foods or Kroger, you’re probably in a B or an A neighborhood. If you see old kind of rundown strip mall centers with a cigar shop and a tattoo parlor and eyebrow threading and all this fun stuff, that’s probably class C. So again, that’s another data point. When you’re trying to figure out is this class A? Is this class B? Is this Class C? One of the frustrating things about it, especially as a new investor, is you can’t turn to page 365 of a book and figure out, oh, here’s what it is. It’s a spectrum. It’s a little bit vague. And so what I’m trying to do is give you the data points that we use to figure that out.
And then finally talk to other property managers and lenders and other people who know that market and they can give you a tremendous amount of insight. The best thing of course is to hop on a plane or get in the car and go drive to that market yourself. It’s amazing what you can gain with the internet in long distance these days. It is so different than it was 10 years ago, but nothing beats being there in person. So if you’re going to invest in a market, make sure you at least get out there once so you have a real good feel of it. So that’s kind of the short version of what I would do. Matt, have you got anything else that you would add on top of that?

Matt:
Andrew, every time that you answer a question before me, I find myself saying, I agree with Andrew because everything you said was so thorough, right? I really agree. I mean, honestly. And I love the end, I’m like, do I have a cigar shop or a tattoo parlor near any of my properties? I may, but what I’ll say on top of all that is that you the listener need to decide which angle of attack you want to get yourself into. There is more money to be made ever, but you’re going to have thick skin to do it is to buy underperforming really, really poorly run D class property where Andrew said you might have to wear a sidearm to go collect rent and turn that into a C or a B class property. Not everyone has the skin for that. Not everyone wants to take the risk, enormous, enormous 10 pounds of risk that it would take to take down a property like that.
So if you do not have the chops and the business plan and the team to do a D to a B or a D to a C conversion, then that’s not the right business plan for you. Everything Andrew said is correct in identifying property classes and determining neighborhoods, but you as the investor then need to figure out which business plan works for you. Do you want to set it and forget it? Maybe make a lot less cash flow, but that could be class A or class B for you. Maybe there’s small little tweaks in the business plan you can do over the years to make the property make more and more money and hold it for a really long period of time. So maybe higher class properties are the right fit for you. It really just has to do with what risk factors you’re willing to take on and the team that you can bring to the table.

Andrew:
Philip Hernandez, welcome to the Bigger Pockets podcast. How are you doing, sir?

Philip:
I’m doing well. I am super stoked to be here. Yeah, thank you so much, Andrew.

Andrew:
You are part of the inaugural group of the Bigger Pockets mentee program.

Philip:
Yes, sir.

Andrew:
And you’re here with a few questions that hopefully we can help out with today. Is that correct?

Philip:
Yeah, that’s right. Yeah, no, super stoked and thank you guys so much for your time. So as I’ve been reaching out to brokers and developing relationships with different brokers in markets that I have a good sense of how things should look, I have had a couple times those same brokers send me deals in smaller cities in MSAs, like tertiary markets with less than 50,000 people. And I don’t have any presence there. I don’t have any connections, I don’t really know anybody there. But when I run the numbers, it works. The deal works. But I’m also like, okay, I have no idea what I don’t know. So what would a deal have to look like for you to invest in a tertiary market where you don’t necessarily have a presence and how would you mitigate the risk of taking an opportunity like that? And yeah, let’s assume everything looks good about it, people are moving there, there’s diverse jobs, the property’s in decent condition. Yeah.

Andrew:
First off, tell me about this market because I want to know where it is. So we could do a whole podcast on this. I’ll try to just hit bullet point, real high level. Number one, I have passed on many opportunities like that because of the challenges of small markets. So keep that in mind. One good asset in property management is where the money is really made and that is one of the biggest challenges that you have in those small markets. Some of these challenges are why those properties look so good on paper because the prices are lower because of the challenges that are inherent with those types of properties in those markets. So not only are you going to have more trouble getting good management, you’re also going to have trouble getting contractors and vendors and staff and all of those kind of things.
But your question wasn’t hey Andrew, what are the problems I’m going to have? It was, how do I fix that? Right? So number one, like I said, in many cases I just pass even if it looks great on paper because sometimes the juice just isn’t worth the squeeze. Second of all, if I am considering doing it, I might say, well who can I partner with that solves these problems? Is there somebody else I can partner with that already has a presence in this market that knows the market, can just move this property into their current portfolio and manage it better than anybody else out there? If you can do that, that can turn a weakness into a tactical advantage. I have seen people do that very thing, go into markets that are fragmented and that they don’t have a presence in, find someone who is just local and knows that market inside and out, partner with them and all of a sudden they’ve got an advantage that just no one else has.
And then another question that I would ask is, how is the current owner managing it? And if they’re doing it well try to copy what they’re doing. If they’re not doing it well go look at all the other properties in town, find the ones that are the most well run, and either try to hire those people, maybe it’s the same management company, or contact the owners and say, hey, can I partner with you? Maybe there’s an opportunity there. That would probably be the biggest thing I would recommend is find some local connection, partner or advantage to help mitigate those risks and then that return might actually have a higher chance of actually coming true.

Matt:
So yet again, everything that Andrew said I agree with. And to expand on that, when my company DeRosa invests in a market… And this is why I wouldn’t do the deal you’re talking about Philip. So the short answer is no, I wouldn’t do that deal because we invest in markets first, and that’s for everything Andrew said. Labor, access to… Everything from the contractor that’s going to turn units over and upgrade them for me to the workforce that’s going to live in the property, access to jobs, those kinds of things, to the property manager themselves. You don’t want them commuting an hour to your property from where they personally live to your property. You want them to live in a reasonable sized metro, that there’s middle income housing for them to live in, that they can come to your property to work for your property as well.
So for those reasons, I wouldn’t do the deal. And above all else, when we invest in markets, it’s market first. And the reason for that is so that I can buy not one, not two, three properties, three multi-families in a market that we can expand. I mean, our goal is to get to at least a thousand units in every market. And that doesn’t have to be your goal, but you should never look at a deal and say, I want to do that one deal in this market. If you can’t see yourself doing at least another 10 deals in that market, if there’s just not the inventory to do 10 more deals, or if you’re not sure if you believe in the market that much to invest 10 more times in the market, I wouldn’t do the deal.
And what investing 10 times in that market does for you is it accesses everything that Andrew talked about. You get the best access to labor, you can really sway the market that way. You can really control the market a bit and direct what rents and amenities should look like, what really awesome housing should look like in that market if you’re a large owner. If you’re not willing to do that, then you’re going to be on the peripheral and you’re never going to be able to really control it or negotiate great labor contracts with folks to do the work for you or to really access full exposure to what that market can yield for you if you’re only willing to go in a little bit.
So everything you said does not get me excited about the deal that you have. It’s just, hey, this deal looks good on paper, it’s a market I know nothing about. That’s just what I heard. This deal looks good on paper, it’s a market I know nothing about, I don’t know anybody there, it’s kind of out in the middle of nowhere kind of thing. I’m saying that, you didn’t say that. But if it’s close to a big market, then maybe look at the big market and look at this tertiary as kind of part of a bigger picture you want to paint for yourself. So that’s my short answer. Cold water on you is no, I probably would not do that deal.

Philip:
No, that’s all good. Any shiny objects that I can take off of my radar will I think help my journey in the long run.

Matt:
It feels like a shiny object to me.

Andrew:
And I’d like to quickly reiterate two things. Number one like I said in being most of those I pass on. And then number two, I really like what Matt said for everybody listening, if you’re going to do that, if it’s a one-off deal, probably pass. But if you can do five, six, seven, 10 and grow it, you can turn that into an advantage. So Philip, we appreciate you coming on real quick and then also just asking questions in front of a quarter million people audience, takes some [inaudible 00:50:53] so we appreciate that. Other than storming your classroom, if people want to get in touch with you, how do they do that?

Philip:
So on Instagram, it’s the_educated_investor, and then I have a website, www.educatedinvest.com. Thanks for that shout out Andrew. Appreciate that.

Andrew:
I like it. Good stuff, man. Well, you’re going to do well. I think we’re going to be hearing a lot more from you here in the near future.

Philip:
Awesome. Thank you.

Matt:
Andrew. We’ve got another question lined up here. I’ve got Danny. Danny Zapata. Danny, welcome to the Bigger Pockets podcast man. How are you today?

Daniel:
I’m doing excellent. Thank you for having me on.

Matt:
You are quite welcome. What is on your mind? How can Andrew and I brighten your day a bit? What is your real estate question you want to bring for Andrew and I to answer and for the masses to hear our thoughts on?

Daniel:
Yeah, I had a thought around raising money. So I’ve had some success raising some friends and family private money. I wanted to get your thoughts on what are the pros and cons. I guess going to the next steps, I either go and I kind of tap out all of my friends and family or do I go and broaden into more less familiar folks. So I wanted to get your thoughts around how do you expand that.

Matt:
Danny’s passing a hat around at Thanksgiving dinner, right? Okay, pass the Turkey and then also pass your checkbook.

Andrew:
Go partner [inaudible 00:52:16] Philip.

Matt:
At the end of the day, Danny, most investors, I know I did and I believe Andrew, you’d be able to say the same, started with friends and family as their investors. And the reason why you do that is because people that are friends and family like and trust you because you’re you. You’re Danny and you’re awesome and they know that, not because you’re Danny, the awesome real estate investor, but because you’re their son and they love you or you’re their brother or they trust you because you’re you, not because you’ve developed this phenomenal real estate track record, whether you have or not. So most real estate investors should and do start with friends and family as their investor base and I highly… And if it gives you the heebie-jeebies talking to friends and family, I’m talking to listeners, not you Danny, but if it gives folks the heebie-jeebies talking to their family members… And in my book Raising Private Capital, I talk a bit about how to overcome personal objections you may have internally and objections that friends and family may have with you as well.
Bottom line, treat them like investors, whether they’re your friends and family or not. Don’t give them special treatment or oh, it’s okay, we don’t need to put this in writing. I’ll just take your check. No, give them every rights and benefit, including full documentation that you would anybody else. Everyone needs to expand beyond friends and family. If you’re going to grow Danny, you need to go beyond that. The way that I did it was to go to friends and family and then start asking them for referrals. Like, hey, who else do you know Uncle Charlie? Who else do you know person I went to high school with that may want to invest with me or may want to consider doing what I do as a passive investment vehicle? That’s how I grew. And then once you’ve done that, then you can expand to tier three, which is social media, picking up the big megaphone, talking into it about what you’re up to and attracting more and more folks.
But it sounds like Danny, you’ve achieved a certain level of success with friends and family capital. Awesome. I would go next level and start asking those folks that are happy for referrals to other folks that they think may be happy too working with you.

Andrew:
Well, that was fantastic. I can’t really add a whole lot to that. Matt, you should write a book about money raising or something and Danny, when he does, you should go order it and read it. Maybe another tip is raise money from pessimists because they don’t expect it back. But beyond that, I did the same thing. My first check as a syndicator was from my mom, and so shout out to mom for believing in her son. And Matt laid it out beautifully. You do that first, maybe skip the uncle if he’s going to bug the heck out of you at Thanksgiving or make life miserable if it doesn’t go perfectly. But other than that, friends and family are the place to start, and then ask for referrals.
And then even beyond referrals, it’s really tough for LP investors to jump in to be the first guy to jump into the pool with you. But if you’ve already got eight or 10 people at your party, then you don’t have to go tell everybody else that it’s your family. You can just say, hey, I’ve already got these eight investors, we’re 70% of the way there. It’s going to be much easier to get people you don’t know or that don’t know you as well to come in for that last 30%. So exactly what Matt said, start with friends and family, then go to referrals, then use that as a base to reach out to people that you don’t already have that relationship with.

Daniel:
I guess I shouldn’t also tout that my mom’s my biggest investor, right?

Andrew:
Hey, you know what? That’s a great thing.

Matt:
That’s a good thing. You shouldn’t discount that, man. I go telling people all the time, and by the way, my mama was one of my first investors as well, by the way. And I tell people that because it is a testament to your belief in your business, Danny. All joking aside, my mother has invested in my business. You should tell people that. I got my mama’s money. Not just somebody else’s mama’s money, I got my own mother’s money in my business and that’s how much I believe in what I do, that I’m willing to put my mother’s livelihood, my mother’s future wellbeing, her wealth goals into what I do. I tell people that all the time because it’s something that I… Not to get emotional about it, but I’m proud of that. I’m proud that I can take a bit of ownership of my mother’s financial future through what I do.

Andrew:
Matt, that’s beautiful. I tell our investors this. I tell them, I say, look, I can’t screw this up because I would have to get a new family and new friends because they’re all in this and I’d have to go out… Yeah, I can’t afford to do that.

Matt:
Yeah, I’m control alt deleting at that point, right?

Andrew:
Yeah.

Matt:
Danny, your thoughts, man. I hope this has been of value. Any final thoughts before we let you go?

Daniel:
No, that was awesome. Thank you for your insights there and I’m glad I was able to make you a little emotional during the podcast.

Matt:
Danny, been awesome having you here, man. Listen, you’ve delivered a lot of value today in your questions and your thoughts. Please tell those listening how they can get ahold of you if they’d like to hear more about what you’re up to.

Daniel:
Sure. I think the easiest way to get ahold of me is on Bigger Pockets. So Daniel Zapata is my legal name on Bigger Pockets. Also, I have somewhat of a Twitter presence, DZapata, my first initial and last name on Twitter.

Matt:
And that’s Z-A-P-A-T-A. I will not ask what your illegal name is. That’s your legal name only. So if you guys want to reach out to Danny and find out what his illegal name is, you can do that now. Good being with us today, Danny. Thank you.

Daniel:
Thank you.

Andrew:
All right. Take care, man.

Matt:
All right, Andrew. If people are living under a rock and they have no idea how to get ahold of the Andrew Kushman, how would they reach out to you to find out more about you as a person, a real estate investor, a visitor of Antarctica, all those kinds of things? How would they find out more about that?

Andrew:
Best way, connect with me on Bigger Pockets. You can also connect on LinkedIn or just Google Vantage Point Acquisitions. Our website is VPACQ.com, and there’s a contact us form on there that comes to my inbox.

Matt:
And folks can find me on our website from my company DeRosa Group, that is D-E-R-O-S-A group, derosagroup.com. They can get ahold of me and anybody on my team there to hear all kinds of cool stuff about what I’m up to derosagroup.com or follow me on Instagram at theMattFaircloth.

Andrew:
All right.

Matt:
All right, folks. This is Matt Faircloth here with my host Antarctica Andrew, and ask him more what that means. Signing off.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Check out our sponsor page!

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


Can we have a soft landing in the economy? Friday’s job report shows there is a clear pathway to get there. Mortgage rates fell aggressively down to 6.20%, putting us at more than 1% below the highs of 2022.

The bond market saw that wage growth was cooling down, leaving the Federal Reserve with few reasons to keep the rate hike story going much longer.

We ended 2022 on a solid note as 4.5 million jobs were created last year — and we still have more than 10 million job openings and historically low jobless claims. And now, the growth rate of inflation is falling.

Bond yields fell after the report since wage inflation is cooling down, a key for the Federal Reserve‘s strategy. The Fed will not tolerate a tight labor market, or Americans on the lower end of the wage pool making more money. They believe this is a bad thing and will create too much entrenched inflation, so the fact that wage growth is cooling off is a positive sign.

If the inflation growth rate and wage growth are slowing down, the Federal Reserve doesn’t need another rate hike. In fact, the Federal Reserve needs its own reset. That is going to be a big theme of mine for 2023 if this trend continues.

However, the bigger story here is there is a pathway for a soft landing for America, and the Fed should be ashamed of itself for believing that a job loss recession is the best way to kill inflation. The inflation growth rate is already falling and the labor market is still solid.

If shelter inflation had a more real-time tracking system, the headline inflation data would already be lower. Thankfully, the Fed has created its own index to account for much of the lagging inflation in the data line. This is a big deal since nearly 43% of CPI inflation is shelter inflation.


This is why Friday’s data is exciting to see and why the bond market sent mortgage rates to 6.20% and yes — we are back on 5-handle mortgage rate watch. It wasn’t that long ago (in October) that people were talking about 8%-10% mortgage rates and a big recession for the United States of America.

Job report

From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 223,000 in December, and the unemployment rate edged down to 3.5 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Notable job gains occurred in leisure and hospitality, health care, construction, and social assistance

This chart shows a breakdown of the jobs created and lost. The two sectors of the economy that are getting hit are the tech sector and housing, but this is a good report for construction. The backlog of homes needing to be built has kept construction labor up until those homes can be finished. I can’t express what a blessing this is because the best way to fight inflation is always by adding more supply. 

Here’s a breakdown of the unemployment rate tied to the education level for those 25 years and older.

  • Less than a high school diploma: 5.0%  (previously 4.4%)
  • High school graduate and no college: 3.6%
  • Some college or associate degree: 2.9%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 1.9%

As we can see above, the labor pool for college educated workers is lacking; this is a big reason the unemployment rate is below 2%. The work visa supply of labor just isn’t enough to supply this pool.  

The unemployment rate has found a bottom of around 3.5%, and I want to remind people that the growth rate of inflation is falling even with the unemployment rate still at 3.5%.

You don’t need to create a job-loss recession to bring inflation down. I understand why some people believe this. However, before COVID-19 happened, we didn’t have breakaway inflation in the 21st century, either here or in other mature economies where population growth is slowing.

Inflation and bond yields

The real story of today is that bond yields are again getting ahead of the Federal Reserve. No matter how many Fed people talk about needing financial conditions tighter for months now, the bond market is saying otherwise.

The Fed’s premise that a job-loss recession is needed to bring down inflation should be pushed back by everyone. If the growth rate of inflation was still running out of control with wage growth exploding higher, then we would be having a different conversation. However, I truly believe that the bond market was always telling us that this wasn’t the 1970s. 

The 1970s saw higher inflation and higher bond yields, and the inflation back then was more entrenched. The 10-year yield, as I speak, is at 3.58% Friday, even after all we have gone through. The growth rate of core PCE inflation, which the Fed wants back down to 2%, should have a three-handle this year.

I made a case for lower mortgage rates on Oct. 27, 2022, and then wrote about how we could still avoid a job-loss recession in November. In both articles, one factor was key: the growth rate of inflation falling. This is happening now, even with a labor market that still has over 10 million job openings.

The second key is falling bond yields; I am not even discussing cutting rates yet. First things first, the growth rate of inflation falls, and the bond market yields fall with it.

For now, both things are falling from their recent peaks. The Fed can’t control Russia, OPEC, or the bird flu, and the U.S. dollar isn’t collapsing. However, any rate hike at this point is on them. They have expressed their beliefs about moving the Fed funds rate to where core PCE is, and if the trend of inflation continues as it is, the 10-year yield is more correct than the Fed today.

To sum it up, we had another solid jobs report Friday: the unemployment rate is low, job openings are high and jobless claims are historically low. I truly believe that at this economic expansion stage, the Fed doesn’t need to continue its path of sounding like a hawk because we already see evidence of inflation falling.

Let’s not forget the biggest driver of inflation for the CPI report is shelter inflation, and that is already cooling off dramatically.

The Fed should think about becoming a dual-mandate organization again at some point since they front-loaded so many rate hikes early on. They should let that stick and watch the data get better. I don’t know if they’re this clever or know that they can take the victory lap. However, what we have seen in the last few months has been very encouraging for those who don’t want to see a job loss recession.



Source link


Nearly every loan originator is fixated on going after the purchase mortgage market in 2023 following a brutal 2022 — a year in which even some of the top producers saw their origination volume drop to 20%. That is also the case for Christopher Gallo, senior loan officer at NJ Lenders Corp. and Scotsman Guide‘s fourth top LO in the country.

After dropping from $1.2 billion in origination volume in 2021 to less than $500 million in 2022, Gallo plans on using his database of former clients — which make up to 70% of his referral business — to follow up and check in this year. That’s something he wasn’t able to do on a frequent basis during the refi boom. 

“That’s going to be a big part of 2023, just kind of getting back to the basics of managing data and managing our previous relationships,” Gallo said in an interview with HousingWire. 

As a mortgage banker who does business solely in New Jersey, Gallo expects to see home equity loans and mortgage loans getting love in the new year — due primarily to the lack of inventory in his market and the equity built up in owners’ homes. 

“People always know people [who are] buying. People always have friends doing something — and people [are] becoming investors buying second homes, third homes — so it’s just good to stay in front of them, because you don’t realize until you look back on how many people you actually probably lost by not staying in front of them,” Gallo said.

While he hopes the housing market may find some consistency again after a volatile year, Gallo forecasts his origination volume this year to be similar to what it was in 2022. 

Read on for more about Gallo’s business strategies for 2023, his general take on LO compensation and prospects for the housing market.

This interview has been condensed and lightly edited for clarity.

Chris-Gallo-Headshot-1
Christopher Gallo, senior loan officer at NJ Lenders Corp.

Connie Kim: It’s been a tough year for even the top producing loan originators in 2022. Have you hit the $1 billion sales volume?

Chris Gallo: Unfortunately, no. My approximate volume for 2022 was a little less than $500 million for around 920 deals in total. Believe it or not, I don’t do numbers on a month to month or quarter to quarter to quarter basis. I kind of go with the flow essentially. I’ve never been a big kind of projection or goal-oriented individual. My goal is [to] always be busy and continue to go with the momentum. 

Kim: The most recent Scotsman Guide list of top LOs shows that 33% of your volume came from purchase mortgages and 67% from refinances. The name of the game in the industry was purchase mortgages. How have you changed your strategy to target those clients?

Gallo: I wouldn’t say it shifted much. I don’t do cold walks, I never cold walk, [and] I’m not going to start cold walking. I would say internally, we’ve kind of shifted things around to manage and accommodate our referral partners better — and just be better. With the last few years being so busy, it wasn’t easy to manage everything and manage the volume at the same time.

We’ve kind of shifted gears a little bit in the way we’re handling things with our referral partners. The year 2023 is going to be a little bit different. We’re going to try to implement different strategies to drum up more business and to help our referral partners out in different ways that can help them generate more business, which will ultimately help us generate more business.

Kim: Then who are your main referral partners – realtors? Financial advisors? 

Gallo: Probably about 60 to 70% of our business comes from referrals from our previous clients. Attorneys, realtors, [and] clients essentially are a big part of our repeat business – managing them a little bit differently, managing them a little bit better, and helping them out in different ways — tweaking things that fell by the wayside during a very, very busy time.

For instance, [managing] smaller relationships that we’ve never really had but we didn’t realize we were getting business from — these relationships. We’ve been able to kind of focus on them more and kind of just step back and look at the business from a different perspective. 

Kim: Are you doing all these deals by yourself or do you have a team that helps with sales? I’m curious how business works at NJ Lenders. 

Gallo: I have a production partner and processors. That’s it. I don’t have anybody else that essentially is taking loan applications. I do have my brother who works for me — he’s licensed in New Jersey, and in all the other states. I’m not; I’m only licensed in New Jersey, so I take all the New Jersey business. He (my brother) is on my team, but he’s essentially handling a whole another aspect of it. That’s not even factored into my numbers. My numbers are solely New Jersey. 

Kim: In an interview with another outlet, you put great emphasis on managing data of your clients as being the key to becoming a top LO. What are some of the other factors that helped put you on the list of top LOs? 

Gallo: There’s not one in particular that has helped me excel. Obviously, managing your previous relationships, and kind of touching on your previous relationships — your data from previous years — is huge. I think that’s a very large part of business. For me, managing it has always been one of my strong points, and touching base with them from year to year. A lot of the business was calling us because of our previous relationships.

But we haven’t been great at managing our data over the last few years. That’s going to be a big part of 2023 — just kind of getting back to the basics of managing data and managing our previous relationships.

People always know people [who are] buying. People always have friends doing something — and people [are] becoming investors buying second homes, third homes — so it’s just good to stay in front of them, because you don’t realize until you look back on how many people you actually probably lost by not staying in front of them.

Kim: What kind of roles does NJ Lender play for you as a top LO that is different from other big national lenders?

Gallo: We’re a local lender that’s been around for over 30 years helping people buy, helping people refinance with construction loans, whatever it may be. They’ve got a strong name in the northern New Jersey area [and] in New Jersey in general. NJ Lenders has relationships with local banks that some of the bigger national lenders don’t have. They’ve seen the ups; they’ve seen the downs.

One of the owners of the company is an originator himself and has been a top-producing originator for many, many years. He’s very well networked across the country, so he’s always bringing in new sales strategies and new little nuggets that people in possibly California are using that New Jersey is not used to, or different parts of the country that we’re not exposed to. 

Kim: It’s going to be another tough year for LOs — at least for the first half of the year — and some LOs have or plan on getting licenses in multiple states to close more sales. Is this something you have in mind?

Gallo: No, I’ve given that to my brother, who is two and half years in the industry. When he came on to learn the business and help, I said to him, ‘Hey, listen, here’s your opportunity.’ This was when the refi business was booming a little bit. I get a lot of referrals, and people say, ‘Hey, can you help in New York? Can you help in Pennsylvania? Can you help in Florida?’  I would have to give it to other people at the company who were licensed there. I couldn’t do it. So he’s kind of taken that [and] run with it.

Kim: Let’s zoom in on the New Jersey housing market. Housing prices were up in 2022 from the previous year, while the number of homes for sale fell. With rates widely expected to drop in the second half of 2023, are you optimistic that the housing market in NJ will see more transactions this year?

Gallo: I do feel that some buyers have dropped out of the market to buy based on the aggressiveness of how the markets have been, especially with the rates going up. But I do feel a bigger part of it has been inventory, which has always been a big issue across the country — but in New Jersey more so just because there’s not so much land to build any more in New Jersey.

I do think 2023 will be a little bit of a better year from a purchase perspective, especially as rates kind of settle a little bit. But I think the inventory is the biggest piece that has to kick over for this to really take shape.

Kim: I want to shift gears a little bit to LO’s signing bonuses. For the top LOs in 2022, even when the rates were climbing, signing bonuses were still around. Are you still seeing that? Are you getting recruiting calls with six, seven figure signing bonuses?

Gallo: Recruiting calls? Probably six, seven times a week. I don’t really take many of them. I’ll talk to people just to network in general with someone from a bigger company or somebody who I respect. I have no problem just talking to them, hearing them out, and seeing what’s going on, but no one offered me any checks with seven figures on it. I did hear of some people getting some very large signing bonuses. No one had ever approached me with anything that was sizable enough to make me move my business from where I am. 

Kim: What’s your take on LOs compensation in the industry? Some LOs have been voicing concerns about having to take on more loans with reduced compensation to make ends meet. 

Gallo: It’s going to all flow from above, right? For lenders to tighten up, one of the ways is to increase their margins, which is going to affect the loan officer. If things are tightening from up top, the LO is probably going to be forced to reduce their basis points to be aggressive.

I mean, it’s survival of the fittest, right? If you’re overpriced in a market where everybody’s beating you, you’re going to have to cut your comp. But if you don’t want to cut your comp, I think the door is going to be the only way out.

Kim: How does LO comp work at NJ Lenders?

Gallo: It’s similar to every other company – there are comp plans in place, and you select the comp plan you want to be on based on the marketplace you’re in. From a company’s perspective, I think there’s a few plans that you can choose amongst — two or three buckets.

If you’re in an area where you’re doing predominantly FHA business or whatever, it may be priced differently, and if you want to be in a little bit of a higher bucket, you have that opportunity. From from my perspective, I know where I’m at, where I’ve always been, and that’s kind of the workflow for my business

Kim: Have you also noticed retail LOs moving over to the wholesale channel? Lower pricing, less red tape in big-name retailers are what’s driving some of them to make the transition.

Gallo: I’ve been hearing what you’ve been hearing, and I’ve been following it a little bit. When I started out, I used to work as a broker, so I understand the way the model works. I haven’t worked in it in 15 years. Maybe it’s changed more favorably to a way a loan officer could do business — and possibly the way that the comp is structured. I could see in a slowing market more people gravitating toward the broker channel. 

I think the broker channel is a great channel, but I just don’t think it’s for everybody — especially an originator who’s doing high volume. Maybe it would be a better channel for someone who’s a lower volume base guy who can kind of coddle the business, pick and choose where you want to go and how you want to do it. I think the banker channel is probably the better route for someone looking to do volume, looking to have the sharpest product, [and] being able to do what we know best.

Kim: Origination volume for 2023 doesn’t look rosy compared to 2022. Is there anything that keeps you hopeful?

Gallo: I hope that the silver lining will be that the market has recalibrated enough where we can have a normalized market, whether that be 20 deals a month, 10 deals a month, five deals a month, [or] 15 deals a month. I feel like we may be able to find some consistency again like we did two years ago or three years ago before the rates went crazy.

With that normalization, I think it will be easier for people buying, and it’ll be easier to manage your database differently and possibly pick up some refinances here and there due to the little dips you may catch in the market throughout the year. 

Kim: The mortgage industry saw home equity loans and HELOCs pick up steam in 2022. Do you expect to see this trend continue, and what other products will gain traction?

Gallo: We did see a lot of that with just equity in homes going up. We’ve seen a lot of people [who] as opposed to moving [are] renovating or pulling money out to do certain things that they’ve always wanted to do — travel, buy second homes, whatever the case may be. I think that trend will continue into this year. 

I also think there is the potential for the renovation loans and products like that to pick up a little bit as well because inventory is low. People are going to have to make do with what they have. 

Kim: I understand you don’t necessarily keep track of your sales numbers, but how do you expect your business to be this year?

Gallo: I’d say I think equal, if not a little slower. I would be happy with it being equal, and if it was a little bit less, that wouldn’t be that bad at all. But I definitely don’t see much change that can make it kind of better. If we could be on pace to do what we did last year, I think that would be a very good market.



Source link


Assisted living investments may be the most underrated, unknown, but ridiculously profitable real estate investment out there. For many investors, turning their single-family home into assisted or senior living seems like an impossible task. Don’t you need to have a medical background? Do you need a license? Can anyone do it? Instead of getting caught in analysis paralysis, Antoinette Munroe looked at the numbers, decided to take the jump, and hasn’t looked back. And after hearing her story, you might do the same!

Antoinette found financial freedom in just a few years with vacation rental investing. She used the game-changing strategy of house hacking combined with short-term rentals to profit over a thousand dollars a month, all while living in her own house. She slowly started building her empire, buying one property a year while working towards financial independence. She reached her ultimate goal, retiring early after only a few years of investing. Then, things started to change.

With new regulations rolling in, Antoinette had a large slice of her business about to be shut down or restricted at best. She needed to pivot to something that would make her the same money while still being passive enough to live the newly-retired lifestyle. When she heard about assisted living, she knew she had to run the numbers to see if the hype matched reality. The income was astonishing, and now she’s dedicated her time, money, and resources to building an assisted living empire that’ll pay her much more than the vacation rentals before.

David:
This is the BiggerPockets Podcast show 710.

Antoinette:
If my goal is to keep this property forever and have it produce the max income that it can, that’s first priority. It can never be to, “Oh, it’s not working out with the city anymore. Time to sell.” No, I committed to this property. We are in a relationship. I said I was never letting it go so I had to find something else. It was the only option to me.

David:
What’s up, everyone? This is David Greene, your host of the BiggerPockets Podcast here today with my co-host, Rob Abasolo, bringing another great episode that is both inspirational, tactical, and practical. And yes, that rhymed too.
Today’s guest is Antoinette Munroe who has a fascinating story. She started off as a short-term rental investor, and then found out the area that she had bought these properties was going to make it very difficult or even impossible to manage them. And what she did to pivot ended up making her even more money than she was making before. You’re going to love it. You don’t want to miss today’s show. Rob, what was some of your favorite parts of Antoinette’s story?

Rob:
I think it’s always really nice to see how quickly someone can learn to change their strategy. A lot of people go into real estate with just one strategy. They’re laser-focused, but they don’t really bake in the contingency plans. And it was just really awesome to see Antoinette. It’s not like she necessarily had a contingency plan, but she adapted. And because she adapted, she’s actually making a lot more money now. So it’s just very fun to dig into that story.

David:
All right. Before we get to Antoinette, today’s quick tip is don’t despair when things go wrong. Ask yourself how you can pivot. Oftentimes, there’s an answer just on the other side of your problem. And if you just think a little differently, it will jump out. Antoinette didn’t have anyone else that told her what to do when regulations shut down her short-term rental. She thought on her own because she listens to lots of podcasts. So fill your mind with information, fill your tool belt with tools, and when things go wrong, you don’t have to freak out. The answer is often right on the other side of a pivot.
That being said, let’s bring an Antoinette. Antoinette Munroe, welcome to the BiggerPockets Podcast. How are you today?

Antoinette:
I’m amazing. Thank you guys for having me.

David:
Yeah, thank you for being here. Now, I understand you’ve already been on the BP Money Show. That was episode 295 if anybody would like to go listen to your interview there. Before we get into your story, I just want to ask, what was it like being interviewed on the BiggerPockets Money Show?

Antoinette:
It was like my holy grail. I’m a finance nerd first. So coming from the FIRE movement, or that’s Financial Independence, Retire Early, Money was the show that I started with. And the majority of my adult life, I was just focused on making good money decisions and learning about what to do with the dollars that I had. So that was always dream number one, let me get on the Money Show and meet Mindy and Scott.

Rob:
You said it was your holy grail. But the keyword there is “was” because now, we’re on the BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast.

Antoinette:
Absolutely, that’s what happened. I transitioned from just a smart money person to becoming an investor. And to make that transition, I had to switch to BiggerPockets Real Estate.

Rob:
All right. Antoinette, can you tell us a little bit about your background, a little bit about your portfolio, and give us a snapshot of your real estate journey?

Antoinette:
Okay. I’m originally from Miami, Florida, currently living in Orlando. I was the college graduate, five-year MBA program graduate to take the highest job offer just on that track of do all the things that you’re supposed to do. Go to school, get a degree, get a good job. Somewhere along there, I stumbled upon Dave Ramsey and so I adopted debt free. It was just trying to do all the right things and check all the boxes. That’s it in a gist.

David:
I relate to you, Antoinette. People think of me as a real estate investor, and I am. But they think of me first as that. I don’t think that was actually my origin story. I was a save your money guy long before I was an invest guy. I was passionate about not spending money on things. My mind was geared towards seeing advertisers trying to trick me into buying stuff, looking at when I was in a bad mood, why do I feel like I need to go spend money to feel better? I was always into the philosophy and the psychology of money spending.
I didn’t become a real estate investor till the second part of my journey. So I like hearing the people who stories start this way because if you have a respect for capital, you understand the work that goes into it and the energy that you put into building it. You will approach real estate investing way different than the person who’s like, “I’m tired of being broke. I want to have some money. Let me go buy a house and try to figure out how it works.” Would you agree with that approach?

Antoinette:
Absolutely. I was the smart money, anti-salesperson. A salesman could never get me to buy something. But I was a salesman by career, so it was just the two weren’t lining up.

Rob:
Yeah. I always appreciate the introduction to the Dave Ramsey thing, because it’s always a progression. It’s like you got to clean up the financial situation, get it right, figure out your philosophy, and then go to the dark side. It’s very rare that it’s like there’s someone like me and David that do so much real estate and then we’re like, “Ah, you know what? We want to go debt free,” and then go the opposite direction. But I agree, David. I think that’s such a natural projection.
So what was that moment for you when you decided to pivot into this, I don’t know, not the opposite direction, but in this world of real estate where you are getting more into debt for obviously the benefit of more cash flow and appreciation and wealth and all that stuff?

Antoinette:
I’ll say that starting off with Dave Ramsey and finding that it was a little too strict, I probably mixed in some Clark, Howard, and Susie to create something that could actually fit for me as someone just coming out of the college into first time career. I didn’t want to suffer so much. And I didn’t have debt, too much debt to dig myself out of. So I was able to find a nice blend that made it comfortable.
But when I found the FIRE movement, and that’s Financial Independence, Retire Early if you aren’t following that, they talked about the multiplier or identifying your FIRE number and then saving your way to that number. And when the math worked out, I think at that time I was making $50,000. So the thought of saving $1 million over the course of 20, 30 years still seemed so unattainable to me and so farfetched that I couldn’t wrap my mind around how I would save that much on the salary that I had. But I did understand money management, controlling expenses, budgeting, so I felt like my path to FIRE couldn’t be saving to $1 million but it could be eliminating my expenses so that I didn’t need money as much, and then I would have flexibility to choose a different job or do something else. So I didn’t approach real estate with the objective of being a real estate investor. It was to make a better expense decision around what the highest percentage of expense was in my budget, and that was the home.

Rob:
And remind us, what were you doing for your 9:00 to 5:00 job initially? I’m not sure if you mentioned about what was your career goals and your trajectory at this point?

Antoinette:
I was working for one of the largest beverage companies in the US. I was a sales manager going through their management trainee program, and the last role with them before I left the company, I was a region manager covering the southern half of the US. So it was a solid career with great growth trajectory, it just didn’t align with my core values.

Rob:
And remind us, what’s your why? Because you mentioned that =you’re doing the FIRE and that the real estate investing thing. What’s the freedom that you’re after through the FIRE movement in real estate?

Antoinette:
The why was freedom, simply freedom, but freedom to choose what I did with my time, freedom of choice, freedom to not be stressed about money or how much money I needed or had. So it was just freedom across the board to wake up each day and decide what I wanted to do with my time.

Rob:
I’m curious, do you feel like you’re there? Do you have it? Have you reached it or are you working on it?

Antoinette:
No, I do. I do. Thanks to real estate investing, I’ve hit my version of FIRE and I do feel free. I’m very anti-alarm when I wake up. I have to wake up naturally. And then I just choose what I’m going to do for that day unless there’s a project going on and I have to plan just a little more. But even still, if it’s a project, it’s something that I chose because I would enjoy it and it would be fulfilling in some way, versus I have to get up every day and exchange time for money.

Rob:
Yeah, this makes a lot of sense. You mentioned that you were doing the MBA track and everything like that. Did you ever anticipate this, that you would be in this, I don’t know, niche or asset class or career? Or did you always want to be in the corporate world and in the 9:00 to 5:00 landscape?

Antoinette:
I knew I didn’t want the corporate world, but I didn’t have any examples of how to not do that. So I knew in order to not go back home to Miami Gardens and live with my family, I at least had to go to college and get a job to be able to take care of myself. But that was the extent that I knew. I’m first-generation college. My sister went before me, so there weren’t examples of how to create a different life than the one that we experienced growing up.
So I was checking the boxes like, “Okay, go to college, get a good job. These are the things I’m supposed to do.” And at the moment of getting the good job, I knew it didn’t fit for me. And I thought initially that I wanted to be an entrepreneur, but I would try to start side businesses while working and it was still a time for money trade. And then I realized I really don’t want to be an entrepreneur. I really want freedom. I’ll be a freedompreneur instead. And so the focus shifted on, “Okay, what things can I do to eliminate my need for money and give myself time back?”

Rob:
Yeah. Was there anything specifically that you did? Because obviously there’s a lot of things that you have to do from a budgeting standpoint, some of the fundamentals that you have to implement to get your financial situation right. Did you have some system or was there some habits that you were working on early on?

Antoinette:
Yes. The very first thing I did with my first paycheck out of college was to sit down and create an Excel spreadsheet with that income. And that was the beginning of developing what I call my budget ABCs, which is to automate, balance, and have some control set for that money. From the very first paycheck, I was allocating what money would be for expenses, savings, 401(k) match, and then also what would I be spending. My goal at that time was to pay off my student loans and any debts that I had so that I could have the opportunity to leave the job if I wanted to and then go chase a dream. So budgeting was the bedrock of all of it, just key financial principles, not making any major purchases in those early years so I could set a solid financial foundation for myself.
Those first three years, the first two years I knocked out all of my debt or student loans, and then that third year I was able to put 50,000 in the bank. Three years out of college, I’m debt free, I have $50,000. So now, whatever choices I decided to make from an investment standpoint, I was prepared to do so. And all of the habits and things that I built over that time period of working through that budget ABC system made me… It gave me the financial control that I needed, that I didn’t know I would need, as I started getting into real estate investing.

Rob:
Yeah. I think this is a skill that for most people we pick up, especially short-term rental people where we get into a short-term rental and every month, the income is always different and you don’t know. And then there’s some months where the income is super high and you feel like you’re really crushing it, and then you got the slow season. And then if you didn’t budget correctly, it can really come and bite you in the butt. So it’s a really nice foundation to come in and actually have your finances relatively tracked, have your bookkeeping up and running from the beginning. I know that you found a lot of success in the short-term rental world, right? That was a big bread and butter for you.

Antoinette:
Yes. Short-term rental mixed with house hacking, equal game changer. That’s the formula. It’s that simple. I thought I was just going to get roommates. But I tested out Airbnb, it seemed simple enough so I just jumped into that. And within that first month, my mortgage was paid and I was also cash flowing 1500 a month. And it was just on renting two bedrooms out of my primary home. So at that point, I wasn’t a real estate investor. I was just a person that bought a property because that was the next good money thing to do. And then wanting to eliminate my expenses, I rented out rooms in my home because that was another good money thing to do. And then it turned into an entire business that I learned. I had to learn how to operate and then scale. So I’m an unintentional real estate investor, but it’s been working out really well.

Rob:
I love this so much. I’m so jealous, by the way. I started out house hacking in 2014. And Airbnb was around, but it was so new really at that time to me. I didn’t even know about it really until 2017, 2018. But I remember house hacking my very first house that I ever bought. We could not really afford it. Somehow we got approved for it. And I remember one of my really good friends, I convinced him to move up to my city to basically intern at the agency I was at. And he was like, “Sure.” And I was like, “Oh. Well, we’ll charge you 400 bucks a month.” And I remember getting that first $400 paycheck from… Oh well, not paycheck, but rent from him. It felt like a paycheck because I wasn’t making really a lot of money at the time. And I remember thinking, “Oh my God, my mortgage is 1100 bucks. I just got paid $400. I really just paid $700 this month. This is crazy.”
But I know that there are a lot of people, I’m so jealous of you that you did the Airbnb thing and you were actually able to make probably a lot more. I always call this supercharged house hacking. So was that a interesting experience or was it like did you embrace it from the very beginning?

Antoinette:
It wasn’t a… I did a test run. I created a listing, I turned it on, let three reservations come through, and then I turned it off just to test and see. But after that first reservation, I walked back in the house and it looked like no one had been there but I had $500 in my bank account that wasn’t there before. And so it was a no-brainer just from that first experience. So I went all in on it. I kept the family room and the master bedroom. They were on this opposite side of the house. I stayed there so I had a good amount of separation. I wasn’t sharing any spaces with guests. And I started in the winter season in Florida. So it was just combination of right time, right house layout, and the willingness to just go for it.
And I told all my friends about it and everybody gave me every reason why they couldn’t house hack or why they needed… That wasn’t enough privacy for them and, “I can’t share space with strangers,” and, “What about my kids?” But they thought more about the reasons they couldn’t do it versus, “What do I have to do to make this work?” And so that’s generally my focus when I’m approaching something. What do I have to do to make it work? Because I want to achieve this greater benefit at the end versus focusing on all the reasons why it might be uncomfortable temporarily.

Rob:
Yeah. I think that is, it’s really, it’s sacrificing that short-term comfort for long-term gain. I always had to of talk my wife and romance her into the idea of house hacking because obviously, privacy is important. But when we moved to LA, I got so tired of wanting to rent an apartment. I was like, “We’re going to buy this house. We can’t afford it, but if we house hack, we’re going to be able to afford it.” And that really panned out to be the cornerstone of my entire portfolio and journey. So you’re doing this house hacking thing and you’re crushing it. At this point, are you like, “Okay, I’m all in. I’m going to start buying Airbnbs.” What comes after that first house hack?

Antoinette:
After that, I happened to tell another neighbor about it. They had this gorgeous cabana on the lake behind their house, and we were over for dinner one day and I was just like, “You know how much money is sitting in your backyard right now?” And I told them about what I was doing with the Airbnb and then set them up on it, and we got really close through that process. And then, but they were real estate investors. They had multiple properties. So I looked up to them as, “I want to do what you’re doing someday.” And then they looked at me like, “Oh my God, I can’t believe you figured out this Airbnb thing. We need to do what you’re doing.”
So they started telling all of their friends about it. And anytime we were introduced is, “Here are these budding real estate investors and here are all the cool things they’re doing.” And I’d go home and be like, “I’m not a real estate investor, but I guess I have to figure out how to do this now.” Because at some of those parties, someone would approach us and say, “Hey, we have some money and we’d be interested in investing.” So I think that was the point where I was like, “Okay. I have to figure out what being a real estate investor means and how to actually do that since people are looking at me that way, and now there are opportunities that are coming from it that I don’t want to miss out on.” So I think that was the catalyst behind figuring out how to actually become a real estate investor and build out that portfolio. And of course, the first strategy that I learned about was the BRRRR strategy, so we start with that one.

David:
Yeah. So you went from short-term rentals where you had initial success, which had to feel good because like you said, you stepped in at the best time in the market before it was saturated. It was fish in a barrel to a degree. So you had a very good experience with real estate, and then you probably recognize you have a knack for it. So your confidence is feeling good. What caused you to switch into the BRRRR and some of the group homes you were doing? Why did you move to a new niche?

Antoinette:
Short term was going really well, and when I started, it was not regulated within the city of Orlando. Shortly after we started, new regulations started to come in. There were requirements for you to live in the home, which worked for us while we lived in that home. But as we wanted to scale out that portfolio, it started to get tricky. We would always have to have multiple units where there was a full-time tenant at one point with Airbnb responsibilities to be able to Airbnb any other units in that. And after a while it just got to be too much to juggle, or I didn’t think it would be sustainable long term because now there are too many players involved and I can’t directly control everything.
I also wanted to keep a small portfolio because a part of the freedom that I was looking for, man, I didn’t want to work every day. If I built out this huge real estate portfolio, I just created another job for myself. I didn’t want to take that approach. So I’ve always looked for the best and highest use of the property, and I’m also big on having multiple exit strategies. I know they tell you, “Pick one niche, focus on that, get great at it before you switch,” but that didn’t really work for me. I needed to be more nimble, so I would always try to understand how I could operate three different things in any property at any given time. That way if one thing didn’t work, I had something else or another thing to switch to.
So group homes became that third piece. I knew that I could BRRRR that house and I could just rent it out full-time. I was short-term renting so we had that strategy. But once you do short-term rental, it can be difficult to find something that’s going to produce equal or more cash flow than that. But the group home model became that opportunity. Short-term rental is maybe a 2X strategy versus long-term rents. But with group home, we’re talking 3X or more. That’s more of unlimited a bit earning potential with a different options and services you can offer there.

Rob:
Okay. Give us a little bit of a snapshot just so that I know where you’re at now with your short-term rental journey. How far did you get to short-term rentals? And then we’ll get into the group home stuff here in a second.

Antoinette:
We went to nine rental units. And at that nine, one of them was arbitrage, the rest we owned. And at that point, it was enough for us to live the lifestyle we wanted to without having too many hours per week of work. Solid cleaning crew, handymen, and you’re good to go. But with the regulations changing in Orlando, I wanted to switch to a different asset or change the portfolio a little bit so we could have a little more stability. Of course, COVID happening. Fortunately for us, we were able to switch to midterm rental during that period and not experience much of a loss. But with the changes of regulations experiencing a pandemic, you just start to understand that anything can go wrong whenever it’s ready to. So the more diversity that you can add to the portfolio or other asset classes that you can tap into that are a little more resistant to those events, the better. And interstate group home.

Rob:
Yeah, I love this. I think that the pandemic really did shake things up for a lot of people in real estate, and really the people that came out on top were the one that were willing to pivot and pivot quickly. Because when you go into an asset class with a single strategy, well, if that strategy doesn’t work, then you start panicking. It seems like you have done a lot. What drives you to think of all of the different creative strategies? Do you just like having safety in diversity, or is it just genuinely a curious thing for you to go and explore all these different asset classes within real estate?

Antoinette:
I think the fun in all of this for me is creating and exploring different things. And the moment I figured something out, probably like the day I started short-term rental, I’m thinking about the next thing already. And it’s just that’s the fun in it for me, exploring, experiencing different things, and just testing stuff out. I don’t think I’ll ever be able to stick to one set thing because I do have the shiny object syndrome. And I used to fight it and try to be like, “Okay, just focus on one,” but I could not. So now I allow myself three shiny objects at a time. That seems to work for me, but I’ll always be looking for something else.

Rob:
Yeah. And so you got to nine, which is really impressive. A lot of people work their whole career to get to nine. How were you even scaling up? Were you self-financing it? I know you talked about maybe working with some investors. What was your strategy? Because this to me, I think, getting from one to nine is the hardest part of the journey.

Antoinette:
Slow and steady. I would buy one property a year. Each of those properties would either be two to three units. When you buy a multi-unit property, that helps speed up the timeline on scaling. But I went really slow. And I would listen to podcasts and how quickly other people scaled and felt like I wasn’t a good enough investor because I wasn’t moving as fast, but it was what worked for me. I would just buy one a year, making sure it was two to three units. I would do the BRRRR strategy. I’m getting them old and ugly. I’m spending a couple months doing the rehab, then refinancing out. So it took a while. One property a year is not that much and it’s pretty slow. So in four years with a combination of two to three units, it’s pretty easy to build that size portfolio.

Rob:
Yeah. So you do this thing where you’re sailing, you’re going slow, you’re scaling up, you get to nine, you’re crushing it. And then all of a sudden you’re like, “All right, I’m going to try something completely different and I’m going to go into group homes.” Why the change there?

Antoinette:
I heard about it. I was working with a contractor at the time who was in the process of creating a group home, and they were talking to me about the process for getting licensed but also the earnings potential on that home. And for me, nine units was already enough. 10 was going to be my cap. I didn’t want a large portfolio. Once they explained to me the breakdown of the earnings on the property and the different services you could offer within that to continue to increase earnings, I felt like that was the next best use for a single family property because I was already at short-term rental. I started at what I thought was the highest earning potential for a single family home, and I didn’t really know how I would scale up from that aside from building out the portfolio and adding units.
So when I found out about group home opportunity, and I was like, “Okay, this solves that problem. I don’t have to have more units. I can convert the units that aren’t in the most favorable either location for short-term rental to this other operation style, I guess, and still make the same that I’m making on short-term rental, but in most cases probably 3X and do some good while I’m at it.”

Rob:
Yeah, okay. Explain to us the concept of group homes. I imagine, is this similar or is this the same thing as residential assisted living?

Antoinette:
Yes. It’s the same. And depending on the agency that you’re licensed with or the demographic that you service, the name would look different. So you’ll hear residential assisted living, you’ll hear assisted living for senior care, foster home. All of these different styles are the same. The terminology just varies by the state that you’re in and the agency that license you. For me specifically, I’m licensed in the state of Florida and I’m servicing clients with mental and developmental disabilities specifically. And within that, some of them may require nursing care. So not only do we provide the home care service, we also provide nursing services within that environment as well.

Rob:
Yeah. I remember many years ago when I was just a wee real estate investor listening to BiggerPockets. Someone came in and spoke about residential assisted living and I was like, “Oh my god, this is… It’s crazy.” It was mind blowing because the numbers seemed to work out. And I remember for me, I was just very nervous to learn the logistics and the actual, the run of show, the day-to-day operations. Did you have any experience at all before you jumped in, or what was the learning curve like for you?

Antoinette:
I did not, but that is not a deterrent for me, not having experience, and it don’t stop no show. So just a basic conversation with what they were setting up, they gave me the website for where to apply and so I just started on the application process. You are required to take a lot of online trainings, so learning a lot of it was on the go. I spent some time volunteering in a group home so I could see what the day-to-day operations were like. And that volunteer experience, I learned a lot about staffing, the nursing care that comes with that, medical supplies, all of these things. It is far more not passive than short-term rental and real estate investing. It is a big difference in terms of the level of liability and responsibility and work that goes into it, but it’s commensurate with the earnings that you could make.
However, I’m building out the business with staff in mind so that it can be run by management, staff within the home and not necessarily me running the day-to-day. So upfront, it’s a lot of legwork. It took a year just to get through the application and licensing process for the property. And so we’ll spend the next year just learning the ropes.

David:
So you own the business and the property. You’re not owning the property and renting the business to somebody else to run, correct?

Antoinette:
Yes. I own the business, and then the property is owned by a separate business and that group home business rents the property from it. But in the end, it’s all me behind it.

David:
Yes.

Rob:
That makes sense.

David:
I got you, yes. So you have businesses that you own and one of them owns the property, one of them owns the business. But what I’m saying is you’re not renting it out, the home, to someone else that’s running it. You’re running the business yourself. Clearly that’s going to be a lot of work. And like you said, it’s probably more work than a short-term rental. Is the money so much better in that space compared to the short-term rentals that it’s worth the extra work?

Antoinette:
Yes.

David:
Okay.

Antoinette:
Short answer.

David:
Right.

Antoinette:
For example, with the agency that I’m registered with, depending on the level of the client that you’re servicing, they’ll have medium, moderate, extensive one, extensive two. Each of those change. And at each level, so at moderate level, I’m making maybe $1,000 more per client. And I can have up to five clients in my home than I would on the entire property if I rent it as a short-term rental. When I go to extensive one or extensive two, let’s just say we add 500 for each level, and that’s times five. So by far in a way, it exceeds what short-term rental would offer, but you do have much higher expenses. I now have a full staff. I have nursing staff. We have food expenses and other expenses in the operation of the business. But even after all those expenses are removed, I’m still making maybe 2 to 3X what the property would do on short-term rental. And I’m not fighting with the city anymore because this is fully licensed and regulated and zoned for it.

David:
Yeah. There’s also a lot more regulations that protect residential assisted living facilities. It’s considered, I’m trying to think of the right word, what’s the Act that deals with Americans? The ADA prohibits cities and HOAs from saying you cannot use this property for this purpose, versus short-term rentals where it’s very popular to get a neighborhood full of angry Karens yelling at you, “Not in my backyard. We don’t want these here.” So it is protected, and that is a good thing to keep in mind, especially if it’s more profitable than a short-term rental. I would’ve actually thought that they were on par. So that’s interesting to hear the business is doing better.
But you’re a full-on businesswoman. You’re hiring people, you’re managing staff, you’re dealing with scheduling people, the attitudes that come from human beings which is something that we often don’t think about with real estate. But if you’re in the short-term rental space or the residential assisted living facility space, you’re dealing with humans, and humans are complicated people. They can make things hard. So kudos to you for taking on that challenge. Is this something you see yourself scaling to get a lot of properties, or is this more of a “I don’t need a lot of them in order to make good money doing this” type of a situation?

Antoinette:
It’s really a solution to another existing problem. I had regulation issues with two properties that were Airbnb. Converting those two to group homes solves my regulation issues but also increases the income. And then the income from that business can funnel into another asset class, whether it’s going into getting a multi-family. So I’m not walking away from short-term rental completely, just I have two properties that it no longer works for so I needed a new use for it because I’m a hold forever kind of girl. I’m never going to sell them. I’d be switching these two properties and then taking the income from this new business to move into multi-family, to step into short-term rental markets that don’t have crazy regulations that are true vacation markets. But it’s still not long-term. It’s being built to sell, created as an agency so that I could get what I need from it, offer a lovely product, take do some good in my community, and then move on from that business to chase something else.

David:
Can you share what some of those regulation problems that you had were with the short-term rentals?

Antoinette:
Yes. When I started with short-term rental, there were no regulations. And then a bit through that, the city of Orlando started to require you to apply for a license. And with that, you had to live on site and be on site whenever you host it, which if you’re approaching short-term rental as a business, having to live in the property means you can only have one. And having to be there when it hosts meant that the freedom you’re supposed to get from real estate investing, you no longer have because you have to be on site hosting.
Fortunately for me, the neighbors weren’t much of a niche issue because they were using the property for their friends and family to visit them. But the city alone just not understanding that short-term rental could add value versus taking away, there was so much concern about taking rental units off the market, transient people in the neighborhood causing issues, not recognizing that I’m also of the neighborhood and this is doing good for me. It’s keeping the property nice, which impacts the value of my home and others in the neighborhood. So I think sometimes the way the municipalities view short-term rental, they forget that the persons operating them are people in their city as well and there is some benefit for us, and then that trickles down to the other people that are impacted by us.

Rob:
Yeah, that’s very true. This is just a reminiscent of my TikTok comments and my YouTube comments of people that say the same thing and I’m just like, “They think we’re these big, big bad investors that are just throwing up cardboard boxes and being like, ‘Rent this for $200 and paint my house before you check out.’” And I’m like, “If you just chatted with me for five minutes, you’d be like, ‘Oh, you’re just a regular guy that just owns homes.’” It’s funny that the regulation and the narrative is so anti-Airbnb sometimes. So that that’s a really good perspective though, that yeah, you are part of that community and it’s building you up. And by doing that, you’re building up your neighbors up and then you’re building up your community. That is a narrative unfortunately that is very much washed out by a lot of the negativity that I see often.
Is that something that is bothers you at all or do you just keep trekking on? Or what are your thoughts on that? Because I’m always, this is something we don’t really ever talk about, but is it something that drives you or is it something that makes you stop and rethink the entire strategy?

Antoinette:
I don’t stop and rethink it. It makes me fight for it. Being an Airbnb host led to also being an Airbnb ambassador, and a part of that is being the voice to tell the other side of the story. I’ll attend the city commission meetings to make sure that they’re hearing the counter-argument and it’s not just a bunch of angry people in there trying to shut something down. I think it’s important to show the other side of the story and be present for those things, interacting with the neighbors. So I’m very active within the neighborhood as well and open about what those houses operate as.
And so they use the property, so now, they’re getting to experience it firsthand and see the other side for themselves. So now, they’re less likely to be at that commission meeting saying, “No, we want to stop this. Get rid of it,” because now they have one down the block from them, and grandma’s coming every winter and she can just walk down the street. So I think sharing the benefits of what the short-term rental opportunity brings to the community is an important part of it as well.

Rob:
Well, I appreciate you chiming in about that. I agree with all of that. And that is to me always a funny thing, is people still use Airbnb but then they’ll be mad about it. So I agree. I think being an active voice is you’re doing your part. And I’m glad to hear you come and say that on the podcast because this is something that we don’t highlight nearly as much as we should. You also mentioned a little bit on your group homes, that you’re doing good there and you’re helping out the community in that aspect. Can you talk about that a little bit? Is that an important factor for why you’re in group homes, or is that just the cherry on top?

Antoinette:
I think it’s important, period. I don’t think there’s any business I want to walk into and there’s not something I can leave behind that’s greater than what I’m getting out of it. The same approach with Airbnb, making it feel very homely and being beautiful and top quality, high end, it’s the same approach for the group home. I set them up as if I were setting them up as a luxury Airbnb, and then it just so happens that the person staying there is going to be a client receiving services. So I want to make sure that those clients are receiving the best home environment I have to offer.
Within that, it’s having organic gardens in the yard so that they can get some outside therapy as well, versus just being in the home all the time. Having access to organic food and produce, these are all little things that you don’t necessarily get in the assisted living space because it’s more like a boarding house or a little older and not as well kept. I want this particular subset of the community to be able to experience the luxuries that they may not otherwise have available to them. And I think that’s important as well.

David:
I’m curious. You caught an L when the city came in and said, “You can no longer do this or we’re just going to make your life so miserable it’s not worth doing.” And you had the idea to pivot in using the same properties for a different purpose. That’s not natural. People don’t just on their own be like, “I’m going to change the entire asset class of the property, go through licensing, have construction done so that it can be held up to license, get the permits for a new thing.” Where did you get the idea to convert into the new use?

Antoinette:
A friend of mine was in the process of converting one. And if the numbers work, that’s enough for me to dig in. So with the numbers that they were sharing me, it sounded like a home run. The properties had already been completely updated because they were Airbnb first, so they were ready to go. I just had to go through the paperwork. So it didn’t seem too hard. All the hard stuff was already done. Now, I just have to fill out an application, take a couple online classes. It seemed simple to me, and I know I’m minimizing what the process entailed, but I think if my goal is to keep this property forever and have it produce the max income that it can, that’s first priority. It can never be to, “Oh, it’s not working out with the city anymore, time to sell. No, I committed to this property. We are in a relationship. I said I was never letting it go so I had to find something else. It was the only option to me.

Rob:
Antoinette, it’s really impressive to hear about all the different ways that you’re thinking about these new ventures. And I know that hearing about some of the missteps or some of the mistakes that you’ve encountered along the journey is equally as valuable to our listeners at home. Can you tell us about one of your real estate failures in this space or just along your journey in general?

Antoinette:
I’ll say I fail pretty regularly, so much so that it is nothing to be afraid of anymore. I just accept it as if something’s going to go wrong, it will happen. But the one that got the ugly cry out of me, I’ll tell you about that one.
It was a property that I bought in 2021. I had a home equity line on one of the properties. And I was in the process of refinancing that home, and I was going to use the dollars to purchase this new home that I was able to get three units out of and what is ultimately becoming the group home. And maybe two days before I was due to close on the refi, and of course five days after that I would’ve closed on that new purchase, the lender notified me that the refi was not going to happen.
It turned out through underwriting now, although I did everything I could to be ahead of it. Prior to putting it in the application, we did a soft underwriting to make sure that everything would pencil out before we even went down this road. But when we got to the final stage of under underwriting to get to the clear to close, the underwriter found that the way my properties were classified on my tax return essentially made all of the rental income wash out. So even though the properties were owned by my business and that’s what the rental income was being paid to, it was classified… I’m sorry, the properties were owned by me, but on the tax return they had it under my business. And because my business was reporting a business loss, it wiped out my rents.
I didn’t know there was this error on my tax return because I trusted my tax accountant to be on top of these things. But in the process of going through that refi, they sent a payoff to the bank that had my home equity line. So not only did I lose the dollars that I would’ve got from the refi, my plan B which was to just go and use the home equity line, that just evaporated as well. I walked into the bank to get the check and I got told that the account was frozen and I could not because I had moved out of that property. And for that particular lender, once you move, you could no longer use your home equity line. I didn’t know that. I learned do the BRRRR strategy, get the home equity line, and you can use this thing forever. Well, not with this particular lender. So in a space of 24 hours, my home equity line was gone, my refi had fallen apart, and I’m three days from closing on a property that I have a $10,000 escrow deposit on and I have no money.

Rob:
Well, I don’t know. Obviously that’s tough in the moment, but what did that really teach you moving forward? Is that a mistake that you think will ever happen again, or do you feel like you’re pretty guarded from that ever happening again? Because sometimes I feel like that’s a value that that’s hard to keep in mind with this type of scenario.

Antoinette:
Particularly I couldn’t have foreseen it. I thought I had done everything I could to anticipate things that could happen by doing the pre-underwriting before applying for that refinance application. By working with an accountant and having my finances managed by a professional, I thought I was doing everything I could. So in that case it could happen again. Because you could be making your best efforts and checking all the boxes to the best of your knowledge and hiring who you think are the right people, but you don’t know that it’s wrong until it hits the fan. So it very well could happen again. I don’t think I could prevent things from going wrong, but definitely that taught me that I could get through whatever went wrong.

David:
That sounds terrible that it was three or four days before closing and the deal almost didn’t work. What did you end up doing to be able to save that deal?

Antoinette:
Maybe for the first 15 minutes, I just sat in the car and screamed and cried because I didn’t know what I was going to do. But after I had my crying fit, I shot my Hail Mary. I had been talking to my boyfriend’s mom about doing a self-directed and partnering with us on some investments, but it had just been conversations. We never moved forward with taking steps to set that up at.
So I called her, explained to her what had happened, and asked her if she would still be interested in partnering on some investments and setting up that self-directed. I explained to her the risk, basically everything that I experienced so far with money evaporating. I broke down the deal to her, explained to her that it would be my intent for this to operate as the group home and gave her the, “I’ve never run a group home before. Here are all the unknowns, but here are the things that I do know. Worst case scenario, this can go back on the market and we can recoup everything,” and asked her if she was in or out. And she said she was in.
So that was my Hail Mary shot and she saved the day, quite honestly. If she had not been willing to lend and create that self-directed, I was out of sources to tap. However, it was going to take two weeks to get the account set up and the money transferred. So I had to call my network to find hard money that could turn it around within two days. I found a guy. They taxed me heavy, charged me 10% to hold dollars for 30 days. But it was what I had to do at the time or the best thing that I could figure out as a solution. So I went into temporary hard money on a 30-day loan, paid a premium for that, started the process of moving over her dollars from her IRA to a self-directed IRA, and then swapped it all out at the end of 30 days.
So I was able to close in two days. I probably paid a lot more for the money that I had to use than I expected to, but it had to happen. For me, that property, knowing that it was going to be the group home in the end, it was the right location, the right layout, everything else about it was right, it was worth fighting through to make sure I got to see that to the end.

David:
Why do you think she trusted you with that money? It wasn’t just money she had lying around. This is her retirement she’s planning on. Was it your track record with money and some of the decisions that you made in your past?

Antoinette:
Definitely that. I think everybody that knows me knows me as the money person. I’m either tight with the money, you can trust me with the money and I’m not going to squander it. But also if I say I’m going to pay you back, I will pay you back. But I asked her specifically why would she? And she said that she had never seen anyone write their own mortgage before, and she was referencing the first deal that she saw me do. So just being able to see that process, she was just like, if you can figure out how to create your own mortgage and then refinance that out in 45 days, I think you can figure out anything.

Rob:
That’s awesome. So did you end up… Was that the last time you ever worked with her, or does she still lend on any of your deals?

Antoinette:
She still lends. We still have that self-directed setup with access to, but actually we’re in the process of teaching her how to achieve a version of financial independence for herself. Two months ago, we just purchased her her first investment property. It was a single family home that we found off market for sale by owner. We’re converting it to a duplex so that half of it can be longer midterm rental and the other half can operate as Airbnb. And so this will be her first investment so that she can get some cash flow coming in and possibly consider retiring a few years early versus having to wait until she’s 67.

Rob:
Wow, that’s really, really, really cool. Now, you’re in this groove of the group home. What is your trajectory? What are you wanting to do? You admitted earlier you have shiny object syndrome. From the sounds of it, it sounds like group homes aren’t really Antoinette’s last stop. Do you want to sit in this moment and keep going the group home route, or are you starting to already expand?

Antoinette:
I’m already, I view group home as a five-year plan for me. Within five years, I’m exiting, whether that’s a sale or just putting in a different manager to operate. But I’ve already achieved financial freedom so I’m molding my lifestyle of sorts. So with the income from the group home, I’d like to diversify the asset, get into the multi-family asset class, which we have not yet, whether we’re purchasing a multi-family or partnering with the operator to bring that Airbnb strategy to the table, buying vacation rentals and true vacation markets. But those markets will probably be identified based on where we want to visit. So now, these become second homes that we can use for lifestyle enhancement.
But while we’re not there, it’s still making money. But I think in the end, it’s just the last few things I’m going to do are going to sure up where we are financially with the portfolio so that I could focus more on living. I want to get more into health and fitness. I might become a herbalist. I want to make enough income so that I could spend more time just fully living life exploring and learning different things.

Rob:
That’s cool. That’s really cool. Do you feel that your group home portfolio is relatively recession-resistant? Is this an asset class that that would worry you less than maybe something like a short-term rental or any other form of real estate?

Antoinette:
It would worry me less on the renter variability. Leases come and go. With a pandemic happening, we now know that short-term rental can shut down completely. But with these homes, this is someone’s home. They live there every day. And generally once a person’s placed, they are there unless they pass or have to relocate because their family’s relocating to another area. But these are probably the most long-term tenant that you’ll have in a property. So it doesn’t have that variability that we experience in long, medium, or short term. They come. And if they’re having a great experience and being well taken care of, they’re probably there to stay.

David:
That is fantastic. I love that. And you got the right approach when it comes to how you build a good business, is you’re asking the right questions. You’re not asking the question of, “How do I make my own life easier? How do I make myself a whole bunch of money?” You’re saying, “How do I provide something for someone else that’s better than my competition?” And you realize that the money will follow. And that’s a key thing that I really want to point out, is it’s so easy for people to listen to these podcasts and think, “Oh, she’s making all that money. How do I do it too?” And then they do a terrible job with the business and it doesn’t work out and they say, “Ah, the Airbnb doesn’t work. Short-term rentals don’t work. Assisted living doesn’t work.” But they were just asking the wrong questions. So appreciate you sharing what it takes to succeed.
With that being said, we’re going to move on to the next segment of our show. It is the world-famous Famous Four.

Speaker 4:
(singing)

David:
In this segment of the show, we ask every guest the same four questions every episode. I’m sure you’re familiar with this Antoinette because I know you are a big BiggerPockets Podcast fan. Question number one, what is your favorite real estate book?

Antoinette:
This question gives me so much anxiety because I have to admit to the world that I’ve never read a real estate book.

David:
Rob just found a spirit partner.

Antoinette:
That speaks to the power of BiggerPockets because I’ve been able to do all this just listening to the podcast, participating in the forums. Legit, that was enough for me to start and build this portfolio and to be successful up until this point. But my favorite business book is The Seven Signs of Highly Effective People by Stephen Covey. And I love the first one, begin with the end in mind. That’s my philosophy. Anything I’m starting, I’m always thinking about what’s the end goal and using that as my North Star to make sure that I complete those goals.

Rob:
Okay, love that. Next question. When you’re not out there crushing your pivots and going into awesome real estate niches that you’re absolutely dominating, what are some of your hobbies?

Antoinette:
My favorite hobby is salsa dancing. It is like if you haven’t tried it, please go and do it. It is absolutely life-changing. It’s a great workout. It’s a brain clearer. If you’re thinking about too much all day juggling all of these properties, go get on the dance floor. It all goes away.

Rob:
Nice. Yeah, I’ve been trying to invite David out to go salsa dancing with me, but he never responds to my text messages.

David:
I don’t feel safe yet. We took a trip to Mexico. It was a big step for us. I feel like things went okay. There was no catastrophe. Baby steps. We’re making our way into salsa dancing.

Antoinette:
Let me know. When you finally try it, take me with you.

David:
Yes, the pivot queen. Does salsa dancing involve pivoting? It’s like are your hips pivoting a lot and that’s why you like it so much? Because you’ve proven you’re such a good pivoter.

Antoinette:
Yes, everything pivots.

David:
There it is.

Antoinette:
Yes. Pivots, twist, turns, all of it.

David:
That’s right. Did we see any salsa dancing in Mexico, Rob? I don’t think we did.

Rob:
We did not. No salsa dancing. Just salsa dipping, my friend.

David:
Ba dum tss. Very nicely done, thank you. It’s BiggerPockets writers for teeing us up. This is becoming like Saturday Night Live, people writing our jokes for us. That was good. All right, my last question for you, Antoinette. What call to action do you have for our listeners?

Antoinette:
Call to action is take action. None of the excuses you can come up with are valid. You don’t know what’s going to happen if you never attempt to make it happen. So don’t let not having read a real estate book hinder you. Don’t let not having all of the answers hinder you. Get clear on a few key things and start taking action. You’ll figure the rest out as you go along. And it’s never as scary in practice as you think it is before you take the leap.

Rob:
Well lastly, Antoinette, where can people find out more about you?

Antoinette:
I am newly on Instagram as @fearlessandfreefi. That’s @fearlessandfreefi on Instagram. And you can also find out more about me on fearlessandfreefi.com.

Rob:
What about you, David?

David:
Find me @davidgreene24. Very boring, very easy to remember. Just remember that unnecessary val at the end of my name, the E. Greene with an E. How about you, Rob?

Rob:
You can find me over all social outlets @robylt, R-O-B-Y-L-T. And lastly, if you listen to this episode and you’re like, “Wow, Antoinette has it down. I love this podcast. I learned so much about it. I’m going to pivot. I’m inspired,” can we just ask for a simple five-star review on the Apple Podcasts platform or wherever else you download your podcast? It helps us get served to all the masses, and all we want to do is help change other people’s lives and help them invest in real estate.

David:
Absolutely. Antoinette, thank you so much for joining us today. Do you have any last words for our audience?

Antoinette:
Yes. It’s been an absolute honor to give back to the platform that’s given me so much, so thank you BiggerPockets. Thank you, Rob and Dave, for the opportunity to share. I’m an open book sharing whatever I can. There are a ton of freebies on our website, and I think I’ll send you guys some links too for a couple freebies to share with the audience because for this, it’s a full circle moment just being able to give back from what I got. So thank you again.

David:
Thank you. And again, if you liked Antoinette’s episode with us, go check out her episode on BiggerPockets Money. It was episode 295. This is David Greene for Rob “Pivot” Abasolo signing out.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Check out our sponsor page!

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


Regina Lowrie, the first female chair of the Mortgage Bankers Association, died suddenly on Jan. 1. She was 68.

Lowrie was most recently the president and CEO of Dytrix, a fintech company that enables secure financial transactions that includes closing agent management and real-time wire/ACH transfer validation for institutions. With nearly 40 years of experience in the real estate finance industry, Lowrie is widely known for making history in 2005 as the first female elected chair of the MBA.

Regina Lowrie
Regina Lowrie, the first female chair of the Mortgage Bankers Association.

“She was a trailblazing leader who was the first woman to serve as MBA’s chairman,” president & CEO Robert Broeksmit of MBA said in a statement. “Her tenacity, resilience, and fierce advocacy for our industry will long be remembered by all those fortunate enough to have interacted with her. We offer our condolences to her friends, colleagues, and family.”

In 2003, Lowrie accepted her nomination to serve on the MBA leadership ladder — initially serving as MBA vice chair. She also served as a volunteer on numerous MBA committees and on the MBA Residential Board of Governors (RESBOG). She was also the first woman to lead the MBA of Greater Philadelphia in 1995.

Lowrie was well-liked by her colleagues who described her as loyal and straightforward in her views.

“Regina was not only a dear friend for many years but was an integral part of our industry, both on national and state level,” said E. Robert Levy, executive director and counsel with the MBA of New Jersey. “To say that she will be greatly missed is an understatement.”

Her career also includes president and CEO of Gateway Funding Diversified Mortgage Services for 12 years until 2006. When Gateway Funding was sold in 2006, the firm had grown to 800 employees with 57 branches and had a loan production of $3.5 billion with revenues of more than $100 million.

Having grown up in the Philadelphia area, Lowrie’s career was mostly based in Pennsylvania. She was founder, president and CEO of RML Investments Inc, a specialized advisory firm focused on helping mortgage banking clients analyze enterprise risks and was president at Vision Mortgage Capital and senior vice president of Continental Bank.

Lowrie also served as an advisory board member and board of directors member for a diverse list of public and private entities, including the Fannie Mae National Advisory Council, the Radian Guaranty Advisory Board, the Board of Directors of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp.

Lowrie “was a tireless advocate and leader to the industry,” Dave Stevens, CEO at Mountain Lake Consulting Inc and former head of the FHA and MBA, wrote on his LinkedIn post mourning her passing. “She will be missed by all who knew her.”

“She taught me a lot about the business,” Anthony Ianni, a former colleague of Lowrie at Comnet Mortgage Services and vice president of solutions at Maxwell, wrote on LinkedIn.

“One thing she instilled was follow-up. I still use her method. Condolences to her family, and rest in peace.”



Source link


When it comes to offering an opinion of ‘good or bad’ on HR 7735 — the VA modernization bill — and its ultimate ability to create a better appraisal process for veteran and active duty borrowers, it’s simply too early to tell with too little information being shared on exactly what changes we should expect.

But, we might also pull from wisdom of the ages: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

Simple enough axiom, and one many military or rural readers may be able to relate to. Veterans are certainly familiar with the saying as many of the techniques, tactics, and procedures (TTP) for warfare have changed little over the years.

That said, modernization is a good thing as well and should never be feared. After all, Marines aren’t fighting wars atop horses with bows and arrows as they did in Sun Tzu’s day. My hope is that many of the features and policies that have made the VA loan the safest mortgage in the U.S. remain intact while updating some of the systems and processes that make it antiquated, inefficient and costly for the veteran. 

While I’m a fan of improving antiquated systems, I first wonder if the VA, the MBA, or Congress were open enough about the problems with the current system. To my knowledge, there were never any open statements backed with any sort of data or analysis to prove the deficiency of the VA appraisal. 

Personally, tracking the occurrences of over 2,700 VA loans through Vetted VA for 2021, I can tell you that professionals — who truly know the VA loan — don’t hate the current VA appraisal process. We don’t believe it is slower than other appraisals, nor does it need massive change as a generality. 

It may be that many of the loan originators and real estate agents calling for major changes to the VA appraisal process are be those with the least amount of first-hand experience with the VA product.

So what’s good, what’s bad, and what’s ugly?

To begin with, I applaud the flexibility of allowing desktop or drive-by appraisals, but at the same time this would seem to fundamentally alter the requirement of the appraiser to inspect the property to ensure Minimum Property Requirements (MPRs) are met. 

MPRs exist on all loan types, and it’s my opinion that they are a good thing even though VA is stricter with a few details, like peeling paint, an issue often dismissed as trivial and unworthy of repair. Peeling paint is an open door to water intrusion, one of the most pervasive pathologies in a home.

MPRs protect the borrower, the home, and the financial investment made by all parties. And one of the many reasons that VA loans default at a lower rate than other loan types, including conventional, is because of the required due diligence to ’protect the property,’ which then protects the homeowner. VA’s MPRs allow for the veteran to not worry about having to immediately sink their funds into repairs and instead have savings in the bank to avoid defaulting on the loan.

I do believe there are issues in rural markets that lead to lengthy delays that are difficult for homebuyers in a normal functioning market, but what about the burden of proof? With other loan types, we are able to see the appraisal data which confirms the average time for the report to be completed. 

Though John Bell, deputy director of the Loan Guaranty Service at the VA, has cited the speed and efficiency of the VA appraisal, the data sources are not available to the larger industry participants to illustrate the actual issues that would prompt a major change like this.

Currently, the VA loan has a requirement to be delivered in 10 days after acceptance and we believe they do in most cases. However, in several rural markets there is failure to meet this standard as appraisers may not even accept the order for weeks. Without a doubt, other loan types, including conventional, also experience long delays in obtaining a completed report in rural markets for the same known issue of shortage of available appraisers.

The supply of appraisers approved with the VA has greatly and disproportionately impacted veterans in smaller markets in two ways: time and money. Fewer VA fee appraisers exist because of the additional requirements appraisers have to meet in order to perform appraisals for VA loans. 

This shortage oftentimes leads to delays in accepting appraisals and costs being driven up for veterans with the ‘bidding’ impact it creates. Veterans have felt hostage to the current system in these smaller markets, and I think that is an appropriate analogy. I believe changes are needed to ensure veterans in rural markets are not disproportionately impacted.

Again, notably there is a shortage of appraisers for all loan types, hence the changes in USPAP to lower the education requirements to become an appraiser.

When it comes to establishing market value, I think the VA appraisal at present determines this as well as any other. When value is not achievable in the opinion of the appraiser — both Tidewater and Reconsideration of Value allow more protective flexibility for the borrower than any other loan type. ‘Market value’ doesn’t change from one loan type to another after all, though there are small inconsistencies between comparable analysis required for VA, FHA, or conventional loans. 

I believe these inconsistencies are nominal at best and, if anything, the comparable requirements of conventional lending are a bit too loose as they are more likely to lead to sale comparisons of truly non-comparable properties. VA appraisal standards have long proven their strength with lower default rates and healthier homes.

So how will the VA modernization bill change comparable property analysis fundamentally? How will it change MPR analysis with the introduction of desktop/drive-by appraisals? How will it change the process to allow for more VA appraisers? How will all of these changes at once impact what is already a very competitive and accurate appraisal?

We don’t really know the how yet, we just know the what. Personally, I’m a fan of improvement even when other new unforeseen problems arise. I think these changes are likely to impact the veteran, the originator, and the real estate agent in a positive way — even if I’m annoyed the powers that be didn’t ‘show their work’ or publish the data that supported a need for this massive overhaul. 

A fundamental change

Make no mistake, this is a significant fundamental change to what we have all currently known as the VA appraisal process. My hope is this creates an environment where real estate agents, loan originators, and even veterans are more likely to consider the VA loan when purchasing a home in the US.

For far too long, ignorant professionals have cited some of these concerns as a reason to include “Not accepting VA Loans” in the MLS property listing, which quite frankly is infuriating to those in the know.

The VA loan is the most cost-effective, efficient, flexible and secure mortgage in the world. I remain hopeful these changes further drive that point home.

Christopher Griffith, a Marine veteran, is the CEO of Vetted VA and Broker/Owner Partner of Be My Neighbor Mortgage.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of HousingWire’s editorial department and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Christopher Griffith at christopher@vettedva.com

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Sarah Wheeler at sarah@hwmedia.com



Source link


The average renter’s income is stretched thin from inflation, and more than 40% of renters are considered cost-burdened because they’re spending 30% of their income or more on housing costs. People are looking to trim their budgets in any way they can—even if it means moving in with roommates, family, or to more affordable areas out-of-state. The newest Rent.com migration report shows growing interest in the South and Midwest as many renters look to leave the West and Northeast. 

Researchers at Rent.com analyzed data from July, August, and September to determine a lead delta for each region, state, and metro. A lead is a potential renter who contacts a property manager or landlord to express interest in a property. The lead delta is the numerical difference between outbound and inbound leads as a share of all leads in the area. It’s important to note that these figures do not represent actual migration but give a good insight into areas with high demand and interest, which correlates with actual migration patterns.

People move for a variety of reasons, which aren’t measured by the report. They may move to be closer to family or to start new jobs. The trends suggest that high rents are pricing some renters out of certain urban areas, and they’re seeking rental homes in more affordable nearby metros and states, as well as desirable areas in the South and Midwest. Investors can look to popular areas with positive lead deltas to find sweet spots where the demand for rentals is high, and the price-to-rent ratio is low. 

Where Are Renters Moving From?

The following metro areas had the highest outbound lead deltas:

  • Chicago, Illinois (-46.00%)
  • Traverse City-Cadillac, Michigan (-43.32%)
  • Atlanta, Georgia (-30.91%)
  • New York City (-26.49%)
  • Charlotte, North Carolina (-26.23%)

Outbound Leads By Metro – Rent.com

Chicago rose to the top of the list this quarter. The city’s bleak winters could drive residents elsewhere, as could its reputation for crime. But high rents are another problem—Chicago is the most expensive city in the Midwest. It’s much more affordable than New York, where rent prices increased nearly 25% year-over-year, but it’s relatively expensive compared to surrounding areas in Illinois and the Midwest. In Atlanta, rents are up almost 14% year-over-year, which could be causing residents to seek homes elsewhere. 

The following states had the highest outbound lead deltas:

  • Illinois (-46.41%)
  • New York (-44.04%)
  • Maine (-17.91%)
  • Georgia (-17.14%)
  • Colorado (-16.43%)

Where Are Renters Looking to Move? 

People tend to inquire about nearby areas and states when they’re considering moving, but Southern states are attracting interest from further away. For example, Chicago renters inquired about Midwestern metros like Milwaukee, Minneapolis-St. Paul, and Indianapolis, but showed equal interest in Dallas-Ft. Worth and Nashville. New York City renters primarily looked at other Northeastern metros, but also expressed interest in Georgia communities. 

The following metro areas had the highest inbound lead deltas:

  • Biloxi-Gulfport, Mississippi (51.15%)
  • Huntsville-Decatur (Florence), Alabama (48.41%)
  • Madison, Wisconsin (42.32%)
  • Waco-Temple-Bryan, Texas (41.55%)
  • Springfield, Missouri (40.88%)

Inbound Leads By Metro – Rent.com

Chicago residents inquired about all five of these cities and were especially interested in Biloxi-Gulfport. The other metros drew residents from neighboring areas, but renters from notoriously expensive areas expressed interest in Southern and Midwestern metro areas as well. 

For example, residents of Atlanta, New York, and Chicago all inquired about Huntsville-Decatur. Huntsville was named the best place to live by U.S. News, and Madison made the top 20 as well. Madison drew interest from Los Angeles, New York, Denver, Milwaukee, and Chicago. Waco-Temple-Bryan also brought inquiries from Chicago and New York, but most came from within the state. Leads for Springfield came from St. Louis and Kansas City, but also Chicago, Denver, and Dallas-Ft. Worth.

State-level trends were similar. Many Illinois renters looked to stay in Illinois or neighboring Indiana, but some also expressed interest in Texas and Tennessee. Many New York and Maine renters looked to stay in their respective states or move to New Jersey, while some also sought homes in Florida, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. Georgia renters inquired about properties in the South, while Colorado renters looked at properties in neighboring Utah as well as the Midwest. Missouri, Wisconsin, and Michigan were all popular sources for outbound leads from Colorado. 

The following states had the highest inbound lead deltas:

  • North Dakota (38.7%)
  • New Jersey (36.35%)
  • Louisiana (35.71%)
  • New Hampshire (31.30%)
  • Mississippi (29.80%)

People are looking to move to North Dakota from all over the country. Over a quarter of leads came from far away states like Illinois, New York, California, and Texas. New Jersey mostly brought leads from within the state or from New York or Pennsylvania, but some Southern renters expressed interest in New Jersey as well. 

Louisiana brought the most leads from Texas. Other leads came from within the state, but almost 10% of inquiries came from the Midwest. The majority of people seeking homes in New Hampshire lived in-state or in Massachusetts or New York, but some renters from Southern states expressed interest as well. Renters from Louisiana, Georgia, and Alabama also looked at properties in Mississippi, but the second largest source of leads in the state, besides Mississippi itself, was Illinois. 

How Migration Impacts Housing Prices

Analysts at many firms expect home prices to fall across the nation in 2023, but how hard each area is hit will depend partly on the demand for homes. The demand for housing tends to increase when more people are moving into an area than out of it. If there aren’t enough homes to accommodate everyone moving into an area, that lack of supply relative to demand can act as a floor that prevents housing prices from decreasing in an economic downturn. In fact, some Southeastern markets that are drawing higher-income homebuyers away from expensive areas like the West Coast and Northeast are still appreciating rapidly while price growth slows in other overvalued markets, CoreLogic reports

Common Migration Trends 

When a city grows in popularity due to factors like incentives for businesses, a booming job market with high-paying jobs in a variety of industries, and a vibrant culture with growing entertainment options—rent prices rise. They can stay elevated for some time, even as people get priced out because demand from higher-income renters remains high. But eventually, price increases often become unsustainable. As people begin to move out of an area where prices have skyrocketed, demand for properties decreases and prices can drop. 

This trend is even more relevant now because remote work has become so prominent. In 2019, only about 5.7% of Americans primarily worked from home. By 2021, that figure more than tripled to 17.9%. With the freedom to live and work anywhere, more people are migrating to nearby areas—or different states altogether—to catch a price break. That’s illustrated by higher inbound and outbound lead deltas this quarter than last

This shift to cooling prices is already happening in Austin, which was overheated through the pandemic—rent decreases there are exceeding the national average. In the Denver area, you can see the shift in action. While rent prices are still up year-over-year in the city, price growth has slowed in Denver more than any other city in the metro. In the more affordable surrounding suburbs, meanwhile, rent prices are skyrocketing. Will Denver begin to mirror Austin? Or will the market stay competitive? Denver metro’s lead delta of -23.75% suggests demand may wane. 

How Investors Can Use Migration Data

When home price growth exceeds the norm, prices tend to come back down, following the principle of mean reversion—but investors can maximize their returns by buying when prices are low and selling when prices are high. One way to achieve this is to try to stay ahead of migration trends. If you can find the next locale that’s likely to draw residents from other areas due to more affordable pricing relative to nearby cities and a thriving economy, you may be able to capture those skyrocketing rents and realize appreciation. 

Huntsville is an excellent example of a desirable place where housing demand is increasing, but prices are low. But perhaps the best strategy is to look two steps ahead in your planning. Where will people go if Huntsville overheats?

Since investors can’t predict the future, there are always risks, and migration trends should not be the only data affecting decision-making. But the more information you can get when investing in a new market, the better. Following migration trends is a strategy that can help investors stay focused on the future and avoid jumping in head-first to hot markets that will soon decline.

Click here to view the methodology used in Rent.com’s report.

On The Market is presented by Fundrise

Fundrise logo horizontal fullcolor black

Fundrise is revolutionizing how you invest in real estate.

With direct-access to high-quality real estate investments, Fundrise allows you to build, manage, and grow a portfolio at the touch of a button. Combining innovation with expertise, Fundrise maximizes your long-term return potential and has quickly become America’s largest direct-to-investor real estate investing platform.

Learn more about Fundrise

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


The housing market has been wild the last few years, making weekly data more critical. This is why I’ve created the Housing Market Tracker — a weekly analysis of purchase apps, housing inventory and mortgage rates that will be published every Monday.

I want to focus on these three data lines because they will give us a glimpse into the future, so we don’t have to wait for the existing home sales data, which can be old if the market turns. In a normal market, we wouldn’t need to be concerned about weekly data so much, but we aren’t living in normal times.

Last year was the most chaotic housing year I’ve ever seen: market dynamics changed three different times and mortgage rates had a historic move from 3.27% to a high of 7.37%. Then those rates fell 1.25%, which changed the demand data, only to rise again in a short timeframe.

Looking at these three data lines is important because:

Purchase application data is a demand trend that looks out 30-90 days. This data had a historic year in 2022, with a waterfall collapse that wiped out eight years of the index in one year. This trend survey index has been the core of the housing economy for a decade and is a tricky data line sometimes if you don’t make some adjustments.

The Altos Research weekly inventory data looks ahead before the sales report inventory data. This can give us a heads-up on how much the forward-looking demand impacts the inventory channels before the sales report comes in.

The 10-year yield shows where mortgage rates will go. Since 2015, when I started to forecast mortgage rates in my prediction articles, I always start talking about where I believe the 10-year yield is going that year. You can see below the relationship between the 10-year yield and mortgage rates has been solid since 1971.

For this weekly tracker, I’ll talk about the weekly bond market moves and what can drive mortgage rates in the upcoming week, and what the previous week in mortgage rates did to the other data lines we are tracking weekly.

Purchase application data

We didn’t have a purchase application report last week, as we will get an updated report on Wednesday for the past two weeks. We had some exciting data after the weaker CPI report in November. For a couple of months, purchase application data was showing aggressive year-over-year declines, and the weekly data didn’t show any growth at all while mortgage rates were rising aggressively.

The second half of 2022 was a rough time for the housing market, up until November. Once rates started to fall and head lower with some consistency, we had seven weeks of a positive trend in the purchase application data.

This also means the completed sales from these applications won’t show up in November or even as part of the December existing home sales report. However, looking at the January and February existing home sales reports, which will be released in February and March, we should see the bleeding stop in the existing home sales data.

The seasonality of purchase application data traditionally means volumes rise after the second week of January through the first week of May. Traditionally after May, volumes fall, so it’s critical to show some discipline in reading the data during the first few months of the year.

Since we were working from an extreme dive in purchase application data for most of the year in 2022, context will be crucial. However, what we have seen since November should be encouraging for the housing market. For now, just think about stabilization, working from a low bar, and we will take this data one week at a time in 2023.

Remember that we wiped out seven years of growth in this data line in just one year in 2022; this was an epic dive in the data line.

Weekly housing inventory

The last few weeks have seen a noticeable decline in inventory. Most of that decline can be attributed to the seasonal decrease we see every year, but a partial amount can be attributed to rising demand.

Let me connect the dots here: On Oct. 28, Altos Research’s weekly data reported a peak of total single-family inventory of 577,172. As of last week, that inventory fell to 490,809. Traditionally we see inventory fall during the fall and winter months. However, in the last two weeks of 2022, some decline can be linked to the better demand we have seen since mid-November in the purchase application data.

It’s now 2023 and total inventory is low by every measure of the existing home sales market. On a historical basis using data from the National Association of Realtors, total inventory has the capacity over the next two existing home sales reports to break under 1 million.

If this happens, it will be only the second time in recent history that we start a calender year below 1 million active listings. Mind that we have over 330 million people in America now and compare this to the active listings we had in the 1980s with fewer people in the chart below. Currently running off the November report only, total inventory is running at 1.14 million and has fallen for four months. 

I am not a big fan of total housing inventory being below 2019 levels nationally. The housing markets that are back to 2019 levels are excellent in my book, and as long as mortgage rates stay high, we don’t have to worry about prices rising out of control. For now, we are ok, but this is something I will be keeping an eye on all year.

The 10-year yield and mortgage rates

Toward the end of the year, mortgage rates headed higher as the 10-year yield sold off and went higher itself. Mortgage rates hit a high of 7.37% on Oct. 20, only to head back down to 6.12% on Dec. 15. They rose to 6.54% to close out the year.

This week we have a few labor market reports that could impact mortgage rates, especially job openings and the Friday BLS jobs report. However, for this weekly tracker, we will also be keeping an eye on initial claims data released each Thursday morning.

I have been writing about the Fed pivot over the last several months, and it’s something I don’t believe we’ll see until the labor market breaks. This would mean initial claims getting above 323,000 on the four-week moving average. The recent headline print was 225,000, and the 4-week moving average was 221,000.

Another labor market data line to track is continuing claims — the people who have filed for jobless benefits and haven’t found work after a week. This number has been rising more steadily lately.

My 2023 forecast article will be published on Wednesday, and I’ll go into more detail about what I think about the bond market, inflation, and what to look for in 2023. However, for this weekly Housing Market Tracker article, the three topics above are what I’ll be focused on all year long.

In summary, we have no purchase application data to report from last week, but the trends have been positive, and housing inventory fell amid lower mortgage rates. We will see if the recent rate increase ends that streak of positive data.

Now that the New Year is here, it’s time to gear up for another year of weekly drama, and we will focus on the forward-looking data so you all have an idea of what is going on before the existing home sales report comes out.



Source link


Rocket Mortgage is providing up to $7,500 in credits for first time homebuyers to use toward their mortgage costs as it looks to court customers in underserved communities in select major cities.

The special purpose credit program, dubbed “Purchase Plus,” launched in the last week of December. The goal is increase homeownership accessibility in targeted census tracts in six major cities — Atlanta, Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Memphis and Philadelphia, Rocket said in a release. 

Eligible homebuyers in one of the six cities are provided a base credit of $5,000 plus an additional lender credit totaling 1% of the home’s purchase price — up to $2,500 — for a potential savings of $7,500.

“Our Purchase Plus program is a catalyst that will help narrow the homeownership gap by addressing a concern we’ve heard time and again – the difficulty of saving for out-of-pocket expenses when buying a home,” Bob Walters, CEO of Rocket Mortgage, said in a statement. 

The special purpose credit program eliminates exclusions based on area median income that broadens the scope of who can take advantage of the program, according to Rocket. 

Rocket Mortgage’s programs to expand access to homeownership efforts include the rollout of Rocket Community Fund’s Rocket Wealth Accelerator Program, which provides residents of Detroit, Cleveland, Milwaukee and Atlanta with coaches who will work with them to improve their ability to meet emergency needs and build their credit. 

Launched in December, the program offers matching dollars for participants’ savings plans with up to $500 for people planning to buy a home or a vehicle and up to $300 for those with short-term or emergency savings goals.

Rocket Mortgage, which was the largest mortgage originator in the country for the better part of a decade, lost its origination crown to its rival United Wholesale Mortgage in the third quarter, mainly due to refis plummeting as mortgage rates began to soar. 

Rocket has been focusing on garnering more users for its platform in the hopes to get them to lock in mortgages when buying homes.

It has rolled out temporary rate buydowns like an “Inflation Buster” program, in which Rocket Mortgage covers the difference in mortgage payments in the first 12 months through a special escrow account.

It has also launched Rocket Rewards, a loyalty program that distributes points toward financial transactions across the Rocket platform for potential homebuyers.

In turn, homebuyers can use points to get discounts in their closing costs in the future. Upon registration, customers receive a 7,500-point welcome bonus on their first reward activity – or $75 in savings on closing costs.



Source link


Deleveraging is a term you probably haven’t heard. And don’t be surprised; most news networks will never cover what deleveraging is or what it means for the real estate market. But, this capital constriction could implode the housing market, causing numerous investors and funds to go under, leaving the rest to pick up the scraps. This massive change is about to happen, but don’t get too scared; if you bought right, you could be one of the lucky few with a buffet of cash-flowing deals to choose from.

So, who’s better to ask about this impending crisis than Ben Miller, co-founder and CEO of Fundrise? He’s been on both ends of lending, not only buying significant assets with credit but also supplying the funding to others who need it. Ben is predicting a massive change in the real estate market that will shock investors to the core and could leave the economy worse for wear. This deleveraging crisis Ben talks about is not a simple concept, but once you understand how and why it’s happening, you unlock a piece of knowledge that 99% of other investors miss.

Ben speaks on how bridge loans and floating financing have put thousands of investors (and lenders) in a bind, why banks will be strapped for cash in 2023, and the scenarios that could play out over the next year if everything goes wrong. Make no mistake, this is NOT a doomsday forecast or some hypothetical hype meant to worry investors. Deleveraging is a real scenario that could have cascading effects for decades. If you’re investing, this is a CRUCIAL episode to tune into.

Dave:
Hey everyone. Welcome to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer, your host joined with James Dainard up in Seattle today. James, ready for the game?

James:
I am ready. I got my cough drops. I’m ready to scream as… The 12th Man is a real thing so I will be screaming with him.

Dave:
I’ve always wanted to go to a game there. Is it really something different?

James:
Oh, when you are back here I will take you. Yeah, I’ve been seasoned ticket holder for a long time. It is loud. When Beast Mode did the beast quake, it was the most intense thing I’ve ever heard in my life, it was absolutely crazy.

Dave:
Yeah, that sounds fun. Well I’m going to be in Seattle in two weeks but you’re not going to be there unfortunately. But next year we’ll do it.

James:
If there’s a game I might be able to give you tickets, let me check the schedule.

Dave:
I’m definitely in. Well let’s get to real estate. So today we have Ben Miller who is the CEO of Fundrise who just full disclosure is the sponsor of our show. But Ben is the single most knowledgeable people about real estate I’ve met in my life. And this is a fantastic episode and interview that we just had. Can you give a brief summary to everyone listening about what they can expect to hear here?

James:
I think this is such a great episode. This is actually one of my favorite ones that we’ve done and the reason being is everyone’s looking for this opportunity and they’re frozen right now. They’re like, I’m not going to buy anything until I figure out what to buy. Ben talks about what’s coming down our pipeline and as an investor to prepare of where the major opportunities are. And the hints he drops are… everyone wants to know where to make the wealth, it is what we’re going to talk about in this episode.

Dave:
And I do want to just give a little bit of a disclosure here because some of what Ben talks about is a little more advanced. We get into the details of the banking system and how loans are generated in real estate, specifically commercial real estate. But it is crucially important to what Ben’s thoughts are about what’s happening in real estate right now. And he provides really good concrete examples of how some of the shifting dynamics in the debt markets and this big deleveraging as he calls it, that we’re going to see over the next couple years could impact commercial real estate assets. So it’s a fascinating episode, I personally learned a ton, but just be before warned that there is some nerdy wonkery in here. But I know for people like James and I, we loved it.

James:
I love shooting this sh*t with Ben, I think I sent you an email before the show, I was like, I had to listen to this podcast twice to digest it, but it is fascinating and it probably changed my whole strategy for what I’m going to do in 2023.

Dave:
Wow. All right. Well those are bold words so if James has taken it that seriously, you definitely want to listen to this. So we’re going to take a quick break but then we’ll be right back with the CEO of Fundrise, Ben Miller.
Ben Miller, the CEO of Fundrise. Welcome back to On the Market. Thanks so much for being here.

Ben:
Thanks for having me guys.

Dave:
Well we’re excited because last time we had a great conversation talking a lot about Build to Rent, but James and I have both listened to a podcast you were on recently. James admitted he listened to it twice because he liked it so much. That was talking about de-leveraging, I think it was called the Great De-Leveraging on that podcast episode and it was fascinating. So we were hoping to start there and just learn a little bit about your thoughts on this topic. So can you just start by telling us a little bit about what de-leveraging is?

Ben:
Yeah. So it means to reduce the amount of debt you have, less leverage, de-lever and that’s basically I think going to be a ratchet on the economy and on all assets this coming year or two.

Dave:
And so when you’re talking about that de-leveraging in terms of real estate, are you saying existing property owners are going to reduce the amount of leverage they have on properties or are purchases on a go forward basis going to use less of debt or how would you describe the phenomenon of de-leveraging as it pertains to real estate investing?

Ben:
So the argument I’m making right is that virtually the entire financial system, not just real estate, has to reduce the amount of debt it has, it has to de-lever. And that is because we were in a low interest rate environment, basically zero interest rate environment, for 15 years and before that we’d been in a falling interest rate environment for 40 years. So that’s a long time. And we move to a high and rising interest rate environment, so you’re basically, it’s like you’re a fish and now you’re in the air. It’s a sea change, completely different environment. And in that rising interest rate or high interest rate environment, the amount of debt a asset can support is less. So to put the math on it rather, you have a business, you have a apartment building and you have a certain amount of income from it, let’s just say a million dollars a year. When your debt service doubles, which everybody’s debt service in the new interest rate environment has gone up at least 2x, maybe 3x, you can’t support the same amount of debt service as you could before. So you have to have less debt on the asset.

Dave:
And are you seeing this already starting to happen in your portfolio or how are you noticing this manifesting itself?

Ben:
Well I can talk about us and then I can talk about what I’m seeing firsthand. So we’re a little bit different than most borrowers. We have essentially what’s like a public REIT, there are publicly registered REITs and so our leverage is much lower. Our average leverage in our funds is 45%, 43%. So that’s a lot lower than most companies or businesses lever their assets. A typical private borrower probably wants to lever 75%, 65%, maybe 80%. So for us, basically we don’t really have this higher leverage problem, but we do have a couple of assets where I have it, because it’s the average leverage, so some are higher. And when I look at a… I’ll give you an example asset and how it’s playing out and what it means and you can then extrapolate that to a lot of other borrowers. So we have a $300 million warehouse line that holds a lot of rental residential with a big investment bank and we’ve got that line of credit or warehouse line, it’s a revolver so you can buy, you can pay it down, you can borrow it again. About 18 months ago.
And so when we got it, we bought a interest rate cap and I think talking about interest rate derivative is a really interesting subset underneath this topic. And basically what the investment banks like to do is lend their balance sheet to you and then you take that and you buy real estate or anything and then they go and they securitize it. Basically their business is really by generating fees and they use their balance sheet to basically enable themselves to get more capital management fees, capital market fees. So that’s really what they’re doing. So they’re not really lending to you, they’re really just bridging you to the securitization markets. And securitization markets, last year, 12 months ago you could borrow… that portfolio we built, you could borrow a 2.25% fixed for five years and now that securitization market is 6%.
So we have to pay down that line with that investment bank, we have to pay it down, we’ll do that and we have to bring it down from what it was probably 73% leverage to 55% leverage. And that’s basically a pay down of about 15, 20%. But it’s illustrative of when interest rates have gone up so much, you basically have to pay down. And we don’t have to pay down until the cap expires, interest rate cap, basically the size of the loan we got is too big for an interest rate that’s 6, 7, 8%. So we have the liquidity, we have a lot of liquidity so it’s not going to be a problem for us. But for a lot of borrowers, if your lender turns around and says I need you to write a check for 20% of the loan and I need that in every single loan that comes due or any loan that basically you’re going to get for a new property, that’s basically the problem for a lot of borrowers.

James:
Yeah this is really interesting because with the sudden increase in rates, this is the fastest we’ve ever seen rates increase this quickly, we’re seeing this in all segments and I think everybody is seeing these interest rates rise and they’re all thinking that the housing market’s going to crash and that there is some sort of crash coming. And for a while I’ve been thinking that there’s going to be this investment graveyard because of exactly what you’re talking about where the loan out values do not work with the current money and there’s going to be this massive liquidity demand to pay down these loans right now. And I know a lot of apartment guys for the last four or five years or the last two years, I know we staggered out our portfolio to be at 5, 7 and 9 years on fixed rates because… Or in 10 years, because we didn’t want to get into that liquidity crunch. But I feel like I’m seeing this now everywhere on any kind of leverage where it’s hard money, it could be banking, it could be commercial loans where the asset now can no longer pay for itself and there’s going to be this huge shortfall of money. And I think that’s where we’re going to see the biggest opportunity coming up, is this demand for liquidity.

Dave:
So it sounds like generally… I mean across the commercial real estate spectrum, we’re seeing people who have adjustable rates or commercial loans are reaching maturity. They’re basically facing the prospect of either having their current loan going up or they’re going to have to pay off their loan or refinance at a much higher rate. And this is going to cause a lot of liquidity issues across commercial real estate. So first and foremost, is this mostly with residential commercial or are you seeing this across the asset classes?

Ben:
Residential is probably the best.

Dave:
Oh really? Yikes.

Ben:
And office is probably the worst. I don’t know, on my podcast I had Larry Silverstein, the owner developer of the World Trade Center and he and I… It was just an insane interview and he’s talking about, he’s like, I’ve been… He’s 91 years old and he’s talking about one building that he’s developing that’s 5 billion dollars.

Dave:
You only need one if it’s 5 billion, then you’re pretty good.

James:
That’s working smart.

Dave:
There you go.

Ben:
I’m a piker compared to him. But anyways, you have office buildings throughout all these big downtowns that are just like, oh my god, they’re just… they’re unfinanceable. Literally, you couldn’t get a bank in the country to give you a loan at any price, period. Done. It’s zero liquidity. Liquidity means ability to get money. No money, so office is the worst. But if you’re a small business, forget about it, it’s everything. So I talked to another bunch of banks this week, this week? This week, yeah, yesterday and the day before, one of the banks we are a borrower, big relationship with them. And they were telling me, so this is a top 15 largest bank in the country, hundreds of billions of dollars of assets, hundreds of billions of dollars. And they said to me, so the way… where do banks get money, right? That’s a question, right? I love to understand how my counterparties work. Because if you understand how they work, you understand how they will behave. So banks, 90 some percent of their money comes from runoff.

Dave:
Never heard that term.

Ben:
Banking and insurance or asset management, you have deals that pay off and as they pay off you have money to redeploy or relend. So it’s called runoff.

Dave:
Oh okay.

Ben:
So yeah, that’s actually where most lending… When you go to a bank and you borrow money, it’s actually from somebody else paid off their loan and that’s why they can lend you more money because they’re usually pretty heavily levered up, banks are levered nine times or something. Of all the people levered banks are the most levered. And so nine times is like 90% leveraged and I think they’re actually like 92-3% levered technically. So anyways, so this bank basically probably lent 30 billion dollars in 2022. I said to them, what’s going on with you and how’s it going on with this liquidity crunch? And he says to me, for 2023 our forecast to the amount of lending we can do based on the amount of runoff we’ll have is by next December we’ll be able to lend a hundred million dollars.

Dave:
This is a bank with hundreds of millions of dollars of assets.

Ben:
Hundreds of billions.

Dave:
Billions.

Ben:
They would’ve normally lent, I don’t know, 30, 40, 50 billion in a single year. And they only have a hundred million to lend next year.

Dave:
What! Is it just…

Ben:
Yes.

Dave:
Okay. So you’re saying that none of these deals are going to pay off because they think they’re going to default or just no one’s going to sell or where does the lack of runoff come from?

Ben:
The essence is, for a deal to pay off it either has to sell and nobody’s going to sell or the borrower has to write you a check which they probably got from refinancing with someone else. But since nobody will finance you, nobody will pay off their loans. That’s whats happening, it’s a fact. Leading up to the last podcast in the last two weeks, I’ve met with probably 7 of the top 15 banks in the country. 7 of the 15, all the exact same.

Dave:
Really?

Ben:
They’re all exactly the same situation, yes.

James:
This is why I listened to that episode twice.

Ben:
People didn’t believe me. I was on Reddit and they were like, no way, this can’t be true.

James:
You were talking about the turtles, right? Will you go over the turtle concepts? Because this is a very complex topic and it made it very tangible and it’s like this never ending…. Go ahead Ben, go ahead and explain it.

Ben:
Okay. If I can do it justice here, because I’m not normally good at being succinct. So the point of the story about the banks is you don’t often think about where the banks are getting their money. And there’s a saying in politics, which is always follow the money. You to got to follow the money, so you’re going to borrow from the bank, but where did the bank get the money? The bank got it from depositors, they got it from a payoff and then the bank levered that, the banks are levered, they borrow, anybody in the market who’s lending to you borrowed against their asset. Just to try to make that simpler, if you go to a bank and give them your house as collateral, you get money from them and they have your collateral. A collateral is an asset and they take those assets and they borrow against them.
So now your lender is a borrower from someone else, your lender is also a borrower and who do they borrow that money from? Another institution who also borrowed money. So there’s this infinite chain of everybody is a borrower and a lender in the system and it stacks up. In a hard money world, you have a property with a hard money lender, the hard money lender may have borrowed against that portfolio of hard money loans from a bank. And the bank has that collateral and that bank has borrowed against that portfolio of loans. So the bank is levered and where did they borrow the money from? They borrow the money from different parts of the securitization market. For example, who levered that up with repo loans. And so there’s just so much more debt in the system than you can see. And because basically we went from a low interest rate environment to a high interest rate environment, everybody in that chain of borrowing to lender, the lender to borrower, everybody’s over levered. 90 some percent of the market, some huge part of the market’s over levered.
And so as the defaults happen or as the pay downs happen, it’s just a cascading effect. And I’ll give you an example. I know a big, big private equity fund, everybody’s probably heard of them, let’s say, I don’t know, top three or four and country, every private equity fund started credit funds over the last 10 years, debt funds. And they went out and became lenders. So if you have an apartment building or an office building and you borrowed from them, let’s say 75% of the money, they turned around and borrowed that money from a bank. And so they have a hundred million dollar property, they lend you 75 million, they turn around and borrowed 55 million from Wells Fargo who is actually pretty active in this part of the market, they call it an A note. And then the private equity fund, we keep it B note and then the borrower basically just thinks that the money was borrowed from this fund, but it’s actually really more complicated than that.
So what happens is, let’s say you have a loan with this credit fund and your loan’s coming due on December 1st and you go over to the credit fund and say, hey I need an extension, the market’s horrible, I’m not going to sell this today, let’s just extend this loan by 12 months. Well that credit fund’s going to say no because they have a loan from a bank and they turn around to the bank and say hey bank, we need to extend this loan. And the bank’s like no, pay me. Because certain banks are saying, F-you pay me. And so the credit fund is turning around and saying, no, pay me. And you’re with the borrower saying no, no, look its fine, the property’s doing fine, just give me an extension. I mean what are we talking about? Just give me extension.
How many times have you gone to a bank and it’s just expected to extend the loan. It’s like nothing, fine I’ll pay a small fee, let’s just extend this thing. No, you can’t extend it, pay me. Well how much do you want? 10%, 20%, they need to turn around pay down their lender because they have to de-lever the loan, they actually used this collateral to get the money to pay you. So there’s this chain of nobody cannot pay down because everybody’s borrowed from someone else. And so if you have a loan, you think you’re going to extend it in the next 12 months just because the property’s doing fine and you go to the bank, you might be surprised to them say, no.

Dave:
So what happens then? I just think the whole system is obviously so dependent on this chain continuing to operate, what happens when… Like you said, at any point any one of the lenders could just be like, no pay me. So what happens to, let’s just say an operator of a multi-family property, what happens when they can’t get liquidity or they can’t refinance? How does this all play out?

Ben:
So there’s a few possibilities, so let’s do the easy to the hard. So the easy way is that multifamily operator says fine, I’m going to go sell all of my freaking stocks and bonds I own, they probably have money outside and they sell it all and pay down, they’re not going to lose their apartment buildings. So they can turn around and sell all their assets and pay down the lender. That’s a luxury situation to be. I just want to point out the second order consequences of that is a lot of people are going to have to be selling their liquid assets like stocks and bonds to pay down their loans. And I’m talking about even massive institutions are going to have to do this. They’re going to have to pay down their loans and so the amount of liquidity is going to go away.
And when you have forced sellers, prices fall. So that was exactly what happened in England. If you guys remember UK two months ago, the gilt or the UK treasury spiked and all these pension funds had to go turn around and sell other assets to basically cover their margin on their treasuries, on their gilts. So the liquidity crisis happened not in gilt but actually in CLOs. So that’s why the cascading effects are much more sneaky because it will hit the liquid markets because that’s where you get money, that’s where you get liquidity. Somebody along the line is going to have to get liquidity. So let’s just say the borrower says I can pay down.
Scenario two they can’t pay down, they go to the lender and the lender says… Depends on the lender, so now if you’re talking about credit fund, they’re going to foreclose, they have to, they don’t have a choice, the extend and pretend that was the playbook for all of banking for the last 15 years, they can’t do, they can’t extend and pretend because the loan no longer covers. Who’s going to pay the interest rate that it doesn’t cover, it just literally fails their FDIC regulations that say you have to have capital ratios, so it just fails it, so they don’t have a choice. The regulator is going to make them default that loan. So credit funds are going to foreclose.
The private equity fund I was thinking about foreclosed on two deals last month from huge famous borrowers. And all this is happening, nobody’s talking about it, its not hitting the news. But you would’ve heard of the borrower and you would’ve heard of the private equity fund. The residential deal they foreclosed on, they’re happy to own it. But even though they are the lender, they still have to pay down the senior. Because if they foreclose, they have a big apartment building and they’ll say 80%… And I know of a deal where this happened in a major city, the deal basically… Even at 80% that credit fund has to pay down their senior lender, it’s not enough. Even if they foreclosed, the senior lender who that has that asset now they foreclosed on, it’s still over levered with their senior lender. Do you follow?

James:
Yeah, it’s just leveraged to the till, it’s a complete mess.

Ben:
Yeah, so it’s confusing. So I almost wish I could say names but it’ll get me in too much trouble. So I’m just going to name like, you went to ABC lender and you borrowed 80%, ABC lender, now foreclosed on your 200 unit apartment building, great, they have a 200 unit apartment building, but they borrowed from XYZ lender and XYZ lender is still saying pay me down, pay me off, pay me down. So even that ABC lender has to sell some… They have to do a capital call, they have to get liquidity, pay down. And so there’s again liquidity getting sucked out of the system. As liquidity gets sucked out of the system, prices fall. It’s the opposite of quantitative easing, opposite of what happened in 2021 where there was all this money everywhere and prices went up everywhere, money is being withdrawn from the system.
If you’re familiar with money supply, the M2 is going to fall because of this deleveraging dynamic and also quantitative tightening. So you actually are going to see, I think a liquidity shock next year as all this money leaves the system. So that’s a second scenario. They also foreclosed on an office building and they’re like F this, what am I going to do with this office building? The office building’s probably worth less than their loan, way less, maybe actually less than the senior lenders loan. They may give that whole office building to the actual bank XYZ bank, bank of America or something. Offices just defaults left and right. It’s going to be a blood bath and everybody talks about office to residential conversion, they don’t know what they’re talking about.

Dave:
Yeah, we’ve had a few people on this show come on and be like, yeah that doesn’t work.

Ben:
It’s just some academic or somebody talking about it, government policy, it’s like, you’re dreaming.

Dave:
It sounds like maybe 5% of offices could realistically be converted, if that.

Ben:
One obvious point, how often is an office building a hundred percent vacant?

Dave:
Yeah, right.

Ben:
Never, there’s always some five tenants in there and this building’s 20% leased, how do you renovate a building when there’s 20% leased with five tenants, you can’t.

Dave:
Yeah, it doesn’t make sense.

Ben:
Anyways, the question [inaudible 00:26:43] interesting is basically does the regulator… Right now the regulator has the hurt on the banks that really… Just absolute [inaudible 00:26:50] to them. So the question is, does the regulator start looking the other way and saying, okay, I know that you have all these assets that are basically in default and not covering, I’m going to look the other way. That’s a question that is… I don’t know, I suspect the regulator is not going to do that, for a bunch of reasons. I say this a lot in my little world, but this is more 1992 than it is any other period in our lifetimes.

James:
In 1992 the investment companies got… Everyone thinks of the crash as 2008. But in 1988 to 1992 the investment banks got rocked and it was the same type of liquidity crunch because the Fed did not step in at all. They did not look the other way in these investment… I was reading up on that and wasn’t like 90% of investment companies just got hammered during that time? It was some astronomical amount that it kind of shocked me and they couldn’t recover for a good two, three years, I want to say.

Ben:
Yeah. So I say that that was the worst real estate crisis in American history, way worse than 2008. Most people our age, it’s way before us… So basically the policy approach back then was let them all burn and they foreclosed on I think 8,000 banks and every developer had their loans called, so every developer you can possibly name either lost all their assets or basically was nearly about to lose all their assets, nobody was spared. And so a lot of times you see with policy and actually generally with human behavior is, if something happened that was bad, people don’t repeat that mistake until enough’s times passed that people forgot and then they do it again.

Dave:
Seems like it’s about time. Yeah, it’s been 30 years.

James:
We’re overdue really.

Ben:
Yeah, so we’re like the full circle. If it doesn’t happen in this cycle, it’s definitely happening next time we have a down cycle. Because it just seems like all these lenders who got over levered, all these borrowers who got over levered, they seem like the bad guy and we should just let them all burn. And it feels very politically satisfying, so we might end up there again this time.

Dave:
You just don’t think there’s political appetite to bail out banks again after what happened 15 years ago?

Ben:
And bail out private equity funds and bail out the rich, that doesn’t… I think there’s probably not going to be any more stimulus this decade. Bailouts and stimulus, forget about it.

James:
Yeah, stop the stimulus. But sometimes you have to let things burn a little bit, right? I mean that’s capitalism.

Dave:
That’s capitalism. Yeah, that’s the basic…

Ben:
Okay.

James:
And what Ben’s talking about is a big deal, it’s in all different spaces of this… People were just middle manning money everywhere for the last two years and making good returns. And it’s not just in the multi-family space and these office buildings, the hard money space was really bad as well. These lenders would come in, they would sell the notes off at 7%, 8% and now these lenders are paying to their senior bank, they’re paying 10, 11% and what’s happening is these fix and flip or burn investors, they’re coming in and they’re going, hey my projects are taking too long, I’m over budget, the value kind of fell, I need that extension and their rates are getting jacked up five, six points or they’re having to come in with money or they’re just not getting extended at all. We’re actually a hard money lender up in Washington and we’ve had so many requests for refinancing other lenders because they have no choice, the lender will not extend right now and it’s causing a big, big deal. And then we’re looking at the loan to values and that’s our answer, yeah we can do this loan but you need to bring in another 15% down and these people do not have it.
And that’s what’s so terrifying, in 2008 we saw a lot of REOs and bank owns through the residential space. But this is like, if you don’t have the money, you can’t pay your bills. And these investment banks and lenders, they’re going to have to take this… There’s going to be a lot of REOs and deed in lieus going back to these banks and banks are going to become… we’re all freaked out that the hedge funds were going to be the biggest residential owner with all this acquisition of housing and they might be just based on bad loans coming back to them.

Ben:
And so again, all the interesting things are the second/third order consequences. So the second order consequence is everything you just said James, is that appraisals are going to start coming down because you’re going to have all these bad REO marks and people are going to be forced to sell and that’s going to really hurt your LTVs. So then you’re going to go to borrow money or refinance and then the LTVs are going to be even worse and then they’re going to be more foreclosures. So we’re going into this cycle that just starts to tear apart… it’s this vicious cycle down and that’s one of the other consequences across the board. And in every [inaudible 00:32:19] we’re a FinTech, buy now pay later. Guess what? Super levered.

Dave:
Yeah. You said appraisals are going to come down, so I presume that you think there’s going to be a significant decline in property values across commercial real estate assets? It has to, right?

Ben:
Yeah, there’s no question. It’s a great opportunity essentially because we’re not talking about organic pricing, the price that banks sell things at, there’s no relationship to what you think is actually worth after the next, I think, probably 24 months of real downturn and distress. And so there’s an opportunity to buy or opportunity to lend to and if you have low amount of debt, this is literally what Larry Silverstein was saying, you go through horrible crises, you come out of it, you still own the building and now he’s worth 10 billion dollars or something. It is part of the game, don’t get caught in the part of the game where you basically lose your asset.

Dave:
So you mentioned Ben, that there’s a lot of opportunity, for people listening to this how would you recommend they take advantage of some of the upcoming opportunity you see?

Ben:
You can go talk to the banks, approach the banks, the banks are going to have… They don’t have it yet and they’re really slow. The brokers that were doing all of the lending will move to become the brokers for this middle capital, this bridge capital, I call it gap funding, rescue funding. All the brokers that were previously doing the work to find you senior loans will now do this work. So the brokers are probably the biggest source of flow. Its funny, the stock market, I still think they’re another leg down, and then overall markets, the recession hits earnings. So you want to be in credit, you want to be in credit this part of the cycle because the real value, the real opportunistic value I think is still a ways off. But the lenders they’re really the headwaters. But the deal flow is going to percolate everywhere else.

James:
I know we’ve reached out and we’re definitely getting a lot of response. The different types of lenders are a little bit, I think seeing it first. These local hard money guys are definitely seeing it first right now because the notes are shorter term, they’re usually 6 to 12 month notes where some of these other ones, they’re 2, 3, 5 years. And there is a lot of inventory starting to show up. I have been getting quite a bit of calls from lenders saying, hey, we just took this back deed in lieu or we’re going to foreclose this, what can you pay for this? And they don’t typically like my number, but the number is the number. But you can do it right now with the local smaller lenders, they’re not big deals but there is volume coming through for the smaller investors or the mid grade investors right now. And it is coming to market as we speak.

Dave:
And it sounds like Ben, you’re putting together a credit fund at Fundrise to take advantage of some of this.

Ben:
Yeah, we’ve had a credit strategy for a long time, but we had sort of sized it back over the last two couple years because it just was… We were deploying mostly elsewhere because it wasn’t attractive. And now all of a sudden its like… I feel like what’s happening now or in the next couple years will happen to us or for us five times in our life, the kind of deals we’ll see, the kind of lending we can make. I went through 2008, I have all these scars from 2008 and so 85% of the time it’s business as usual. And then there’s a few times where it’s just the entire ballgame’s made or lost. And so yeah we’re going to do credit first and then we’ll do equity second. Because you could almost see the other side of this, you could feel confident that it’s not permanent. It’s a couple years of transition to essentially a new borrowing environment.
And some people are unlucky, they had maturities come due in the middle of this, basically this period where there’s high rates and no liquidity and that sucks. It’s unfortunate for them but it’s an opportunity for someone else, problem is an opportunity. I’ll give you another example, this is outside real estate, but we have a tech fund we launched and we’re debating this, I don’t know if we’re going to do this because it’s so controversial, but I have sales coverage, I was buying all this… I came in and started lending to all these big… Investment banks, they get these deals and they securitize them and the problem is all these deals they intended to lay off or syndicate they say, they got stuck with, it’s called hung loans. So they have tens of billions of all these hung loans. And an example of one that’s well known is they have 12 billion dollars of Twitter’s debt. And I know exactly who has it and I’m talking to them and I’m like, at some point they’re going to just dump this debt for nothing. They’re just going to be like get me away from this thing. And we’re debating internally, is this a good opportunity or is this just too messy?

Dave:
Wow.

Ben:
It’s so messy.

Dave:
It’s the brand new debt.

Ben:
Yeah, yeah, the new debt. So I don’t know if it’s a good idea or not. This is an interesting question, but that kind of thing is insane. Twitter was worth 44 billion a year ago and you’re like, do I like it at 5 billion? I don’t know, maybe.

Dave:
That must be a fun debate to have.

Ben:
Well also it’s just like, I don’t really want the noise. That’s the problem with it, it’s not just evaluation question, I’m only making an economic decision here, but I’m not sure that’s allowed. But it’s just illustrative, it’s just totally illustrative of that it’s a special time to have that kind of investment opportunity.

Dave:
All right. Well Ben, thank you so much. This has been very, very insightful, I’ve learned a tremendous amount. And honestly it’s really surprising people aren’t talking about this. So I guess maybe that’s my last question to you, is why is this not being talked about more broadly?

Ben:
Yeah, it was so fun to be here. Everybody talks about this, but back in early February, I was obsessed with the pandemic, February, 2020. And we were going to California, my kids and my wife and I, we were going to be in California for Valentine’s Day. And I was like, we can’t go and made the kids wear masks on the plane and my wife’s like, you’re f*cking losing it, she was so annoyed with me and at some point everybody woke up to it. There’s something where information has to leak out to the public and it adds up, it requires a preponderance of data before people will shift. And it then happens all at once.

Dave:
People don’t want to believe inconvenient news.

Ben:
And it’s just like people are busy, it’s not what they’re focused on. And so it just takes enough pings before people will start to pay attention. So that’s why… at least I think that’s like… And of course everybody, in this case its all the participants in the financial system, they’re not talking about it, this is the last thing they want to talk about. They want to say everything’s great. And same thing with China, they’re like, everything is great, pay no attention to the the doors we’re welding shut in Wuhan. So again, there’s active participants trying to stop this from becoming a story and that’s confusing for the media and it takes a while for it to just to graduate.

Dave:
All right, well we’ll have to follow up with you soon as this unfolds, we would love to get your opinion because you’re obviously a bit of a canary in the coal mine right now, warning us ahead of time. So we really appreciate your time Ben, this is always a lot of fun when you come, so thanks so much for joining us.

Ben:
Yeah, thanks for having me.

James:
Thanks Ben.

Dave:
I don’t know whether I should be excited or scared right now.

James:
I’m actually extremely excited because I feel like we’re all looking for that massive opportunity and this is going to be a big deal. For a while I’ve always thought about this investor graveyard and I think it could be a banker graveyard, not an investor graveyard.

Dave:
Yeah. You’ve been saying this for a while that, specifically, and just for everyone to understand, we’re talking about mostly commercial, this could bleed into residential as Ben was saying, there’s all these secondary and tertiary impacts, but it could be really interesting for people who have… Syndicators, people who can raise money to start going and trying to buy these assets really cheap right now or in the next six months, whatever.

James:
And especially because banks don’t want to own assets. A lot of times they don’t want them, they want to get rid of them. And if you have liquidity, it’s going to make a big, big difference in… I’ve been saying that for a while because the weird thing is I’ve saw people make a lot of money over two years and then six months ago they’d be like, oh, I’m strapped on cash. And I’m like, well, you’ve just made this much money over the last two years, why are you strapped on cash? And that could come to a fruition in 2023, there’s going to be a call for some liquidity and it might all be on the street.

Dave:
You’re a perfect person to answer this question because you do a little bit of everything, you lend, you flip, you buy distressed assets. If all of what Ben thinks is going to come to fruition does, and we start to see liquidity crunch, declining prices in commercial real estate, how would you look to best take advantage of it?

James:
For us, I think we’re trying to gear up with more private equity and equity partners to where we’re trying to bring in some bigger dollars on this. A good example is we’ve done more syndicating deals in the last 120 to 150 days than we did the previous two years because the liquidity is on a crunch. But partnering up with investors that have cash right now is key to everything. And whether it’s fix and flip apartments, it could be burr properties or cash flow properties, for us, you want to attach to where the liquidity is. For us, we’re raising some money right now because we do see the opportunity with these buying notes, buying defaulted buildings, and then just really start building the relationship with these people with paper.
And like what Ben talked about, it’s hard to get ahold of the big banks. You can’t get ahold of them, I don’t know anybody there. But these small local lenders, you could be reaching out to them and saying, hey, I have liquidity, I’m looking for projects, let me know what you have. And I can tell you we’ve gotten some fairly good buys recently where I’m like, I just throw a low number out and they do the deal. They’re like, can you close it in five days? And we’re able to kind of click that out. So just talking to the people that have been in that space, all these hard money guys that have been harassing you for two years to lend you money, talk to them, see what opportunities are and then keep your liquidity on hand, don’t rush into that deal, make sure it’s the right one.

Dave:
That’s very good advice. All right, well thanks James, this was a lot of fun. I really do enjoy having conversation with you and Ben. It’s always a high level conversation, pretty nerdy and wonky stuff, but I think for those of us who really like the economy and the nuts and bolts of how this all works, this is a really fun episode.

James:
Oh, I love having Ben on. I start geeking out and we go down rabbit holes, they’re all fun to go down.

Dave:
Oh yeah, absolutely. When the cameras turned off, we were trying to convince Ben to let us come out to DC and hang out with him in person, so maybe we’ll do that next time.

James:
Oh, I’m a hundred percent in.

Dave:
All right, well thanks a lot James, have fun at the game.

James:
Yeah, go Hawks.

Dave:
I don’t really have any dog in this fight, but I’ll root for the Hawks for you, so hopefully you don’t have to… I guess, can I say that on the air?

James:
Yeah, I got a big bet on the line right now.

Dave:
Do you want to tell everyone what your bet is on this Seahawks game?

James:
Yeah, I think my mouth got me into trouble because we’re playing the 49ers, they have a better talented team. And I made a bet with one of my good buddies who’s also a 49er fan that the loser has to wear the other team’s logo Speedo to the pool for a whole day. So I’m really hoping it’s not me.

Dave:
Yeah. Well I’ll root for the Seahawks for your sake, but that is a pretty funny bet, and hopefully you didn’t just tell too many people, this is the tail end of the episode, so maybe no one’s listening anymore.

James:
Yeah, everyone should be rooting that the Seahawks win, no one wants to see me in a Speedo.

Dave:
All right. Well thanks a lot man, this was a lot of fun. Thank you all for listening, this is our last episode of the year, so happy New Year to everyone, we really appreciate you helping us and supporting us through our first year for On The Market, we’ll see you in 2023.
On The Market is Created by me, Dave Meyer and Kaylin Bennett. Produced by Kaylin Bennett, editing by Joel Esparza and Onyx Media, researched by Pooja Jinda, and a big thanks to the entire BiggerPockets team.
The content on the show On The Market are opinions only. All listeners should independently verify data points, opinions, and investment strategies.

 

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link