Finance of America Companies (FOA) has entered into an agreement to sell the operational assets of its Finance of America Commercial vertical to Roc Capital Holdings LLC. The deal will offload an FoA subsidiary division that offers residential real estate investment loans.

Roc Capital is expected to pay FOA an “aggregate purchase price” over a three-year period, which will be based on the purchased asset performance and will not exceed $30 million, according to an 8K form reviewed by HousingWire.

“Today’s announcement is another step taken by the company as it executes on its long-term strategy,” Graham Fleming, interim CEO of FOA, said in a statement. “By streamlining our focus and growing our core businesses, which benefit from a shared set of demographic and economic tailwinds, FOA can more effectively dispatch our innovative suite of solutions to help Americans achieve their retirement goals through the use of home equity.”

The terms of the deal do not include the FOA commercial vertical’s financial assets, which are comprised of loans and securitizations, according to the 8K filing.

“[Those assets] will continue to be sold or otherwise paid in full or liquidated in the ordinary course of business,” the company said in the filing. “Following the closing of the [deal], FAM will no longer operate in the business of originating business purpose loans to residential real estate investors. Upon closing of the [deal], the company will no longer have a reportable commercial originations segment.”

Credit Suisse Securities LLC acted as FOA’s financial advisor on the terms of the deal, according to the company.

FOA announced its intention to exit the forward mortgage originations business in late 2022 by winding down the operations of Finance of America Mortgage. The company’s primary focus will be on its specialty finance and services (SF&S) businesses, including its Finance of America Reverse (FAR) vertical, which offers government-sponsored and private-label reverse mortgages to older homeowners.

Earlier this month, FOA announced its subsidiary, Incenter, had entered into an agreement with a subsidiary of Essent Group Ltd. to sell the issued and outstanding shares of Agents National Title Holding Company, along with the issued and outstanding membership interest of Boston National Holding LLC and their direct subsidiaries, for $100 million.



Source link


Jay Farner likes to tell a story about his early days at Rock Financial, which would become Quicken Loans and eventually Rocket Mortgage. It was 1996 and Dan Gilbert, the founder and CEO, announced that the company’s mortgage bankers weren’t going to meet with applicants face to face. Instead, Farner recounted in an interview with tech outlet Protocol, they would do mortgages by telephone.

“We’re going to send our clients the applications, they’re going to sign it and they’re going to mail it back to us. That was new back then. Dan was really focused on the marketing component. How do we get clients directly to reach out to us? One of the funny things I recall is I structured a deal to buy fax machines and we told every client that we’d send them a free fax machine to make it easier to send the information back to us. I probably bought maybe 500 or 600. That didn’t work because setting up the fax machine proved more complicated than putting the documents in the UPS envelope.

“I share the story because that’s the culture we worked on creating, which is: Try something. Learn quickly. Adjust.”

With the Feb. 13 announcement of his resignation, Farner, known as the marketing whiz behind groundbreaking “Push Button. Get Mortgage,” campaign, has forced Rocket Companies, the parent of Rocket Mortgage, to show the same adaptability in finding a new leader.

One caveat: Farner’s successor will be tasked with getting the company on the right track amid one of the most challenging mortgage markets in decades. And the new leader will have to do so as the company attempts to transition from a refi-reliant mortgage lender into a multi disciplined fintech. 

“A change at the CEO level prior to a pending earnings announcement presents some consternation, particularly within a very challenging mortgage origination market and taking into account Mr. Farner bought 5M+ shares of stock over the past year,” analysts at Piper Sandler wrote in a report published last week. “That being said, we believe Rocket remains in capable hands with a deep management team.” 

HousingWire interviewed several of the lender’s analysts to better understand the challenges and opportunities ahead for Rocket’s new CEO. A Rocket spokesperson declined to comment on the topic, as the company is in a quiet period leading to the Feb. 28 earnings call.

C-Suite changes

News of Farner’s resignation came as a surprise to analysts and investors, and for good reason. Farner is a Rocket lifer, having spent his entire 27 year professional career at the Detroit company. Notably, the 49-year-old also relinquished his seat on the board this month, an unusual move at a company that typically keeps its senior leadership in the Rocket orbit. 

Bill Emerson, Farner’s predecessor as CEO at Rocket Companies, will be moving over from Gilbert’s holding company Rock Holdings to again run Rocket Companies. Emerson has also taken Farner’s board seat. 

In Emerson, Rocket has a seasoned leader who knows the mortgage playbook. Rocket says it will look both internally and externally for Farner’s permanent replacement. 

Farner’s resignation also follows a broader series of changes in the lender’s C-Suite over the last six months. In November, CFO Julie Booth and general counsel Angelo Vitale retired after over two decades at the company. Brian Brown and Tina John, respectively, replaced them. In January, Austin Niemiec, the head of its wholesale division Rocket TPO, was promoted to chief revenue officer, with Mike Fawaz tapped to lead wholesale. (Bob Walters, who was promoted to CEO of Rocket Mortgage in January 2022, remains in place.)

Despite much of the talk out there, buyers are not coming back until home values come down dramatically – you probably won’t see a tremendous pickup. It seems that we’re going to be at a higher rate environment for a while.

Kevin Heal, Argus Research

The changes are happening as Rocket looks to adapt its staffing levels and its overall strategy in a depressed mortgage market. It has offered voluntary buyouts to workers, made at least two rounds of layoffs, and, according to a recent Wall Street Journal story, been stung by declining employee morale and missed financial targets. Rocket Companies lost money in the third quarter of 2022 and could be looking at multiple quarters of consecutive losses. 

Looming large still is the transition from mortgage lender to fintech, a strategy Farner set in motion following the acquisition of Truebill – now called Rocket Money. The company paid $1.275 billion in cash for the app in December 2021. 

The path to breakeven 

Declining mortgage rates were the cause of optimism across the mortgage industry in January. But data indicating the economy has been resilient to the Federal Reserve’s tightening monetary policy brought mortgage rates closer to the 7% mark again in February. The message? Volatility will be the norm in 2023. At least for several more quarters. 

“It’s a tough time for any mortgage company. Rates are ticking back up recently,” Kevin Heal, chief compliance officer and senior analyst for financial services at Argus Research, said in an interview. 

“But honestly, despite much of the talk out there, buyers are not coming back until home values come down dramatically – you probably won’t see a tremendous pickup. It seems that we’re going to be at a higher rate environment for a while,” Heal added. 

Demand in the mortgage market has declined roughly 60% to 65% due to higher interest rates, affecting both refinancing and purchase markets, according to Kevin Barker, a managing director and senior research analyst at Piper Sandler, who covers mortgage companies. 

“This massive decline in demand has forced Rocket to reduce their capacity by shrinking their business,” Barker said in an interview. “But when you have a revenue stream that is shrinking, it is also often very difficult to reduce your expense base as quickly as your revenues are dropping.”

That happened in the third quarter of 2022 when Rocket posted its first unprofitable quarter since going public two years ago. Rocket’s revenue dropped 58% from a year ago, while its expenses declined 30%. Ultimately, the lender reported an adjusted net loss of $166 million from July to September. 

We model for Rocket to return to profitability in the third quarter of 2023.

Kyle Joseph, a specialty finance equity research analyst at Jefferies

According to Barker, who has given a “neutral” recommendation on Rocket’s stock, the company is close to breakeven. However, Barker estimates it is “probably losing money in the fourth quarter of 2022 and could lose money in the first quarter of 2023 as well.”

Barker projects that the first half of 2023 will be tough for Rocket, with the lender having to cut the operating expenses significantly to generate a profit. Regarding the second half of the year, the analyst said demand and margins should improve over time as capacity is coming out of the system. 

Kyle Joseph, a specialty finance equity research analyst at Jefferies, estimates Rocket may take longer to turn a profit. 

“We model for Rocket to return to profitability in the third quarter of 2023,” he said. Joseph said Rocket is facing similar pressures as its competitors, but he has “no doubts about the company’s ability to emerge on the other side due to its size and scale.” 

Despite the challenges ahead, the next Rocket CEO will inherit a company with three main competitive advantages compared to its peers, according to analysts. Rocket has a well-known brand. Its operating margins have been superior to the industry over the last five to seven years. And the company tends to be the best at recapturing loans in its servicing portfolio. 

Will Rocket become a fintech company?

During Farner’s leadership, Rocket accelerated the plan to diversify its revenues from mortgage loans with other businesses. It reached 24 million Rocket user accounts in the third quarter of 2022 through Rocket Homes, Rocket Auto, Rocket Solar and Rocket Money.

Additional products and services will be easier than the work we did for mortgages. But mortgages feed everything. We’ve done a great job, I believe, of strengthening our brand. But the cost to market without a way to engage clients over the lifetime is too great. That’s not sustainable unless you have all the components. We focus on the lifetime value of the client when we make a marketing dollar investment.

Jay Farner, CEO Of Rocket Companies

However, the fruits of this strategy’s success have yet to come despite billions in dollars in investments. Mortgages still represent about 85% of Rocket’s revenues (including gain-on-sale of loans and loan servicing income), according to the third quarter earnings filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

Rocket’s strategy is to bring members of these other business lines to maintain a relationship before they are ready to buy a home. 

“To offer real value to the customer, you need to have multiple products and services,” Farner said in the February 2022 interview with Protocol. “The mortgage, which is incredibly challenging and difficult, is where we started. I like the fact that we’re able to figure that out because the additional challenges we take on typically require less of everything compared to what a mortgage requires. So additional products and services will be easier than the work we did for mortgages. But mortgages feed everything. We’ve done a great job, I believe, of strengthening our brand. But the cost to market without a way to engage clients over the lifetime is too great. That’s not sustainable unless you have all the components. We focus on the lifetime value of the client when we make a marketing dollar investment.”

Farner added: “We’ve got to know that our platform will monetize that at some point in time, whether it’s through a Truebill subscription, a purchase of an automobile or the purchase or the refinance of a home, a debt consolidation loan or putting solar panels on somebody’s home. We have to have that certainty that we’ll be able to capture that lifetime value.”

There’s a lot of technology involved in what Rocket makes. But a lot of it is also related to lending and being able to sell the loans they create. They are extremely early in the process (of becoming a fintech). We haven’t seen meaningful earnings, contributions from those various businesses.

Kevin Barker, a managing director and senior research analyst at Piper Sandler

Heal, of Argus Research, said there’s at minimum a short-term risk in that strategy. 

“Rocket is acquiring a customer base that, down the road, will want to purchase a home and get a mortgage through Rocket. The problem is the affordability may not be there for the next couple of years. Will the next generation be loyal when it comes to getting a mortgage?” 

Barker added that, as the company’s CEO, Farner had a critical role in transforming Rocket into what would be considered a fintech company –  companies receiving a fee for services they’re providing as financial institutions.

“There’s a lot of technology involved in what Rocket makes. But a lot of it is also related to lending and being able to sell the loans they create,” Barker said. “They are extremely early in the process (of becoming a fintech). We haven’t seen meaningful earnings, contributions from those various businesses.” 

Another challenge, according to Joseph, is that the new CEO of Rocket will also have to face a new reality for fintech companies on Wall Street. 

“Fintechs have lost a lot of luster,” he said. “They were the belle of the ball, trading at crazy prices to revenue multiples. But things have come back to Earth.” 

Farner’s leaving the company raises questions about how fast Rocket will pursue the fintech strategy. A clear sign will be given when the company announces Farner’s successor.

According to Heal, Rocket has two paths in choosing the next CEO: Rocket will stick to the company’s bread-and-butter business and hire a mortgage professional. Or the company will accelerate its strategy by hiring a CEO with a fintech background, and for the first time moving beyond its own stable of mortgage talent. 

“It remains to be seen,” Heal said. 

James Kleimann contributed reporting to this article.



Source link


The real estate markets that have the highest populations tend to have the highest housing prices. Think of cities like New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle. Just a few years ago, these bustling metros were packed to the brim with tech workers, all of which contributed to housing shortages and sky-high home prices. Now, with remote work the new norm, these big cities are seeing their populations slowly start to siphon out to more affordable housing markets in America.

As an investor, you may ask yourself, “where are the most people (and money) headed?” In this episode, Dave Meyer and David Greene will answer this exact question. But, it isn’t as easy as solely looking at population growth. Dave and David go deep into the data to see where businesses, tech jobs, and high salaries are moving so you can make the best bet for future equity plays. And even though it seems like Miami, Austin, and other booming markets have already priced out most investors, recent price drops could be a short-term loss that leads to your long-term gain.

But even if you know where Americans are migrating, you’ll still need to know the “why” so you can find future markets fitting these criteria. Dave and David touch on how work from home changed the housing market, why the pandemic split the nation into affordable and unaffordable housing markets, and how something as simple as a warm day could heavily impact where the best investing opportunity is. So stick around if you’re planning on buying, investing, selling, or moving in 2023!

David:
This is the BiggerPockets Podcast show 729. When we talk about why, I think it’s a combination of factors, but most of them are related to technology. So if you think about the ’50s, what made someone determine where they’re going to move? It’s probably where dad’s going to work. So, markets would explode stuff like New York or Boston. You had these areas, like you mentioned, San Francisco, where you had to be physically present because this is where things were done, Detroit, Michigan, right? You moved to where the jobs were. Well, internet has increased its capability rapidly in the last 10, 15 years, and we’ve gotten to the point where now people are specializing, and they work from home all the time.
What’s going on, everyone? This is David Greene, your host of the BiggerPockets Real Estate podcast here today with my partner in crime, Dave Meyer, to talk about real estate by the numbers. Funny enough, that’s the same book that he helped write with J Scott. We get into migratory patterns, absolutely. We get into data. We get into information. We get into objectiveness. If you like Excel spreadsheets, if you like to make your decisions on the firm bedrock of information, you are going to love today’s show about where you should be investing in 2023.
Before we move on with that, today’s quick tip is if you like this kind of information, if you listen to the show, you get all the way to the end. You say, “That’s what I want more of. I want people telling me the numbers, the data, the statistics, the facts, the cold hard facts about where I should invest.” Consider checking out the BiggerPockets’ YouTube channel. Now, this is a podcast, and there are other podcasts, and those do go on YouTube, but in addition to that, we make additional content that you might not know about that never makes it into the podcast realm. It only goes on YouTube.
You could catch me on there talking about the nitty-gritty details of what it takes to have a career in real estate, or loan products you might not know about, or negotiation techniques that you need to tell your agent to be using. You could catch Dave on there talking about more information like this, what studies have been done, how to interpret that data, and what the next trend in real estate investing is going to be. So if you’re like me, and you’re addicted to YouTube, and you listen to it all the time, go follow and subscribe to the BiggerPockets’ YouTube channel, and get more information in between the podcast that we try to release as frequent as we can.
All right, Dave, what were some of your favorite parts of today’s show?

Dave:
I think today’s shows is one of my favorite ones we’ve done in a while, because this is one of those areas where investors can really gain an edge over their competition. This is like… If you’re the kind of person who likes to research and understand what’s going on around you, this is a great practical episode where you can learn some of the specific things that you should be looking for and identifying to pick markets. We’re going to talk about where people are moving, why people are moving, where businesses are moving, and why they’re moving.
If you can follow these trends, and extrapolate them out to what might happen over the next couple of years, you’re going to be in a really good position to identify great locations and great markets to invest in real estate.

David:
Yes, and on today’s show, we name names. We’re not just talking principle. We get into the theories and the principles of why this works, and we actually give you specific cities that we think are going to do well and why. This is what nobody ever wants to do in our space, because if you’re wrong, you look like a fool, and nobody likes that, but that’s okay. Dave and I are willing to risk that in order to share where we invest and where we think that you can do well because we love you. All right, let’s get into today’s show.
What’s going on? Dave Meyer, I’m so happy you’re here today. We get to talk about a topic that I love. As the author of Long Distance Real Estate Investing, I like to track where people are going, what markets are heating up. As the BiggerPockets host of the podcast, I like to talk about where people could be buying real estate, what listeners from BiggerPockets happen to listen in the hot city that everything’s happening in, or a cold city that people are leaving. I think this stuff is really important. So glad you’re here with me today. Can you just briefly explain to people why you are the person that we brought in to talk about this with us?

Dave:
Well, sure. It’s a really fun topic to discuss, I think, as you just said, in normal times. But ever since the pandemic, basically, the trends of migration and businesses moving to new places has accelerated in a way we really haven’t seen. A lot of the trends that we were used to are now the opposite, and we’re seeing a lot of changes in where people are moving and where money is being invested. Obviously, this has implications for everyone and the whole country, but as real estate investors, we really want to know where population is growing, where money is being invested, because it has big implications for rent growth, for appreciation, for vacancy, for all these important things.
I’m pretty excited to talk about this, because there’s a lot of cool information that we’ve gathered for you.

David:
We have several headwinds that have all joined together to create this huge rush that’s made a lot of money in real estate in the last several years. We have the fed printing a whole lot of money, so you have this oversupply where this money needs to find a home. Then we have, obviously, COVID-19 and the way that that shook up the way that work is done, and so we have people moving into different areas based on all kinds of different reasons that we’re going to talk about. Then we have the fact interest rates were incredibly low, so you really couldn’t get any return on your money in most traditional cases, just like putting it in the bank.
So, you had to invest your money. You have a lot more money to invest, maybe not the individual, but the economy as a whole, and people are moving quicker. So if you got the right location, and all the money flooded to that place, you did really, really well. If you didn’t get the right location, you still did well because assets in general, the prices of them-

Dave:
You got lucky.

David:
That’s exactly right. But now that you see it starting to turn around, we’re starting to head into a bit of a recession. The people who bought in the areas that appreciated the most, they’ve got the most cushion, so they’re going to be hurt the least when things turn around. That’s why we’re talking about this, because we always want to try to be ahead of what’s going to be happening next. Let’s start off, and just have you get into the great reshuffling as we’ve called it. Tell me what’s going on in the way that real estate investing has changed.

Dave:
I think basically, you’ve hit on a couple of the major things that are happening. The first one, like you said, is the pandemic and just remote work. We saw that all sorts of people were working from home for the first time, and not that long into the pandemic, a lot of companies said, “We’re actually going to make this permanent,” and so people for the first time really in history were untethered from locations in a way that they never have. Historically, if you wanted to have a great job, you’d move to where you are, David, in San Francisco or New York or any of these big major metropolitan areas that have strong job growth, strong wage growth, economic growth.
Now, people were saying, “I can still make a San Francisco salary, or I can still make a New York salary and move somewhere else.” What we’ve seen just in terms of data, what’s going on here is that the number of people who are moving out of state who are moving to a different metro area has exploded. Just from data from Redfin came out, and showed that of all the people searching on Redfin for homes, 25% of U.S. home buyers were looking to move to a new metro in Q3. That’s up significantly from pre-pandemic levels, and it’s still…
We’re no longer in lockdown mode anymore, and we’re still seeing this elevated sense of migration. So, I think what I was hoping to talk about a little bit is what happened over the last couple of years, and are these trends likely to continue?

David:
I think that’s a great place for us to jump off here. Let’s get a bit of a foundation and understanding what led to the change, and then let’s talk about what we think is going to happen. Then before we do, I just want to highlight why we’re talking about this, why it’s important. In the past, it’s been enough with real estate to just teach someone how to analyze a property. What’s it going to cash flow? Is it going to make or lose money? Add a little bit of sauce on the top. Can you throw a little bit equity in there? Can you upgrade a little bit?
Boom, you’re good. You got a property, and that’s going to take you to financial freedom if you just repeat it a couple times. There has been so much changing in our industry that it gets a little bit more complicated with every single change, and you need a little bit more information to stay competitive in this market. That’s why we’re bringing this information. That’s why we’re not just only bringing in the story of the gym teacher that bought four duplexes, and now they’re done, and they don’t have to work. It’s getting harder and harder to do that, but at the same time, it’s getting more and more important that you are investing in real estate.
That’s why so many people are flooding into the space, because they’re recognizing the safety, the long-term benefits, and the fact that when you compare it to other investment options, they don’t stack up at all. The word is out. More people are hearing about this. We just want to bring more information so you can stay ahead of the others that are chasing after these same vehicles.

Dave:
That’s a very good point. I mean, there is also a good point about what you said earlier that even during the pandemic, it didn’t matter where you invested because everything was going up so much, but we’re not in that market anymore, and different housing markets are going to start to behave different from one another, which is normal for the record. Having some markets that are better for cash flow, and having some markets that are better for appreciation is the normal state of affairs. We were just in this crazy abnormal situation for the last couple years.
So, by studying and understanding different markets and some of the trends about population, migration, where money’s being invested, you’ll have a good sense of what markets are likely to withstand this downturn the best, and likely to start growing again in the future the soonest and the most dramatically. All right, so now you know why we’re talking about this, and why this is important. We know that people are moving a lot, and they’re continuing to move more than they used to. So before we jump into where they’re going and what this all means, maybe we should hit a little bit on why people are moving from where they currently live.

David:
That’s a great point, because if you can understand the why, you’re more likely to predict what will happen in the future. First thing I’ll say, I think this is going to continue in even more frequency as we go. People are moving more than they ever did before. It’s more important to know it than they ever did before. I don’t think this is a fad. I think this is going to continue. I think if we look at the next 5, 10, 15, 20 years, you’re going to see an increase in the velocity of human beings jumping around between markets and businesses probably doing the same thing.
When we talk about why, I think it’s a combination of factors, but most of them are related to technology. So if you think about the ’50s, what made someone determine where they’re going to move is probably where dad’s going to work, right? Back then, you got dad’s going to work. Mom’s staying at home, raising the kid. We have very traditional gender roles that people are operating through, and you can’t… There’s no Zoom calls. There’s no internet. You are driving into a physical location to attend meetings in person. I’m sure some stuff was done over the phone, but I don’t think it was very much.
So, markets would explode stuff like New York or Boston. You had these areas, like you mentioned, San Francisco, where you had to be physically present because this is where things were done, Detroit, Michigan. You moved to where the jobs were. This is the way that human beings have been for a very long time. If you go back before jobs, you have the Native Americans following the bison across the planes like, “I got to go to where I get my food, which now is our work.” Well, internet has increased its capability rapidly in the last 10, 15 years, and we’ve gotten to the point where now people are specialized, and they work from home all the time.
We had the capability to do that, but we just didn’t break out of the pattern. Then COVID-19 hit, and that was a pattern disruptor. You absolutely had to change the way you’re doing things, because you could not leave your house. So as they say, necessity is the mother of invention. People change the way that they operate in the workspace, and you started seeing more people working from home. Now, you also see that people can learn skills much faster, because we have technology-assisted abilities in the workplace. So if you’re someone who writes code on computers, you can learn how to write new code faster in different ways.
If you work for a company, and you’re in sales and marketing, you probably don’t have to be in that company. You’re probably locked into your computer studying algorithms of different social media websites. A lot of these tech-based jobs can be done anywhere. So, you got this niche where people can bounce around from different job to different job, and they can work from home. Then COVID-19 happens, and the place where certain people lived had its resources shut down. So where I’m at in San Francisco, it was terrible. I don’t live in the city of San Francisco, but I sell a lot of houses there, and they just shut down everything.
It was so hard to sell anyone on why they should live in San Francisco, because all the restaurants were closed. All the nightlife was closed. All the museums were closed. All the reasons that people want to be in San Francisco, they disappeared. Same thing happened in New York. Basically ,two of our biggest hubs for business in the country had the same thing happen. Some people moved into the suburbs, or they moved into new states. There were political differences, and I think we can agree that there’s becoming a bigger spread in the spectrum politics every year.
So certain people said, “I don’t want to live in a state that’s this way, or I don’t want to live in a state that’s that way,” and they moved to a different state. After a couple years of doing this, we figured it out. It became easier and easier to go from one area, and work one job to another area, and either work that same job or get a new job. Then technology increased with stuff like Airbnb and VRBO, and we had more people putting supply into the market, and so it became much easier to live in a new area. It used to be you stayed at a hotel that was super expensive, or you had to commit to a lease. Landlords like us don’t want to commit to a two-month lease for someone. It was a 12-month lease.
So if you didn’t know anyone in the area to move to, it was very hard to go get there, get established, set a foothold, figure out if you like it or not, and then make a long-term solution. Well, now Airbnb makes that so easy. You’ve got expensive options if you want to move your whole family into a big house. You’ve got cheap options if you just want to live in someone’s basement, and sleep on a pullout bed. It has become so easy to bounce around from location to location that people have figured this out, and what used to be a dream, “I want to make a bunch of money and quit and retire so I can travel,” is now something that you can do while you’re still working.
You don’t have to wait until you’re 50, 60, 70 years old to retire and travel. You can do it at the same time. You’re doing your work right now from Amsterdam. Are you in Amsterdam today?

Dave:
I am.

David:
So, you’re the perfect example of the person who is able to do a great job at their job, also work a side hustle hobby of sandwich connoisseurship if I can say so, and do it from different locations in the world. This is happening all over the place, and understanding these patterns and these trends will help investors buy in the areas where there’s going to be rising demand.

Dave:
Absolutely. I think one of the things you talked about, I just want to follow up on, which is that people used to have to move to these places to get good paying jobs like New York or San Francisco. We’re just picking on those two. You’re from around San Francisco. I grew up around New York, so we can pick on those cities, but basically, what happened though is because they offered in many cases the highest paying jobs or the highest concentration of high-paying jobs, there was so much demand that those places got insanely expensive. It’s not a coincidence that San Francisco and New York are two of the most expensive real estate markets in the world. It’s because people want to live there, because they want to have access to those very expensive jobs.
Now, you’re saying, “Oh, I can get that San Francisco or New York salary, but I don’t have to live there. I can go to Nashville, or I can go to Dallas, or I can go to somewhere in Florida, and live.” It’s basically getting a raise. You could be getting a 20% or 30% raise. People were doing this, and companies over the last couple years who have been struggling to find employees were allowing people to do this, because it was a way for them to basically give their employees a free raise as well. If you’re Facebook or Twitter or Google or whatever, if you say you can take your San Francisco salary, and move to wherever you want, you’re giving them a much higher quality of life, and I think for just cost of living wise.
I think people really wanted to take advantage of that. I don’t necessarily think they’re going back. I know you hear some of these high profile things where people are getting called back to the office, and some are. But if you actually look at the data about how much people work remote, it’s pretty stable. It peaked a couple years ago. It has come down a little bit, but now it’s pretty flat. So, I think we are going to continue to see people able to work remote. To your point, David, I think that’s going to just increase this transience among people going forward.

David:
Well, I think in some of the places that we’ve seen more people moving to than anywhere else, like the winners that are going to show up here, a lot of these were places that typically people only went to when they retired, which means they wanted to be there. It had a lower cost of living, a better client, more amenities, but they couldn’t. They had to wait till they were done. You think Florida’s exploded. That is our typical retirement community of America. Everybody waits to retire the move to Florida. You’ve got Arizona. Arizona has exploded in demand as Californians have realized it’s a little bit hotter, but it’s not a whole lot of different climate than what we’re used to, but it’s a third as expensive as the Bay Area.
Like you said, it’s a huge… it’s like getting a raise to move there. Texas has been a place that typically like you were just from Texas or that was it. Nobody was going into Texas, but the people that lived in Texas loved it. Now that the word is out, I’m sure the Texans don’t love this that are listening to this, but everyone else wants to go there. Tennessee was another place that a lot… It was like a niche market. You were a musician, and you went to Nashville to try to make it. It was like the Hollywood of the south a little bit, or you retired, and you moved up there. But if you lived in Tennessee, you knew about some of the gems, like the Smokey Mountains, Nashville, the areas that people wanted to go vacation to.
Now, you can just live in those areas. People are… They wanted to be there the whole time, but their job was restricting them. As we’ve cut the tethers of your workplace requiring you to be someone, we see people naturally going to where they wanted to go. That’s one of the reasons that I invest in those markets. I don’t see that changing in the future.

Dave:
100%, totally agree. Before we move on, I just want to say, David and I have been talking a lot about price-wise affordability. I do think that is probably the number one major driver people want to go where they want to go. But when we look at some of the data to why people are moving, I just also want to say that some of the things that we’ve noticed are, one, income tax. States with no or low income tax have been major winners like Nevada, Texas, Florida.

David:
Tennessee.

Dave:
Tennessee. Exactly. There you go. Then a lot of times… This is pandemic related too, but just a lot more space. People who were living in small spaces when you were confined to your home wanted bigger areas, so we saw suburbs really take off as well. Places that had affordable suburbs were other areas that really we’re seeing a lot of net migration, and are still seeing a lot of net migration. All those things combined have led to this trend, and now we have seen and have some winners and losers that we can actually share with you over the last couple of years, which markets have seen the most and most people lost and the most people gained.

David:
It’s funny. Three years ago, I was doing real estate meetups in the East Bay Area, and people would say, “You wrote long distance real estate investing. Where should I buy it?” I was like, “Everyone overthinks it. We overthink it so much.” You want to buy in places with warm climate and low state income tax, because the people who are making the most money are living in New York and California. They’re paying the highest in taxes, and people in New York don’t like the cold. They would rather live in the warm, and people in California can’t live in the cold. We can only live in the warm because we’ve been spoiled.

Dave:
You’re not adapted to the cold.

David:
Yes. It’s like 50 degrees over here, and everyone’s complaining like, “This is ridiculous. We’re going to die. My petunias can’t make it in this 50-degree weather.” We don’t adapt at all. I said, “You should invest in Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. That’s it.” Find the areas that someone would move to to start, and those places have exploded, and everybody has made money that’s invested there. It really can be simple when you understand the principles that we’re about to get into now.

Dave:
Hopefully those people listen to you.

David:
All right, so Dave, the numbers guy, the data guy I should say, tell me, what is Redfin statistics on this trend? What’s the data telling us?

Dave:
Well, we’ve been picking on New York and California, and I will say that those are the two cities, two states, excuse me, that had the largest out migration. New York, over the last couple of years, has lost 180,000 residents, and California has lost 300… No, excuse me. They’ve lost 343,000, but they gained another 150,000. Like we’ve been saying, you see, if you look at this and dig into it a little bit more, a lot of it is from the New York City area, San Francisco and LA areas. They’re very, very expensive, and we’re going to talk about that in just a moment.
A lot of this, I believe, is not just personal lifestyle, but you’ve seen a lot of companies move out of San Francisco and LA. You’ve seen a lot of finance companies, for example, leave New York, and head to Florida. Those aren’t super surprising. The other general area that has lost a lot of population is the Midwest. People are leaving Illinois and Ohio, and where they’re heading, no surprise, some of the states that we’ve already named, which are Florida, which gained a net of 400,000 residents. Texas has also gained 400,000 residents, and now is the second state after California with over 30 million residents.
The other ones are all in the south. Arizona, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Georgia lead the way in terms of cities with a ton of migration. I’m guessing you are not surprised by anything I just said.

David:
No, I think… Man, it’s not too hard to see the writing on the wall. Florida was the only state doing things the way they did, and because of that, what was the net addition to people that moved there? Was it 500,000 you said?

Dave:
400,000.

David:
400,000, that’s a lot of people moving into an area that doesn’t have enough supply of homes. It’s typically only retirees that are moving into Florida, or immigrants that are on that part of the world. So, you’re seeing a massive amount of houses that are being built. Florida’s trying to adapt to this. There’s subdivisions going up everywhere. Prices are increasing super fast. The Floridians, they think they’re in a bubble. They’re over there like, “That house used to cost 300,000. Now, it’s costing 440,000. This is ridiculous,” but the New Yorkers are like, “I was paying 1.2 million, and I could go live there for 440,000, and it’s warm. Sign me up.”

Dave:
I mean, my friends who still live in New York would pay 1.5 million for a one-bedroom apartment. It’s nothing to them. They still see that this is a good deal, but I do think it is just… I will say this is a tangent, but Florida is one of those states where it’s really depends what city you’re in. Some markets are just humming along, which we’ll get to in a minute. Some I think might be at risk of oversupply, but regardless of supply, people are moving there. A lot of people are moving there, and that trend does not seem to be slowing down.
We wanted to talk about another thing here, which is not just that people are on the move, but businesses are really on the move. It was actually… It’s hard to find data for this. I was surprised at how difficult it was, but I’ve seen some evidence, and I think we just know this anecdotally, that there’s a lot of businesses moving their headquarters. I could only find data that was reliable, that goes back to 2009. So, it’s not really all pandemic related, but just over the last decade, we’ve seen that some of the major winners for businesses moving places are at the same places, so Arizona, Florida, Texas, but also Illinois, which I find was strange, because people were moving out of Illinois, but they’re gaining businesses which doesn’t really make so much sense.
Then losers were California, New York, and Nevada, which I was also interested, and Utah, because Utah and Nevada, they weren’t on our list of places where most people are moving, but Nevada and Utah have absolutely seen a lot of population growth over the last couple of years. I mean, Salt Lake City is one of the fastest growing real estate markets in the country. I just thought that was really interesting. I mean, Texas and Florida are making a lot of headlines, but to me, this is a really interesting long-term trend that we might just be seeing the beginning of. Because like you were saying with how people can move now in terms of Airbnb, and it’s made it more easy, look, just go look at what vacancy rates on offices are around this country.
They are exploding. So if there was ever a time where office… You want to move from New York to Miami or wherever to wherever. Now is pretty good time to negotiate a good office. There’s a lot of flexibility. People might be willing to leave, and so I think this is one of those trends that, I think, really did start to pick up. I don’t have a lot of data on this, but this is just my anecdotal opinion that really started to pick up during the pandemic, and I think is going to increase a lot over the next couple of years. What do you think about that?

David:
I think this makes perfect sense with what we’re just describing. If we’re talking about people needing to be in a specific location to work less, but then wanting to travel more, you’d expect office space to decrease within areas, because people don’t have to go to an office to work. They’re working from where they live, and you’d expect demand to increase in the residential space. That’s exactly what we’ve seen. Specifically within the short-term rental markets, you’ve seen increasing demand, which has been so much that even as supply has flooded the market, we all know someone out there who’s like, “Oh yeah, we just threw our house up on Airbnb, or we put a trailer in the backyard.”
Everyone’s doing this, which is funny because it’s not a thing that you would think could be supported if everyone threw their properties up. It’s not meant to be something everyone can just do. You have to match supply with demand. Yet, there’s been so much demand that so many people have put stuff up there, and they’ve done well, and then, like you said, commercial space, office space, it’s becoming very easy to lease and very difficult to manage. I bought into some office space, and vacancies have been up. It’s been harder and harder to figure that out.
You and I have brought guests on to talk about what we’re going to do converting some of this commercial space into residential space, because demand across the board is going down for those locations. I think that part makes sense, but I also thought another interesting factor that you brought up was that some of the areas where businesses are moving into have people moving out. What’s your thoughts on why that might be happening, some of those states?

Dave:
I have two ideas about this. The first one is the inverse of what we were talking about where people used to move to cities where there were good paying jobs, but companies used to also move to places where there was a good talent pool, where they had the type of people who could fill the jobs that they need. Now, if those people are spreading out from San Francisco or New York, the businesses have the same incentive to leave those expensive markets that people do. So if you could get maybe in Illinois or wherever, Utah, wherever these places are, maybe there are cheaper places. Maybe there’s cheaper for office space.
Then the second thing I wanted to say is that there is… I listened to this podcast about this, but states and cities are just at war with each other with tax incentives trying to bring companies in. I listened to this podcast. It was crazy about… You know the city, Kansas City, obviously. It’s split between Missouri and Kansas. Apparently, every couple of years, they just move. The companies will just move back and forth across the river because Kansas will be like, “Wait, you won’t pay taxes for 10 years.” Then Missouri will be like, “You won’t pay taxes for 12 years,” and so they’re all doing this.
I think that now because a lot of companies, workers are remote, they can take advantage of these tax advantages that states are throwing at them. So if it’s like… If you run a business, and it’s going to cost you 20% less whatever in taxes to move to Nebraska, maybe you do it because your employees wouldn’t even care, because they’re remote anyway. That’s just my personal opinion. That’s not really backed up by any data, but I was thinking about it, and that’s where I came out. What about you?

David:
You’re exactly right. We saw that play out with Tesla. With Elon Musk in the Bay Area, they have a Fremont plant, and there’s all these regulations that are put on them. Taxes are very high. That’s where the talent pool has been is the Bay Area is known for having some of the brightest minds, because we have Stanford and Berkeley, two colleges that are known for attracting the brightest minds. People move here. They get exposed to that California weather and California amenities. They don’t want to leave.
I mean, this is… California is expensive, but it’s expensive for a reason. We’ve got mountains. We’ve got beaches. We’ve got deserts. We’ve got incredible urban infrastructure, restaurants, all kinds of really cool things in diversity that once you see this, you’re like, “Oh, I wouldn’t want to live anywhere else,” but we also have high taxes. We also have a lot of regulation. There’s negatives that come along with that. He was basically saying, “I’m going to move to Texas, or I’m going to move to Nevada. I’m going to move somewhere that I wanted.”
Those states that said, “Come here. We want you,” where California’s making it look like, “We don’t want you. We want your money. We want your taxes, but we don’t want to support your business.” That absolutely happened, and as I was just saying, when people or businesses see someone else does it, they’re more likely to follow suit. You see a lot of businesses leaving California, and moving into Texas. It’s like you mentioned. It’s like getting a raise for them too. If their employees were paying a 13.5% state income tax, and they could go to Texas where there’s a zero state income tax, they can pay them the same amount, but claim that they gave a 13.5% raise. It’s absolutely true.

Dave:
The employees feel that. They actually feel it.

David:
It is easier to save money than it is to make money. That’s one of the things I talk about all the time. Even if you make money, that money gets taxed. Well, when you save money, you’re not having to pay taxes on what was saved. So, I think it’s fascinating that different businesses are recognizing that different states offer different opportunities. So even though the California population did decrease, I think you mentioned more businesses moved into California. Is that correct?

Dave:
That’s true.

David:
That’s the talent pool. Those are the types of businesses that are saying, “We need this kind of brain, and these people aren’t leaving California, so we are willing to go there and pay more money to get them.” But if you’re a different business, maybe you’re an international business that’s not dependent on the California amenities like the talent pool, you’re absolutely going to go to Tennessee, and you’re going to save some money. It’s not as simple as just understanding, “Are they coming in, or are they coming out?” That’s where the conversation starts. The next question is what types of companies are coming in, and what types are coming out?
Tech has notoriously been known for paying more wages than other industries. Those companies are in California still. Silicon Valley is still the hub. That’s one of the reasons that real estate in that area is so dang expensive, because the wages are incredibly high.

Dave:
They’ll make so much money.

David:
So much money. If you buy in those areas where tech jobs move, you tend to do really well. If we could travel back in time 10 years, and buy a lot of Seattle real estate, Austin Real Estate, San Francisco Real Estate… Birmingham Alabama’s even had some of the tech company move out there. Madison, Wisconsin has seen a lot of that. South Florida has seen… Those are not coincidentally the areas that we’ve seen the biggest spike in prices, because the wages that were paid went up a lot. So, understanding not just are businesses moving in and out, what kind of businesses.
If you’re a tire manufacturing plant, you don’t need to be in San Jose, California. You can absolutely go to Nevada, and save a lot of money. But if you’re working on the next microchip, and you’ve got 700 moving pieces that all have to come together to make that happen, you probably have to be where the people are.

Dave:
Absolutely. It makes sense. I think that one of the… We’ll talk about this in just a couple minutes, but one of the major things as an investor that you want to see is wage growth. That is one of if not the best predictor of rent growth in your city and appreciation for homes. So if you see businesses that are paying high wages, that happens… That bodes very well for real estate investing. It’s not just those things. If you think about something like Tesla or all these other companies moving to Austin all at once, think about how much money the city then has to invest into infrastructure.
They’re going to be hiring engineers. They’re going to be bringing in construction workers. They’re going to be building a new airport terminal, all of these things that increased demand for housing, increased demand for rentals, increased demand for just shoots up prices across the board. That’s why we’re talking about this is that it’s not just interesting to see, but it does have actual implications for these local economies.

David:
100%. Now, let’s talk a little bit about the south, because on this podcast, we’ve been talking about this for a long time. I’ve made the joke that if you take the United States of America on a flat plane, and you just tilt it down into the right, that’s where everybody tends to be moving into, and it’s been this way for a long time. My partner, Andrew Cushman and I buy multi-family property. We’re only buying for the most part in the south. We’ve done very, very well in these, because we’ve seen so many more people moving there, and the demand has increased faster than supply. It can’t keep up.
For a long time, that was all you had to do. Just go by somewhere in the south, and if it happened to be an area that wages were increasing, you crushed it. This is why knowing this information matters. So, what’s some of the data and the numbers on where people are moving in the south?

Dave:
So if you look at businesses, it’s Texas, Florida, Tennessee in the south, but I did pull some data about just some of the cities that overlap in terms of the most popular places for both business to be moving, and people. On a state level, it’s Florida, Texas, and Arizona. That’s not super surprising, but like we said for the combination of reasons why people are moving Florida, Texas, and Arizona. If you want to know specific markets though, it’s not that easy. We talk about it on the show, and this is my fault talking about it at a state level, but each market is super different.
Let’s just talk about specific cities. Dallas is really one of them. Atlanta, which we haven’t talked a lot about Georgia, but Atlanta has to be one of the fastest growing in terms of population and businesses. Atlanta is just absolutely exploding. Austin, of course, Tampa and St. Pete, Raleigh, Durham, Miami, Phoenix, Charlotte, these are all just massive. Raleigh, all these cities are just enormously and exploding. There was one in the north though. Boston was one of the top 10, but all the rest were basically in the Sun Belt as they say, which is, I guess, the south but also includes Texas and Arizona.
I don’t know what you call Arizona if that’s technically the south, but the whole Sun Belt area seems to be just absolutely exploding, and those markets are at the top.

David:
That’s the perfect mix here of where people are moving and businesses are moving. Now, the only question left to ask is are these businesses that tend to pay better? Now, there’s one thing I want to point out, where when people are just headline readers, and they don’t ask the why, it’s very easy to see markets like Phoenix or even Tampa that’s been listed in their Las Vegas as they’re dropping in prices. It would appear from the outside like, “Oh, that’s a declining market. You want to get out of it. You don’t want to buy there.”
They’re dropping because they rose so freaking fast. It was almost impossible. They were skyrocketing, and they finally tailored off, and they’re correcting to where they need to be, but they are set up to where you should expect to see long-term growth in those markets over the future. It doesn’t mean jump in and pay list price right now. We’re not saying that. You probably don’t have to get into a bidding war if you’re buying in Arizona, but if everybody else was in a frenzy, and they bid these prices up, you can now come in and get them significantly less than less price if you make the right offers and you work with the right agent.
Shout out to BiggerPockets’ agent finder here. Use that if you want to find someone on BiggerPockets to help you do that. But over the next five to 10 years, there is a reason why they were shooting up. There is a reason why those markets had so much demand is the smart money is looking at this, and they see, “This is where people are moving. This is where business are moving.” We do have a window with rising interest rates where you can get in there, and get some of these properties, whereas before, it wasn’t even possible.

Dave:
Totally. I think similar to you, people ask me a lot like, “Where should I invest?” Over the next few years, I think that there’s this interesting dynamic where the cities and markets that have the best long-term potential have the worst short-term potential right now and vice versa. So it’s like… You look at Austin. Austin is crashing harder than any city. Austin is going to explode over the next 20 years. I try and not time the market, but like you said, you can try and bid under asking, find a diamond in a rough right now, because Austin is one of those cities where it’s like people are going to want to move there. Businesses are moving there.
Austin’s the poster child for everything we were just talking about. Same with Tampa. Cities like that are going to keep doing well. Tampa’s actually doing okay right now, but I think there is a really important difference between what’s going to happen in the next, let’s say, 12 to 24 months, and what’s going to happen in the next 10 years. Those are not necessarily the same thing, and so as an investor, you really have to think about that. I’m not sure I would flip a house in Austin right now, but would you find a great deal, bid under asking, and find a great location in Austin, and hold onto it for 10 years? Probably.

David:
Let’s sum up some of the advice that we have for the people. One of the points here is you should watch migration patterns closely. It is not enough to say, “Where is the cheapest real estate, or where is the highest price to rent ratio right now without thinking about the future,” because real estate’s great over the long term, but one of the downsides of it is you own it for a long time. It’s been traditionally easy to sell, but that doesn’t mean it will stay that way. If you buy in a market that people are leaving, you can’t think, “I’m just going to sell if it doesn’t perform well,” because there’s no one to buy it.
It’s hard to get rid of it. That’s a thing we need to be thinking about more in the future is we’ve just assumed buy as much real estate as you could possibly own. We haven’t even had to worry about where. If you’re in one of these areas where people are leaving like some of the areas in the Midwest, and you go buy five or six properties there, and it gets harder and harder to get tenants, and the tenants you’re able to get are worse and worse, and you’re not wanting to own. Don’t think, “I’ll just sell it,” because no one’s going to buy it. It doesn’t work that way. But watch these patterns closely, and try to get out of markets early that people are leaving, and get into markets early that people are moving to.
Look at the types of the jobs and the businesses coming to a city, not just is their business coming. We use the example of the hypothetical tire manufacturing plant versus a tech company that’s trying to make the next super, duper microchip. Then look at how this will impact the overall makeup of a market’s economy. Are businesses moving in that bring other businesses with them? If you look at commercial real estate, you see the same pattern. They’ll take an anchor tenant like a Target. They’ll put this in a shopping center, and then you’ll have all these little additional tenants that will jump on like the place you get your haircut.
Do you notice there’s always the ice cream shop next to a haircut place?

Dave:
There’s always a Chick-fil-A. They follow them around. It’s an actual thing. We talked about this on the market show the other day. It’s like the Chick-fil-A follows around Lowes. They do it on purpose.

David:
They’re smart to do that. I noticed there’s always a [inaudible 00:41:13] around. There’s ice cream next to the haircut place, because every parent wants to get their seven-year-old to sit still, and they say, “If you do, I’ll take you to go buy ice cream”. They know a certain demographic of people shops at Target, and if you put stuff next to Target that’s convenient for people that are shopping there, they’re more likely to go and buy those products, or get that food or whatever the case will be. Real estate in general works this way, so look at what types of companies are moving somewhere. Think about the type of human being that’s going to want to follow that, and then think about what type of real estate they’re going to want to own.
This is why for so long when companies were like Austin, Texas was exploding, high rises was the flavor of the month. Everyone was building these high-rise condos in pristine locations. You were seeing redevelopment happening, where they were tearing down a two-story building, and replacing it with a 200-story building right next to the downtown area that everybody wanted to live. That was the trend until COVID-19 shook that up. Think about that. Don’t just blindly follow where you see other investors going. Dave, anything you want to add about that?

Dave:
No, just that similar to how I was saying that you shouldn’t look at a state, and be like, “Everything is one way in that state.” You need to look at the market. I would say that look at even in the submarkets in a city as well. You talked about Birmingham, Alabama. I did an investment there. They are losing population on a macro scale, the whole metro area, but there are some areas of Birmingham that are absolutely exploding. I’m sure when you, David, talk about “the Bay Area,” there are so many different submarkets within the Bay Area that are performing really differently.
So, don’t just look and read the headlines. Again, the more you dig in, the more you look at this data on a really specific basis, the better you’re going to make decisions.

David:
Such a good point. The people that need to hear this are the people that are unfamiliar with the market, because what happens is you don’t know the Bay Area. You don’t know Birmingham. You’re going to go look for the cheapest real estate you can find, because that’s the safest. At least that’s what you’re thinking, that you need to talk to an agent.

Dave:
Not the safest.

David:
No, it’s almost always the opposite, right? I have people that say, “Hey, I’ve been looking to invest in the Bay Area, but it’s really, really expensive. So, what do you think about Stockton, California?” That’s one of those. I know that area very well. I grew up near there. I went to college there, huge red flags. You better be super careful if you’re going to be investing in Stockton. You need an agent that knows the market really well, so some questions that people can ask when they do use their BiggerPockets agent finder, or they reach out to me, or they reach out to you, and say, “Hey, I need an agent in that area that you know.”
Ask them what type of people live in this city? What are they doing for work? What’s industry like here? In these neighborhoods, what type of people live in these neighborhoods versus those? Is this a commuter area? Is this an area where people have… It’s high walk scores, so they don’t even need to have a car. They’re just going to stay in this space all the time. Have a really good understanding for what types of people want to live both in the city and in neighborhoods within the city before you commit to this 30-year mortgage you’re going to be making on this house payment.

Dave:
Absolutely. I think that’s great advice.

David:
All right. Well, Dave, if people want to hear more about your studies, your data collection, where can they do that?

Dave:
Well, I host a podcast twice a week called On The Market. It’s also made by BiggerPockets. You can find it on Spotify and Apple. It comes out every Monday and Friday. The whole premise of the show is basically to keep investors up to date on all the latest news, data, and trends that should inform your investing decisions. So, you should do that. If you want to actually reach out to me and connect, you can find me on Instagram where I’m @thedatadeli.

David:
Yes, and I highly encourage any of you here to reach out to Dave for questions about real estate data, or questions about sandwiches. He is a highly underrated sandwich expert. He is the guy. He’s my go-to person every time I’m not sure, “Do I want this Buffalo Chicken Ranch, or should I stick with a turkey and avocado?” Dave is a whizz. In the same way that people come to me on Seeing Greene, and they say, “I’m stuck. I don’t know what to do,” I can go to Dave every single time if I’m not sure if I want to get the aioli or just a straight mayonnaise. He knows the questions to ask. He’s the guy to of to.

Dave:
Oh my God. What a topic. We could talk… This could be a whole episode.

David:
All right. If you want to reach out to me, you could do so at davidgreene24 on Instagram or on YouTube or anywhere else. As always, if you didn’t know, BiggerPockets has more resources than just this podcast. There’s an entire website, an entire world, an ecosystem of information, amazing forums that you can read questions other people have asked and had answered, or you can ask your own, a host of books that you can buy at biggerpockets.com/store, honestly, more than I could say on this episode, and I couldn’t do it justice anyway.
So if you got a minute, just type in biggerpockets.com, and get lost exploring all the ways that we provide value for you, including a lot of Dave’s work on data and reports that he’s put together. All right, I’m going to let you get out of here, Dave. Do you have any last words before we go?

Dave:
No, thanks for having me. This was a lot of fun.

David:
This is David Greene for Dave, the sandwich guru, Meyer signing off.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Check out our sponsor page!

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


When people consider taking the leap to start investing in real estate, one question always persists: is now the right time to start investing? The longer this question looms in an investor’s mind, the harder the proposition becomes. The short answer is yes. It is always the right time to invest in real estate. In terms of an asset class, real estate tends to appreciate over time and provides investors with income that can lead to generational wealth. 

To be frank, more people should be investing in real estate, but it takes planning, hard work, execution, and a little bit of luck. Most savvy real estate investors all have stories that include roadblocks and obstacles to their success, but they found a way to maneuver through the industry to still be thriving today. 

Some investors give up too easily when something goes wrong or if the current environment isn’t as easy to navigate as they’re used to. Success doesn’t come easy, but these tips to navigate the market and find success may instill some confidence in investors that are looking to start investing or investors that are considering moving on to a different venture. There has been a lot of discussion regarding the current state of the market, and a lot of panic from investors has ensued. Interest rates have increased, which brings challenges into play, but with the right tools and guidance, there are still plenty of opportunities for success.

Increases in Interest Rates Create Opportunities

Let’s start with a topic on most people’s minds when it comes to real estate investing lately: interest rates. 

Interest rates, inflation, and a potential recession dominated the headlines in 2022. However, plenty of investors across the country still had a very successful year of business. The rise in interest rates discouraged numerous investors, lowering competition and making it easier to find deals. 

Interest rates are always a hot topic, and any changes to them tend to make investors nervous. Usually, this stems from a lack of knowledge about the financial industry as a whole. Although rates were extremely low at the beginning of 2022, they have quickly risen to the 5-7% percent range. 

According to Freddie Mac data, interest rates reached their highest point in modern history in 1981, when the annual average was 16.63%. The 1980s were not the best time to borrow money, but investors were still figuring out how to make it work. If people were successful back then, you should be able to find success now. 

“A 5.5% 30-year fixed mortgage is modest compared to average yearly interest rates since 1975. Smart investors know that real estate is a long-term investment and that today’s rates are still historically low. Expect rising interest rates. As of this writing, there’s no end in sight to our astronomical inflation rate. In a few years, buying now may seem prudent,” writes Marco Santarelli from Norada Real Estate Investments.

Rising rates have also affected affordability. Price drops are occurring for the first time in several years. This is important for you to take advantage of and build a strategy around. With prices dropping and investors leaving the industry out of fear, now is the time to strike while the iron is hot. 

Investor Attributes That Can Weather Any Storm

Planning and patience are also two things you’ll need to start investing in real estate. 

Instead of “when and where,” think “where and what.” Ask yourself what markets you’ll be investing in and what strategies you will deploy.  

Depending on the market, an investor has to change the way they think about their strategy to achieve success. There are plenty of cities around the U.S., such as Atlanta, Cleveland, and Nashville, where the suburbs are exploding with growth. 

In terms of strategy, what’s working right now is:

  • Long-term rentals
  • Ground-up construction
  • Short-term rentals (depending on location)

Patience needs to be kept in mind, especially now. Real estate investing is known as a “get rich slow” industry. There is no overnight success or proven pathway that every investor has to follow. Rather, it’s patience and persistence that lead many investors to successful careers. Not every deal is going to close, not every property is going to make an abundance of money or cash flow, and investors will definitely consider calling it quits a time or two. However, success is out there, and it’s attainable for the people that work hard and stick with it. Just when you think you’re out of time, a property comes along that vastly changes a portfolio and gives the investor the spark they need to continue their real estate investing journey.

Preparation and Knowledge Breeds Results

A large piece of the puzzle when starting your real estate career is education. It’s a good time to start investing in real estate, but don’t measure success by whether you have a property in your portfolio by tomorrow or not. Find small victories and build on that day by day. Take advantage of the educational opportunities out there and learn something new each day. There are a bunch of local REIAs (real estate investment associations) to join where the community is supportive, and investors can find people that can be crucial to their success in the real estate investment space. 

Online courses and YouTube is always an amazing resource. On top of education, investors must be tapped into social media. Any sources that can provide an investor with tips, tricks, or breaking news are vital. 

If investors are always seeking knowledge, they’re more prepared. This education lends itself to noticing market trends, realizing when times will get tougher, and what other top investors are doing to navigate the tougher times in the industry.

Finally, finding a mentor is critical. Having someone to talk to for advice, problem-solving, or simply venting about trials and tribulations can be extremely helpful for both new and veteran investors.

Final Thoughts

The time to start investing in real estate is now. There is less competition, many avenues to success, and an abundance of resources out there for investors to take advantage of. 

Don’t let rising rates and a lack of experience get in the way. Again, expectations must be tempered, and success cannot be determined right off the bat. But with the right strategies, tools, and mindset, success will come.

This article is presented by RCN Capital

RCN Capital

The leading nationwide lender for real estate investments.

RCN Capital is a national, direct, private lender. RCN specializes in ground-up construction financing,
short-term bridge loans, fix & flip financing, and long-term rental financing for real estate investors.

Learn More About RCN Capital

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


Economic data indicating that the U.S. economy has remained resilient despite the Federal Reserve‘s tightening monetary policy led to a substantial increase in mortgage rates last week. Does this mean mortgage rates are close to reaching the 7% level again? 

“Mortgage rates have been rising after the jobs report was solid, retail sales beat expectations, and the homebuilder’s confidence is rising,” Logan Mohtashami, lead analyst for HousingWire, said. “We have an array of economic data that has been good.”

In January, inflation continued to climb well above the Fed’s target, at an annual rate of 6.4%. In addition, total nonfarm payroll employment rose 517,000 jobs from December, breaking the downward trend, and retail spending increased 3%, the largest monthly gain in nearly two years. Meanwhile, builder confidence in the market for newly built single-family homes rose seven points in February from January’s reading. 

Positive economic indicators were enough for the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage to rise again to 6.32% as of Feb. 16, up 20 basis points compared to the previous week, according to the latest Freddie Mac survey. A year ago at this time, the same rates were at 3.92%. 

Other indexes show mortgage rates that are even higher. At Mortgage Daily News, rates were at 6.75% as of mid-day on Thursday, up 13 basis points compared to the previous day. At HousingWire’s Rates Center, the Optimal Blue data showed rates at 6.48% on Wednesday, compared to 6.28% in the previous week. 

“Mortgage rates moved up for the second consecutive week,” Sam Khater, Freddie Mac’s chief economist, said in a statement. “The economy is showing signs of resilience, mainly due to consumer spending, and rates are increasing. Overall housing costs are also increasing and therefore impacting inflation, which continues to persist.”

Where are mortgage rates heading to?

Economists believe that mortgage rates may rise to the 7% level soon amid the stronger-than-expected U.S. economic performance, adding more affordability challenges to the housing market. The last time rates were at 7% was in November 2022.

“Mortgage rates are going to move in the 6% – 7% range over the next few weeks,” George Ratiu, Realtor.com manager of economic research, said in a statement. 

Ratiu added that the Fed signaled that it will continue to raise rates this year but at a less aggressive pace than in 2022. The expectation is for 25 basis point increments.

“The central bank is acknowledging that it sees its monetary actions having a tangible effect on inflation. The CPI data out this week seems to confirm the bank’s views,” Ratiu said. 

Mohtashami estimates mortgage rates at 7.25% and the 10-year yield at 4.25%, the highest level in 2023, according to his forecasts. 

However, according to Mohtashami, “the growth rate of inflation will look softer as the year moves on as the real rent inflation data starts to look more in line with current market data.” 

Rising rates, however, tend to bring affordability challenges. 

“For housing markets, the rebound in rates translates into higher mortgage payments from a year ago, but lower than the summer 2022 peak of the market, because prices have dropped 11% over the past seven months,” Ratiu said. 

Ratiu estimates that the buyer of a median-priced home is looking at a $1,985 monthly payment at today’s rate, 42% higher than last year, yet 6% lower than it would have been in June 2022. 

This means a challenging market for mortgage companies. 

“Economic uncertainty, affordability challenges, and inventory constraints are keeping some would-be buyers on the sidelines,” Bob Broeksmit, Mortgage Bankers Association‘s (MBA) president and CEO, said in a statement. “Applications to refinance and buy a home declined on both a weekly and annual basis, as an uptick in mortgage rates curbed activity.” 



Source link


Roughly a year after Mortgage Coach and Sales Boomerang were acquired by a private equity firm, they’ve merged their services onto one platform and rebranded to “TrustEngine.”

The company unification and new platform come as mortgage origination volume falters and lenders struggle to stay afloat in a high mortgage rate environment.

The TrustEngine Borrower Intelligence Platform, as the platform is called, wraps around the entire mortgage tech stack to drive origination volume by “identifying loan opportunities and engagement strategies tailored to each borrower’s needs,” the companies said in a statement Wednesday.

In early 2022, Philadelphia-based private equity firm LLR Partners bought controlling stakes in two fintechs, which are focused on attracting and retaining mortgage borrowers and making loan originators more efficient.

TrustEngine, led by CEO Rich Harris, said borrower intelligence platforms are rapidly gaining traction as mandatory technology for modern mortgage lenders.

TrustEngine says its platform drives increased loan applications, customer loyalty and team performance by collecting, enhancing and analyzing borrower data; suggesting actionable borrower opportunities; pacing opportunity delivery; and guiding borrower and loan officer interactions that result in conversions.

The company says more than 200 independent mortgage companies, credit unions, banks and brokers currently use TrustEngine’s solutions.

Company executives say that TrustEngine is the only solution on the market today that equips mortgage advisors with “proven scripts and dynamically generated presentations” that show borrowers their best loan options based on their individual profile. The platform automatically measures conversion at the branch and individual level across various loan types and suggests borrower outreach strategies across the lifespan of the loan.

“This groundbreaking solution will help lenders become lifelong champions for borrowers by gaining access — for the first time in history — to the kind of world-class customer intelligence leveraged by global leaders like Apple, Microsoft and Amazon,” Harris said in a prepared statement Wednesday.

In January 2022, Sam Ryder, principal at LLR Partners, cited the companies’ solutions products as the reason for the capital investment. He said lenders reported that they received a high return on investment from the products, and LLR felt that there was significant upside in the firms, even though margins in the industry are narrowing due to higher rates.



Source link


Temperatures are slowly starting to rise in many parts of the country as we head into spring — and so is homebuilder sentiment, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) report, released Wednesday.

In February, builder confidence in the market for newly built single-family homes rose seven points from January’s reading, to an index value of 42. This is the second consecutive month of gains after a year of decreases, and it is the index’s strongest reading since September 2022.

The NAHB/HMI report is based on a monthly survey of NAHB members, in which respondents are asked to rate both current market conditions for the sale of new homes and expected conditions for the next six months, as well as traffic of prospective buyers of new homes. Scores for each component of the builder confidence survey are then used to calculate an index, with any number greater than 50 indicating that more homebuilders view conditions as favorable than not.

The NAHB attributes the increase to the slight easing of mortgage rates, which the trade organization feels is a signal that the housings market might be turning, despite builders still dealing with high construction costs and supply chain issues.

“With the largest monthly increase for builder sentiment since June 2013, the HMI indicates that incremental gains for housing affordability have the ability to price-in buyers to the market,” Alicia Huey, an NAHB chairman, said in a statement. “The nation continues to face a sizeable housing shortage that can only be closed by building more affordable, attainable housing. However, the two monthly gains for the HMI at the start of 2023 match the cautious optimism noted by the large number of builders at the recent International Builders’ Show in Las Vegas, who reported a better start to the year than expected last fall.”

According to Huey, the most challenging part of the homebuilding market is the construction of entry-level homes, and he called on policymakers to “help by reducing the cost of developing lots and building homes via regulatory reform.”

Builders are continuing to offer a variety of incentives. However, data shows that things may be stabilizing. In November, 36% of builders were reducing home prices, but the percentage of builders who are dropping home prices declined to 31% in February. In addition, the average price drop decreased from 8% in December to 6% in February.

“While the HMI remains below the breakeven level of 50, the increase from 31 to 42 from December to February is a positive sign for the market,” Robert Dietz, the NAHB’s chief economist, said in a statement. “Even as the Federal Reserve continues to tighten monetary policy conditions, forecasts indicate that the housing market has passed peak mortgage rates for this cycle. And while we expect ongoing volatility for mortgage rates and housing costs, the building market should be able to achieve stability in the coming months, followed by a rebound back to trend home construction levels later in 2023 and the beginning of 2024.”

Three other indices monitored by the NAHB also posted gains in February. The gauge measuring current sales conditions rose to 46, up six points month over month. The component analyzing sales expectations for the next six months rose 11 points to a reading of 48, and the index that charts traffic of prospective buyers rose six points from January to a reading of 29.

Regionally, the three-month moving averages for HMI rose in all four regions, with the West gaining three points to a reading of 30, the South rising four points to 40, the Northeast adding four points for a reading of 37 and the Midwest rising one point to a reading of 33.

Another survey, the BTIG/HomeSphere State of the Industry Report, also reported a leveling in homebuilder outlook.

According to the survey, 54% of builders saw a yearly decrease in sales last month, down from 71% in December. Despite a 41% yearly decrease in sales, builders again reported a slight improvement in performance relative to expectations, with 21% of respondents reporting that sales were better than expected, and 38% reporting that sales were worse than expected. These metrics improved from 11% and 35%, respectively, in December.

The BTIG/HomeSphere study is an electronic survey of approximately 50-100 small- to mid-sized homebuilders that sell, on average, 50-100 homes per year throughout the nation. In January, the survey had 107 respondents.

The January survey included a special question about the impact of mortgage rates, with 80% of builders reporting that lower rates have positively impacted business.

“Conditions continue to be sluggish overall, but we believe the environment is improving heading into the Spring selling season,” BTIG analyst Carl Reichardt said in a statement.



Source link


Expectations that high inflation may persist for longer than previously projected put pressure on mortgage rates last week. In turn, it affected borrowers’ appetite for home loans. 

The latest Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) survey showed that mortgage loan application volume declined 7.7% for the week ending Feb. 10 from the previous week. Compared to the same week last year, mortgage apps are down 57%. 

“Mortgage rates increased across the board last week, pushed higher by market expectations that inflation will persist, thus requiring the Federal Reserve to keep monetary policy restrictive for a longer time,” Joel Kan, MBA’s vice president and deputy chief economist, said in a statement. “Mortgage applications decreased for the second time in three weeks because of these higher rates.”

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported on Tuesday that the Consumer Price Index rose by 6.4% in January compared to a year ago. The increase is lower than the 6.5% posted in December and the smallest year-over-year since October 2021.

But, according to experts, the report brought adjustments to the fourth quarter CPI numbers, indicating the disinflation process was slightly slower than expected. 

“Today’s report suggests that the downward trend in inflation may be bumpier than had hoped. It means that the Federal Reserve will push forward with rate hikes through the spring, which will increase borrowing costs for consumers and businesses,” Lisa Sturtevant, Bright MLSchief economist, said in a statement. 

According to the MBA data, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($726,200 or less) increased to 6.39% for the week ending Feb. 10, compared to the previous week’s 6.18%. Rates for jumbo loan balances (greater than $726,200) rose from 5.96% to 6.26% in the same period. 

Mortgage rates were even higher at Mortgage News Daily on Wednesday morning, marking 6.62%.   

Mortgage loan types 

The MBA data shows refinancing demand is in free fall, as there is little financial incentive to act, which is keeping borrowers on the sidelines. Compared to the previous week, applications for refis declined 13% for the week ending on Feb. 10. It was also 76% lower than the same week one year ago. 

Consequently, the share of refis in mortgage activity fell to 32% of the total applications from 33.9% the previous week. The FHA share rose from 11.9% to 12.6%, the VA share declined from 13.4% to 12.6%, and the USDA remained at 0.6%. Adjustable-rate mortgages increased to 6.9% of the total. 

According to the data, purchase applications are also declining, down 6% week over week and 36% year over year. Last week, purchase apps hit the lowest level since the start of the year. 

“Potential buyers remain quite sensitive to the current level of mortgage rates, which are more than two percentage points above last year’s levels and have significantly reduced buyers’ purchasing power,” Kan said.  



Source link


You may not have heard the terms “dual pathing” or “single point of contact” lately, but just wait. COVID-era forbearances are ending and odds are some borrowers won’t be able to come current on their loans without help. HousingWire recently spoke to Amanda Phillips, executive vice president of compliance at ACES Quality Management, about getting servicing staff and technology ready to meet upcoming regulatory requirements while ensuring quality throughout the life of the loan.

HousingWire: As financial institutions plan for 2023, what is their best line of defense in maintaining loan quality and mitigating risk?

Mandy-Phillips-Headshot

Amanda Phillips: We agree with other market players that 2023 will be a challenging origination environment. Fannie Mae projects that single-family mortgage origination volume for 2023 will decline 20% from $1.66 trillion to $1.33 trillion along with a 20% decline in home sales. As a result, margins will be tight as origination activity slows and lenders earn less per loan.

Many lenders will look to servicing revenue to carry them through this slow originations market. To confidently rely on that revenue, however, servicers must assess the integrity of their servicing portfolios and staff to ensure compliance with all relevant servicing rules, guidelines and regulations. These teams will need to rely on updated technology not only to stay on top of regulatory changes but to communicate effectively and efficiently with other internal stakeholders.

Ultimately, there are inherent risks in the servicing process. Ideally, risk management teams have already identified those risks and internal audit is making sure the proper processes and procedures are in place to address those risks. From a transactional standpoint, it is then up to the QC team to ensure that the organization is following those policies and procedures and are mitigating the risks. Without technology, this will be an overwhelming burden. So, I would say one essential line of defense is to make sure your technology and staff are up to the challenges ahead.

HW: How can lenders keep up with evolving servicing regulations, and what trends do you expect to see this year from a servicing perspective?

AP: With recent and upcoming regulatory requirements, servicers are gearing up to deal with borrowers exiting COVID-era forbearance programs. Servicers haven’t faced this much regulatory oversight since 2012. However, as cyclicality is a hallmark of the mortgage industry, the fact that regulatory focus has once again turned to servicing should be no surprise, especially given the looming fears of another foreclosure crisis.

Inevitably there will be homeowners unable to bring their mortgage current as they exit forbearance, which means mortgage servicers will need to engage in loss mitigation processes and options for those consumers. If the servicer is ultimately unable to find a successful loss mitigation option for these borrowers, then the servicer may ultimately enter the foreclosure process, with its own requirements, timelines and potential costs.

Servicers will need to comply with requirements from CFPB, the GSEs (or other investors), as well as state and local regulators – and that’s going to take technology that can be quickly adapted as new requirements emerge. For example, to ensure our clients could prepare and audit up-to-date guidelines, ACES Quality Management was the first to incorporate Fannie Mae’s updated guidelines into ACES Quality Management & Control software and publish on our Compliance NewsHub.

In addition, servicers need to stay abreast what’s happening from a regulatory perspective. ACES hosted a webinar on Feb. 8 titled “Hot Topics on Mortgage Servicing & Originations Compliance,” where we covered the current outlook, for mortgage servicing compliance, regulatory trends related to redlining/digital redlining/appraisal bias and fair lending/servicing regulatory activity and trends.

HW: How can servicers set their departments up for success regardless of the current market trend?

AP:  Servicers should be examining their existing policies and procedures to ensure compliance. If adjustments need to be made to align with current rules and regulations, those changes need to be prioritized and documented.  This way, come exam time, the servicer can show evidence of self-identification, correction, and remediation.

It is not enough to ensure the documented policies and procedures reflect what is required. Financial institutions should also audit employee activities against their documented policies and procedures, identify any areas where policies and procedures are not being followed and document both the corrective action taken and plans for follow-up to ensure compliance going forward. 

One of the items from the CFPB’s servicing guidance that has received less attention is limited English proficiency, or LEP. In addition to ensuring servicers are providing good customer service to borrowers and adhering to all loss mitigation regulatory requirements, the CFPB will also be examining how servicers are communicating with borrowers for whom English is not their primary language. This has been a recurring topic over the past several years, most recently with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but now, it’s popping back up from the CFPB. So, servicers will need to take a closer look at how they are handling both written and verbal communications for non-English-speaking borrowers.

By paying close attention to signals from the CFPB and engaging in proactive self-examination, servicers can be ready to defend their business practices.

HW: What is your top advice for lenders that have neglected quality control?

AP: Servicers are always going to have to deal with the fallout from loans that were not originated properly or were originated using poor underwriting standards, especially those originated during high volume years. We saw this in the past with a lot of the FHA Streamline Refinances and some other, similar products – invariably, you’re going to see increases in delinquencies, more issues regarding straw buyers, etc. That’s always going to be there. 

Lapses in control on the origination side inevitably make their way down to servicing, forcing servicers to deal with problem loans because of one or more failures upstream. Of course, it’s one thing if the loans are servicing-released, but if you are servicing your own originations or have a sub-servicer, then your servicing group needs to make sure they are informed and following QC findings on the lending side and conducting what I consider risk-based testing (because testing 10% of your loans just randomly is not going to give you everything that you need) to ensure that any risk or lack of controls are being shored up. 

Servicers need to make sure to identify those pockets of risk, and if that comes from the origination side, then so be it. You’re constantly going to be re-evaluating where those risks are, but then you need to have the data and the audit steps in place to make sure that you are covering those things.

It really should be a constant re-evaluation and recalibration. 



Source link


Given the hotter inflation reported in Tuesday’s CPI data, can mortgage rates go above the 2022 peak of 7.37%? Initially the 10-year yield fell after the report, then rose higher, only to fall back down again. For all the hype around today’s stock market close, it was a dud of a Valentine’s date if you ask me.

A lot of times, on days when big economic reports are released, you can get wild intraday action but not have much happening by the end of the day. We still have a lot of big housing market economic reports this week, so stay tuned as retail sales, builders confidence, purchase apps, jobless claims, producer price inflation, and leading economic indicators data are still to come.

2023 bond and mortgage rate forecast

When I do my mortgage rate forecasting for each year, I don’t target mortgage rates but where I believe the 10-year yield channel will be with a set of variables in play. Of course, post-COVID-19, we have had extreme variables that can crazily move the market.

However, for 2023 I believe this range on the 10-year yield would be appropriate, considering the labor market is still solid. If the labor market starts to get worse — meaning jobless claims rise with some speed — the initial range of this forecast will break, and bond yields will go lower. The data isn’t there yet to even have that conversation. 

From my 2023 housing market forecast: “For 2023, the 10-year yield is currently at 3.70% and I believe the 10-year yield range this year will be between 3.21%-4.25% as long as the economy stays firm. Now if the economy gets weaker, especially in terms of the labor market breaking, which for me is jobless claims rising to 323,000 and beyond, then we can get as low as 2.73% on the 10-year yield.

“With that 10-year yield range (3.21%-4.25%), mortgage rates should be between 5.25%-7.25%. This assumes that the spreads are wide and pricing for mortgages is still weak. However, if the spreads get better, we could even see mortgage rates under 5% if the 10-year yield breaks under 3%.”

What do we know about inflation? The growth rate is cooling from last year’s peak, and the shelter inflation portion of housing will cool down over time. It’s widely known that the CPI inflation shelter data lags a lot, and since it’s the most significant component of core inflation, it’s a big deal.

This is why I went on CNBC last year to say the growth rate of rents falling was a positive for inflation for 2023. However, the CPI data lags badly on this reality, and the fear was that the Federal Reserve didn’t understand this.

However, then the Federal Reserve actually created a new index that excludes shelter to adapt to the more current data, which shows the growth rate of rents is cooling down. Now the Fed focuses on core inflation data, excluding food and energy. However, even if I take shelter away and leave food and energy inflation in the equation, the growth rate of inflation is cooling more noticeably.

Without rent inflation taking off, you can kiss the 1970s inflation comparisons goodbye, and this is why the 10-year yield never broke above 5.25% — a critical level for me to even have a thought about 1970s-style inflation. As you can see below, the growth rate of rents took off a few times back then. After the 1970s, the growth rate was stable for decades.

My mindset with inflation data since October of 2022 has been to give it time: 12 months from now, we will be in a better place. If the economy went into a job-loss recession, the bond market would get well ahead of the Fed and mortgage rates would fall faster. However, we aren’t there yet.

The Fed pivot won’t happen until jobless claims break over 323,000 on the four-week moving average, but the truth is the bond market isn’t old and slow; they will head that way before the Fed does. 

CPI report 

From BLS [bolding is mine]: “The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) rose 0.5 percent in January on a seasonally adjusted basis, after increasing 0.1 percent in December, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 6.4 percent before seasonal adjustment. The index for shelter was by far the largest contributor to the monthly all items increase, accounting for nearly half of the monthly all items increase, with the indexes for food, gasoline, and natural gas also contributing.”

As we can see below, the growth rate of inflation is cooling, but shelter inflation, “Which is lagging real-time data,” is keeping the core data higher than it should be today. Remember, you should always focus 12 months out with inflation data and tie it to the weekly economic data. This is why we created the weekly Housing Market Tracker.

Other rental inflation data shows a cool-down, common with global pandemics. However, not only is the real-time data cooling, we have nearly 1 million apartments that will be built in the near future, and the best way to deal with inflation is always more supply.

Hopefully, this explanation of my forecast for 2023, including the 10-year yield, mortgage rates, and inflation gives you a better understanding of why I don’t believe mortgage rates can rise above last year’s peak of 7.37%. 

Now, one way mortgage rates could blow past 7.37% is if the economy starts to boom again, supply doesn’t grow, and wage growth, which has been cooling, reverses, and explodes higher again.

If rents and wages took off higher again, some new war created more of a supply shock, and the labor market got even tighter, this would counter my discussion that the growth rate of inflation has peaked. However, so far, it doesn’t look like anything I just talked about is happening, so give it more time, and the inflation growth rate will moderate. 



Source link