Homebuilder confidence is continuing to trend upward this spring, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) report, released Tuesday. 

In May, home builder confidence in the market for newly built single-family homes rose to an index value of 50, an increase of five points from the April reading. This is the fifth consecutive month of increase after a year of decreases. May’s reading also marks the first time since July 2022 that sentiment has reached the midpoint mark of 50. 

The NAHB/HMI report is based on a monthly survey of NAHB members, in which homebuilders are asked to rate both current market conditions for the sale of new homes and expected conditions for the next six months, as well as traffic of prospective buyers of new homes. Scores for each component of the homebuilder confidence survey are then used to calculate an index, with any number greater than 50 indicating that more homebuilders view conditions as favorable than not.

“New home construction is taking on an increased role in the marketplace because many home owners with loans well below current mortgage rates are electing to stay put, and this is keeping the supply of existing homes at a very low level,” Alicia Huey, the NAHB chair, said in a statement. “While this is fueling cautious optimism among builders, they continue to face ongoing challenges to meet a growing demand for new construction. These include shortages of transformers and other building materials and tightening credit conditions for residential real estate development and construction brought on by the actions of the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates.” 

Although interest rates have more than doubled since 2021, home builders are still cautiously optimistic about business, something the NAHB attributes to builders’ usage of buyer incentives. However, as sales have picked up this spring and existing home sales remain at record lows, the use of sales inducements from homebuilders has slowed. 

In May, the share of homebuilders reducing home prices dropped to 27%, down from 30% in April and 36% in November 2022, with the average price reduction hovering at 6%, unchanged for the past four months. Additionally, the share of homebuilders offering some type of incentive dropped to 54% in May, compared to 59% in April and 62% last December. 

“Lack of existing inventory continues to drive buyers to new construction,” Robert Dietz, the NAHB’s chief economist, said in a statement. “In March, 33% of homes listed for sale were new homes in various stages of construction. That share from 2000-2019 was a 12.7% average. With limited available housing inventory, new construction will continue to be a significant part of prospective buyers’ search in the quarters ahead.”

The three other indices monitored by the NAHB rose in May. The gauge measuring current sales conditions rose to 56, up five points month over month. The component analyzing sales expectations for the next six months rose seven points to a reading of 57. Compared to a month prior, the gauge measuring traffic of prospective buyers rose two points to 33. 

Regionally, the three-month moving averages for HMI rose in three out of the four regions, with the West gaining three points to a reading of 41, the South increasing three points to 52, and the Midwest rising two points to a reading of 39. The Northeast held steady month over month at a reading of 45.

Another survey, the BTIG/HomeSphere State of the Industry Report, also reported an improvement in homebuilder outlook.

According to the survey, nearly twice as many builders reported sales that were better than expected (38%), than those who report sales that were worse than expected (20%) in April. In addition, nearly three times as many builders saw traffic as better than expected (42%) versus worse than expected (15%). The share of builders reporting a year over year decrease in sales also shrank to 34% in April, compared to 40% in March. 

The BTIG/HomeSphere study is an electronic survey of approximately 75-125 small- to mid-sized homebuilders that sell, on average, 50-100 homes per year throughout the nation. In April, the survey had 124 respondents.

Like the homebuilder confidence survey, the BTIG survey also found that homebuilders are easing up on buyer incentives. Of the 124 respondents, 17% cut some, most of all prices versus 22% last month, while just 22% of surveyed builders reported increasing some, most or all incentives compared to 27% a month prior. In addition, 30% of homebuilders reported raising some, most or all base prices in April, up from 21% in March.

“New home demand momentum has continued to accelerate throughout the spring season, which is in-line with anecdotal public builder commentary,” Carl Reichardt, a BTIG analyst, said in a statement. “With comparisons for both sales and traffic beginning to ease meaningfully, we expect results should become stronger on a year/year basis next month.”



Source link


Multifamily and commercial real estate has been the butt of the joke over the past year. As mortgage rates started to rise, commercial real estate investors were hit hard, as profits became pitiful and asking prices laughable. For months, the media has been predicting a commercial real estate crash, citing a wave of mortgages coming due with sellers who won’t be able to pay the high price of a refinance. And while these fundamentals aren’t wrong, a mortgage meltdown might not be a reality.

So instead of speculating, we brought on Richard Hill, Head of Real Estate Strategy & Research at Cohen & Steers, to differentiate the facts from fiction. Richard knows that loans are coming due, and buyers with low-rate adjustable mortgages may be in trouble. But that’s not the whole story, and some parts of commercial real estate could be primed for massive growth that residential investors have no clue about. The opportunities could be flowing soon for those who know where to look.

In this episode, Richard will talk about the true risk of commercial real estate mortgages, which sectors are in the most trouble, which are being blown out of proportion, and how much investors can expect prices to drop. Plus, Richard gives his take on the three best times to invest in a quickly changing market like we’re seeing today.

Dave:
Everyone, welcome to On the Market. I’m your host, Dave Meyer, joined today by James Dainard. And this might be a pretty special day, James. We just saw that the Fed raised interest rates 25 basis points, but they are signaling that this might be the end of the tightening cycle. What do you think?

James:
Well, I’m not happy that we’re sitting at 5%, but I am happy because the increase is under control. I feel like it always makes the market so emotional, whereas we just need to get back to stability. So it’s like, “Get to where they want to be, kind of grow off off there.” But I will say, though, they didn’t tell us the truth. 12 months ago, he was saying that the high was going to be what? 4? 3.75 to 4? Was that what it was?

Dave:
Oh, yeah. But they’ve upped it, little by little, every month. They’re like, “It’s going up. It’s going up. It’s going up.” But I think this is the first time they haven’t said that there’s going to be future rate hikes, in over a year.

James:
One thing, though. I don’t trust what the Fed says or doesn’t say anymore. So we’ll see what happens.

Dave:
Yeah, that’s a good point. But I mean, I think a lot of people have been calling for a pause now for a while. They’ve said that they’re going to pause. Obviously, if inflation stays high, they’re going to reconsider. But to me, this is what I would do, is sort of take a break. And if I had a vote on the Fed, which I most certainly do not, I would say, “Take a break, and see what happens,” because there are signs that the labor market is starting to crack a little bit. Obviously, there’s been bank crisis, so to me, it doesn’t hurt to wait couple months and see what happens and reassess, than hiking at every single meeting. And they meet every six to eight weeks.

James:
Yeah, it’s just getting to stability. It’s going to be so important because we’re all on pins and needles every time he’s coming out. And it’s not like that they haven’t had the negative impacts. I mean, we have seen some banks fail. We have seen housing come down a little bit. And in the labor market, hopefully that breaks more because that has just still been the… I know it’s still tough for us, as business operators.

Dave:
Yeah, for sure. Well, we are recording this, obviously, early. This episode drops on the 15th of May. We are recording this on May 3rd. So in subsequent episodes, we will cover more… Maybe we already have… cover more sort of the fallout of this decision. But I was just excited and wanted to talk to you about it. But we have an incredible episode today. I mean, all of them are my favorite, but this was one I learned so much from, something I absolutely don’t know enough about. But maybe after today, I know a little know bit more. Today we have Rich Hill, who’s the senior vice president and head of real estate research and strategy for Cohen & Steers. And his expertise is all about commercial real estate and debt. And he just dropped some knowledge on us, James. What did you think of this interview?

James:
Oh, he’s definitely an expert. That is for sure. This was one of my favorite episodes we’ve done. There’s so much clarity in this, with the amount of hype behind what’s going to happen in the commercial real estate market and the banking. And some of the clarity he provided with me, it kind of blew me away. Like, “Oh, yeah, those big stats they’re throwing out are just normal.”

Dave:
Absolutely, yeah.

James:
It was refreshing to hear all what he was talking about, and he is one smart dude.

Dave:
For sure. And the reason we brought Rich on is because there’s been so much media coverage about the commercial real estate market and potential defaults and bank crises, and it’s in the media a lot, and I get a ton of questions about this, but it’s not really my area of expertise. So we got Rich to come on to explain to us what is really going on. And, spoiler alert, it’s not always exactly what the media says. But Rich provides some incredible data and information about what’s actually going on in the commercial real estate mortgage market, debt markets, and provides some ideas for opportunities he sees in the commercial real estate space as well. So we’re going to take a quick break, and then we’ll welcome on Rich to talk about the commercial real estate mortgage market.
Rich Hill, welcome to On the Market. Thank you for being here.

Rich:
Yeah, thanks for having me.

Dave:
Can we start by having you introduce yourself? And just tell us a little bit about how you got into real estate and all of the research topics we’re going to talk about today.

Rich:
Yeah. Good God, I don’t think anyone’s asked me that before. Where do I start? So, look, my name is Richard Hill. I’m head of commercial real estate research and strategy at Cohen & Steers. Cohen & Steers was founded in 1986 as the first manager to manage listed real estate. We now manage around $80 billion. About half of that is in listed real estate, and the other half of that is in other real assets, including private real estate.
So how did I get in commercial real estate? Well, look, I grew up in a real estate family, and my dad was a mall manager. I usually joke that that means he’s like one step up from the janitor. I had no desire to get back in commercial real estate after graduating undergrad, but ended up getting back into it, working on a interest rate derivatives desk, hedging commercial real estate developer and home builders’ interest rate exposure. Fast-forward, I joined a debt capital markets team. Did that until my services were no longer needed, in 2008. Was told that I had a couple months to look for a job. Went to work for myself, did some consulting in the Middle East. Figured out that was really hard. And someone was looking for a research analyst in around 2010. You couldn’t find someone that was more non-traditional than me because I had never been one before, but I became a research analyst focused on the debt markets, then [inaudible 00:06:15] REIT equity markets. And here I am today.
So hopefully, that’s a really quick Cliff Notes version that gives you an overview of sort of, maybe who you’re talking to today.

Dave:
Awesome. Well, you did plenty to qualify yourself for the questions that James and I have in store for you, because they’re all about commercial real estate, and a lot of them are about debt. So let’s just start at the highest level. There’s obviously a lot of media focus on the commercial real estate debt market and what’s going on. But can you give us your read on the overall commercial debt market?

Rich:
Yeah, well, so maybe I can start here, and I can size up the commercial real estate market for you because I think there’s a lot of misconceptions about what it is and what it isn’t. We think it’s almost a $21 trillion market in the United States. People immediately think of office or retail, multifamily, and industrial. I get it, because that’s where they live. That’s where they work. That’s where they shop, and that’s where they get their goods from Amazon. It’s things that people really understand. But believe it or not, that’s not the entirety of the commercial real estate market. There’s things like data centers and cell towers and single-family rental and seniors’ housing. So it’s a pretty diverse ecosystem of different property types, all under the same umbrella.
But I sort of like to describe it, it’s sort of like when I go into my kindergartner’s class, and they’re all running in different directions at the different times. So while commercial real estate gets a bad rap right now, there’s certainly subsectors of commercial real estate that are doing quite well. Senior housing is booming right now. Office is not doing so well. So my only point to you is, it’s easy to fixate on the office market, and I’m sure we’ll come back to that, but that is not the totality of the commercial real estate market.

Dave:
So, given what you just said, Rich, about how diverse it is, it unreasonable to ask you to give us an overall risk assessment in the market? Or if you could focus in, our audience is mostly focused on multifamily, but there are also people interested in retail and office space. I’m sure there’s some other ones, but those are probably the three biggest.

Rich:
Yeah, so maybe I can explain it this way. If we were having this conversation six to seven months ago, I would’ve been telling you a similar story to what I’m telling you today, but I would’ve said, “Hey, look, I’m pretty concerned about commercial real estate.” So I probably would’ve put myself at maybe a 7 or 8 out of 10 on concern. And so, why would I have been concerned? Well, seven months ago, I would’ve told you commercial real estate valuations are going to be down 10 to 20%. Certainly the 10% is likely off the table right now, and we think valuations are going to be down more like 20 to 25. But I actually would consider myself more like a 5 or 6 on the risk scale right now. Why is that the case?
Well, it’s because the whole market has gone student body left for the bearish narrative, and suddenly, a pragmatic, objective view on the risks and maybe some of the good parts of commercial real estate suddenly look ultra bullish, and maybe even, dare I say, puppy dogs and rainbows. So I think there’s just some misconceptions, and maybe the truth is a little bit in the middle. I don’t think the world is coming to an end. I don’t think the next shoe to drop is the thing that everyone says is the next shoe to drop. So I’m happy to dig in there, but I would tell you that I was pretty cautious seven to eight months ago. Things have gotten worse since then, but I actually feel like we’re in a better position now, given how bearish the debate has turned.

James:
Yeah, and I’m glad you brought that up, because that’s all you hear the last 60… no, the last 90 to 120 days, is the commercial real estate market is going into the deep end, and it is going to just explode and melt down. We’ve been investing up in Pacific Northwest for the last 15 to 20 years. It’s like every time you are expecting the bad thing to happen, and everyone’s talking about it, it almost never happens. And then, something randomly out of left field just comes and kind of hits you out of nowhere. And so I feel like the narratives are really, really aggressive because some of that narrative I’ve read is some valuations will go 40 to 50% down, is what people are projecting. Why are you guys looking at the 20 to 25%, which is still a very aggressive correction, but why are you guys kind of in the middle compared to some of the other valuations that people are talking about?

Rich:
Yeah. Well, let’s, first and foremost, talk about the 40 to 50 valuation that’s being thrown out there. I think there’s a really bad game of telephone occurring. So if someone gets one headline, and someone else picks it up without fact-checking it, and then it, just like three weeks later, been extrapolated out to mean something else. What you’re hearing is that coastal office property valuations could be down 40 to 50%. Is that reasonable? I don’t know. Maybe. Coastal REITs are down 50% right now from their peaks. So it’s not that crazy. But let’s game theory this out a little bit. When you suddenly say all office in the United States is going to be down 40 to 50, that’s a huge number, and I don’t think people actually understand what that means.
For office to be down 40 to 50% on average across the United States, that means something like San Francisco probably has to be down 80% because guess what? Nashville, Tennessee’s not going to be down 50%. It’s going to be down 10%, 15%, 20%. So the law of averages, to get to 40, 50% nationwide for office, that’s a really, really draconian scenario for major coastal markets. Never mind that across the nation, valuations aren’t going to be down 40 to 50. During the GFC, we were down 30%. This is not nearly as bad as the GFC. During the S&L crisis, we were down like 32%. This is not as bad as the S&L crisis. So how are we coming to 20 to 25? Look, I don’t have a crystal ball, but we do try to triangulate across a lot of different sources. We’re a big believer that REITs are a leading indicator for the commercial real estate market. REITs were down 25% in 2022. They were down almost 35% at their troughs in 2022. So 25% feels like an okay number relative to what the REITs are pricing in.
But what we also spend a lot of time on is a cash-on-cash return analysis. So, that’s basically taken into account my economic cap rate… So that’s your nominal cap rate after adjusting for capex spend… how much leverage I can get on it, and my cost of debt. Guess what? Economic cap rates are still relatively tight, relative to financing costs that have risen significantly. So my cash-on-cash return is well below historical averages. If I need to get it back up to the historical average, property valuations have to be down 20 and 25% on average. I don’t want to get too wonky here, but that’s just math. It’s just levered return math.
And so when we think about what cash-on-cash returns are telling us, what the REIT market’s telling us, and, by the way, what the private market indices are already starting to tell us, and I’m happy to unpack that for you, 20 to 25 doesn’t feel unreasonable. Now, a year from now, if you come back, and you say, “Hey, Rich, it was 27” or “It was 17,” I’m just not that smart. I think we’re directionally right. We’ll let the markets figure out if it’s 17 or 27 or 22.

Dave:
And is that across all asset classes within commercial real estate, or you think there’ll be some variance between assets?

Rich:
Oh, huge variance between asset types. That is a generic 18 subsectors that fall under commercial real estate. We think they’re going to be, on average, down 20 to 25. You mentioned multifamily is an important asset class. That’s going to hold up generically better than, let’s say, office. Multifamily fundamentals are in strong footing. Industrials are on strong footing. What multifamily’s dealing with has very little to do with the fundamental side of the equation. It has everything to do with the repricing of financing costs, and cap rates were below 4% two years ago. That is well below where financing costs are. So you have negative leverage. You’re just repricing to where the new normal is for interest rates. And again, happy to break that down, but I would not be surprised to see multifamily down, call it 10 to 15 percentage points, whereas office could be down substantially more than that, but it’s on average 20 to 25. There will be some property types that do quite well. There will be some property types that don’t do as well.

James:
Yeah, and I think that’s the problem with the narrative, is they’re lumping everything into one big pond of saying that commercial real estate banking can melt down, but then the multifamily asset class that is actually seeming to stay fairly strong besides cap rate compressions, and then office is getting put in the mix. And so that’s kind of where the negative… I saw there’s like $4.5 trillion in US back and multifamily commercial. It’s like when they go over all these stats in the media, they’re always jamming it all together. Have you guys broken out the difference between multifamily and office debt, and what’s coming due-

Rich:
Yeah.

James:
… and what that’s going to look like over the next 12 to 24 months?

Rich:
Yeah, yeah. So, we have. We spent a lot of time on this. And basically, [inaudible 00:16:22] me hitting my head up against a wall for two weeks straight, trying to figure out fact from fiction. Let me give you some numbers. Well, before I go there, we think the commercial mortgage market in the United States is around $4.5 trillion. There’s another half a trillion dollars of construction loans out there. So you get to around $5 trillion of total commercial mortgages. Sometimes you will hear a number of like 5.5 trillion thrown out there. That includes owner-occupied properties. So what’s an owner-occupied property? That’s like Amazon owning its own industrial facility and putting a mortgage on it. That has a much, much different risk profile than traditional commercial real estate. We don’t include that.
Sometimes you’ll actually hear a number much smaller than that, and that’s focused on banks. And I want to come back there for a second, but let’s just focus on the 4.5 trillion for a second. You’ve heard about this huge wall of maturities that are coming. The media loves to talk about this huge wall of maturities, that 40% of all commercial mortgage loans outstanding are coming due over the next three years. That’s sort of true. So let me give you the facts here. 16% of commercial mortgage loans are coming due in 2023. 14% are coming due in 2024, and 12% are coming due in 2025. I think you sum that up, that’s like 41 or 42%.
When I hear someone saying that, “Oh, my God, the sky’s falling. 40% of all commercial real estate loans are coming due over the next three years,” I laugh. And the reason I laugh is not because I’m flippant, but commercial mortgages have a seven-year wall. That means, by definition, 15% of all loans come due every single year, forever and always. I’ve been doing this 22 years. There’s 40% of all loans coming due for the next three years as long as they studied the market. That’s just the way that’s it is. So it’s not a wall of maturities. It’s just what happens. So I love to say it because it’s like when you think about it that way, it’s like, “Oh, my God,” Captain Obvious stuff.
The second point I would make to you is that everyone’s talking about office. So of the 16% of loans coming due, 25% of those are office. That sounds like a big number, guys, but I’m telling you, 4% of commercial mortgages are office loans coming due in 2023. That’s nothing. That’s not very big. And by the way, office is less than 20% of commercial mortgage exposure. Multifamily is actually almost more than 40% of commercial mortgage exposure. But multifamily benefits from GSEs. The GSEs, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, they’re there to support the housing market. And I don’t want to come back and say there’s not going to be challenges with multifamily. I’m happy to unpack what that actually means. James, you bring up these great questions. There’s all these facts being thrown around, and they’re half truths, and in the game telephone, it ends up being this lowest common denominator of who can be the most bearish. But it doesn’t really tell the whole story of what’s going on.

Dave:
I mean, there there’s concern, but this is why your concern level has gone down over the last six to nine months. Is that why?

Rich:
Yeah, look. We’ve done a little bit more work. Our views are a little bit more nuanced. And at the same time, everyone’s writing a story about how bad commercial real estate is. You guys might have heard that office is a problem, and there’s a lot of debt on commercial real estate. There’s probably been five stories written about how bad commercial real estate is in the 15 minutes we’ve been talking. It’s like a, “Me, me, me, me.” Everyone needs to write the story. Ironically, the more stories I hear and the worse the narrative becomes, I think we’re closer to the end than beginning. As an investor, I actually want to see these peak level takes. That tells me that it’s actually a time to buy.
Give you just maybe a quick anecdote here, but the equity markets and the fixed-income markets do a really good job of understanding this concept of “Buy low, sell high.” The real estate market does a exceptionally poor job of that. Everyone wants to buy everything when it feels really, really good, late cycle, and everyone wants to sell everything when it feels really bad, early cycle. It doesn’t make any sense. We’re actually beginning to approach a period of time where I think this is one of the most attractive entry points I’ve seen in my career. We’re not there yet, mind you. But look, property valuations are down 10 to 15 percentage points right now. You can look at the NCREIF ODCE Index, which is a widely followed index of core open-ended funds. All the other private indices are down 10 to 15. We’re all there right now. This is happening in front of us.
And I think people just need to understand that the grieving process, if you will, is moving much faster. We were in denial three months ago. We’re certainly not in denial anymore. We’re probably in an anger stage, but we’re quickly moving to acceptance. And I do think this is going to create a pretty big entry point. So why am I less bearish? I don’t think I’m less bearish fundamentally, but relative to where the narrative has gone, I suddenly feel like the guy out there that’s big bull.

Dave:
I wonder if some of the bearishness and the recent focus on this is due to the banking crisis with very different types of banks. Do you think people are just looking at the banking industry and now projecting these cataclysmic events?

Rich:
Oh, for sure.

Dave:
Even if they’re unrelated.

Rich:
Well, I do think they’re related. So-

Dave:
Oh, yeah. I mean, just commercial real estate and Silicon Valley Bank [inaudible 00:22:23].

Rich:
So, let’s break down what’s actually happening in the banking sector. So, the top 25 banks in the United States have very de minimus amounts of commercial real estate exposure. They have less than 4% exposure to commercial real estate as a percent of total assets. And their office exposure is tens of basis points. It’s really, really small. But this top 25 banks began pulling back on lending to commercial real estate 12 months ago, maybe even a little bit more than that. And as they started pulling back, regional community banks looked to take market share.
So, when I talk, the reason I lead with the top 25 banks is because the FDIC and the Fed classifies anything outside of a top 25 bank as a small bank. I didn’t know this stat a month ago, but do you know there’s more than 4,700 banks in the United States? That’s a lot. 4,700 banks. So it is true that these smaller banks have more exposure to commercial real estate. On average, it’s around 20% of total assets. And there are some small banks that have upwards of 50% exposure to commercial real estate. Some even have 70 to 80% exposure to commercial real estate. But I think the market assumes that there’s like 200 banks in the United States, and this exposure to commercial real estate is highly concentrated. It’s just not. It’s spread out across literally more than 4,700 banks across the United States. That diversity actually makes us feel a little bit better, assuming this doesn’t become a huge problem.
So I think people get scared about things that they can’t see and they can’t explain. And so you don’t know what the commercial real estate exposure looks like, what the lending looks like, what the property types are across all of these banks. It’s impossible to know. I’m not even sure the government, the FDIC, and the Fed can really monitor all of these banks in an efficient manner. I think it’s scary because we don’t know what’s out there. I do like to bring up this fact, though, because I think it’s important. You may have heard of the CMBS market, the commercial mortgage-backed security market. What a lot of people don’t remember is that the FDIC actually created this market in the aftermath of the S&L crisis. So they created this securitization vehicle to get small loans off of small bank balance sheets, and it was extremely successful. They actually used the technology again after the GFC. They issued a couple FDIC deals.
Our view is that if this small bank problem is bigger than we think it is… And I want to come back to why we don’t think it’s as big as people perceive it to be… I think they could use this technology again to help securitize and get small loans off of small bank balance sheets. No one’s talking about that, but I think it’s a really good point. But I do want to spend maybe a little bit of time talking about why we don’t think the risk to bank balance sheets is as big as maybe some of the media narrative suggests. So I just ask my next question? Or do you [inaudible 00:25:24]-

James:
[inaudible 00:25:24].

Dave:
James, were you going to ask a question? Because-

James:
Yeah.

Dave:
Rich, you can just go into it. Or James, why don’t you [inaudible 00:25:30]?

James:
Yeah, Rich, I have one little follow-up question with something you said. I just want to ask real quick. Rich, you had brought up that the 15 largest banks only have 4% of these real estate loans, these commercial loans, out there. And what we have seen over the last 48 to 36 months is a lot of investor activity because there was so much access to capital. These small banks were being very aggressive. I know we got very favorable terms out of a lot of them on what we were buying. What do you see happening to the market if these smaller banks are the ones that could have some potential issues there? What do you think’s going to happen to the access to capital? Because once capital can get locked up, that’s where we can see some market issues.

Rich:
Yeah.

James:
What are you guys forecasting? The requirements for getting loans, and moving forward as an investor to keep purchasing, what is that going to look like with these small banks? Because if they’re going to take a little bit of hit, they’re going to tighten all their guidelines dramatically.

Rich:
Yeah, so you’re asking the right question, and a really important question. The first point I want to make is that lending conditions were tightening prior to these banking headlines. We spent a lot of time looking at the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey, and you can see that lending standards were pretty tight in aggregate, and loan demand was beginning to fall off a cliff. Why is that important? Well, if you look at the correlations between the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey and property prices, they were highly correlated. And where you see the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey from a tightening lending standard, it actually looks like valuation should be down 20% right now.
We fully expect that lending standards are going to tighten more. So if your average LTB was 50 to 55%, and I recognize some small banks were giving more leverage than that, they’re going to tighten from there. But I think it’s a little bit different than what the market thinks. It’s not like lending standards are suddenly going to 30 or 40% LTB. Banks are just going to be a lot more selective as to who they lend to. And I think it’s going to end up being a binary outcome. You can still get loans on a high-quality office property right now. It has to be a high-quality property, and you have to be a good sponsor. If it’s a low-quality property of any type, good luck with that. So I think it’s got to become binary. You got to get financing, or you can’t get it. And so that’s where we think about tightening lending conditions. But mind you, look, banks are going to pull back.
Maybe one of the unintended consequences and the unintended bullish things that’s going to come out of this is non-bank lending. You’ve maybe seen some headlines. They’re not getting the attention, but you see all of these companies, smart companies, that are now beginning to move into commercial real estate lending, non-banks, private equity funds. We could end up seeing a five- to 10-year bull market for lending to commercial real estate in non-bank lenders if, in fact, banks pull back. We’ve seen it happen before in other asset classes. This might be one of the most attractive times to lend as a commercial real estate lender because financing costs are high, lending conditions are tight. And by the way, you can be super selective who you lend to. So I think you’re going to start to see it change, but I don’t think it’s suddenly going to be the bottom falls out. GSCs are still lending. Life insurance companies are still lending. Banks have pulled back. Non-bank lenders are there. It’s just not a wasteland like everyone thinks. It’s become a lot more selective than maybe the market perceives.

James:
Yeah, I think that’s the issue right now, is when you’re looking at deals, the money is there, but they’re requiring a little bit more money down. The debt service is a lot higher. And then properties in especially the commercial space aren’t occupied as much. So that’s where I think there could be the compression. Your cap rates and your cash-on-cash returns just drop dramatically.

Rich:
Well, that’s why valuations have to reprice. There’s just no ifs, ands, or buts about it. If cash-on-cash return went from, let’s say, 8 to 2, or maybe even negative at some points, that doesn’t work. You guys know that better than I do, as investors. I just write about things and let other people at Cohen & Steers invest in it. But you’re absolutely right. Property valuations have to reset because the returns don’t work right now.

Dave:
Richard, I want to get back to your question you asked yourself before. I have one follow-up question on this. You mentioned that REITs were down in a way that is sort of in line with what we’re saying, that things need to reprice to adjust to these changing conditions. Do you have any thoughts on why the private real estate market lags so far behind the public market?

Rich:
Yeah, a couple different reasons. Public markets get a mark on them every single minute of every single day that the stock market’s open. And believe it or not, the market’s fairly efficient. It reprices commercial real estate very quickly for all the reasons that we were just talking about, James. The market understands that levered returns, cash-on-cash returns, sort of suck. And so they say, “Well, I need to reprice the implied cap rate for REITs.” I’ll give you just a stat right now. REIT implied cap rates are around 5.7 right now. I can go out and buy very high-quality apartment REITs at 5.4 and 5.5 cap rates. These are super high-quality REITs, without naming names. The NCREIF ODCE Index still has their apartment cap rates marked at 3.8. That’s a huge difference. A huge, huge, huge difference.
So why is the private market lagging? It’s two reasons. The transaction market is non-existent right now because there’s such a bid/ask spread between buyers and sellers. Buyers don’t want to buy at the level sellers want to sell at because we’re still going through the grieving process. So when there’s no transparency on where properties are trading, you have to rely on appraisals, and appraisals are really hard. It’s not easy being an appraiser right now. They are slowly bringing back their property valuations because they’re recognizing that the financing costs are higher than where cap rates are, but it’s a slow-moving train.
This is playing out similarly to how we’ve seen every other single downturn, the property market, the listed market declines. It leads. By the way, when private markets start to decline, that’s usually the final leading indicator. That’s the time to buy REITs. It’s just a [inaudible 00:32:13] relationship. Public markets get a mark on them every minute of every hour of every day, and the private markets take time to correct. If you look at valuations between the two, the correlations between the two over a cycle are around 90%. They’re super, super high.

Dave:
Great. Thank you. All right. Let’s get back to your question. I think it was about mortgage exposure, right?

Rich:
Well, look, one of the things that’s really struck me over the past month, and I don’t mean this to be cynical or flippant at all, but what’s really struck me is the lack of maybe appreciation for what LTV means and the amount of cushion LTV provides to a bank. A couple comments here. Open-ended funds that own core commercial real estate have 22, 23% LTVs on current valuations. REITs have LTVs of around 34%. Your typical CMBS loan has LTVs around 50 to 55%. So let’s just use CMBS as an example. What does it mean that a loan has 50 to 55% LTV? That means the property valuation has to fall 45 to 50% before that loan takes a loss. I’m telling you that I think valuations are going to be down 20 to 25 on average. It’s a real significant decline to touch LTVs of around 50%, and I don’t think the market has a whole, great appreciation for what that means.
That doesn’t mean there’s not a problem here because, guess what? If you’re a borrower that bought a property in 2020 at peak valuations, you’re probably going to have to inject equity back into that property to refinance. If property valuations are down 20% from their peak, you have to inject 20% more equity. But let me take a step back because I still don’t think the market appreciates what this means. Property valuations are up 40% since the beginning of 2012. That means your LTV that was originally at 50% is now 33%, and that means that property valuations have to fall 70% for that loan to take a loss. Dave, the reason I think this is really important, and I’ll tie this back into multifamily, we actually think multifamily in aggregate is underlevered because not every property was financed in 2020, 2021, and 2022. There’s a lot of properties that were financed in 2012, ’13, ’14, and ’15, and they have LTVs, effective LTVs, less than 50%. So they can actually probably do cash-out refis right now, believe it or not.
I was re-underwriting loan, though, on a multifamily property yesterday. I’ll give you just a live example. This was a student housing property in Greenville, South Carolina. The property fundamentals are great. [inaudible 00:35:17] are higher. NOI’s higher. But the debt service costs have doubled over the past three years. And so suddenly to get your DSCR from 1 to 2, you have to pay down that loan by 50%. That’s a real example of, “Hey, look, there’s just too much leverage on this property.” The property worked fine when financing costs were at 5%, but they don’t work so well when LIBOR is where it is today and the spread’s at 4.50, so you’re closer to like 8, 9, 10% financing cost. That’s the real example where properties are just overlevered.
So I would argue to you that when the market thinks about the totality of this mortgage problem, as James said, it’s thinking about this and extrapolating. The problem is office. The problem is, to a lesser extent, hotel, and it’s some retail. It’s also properties that were financed, particularly with short-term floating rate debt, over the past three years. But that’s not the totality of the commercial real estate market. I think the totality of the commercial real estate market is underlevered, but there is some properties that probably need about $500 billion of new equity to refinance. That’s a lot. That’s a big number.

James:
Chump change. 500 million.

Rich:
Billion. 500 billion.

Dave:
I see you’re writing, James. Are you writing a check? Is that what you’re-

James:
I’ve been taking notes this whole time. This is extremely fascinating. So out of that 500 million that you’re seeing of liquidity that’s going to need to be brought to that asset class, over what time frame do you see that coming up? And then, what do you see as you’re forecasting down, right? Things that can substantially affect the market is a lack of liquidity. Right? If people all of a sudden have to pay a big bill, and they can’t pay it, there’s defaults.

Rich:
Yep.

James:
Where do you see, A, people coming up with this capital? Do you think there’s going to be secondary lenders now coming into the market to kind of bridge gap it? Or do you think it’s going to be one of those things where the banks are just going to go full steam ahead and try to close out the note?

Rich:
D, all of the above. So I know that’s a cop-out research answer, so let me explain to you what I actually mean by that. So your first question, how’s this going to play out? It’s going to play out over the next five to seven to 10 years. The idea that all of these loans are in trouble next year, that’s just actually wrong. A lot of the loans have pretty good DSCRs, especially if you had a fixed-rate loan. And as I mentioned to you at the very beginning, only 15% of loans are coming due in 2023. This exposure’s spread out pretty evenly over the next, call it five, six, seven years. That’s not great, but it actually is okay relative to how bearish the media has become.
So what are the solutions? I think there’s a lot of them. Some borrowers will find a way to refinance, particularly smaller borrowers. The second point I would make to you is there’s about $350 billion of dry powder on the sidelines that’s sitting in closed-end funds. Most of that’s opportunistic and value-add. I’m not suggesting all of that’s going to go to help recap borrowers, but there is a lot of money on the sidelines.
The third point is that some banks will modify and extend loans because they don’t want the keys back. And I do want to spend a little bit of time on this because there’s a really important point that no one’s spending time on. It’s the tax implications of defaulting on your loan. When you default on your loan and the basis in your property is less than the loan balance, the IRS considers that a sale back to the lender. And guess what? The IRS actually wants their money. So let’s assume you owned a property 20 years ago, and your basis is close to zero because you took all your depreciation, and you had a $50 million loan on it. It’s effectively a $50 million sale. There is a very real scenario where the tax consequences are equal to, if not greater, than the cash-in refinance that the bank’s going to require. Yet you don’t have anything to show for it. And this is a real issue for the smaller banks. Small borrowers don’t have that money. There is a real tax consequence for this.
So I think that ultimately means that there’s going to be a lot more structured solutions, a lot more loan modifications than the market thinks. And for some reason, the market’s not talking about this. But I’ll go out on a limb here. What are the odds that the IRS allows rich owners of commercial real estate to find a loophole by forcing the loans back to banks which are already in trouble, and the IRS doesn’t want their money? I would say that’s a very, very small probability. So, Dave, I can see you. I can see you. I don’t think the audience can see you. I see you somewhere between smirking and shocked and surprised, but I think it’s very real. And there’s some people that are a lot smarter than me… and, frankly, a lot wealthier than me… that are bringing this up to my attention, saying, “It’s not so easy just to default on your loan.”

Dave:
I didn’t even know that. James, did you? I’ve never even thought about that. That was my smirk. I was kind of just shocked. It’s really interesting.

Rich:
I think it’s called 1099-C. The bank will actually send you a 1099-C form when you default on your loan.

Dave:
Ah. Kicking someone when they’re down.

James:
Is that a similar call? I’ve remember back 2008 to 2010, tons of short sales going on, and then people were getting these 1099s for the gain on the property. And it was brutal. People were like, “I just got a tax bill, and I just got foreclosed and short sold my house.” That was a real thing that we saw every day. People were getting this stuff.

Rich:
Yep. It’s very real. And by the way, the IRS feels a little bit better for homeowners, so they’ve closed some of those issues in the GFC. They don’t feel bad for commercial real estate owners.

James:
Investors don’t deserve a break too?

Rich:
I’m going to plead the Fifth on that. The IRS does not think they do.

Dave:
All right. So, Rich, this has been fascinating. We do have to get out of here in a little bit, but I want to get back to something you said earlier about this being an attractive opportunity. You’ve said a lot about different asset classes, but what opportunities excite you the most in the coming year or two?

Rich:
Well, a lot of them. We think multifamily is intriguing here because the fundamentals are on sound footing. We happen to like listed apartments more than we like private apartments, although private apartments are resetting very quickly right now in terms of a cap rate. I think open-air shopping centers are very well-positioned right now and are trading at wider cap rates. I would even go as far to say, and I know this is taboo, but there’s some really attractive opportunities in the office sector, particularly in the private markets. The market is painting office with too broad of a brush and thinks everything is New York City or San Francisco office. That’s not the case. You can go to some Sun Belt markets and find office trading at attractive cap rates with really strong fundamentals.
So look, I don’t want to say that the opportunities are limitless, but there’s a lot of opportunities out there. I would go as far to say that heading into 2022, we were sitting here scratching our heads saying, “Stuff feels really expensive. What are we supposed to do?” Now we’re looking at things for the first time and saying, “This feels okay.” We’re actually getting back to decent levels. So look, mean, we like things like seniors’ housing, apartments, single-family rentals, also things like data centers and industrial. We’re picking our spots on the office sector. We’re probably a lot more cautious than we used to be on storage because fundamentals are weakening. But I do think that this is going to be a really big opportunity to pick up assets across the spectrum at levels that we haven’t seen in quite some time.
And what I would urge everyone to think about is be greedy when everyone else is scared. I know that’s cliche to say, but you’re not supposed to be buying stuff at the top of the market when everyone else is buying it. You’re actually supposed to be thinking about dipping your toes in now. So how do we think about it? Well, if you have three chips to play, play one of them right now because things are beginning to reprice. Play the second one at the depths of despair, and play the third one when it’s clear that you’ve missed the boat and the cheap opportunities are gone. That’s sort of the way we think about dollar cost averaging right now.

James:
I like that.

Dave:
I love that advice. Yeah, that’s a great way to put it.

James:
Yeah, three chips. My problem is that I like to throw the three chips in only when it’s in desperate and despair.

Rich:
Well, that’s why you’re on that side of the mike, and I’m on this side of the mike. I’ll leave it up to you if that’s a compliment or a back-handed compliment. It’s a compliment.

Dave:
All right, Rich. Well, thank you so much. This has been eye-opening, honestly. I learned so much today. I really appreciate you joining us. If people want to follow your work more, where can they do that?

Rich:
Yeah, you can just go to cohenandsteers.com. Pretty easy to spell. C-O-H-E-N and Steers, S-T-E-E-R-S dot-com. We have an Insights page. We publish there periodically. And anyone that wants to chat, I’m sure you can find my phone number or email someplace.

Dave:
All right. I have to ask, Rich, so it looks like you’re sitting in an office building right now, is that correct?

Rich:
Yep, I am.

Dave:
Are you in New York or where are you?

Rich:
Yeah, I’m in New York. I have been back in the office since August of 2020.

Dave:
So are you like by yourself in an empty office building right now? Are you the only one?

Rich:
No, man. So, that’s a fascinating question. Let me just give you a story. I have a wife and four kids. My wife and I try to steal away to New York City periodically. Even in the depths of COVID, when Midtown Manhattan was a ghost town, you Google “Downtown, West Village, Tribeca,” and it was like Mardi Gras. So this whole idea that New York City’s going to die, it’s not true. Midtown’s pretty bustling. I think high-quality office is in fine demand. The problem is the Class B and C stuff. It’s not in good shape right now. But I mean, I don’t know. I take a godly early train every morning, and it’s sometimes standing-room only. It’s like I’m not the only schmuck pedaling my way into New York City. Now, I recognize that’s not all of the United States, and there’s a lot of people that are different. But sadly, yes, I’m sitting in an office on Park Avenue with a lot of other people around me.

Dave:
Yeah, I’m actually from not far from New York City, so I grew up around there. I think there’s always been calls that New York City and all these markets are going to die, and it never seems to happen. Even though there is likely a correction, like you just said, I think there are still segments of the city that are probably thriving.

Rich:
Yeah, we could get really dorky about what happened after plague and what cities survived and what didn’t. And you actually want a really interesting story about how a city does die, look at Siena in Italy post-plague, and I’ll leave you with that, a pretty fascinating story about how one of the great cities of the world cannot survive post a radical change.

Dave:
Yeah, my data doesn’t go back to the plague, but I’ll check it.

Rich:
You don’t know what cap rates were then?

Dave:
No, no. For some reason, CoStar doesn’t have all the data back to Middle Ages Italy. All right. Well, we really appreciate you being here, and hopefully we’ll have you back again to see, once this has all played out a little bit.

Rich:
Yeah, you can tell me everything I got wrong. But thanks for having me, guys.

James:
Yes, good meeting you, Rich.

Rich:
Yeah, likewise.

Dave:
So, James, are we going to do an episode on the history of Siena after the plague? What do you think?

James:
I have written that down. I’m pretty sure as soon as we get off, I will be listening to some sort of podcast on that.

Dave:
Why don’t you just come over to Europe? I’ll meet you down there. We’ll go on a Bigger Pockets, On the Market exposé of what happened in Siena. We’ll eat some Italian food. It’ll be great.

James:
I’m a hundred percent in. I think what we should do is we take a layover in New York.

Dave:
Ooh, yeah.

James:
We grab dinner with Richard Hill. Let him explain it all to us.

Dave:
Let’s bring him.

James:
Yeah, we’ll bring him too.

Dave:
Yeah, we’ll bring him to Siena. We’re all going.

James:
That’s the plan. Yeah.

Dave:
But really, so what did you think of that episode in total? I mean, that was phenomenal.

James:
I feel like I just learned more about commercial banking, that in the short term, I’ve learned so much from what he was talking about and how thorough he could explain the positions, the data and the points, and really just always comes back to the same thing. These tidal waves of negative headlines are sometimes just… They’re not real. It’s just clickbait, and you really got to dig into the analytics and the data, and interpret it to make the right decisions as an investor. I think this was by far one of my favorite episodes I listened to.

Dave:
Totally. I saw you scribbling notes furiously, but-

James:
Yeah.

Dave:
I love what he was saying about the 15% of mortgages due every year, because it’s so interesting, and how he called the stats half-truths, because it is definitely true. He’s saying, “Yes, it is true that 40% of loans are coming due in the next three years, but that is not different than any other year.” There’s additional context that needs to be explained for you to fully understand what’s going on. And I think Rich did a really good job of breaking down what actually matters in this market. And so hopefully, everyone learned as much as James and I did here.

James:
This would be one to listen to twice, for sure.

Dave:
Definitely. I might be again. I mean, I thought that it was fascinating, and looking forward to some of those opportunities he was talking about. Man, I’m gun-shy on office. I’ve never invested in office, but I’d still be a little gun-shy. I was really interested in what he was talking about with the strong fundamentals for multifamily, industrial. What else did he say? Open-air shopping centers.

James:
Data centers are big.

Dave:
Data centers. Yeah. So-

James:
Yeah.

Dave:
And I also love what he was saying about the three chips, that thing. I really like that. I know it sound like you’re waiting to put them all in in the depths of despair, but I liked what he was saying about dollar cost averaging.

James:
No, I think that’s a smart plan. Play all markets. Right? I like to throw it all on black sometimes.

Dave:
All right. We’ll see how your chips play out. All right, James, thanks, man, for being here. We appreciate it. This was a fun one. I’m sure we’ll see you again soon. Thank you all for listening. We really appreciate you, and we’ll see you for the next episode of On The Market.
On The Market is created by me, Dave Meyer, and Caitlin Bennett, produced by Caitlin Bennett, editing by Joel Esparza and Onyx Media, researched by Puja Gendal. And a big thanks to the entire Bigger Pockets team. The content on the show On the Market are opinions only. All listeners should independently verify data points, opinions, and investment strategies.

 

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


The rise of active listings in this spring housing market reminds me of a zombie slowly rising from its grave. Yes, we found the seasonal bottom for housing inventory on April 14, but this year’s rise in active listings has been tepid at best.

Here’s a quick rundown of the last week:

  • Total active listings grew 662 weekly, and new listing data is still trending at all-time lows.
  • Mortgage rates fell last week as we started the week at 6.65% and got as low as 6.49% to end the week at 6.55%.
  • Purchase application data rose 5% weekly as the streak of lower rates impacting the weekly data continues.

Weekly housing inventory

Well, the best thing I can say for spring 2023 inventory is that we found the seasonal bottom a few weeks ago. On the positive side, we’re at least seeing inventory rise — some had feared that because new listing data was trending at all-time lows, we wouldn’t see a spring increase in the active listings at all. This doesn’t appear to be the case for 2023.

However, new listing data is very seasonal and we have less than two months left before it starts declining again. I had hoped we would see more active listings before that period, but unfortunately that’s not the case. In fact, this data line has been absolutely crazy.

How crazy?

Last year, from April 22 to April 29, total single-family inventory grew by 16,311 in that one week. This year, from the seasonal bottom on April 14 to now — a whole month — total active inventory has only grown by 14,913.

  • Weekly inventory change (May 5-12): Inventory rose from 419,725 to 420,381
  • Same week last year (May 6-13): Inventory rose from 300,481 to 312,857
  • The inventory bottom for 2022 was 240,194
  • The peak for 2023 so far is 472,680
  • For context, active listings for this week in 2015 were 1,108,932
image-28

According to Altos Research, new listing data rose weekly but is still trending at all-time lows this year. When you consider that a home seller is a natural homebuyer as well, you can see why the housing market broke after mortgage rates went on a roller coaster last year. Mortgage rates went above 6.25%, then declined back to 5% then spiked back to 7.37%. We have not been able to recover from that mortgage rate spike and it has bled into 2023 as well.

Last year, new listing data, while trending at all-time lows, was at least rising year over year. That is no longer the case after the second half of 2022.

New listing weekly data for this week in May over the past three years:

  • 2023: 62,382
  • 2022: 73,515
  • 2021: 71,191

New listing data from previous years for the same week, to give you some historical perspective:

  • 2017: 90,112
  • 2016: 82,621
  • 2015: 98,436
image-29

The NAR data goes back decades and it illustrates just how hard it’s been to get the total active listings back to the historical range of 2 million to 2.5 million. The next existing home sales report comes out this week and we should see an increase in active listings, which have been stuck at 980,000 active listings over the last three months.

NAR: Monthly active listings

image-30

NAR: Total active listing data going back to 1982 

image-32

I often get asked about the big difference between NAR and Altos Research inventory data. This link explains the difference. Overall, inventory data tends to move together, even if different sources are working with other numbers and have a different methodology.

The 10-year yield and mortgage rates

For 2023, one of the most important economic storylines has been the 10-year yield refusing to break below the critical levels I have talked about for months — the level between 3.37%-3.42%. I believed this level was going to be so hard to break under that I named it the Gandalf line in the sand. No matter how crazy things have gotten in 2023, the 10-year yield only broke it once, at the height of the banking crisis. That didn’t last long as we headed right back higher.

As you can see in the chart below, that line in the sand has been tested many times.

image-33

When I talk about mortgage rates, it’s really about where I feel the 10-year yield will go for the year. In my 2023 forecast, I said that if the economy stays firm, the 10-year yield range should be between 3.21% and 4.25%, equating to 5.75% to 7.25% mortgage rates. 

Now if the economy gets weaker, meaning the labor market sees a noticeable rise in jobless claims, then the 10-year yield should break under 3.21%, going all the way to 2.72%. This will take mortgage rates under 6%, and if the spreads return to normal, this can get us below 5% mortgage rates again. Yes, I said below 5% again.

Can you imagine the housing market at that point? We would have much more stability. 

However, for that to happen, jobless claims would need to rise to 323,000 on the four-week moving average. We did have a big jump in jobless claims last week. However, this data line can have some odd quirks week to week, so focus more on the trend and the four-week moving average rather than one week’s data.

From the St. Louis Fed: “Initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits increased by 22,000 in the week ended May 6, to 264,000. The four-week moving average also rose to 245,250.”

image-34

Last week, mortgage rates didn’t move much, but as the year goes on, we will be tracking more and more economic data to get clues on the economic cycle and where mortgage rates will be heading. 

Purchase application data

The dynamics of the U.S. housing market changed starting Nov. 9, 2022, when the purchase application data began to react more positively as mortgage rates fell. Since that time, making some holiday adjustments to the data, we have had 17 positive weekly prints versus seven negative prints. Year to date, we have had 10 positive prints versus seven negative prints.

Last week, the weekly data showed a positive 5% print, while the year-over-year data shows a 32% year-over-year decline.

image-35

I view this data line as just a stabilization of the housing demand data, coming off a waterfall dive in 2022. However, this stabilization is critical because of what it has done: It has changed the housing dynamics.

When housing demand collapsed last year, the low inventory didn’t provide a big shield against pricing getting much weaker. Pricing in the second half of the year was going negative month to month, of course, from an overheating start in 2022. Starting from Nov. 9, the entire housing dynamics changed from demand collapsing to demand stabilizing.

This explains pricing getting firmer in 2023 due to the low inventory environment. Purchase apps look out 30-90 days before they hit the sales data, so we don’t have the sharp recovery data we saw during the COVID-19 recovery. However, we do have a good stabilization story here today.

I traditionally weigh this data line after the second week of January to the first week of May, and now that we are in the second week of May, I would say the 2023 purchase apps data is slightly positive, with stabilization for sure, just not a booming mortgage demand market with mortgage rates still over 6%.

The week ahead: Big housing data coming up

We have a jam-packed week with economic data, especially for housing. We have the builder’s confidence data, housing starts and existing home sales. Monday, we also have the New York Fed quarterly credit and debt update. Those charts are my favorites as they show how credit stress in the U.S. today doesn’t look like anything we saw in the run-up in 2008.

Since the foreclosure process has started again, we should be working our way back up to pre-COVID-19 levels. However, 30, 60, and 90-day lates are near all-time lows, and it took many years to build up the credit stress we saw from 2005 to 2008, before the job-loss recession.

image-36

Retail sales come out on Tuesday, which can move the bond market depending on what the report shows. As the year progresses, all these reports will give us more clues to see where the economy is heading. That’s critical since economic data can move the bond market and what can move the 10-year lower or higher drives mortgage rates as well. If mortgage rates head lower, we could see inventory drawn down faster during the seasonal decline period of fall and winter.



Source link


This week’s mortgage rates declined slightly, continuing a recent “sideways trend” at the low 6% mark. Rates reflected a moderation in inflation and the banking crisis, and the consequent expectation that the Federal Reserve (Fed) is done hiking the federal funds rate. 

Per Freddie Mac‘s Primary Mortgage Market Survey, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 6.35% as of May 11, down four basis points from last week’s 6.39%. The same rate was at 5.30% on average a year ago at this time. 

“This week’s decrease continues a recent sideways trend in mortgage rates, which is a welcome departure from the record increases of last year,” Sam Khater, Freddie Mac’s chief economist, said in a statement.

“While inflation remains elevated, its rate of growth has moderated and is expected to decelerate over the remainder of 2023. This should bode well for the trajectory of mortgage rates over the long term,” Khater added. 

Overall, inflation cooled further in April. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 4.9% year over year before seasonal adjustment, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This is the 10th consecutive month of declines to the lowest level in two years. 

“The Freddie Mac fixed rate for a 30-year mortgage rate continued to move lower this week to 6.35% as 10-yr treasury yields trended down,” Jiayi Xu, Realtor.com‘s economist, said in a statement. “In light of a strong jobs report last week, April’s CPI data reinforced that we are very likely at the end of the tightening cycle.”

However, Xu highlighted that the U.S. economy is moving in the right direction, but at a slower pace than desired by the Fed, with inflation at double the 2% target. 

“Although the labor market figures are promising amidst concerns of a recession, it also gives the Fed little reason to cut rates in the short term,” Xu said. “In June, the Fed will release its updated economic projections, and we will have a clearer picture at that time after more data is available.”

Where is the market headed?  

Xu says that, as long as the economy continues to see progress on inflation, “it is expected that mortgage rates will remain toward the lower end of the 6-7% range.”

“Meanwhile, the housing market continues to face challenges as home sellers are less active this spring. In addition to the “locked-in effect” of mortgage rates, sellers are facing another issue caused by high inflation: the increasing costs of home improvements prior to selling.”  

Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) president and CEO Bob Broeksmit said the recent decline in mortgage rates is good news for prospective homebuyers. However, the housing supply is still too low in many parts of the country.

“Housing construction has slowed, and some would-be sellers are delaying decisions because of economic uncertainty and an unwillingness to give up their low-rate mortgage,” Broeksmit said in a statement. 

Logan Mohtashami, HousingWire’s lead analyst, said mortgage rates are not where they should be, if considering their historical correlation with the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield. Spreads have been impacted by tighter financial credit, and the Fed is no longer buying mortgage-backed securities (MBS). 

“If mortgage spreads were normal, mortgage rates would be 5.25% today,” Mohtashami said. 

That’s below his range for mortgage rates in 2023. Mohtashami projects mortgage rates to be between 5.75% and 7.25% this year, but “as long as the labor market stays firm, meaning jobless claims don’t break over 323,000 on the four-week moving average.” 

Today’s number is 264,000, Mohtashami said. 



Source link


Homebuyers are gearing up for a hot summer housing market as demand starts to surge. At the beginning of 2023, nobody thought it possible that we’d be in the position we’re in today. Days on market have shrunk in some areas as listing attendance explodes and buyers’ home-owning dreams resurface. But it’s not all sunshine and rainbows in the world of real estate; something bleak is on the horizon for large-scale investors.

We’re halfway through Q2 of 2023, and the real estate market is changing fast month by month. Multifamily buyers are sitting on the sidelines, foaming at the mouth to dig in on deals that will soon be dead, but primary residence shoppers are facing another challenge. With a lack of inventory and mortgage rates on the verge of falling again, the buyers who were kicked out of the market last year are hungry to get back in the game.

Don’t know whether now is the right time to buy your next rental property? Kathy and James give up-to-date advice on what they’re pursuing in today’s market and whether or not now is the time to get aggressive. If you want to get the data these (and many other) experts use to make their investment decisions, check out Dave’s newest Q2 housing market report!

Dave:
Hey, everyone. Welcome to On the Market. Today, you have me, Dave Meyer, Kathy Fettke, and James Dainard. Kathy and James, how are you?

Kathy:
Great.

James:
Good. The sun’s back out in California.

Dave:
Yeah, you were over in my neck of the woods in Northern Europe for a while, and you saw how bad the weather is here.

James:
That weather’s emotional out there. It was like it would rain for two hours and then it’d be sunny and then it’d be raining for two hours. It was almost like a tropical storm in Seattle collided together.

Dave:
Yeah, it’s very unpredictable, it’s very gray, but once it turns this time of year, it starts to get better. I think you just got the tail end of it, but unfortunately, it’s not like where you both live and sunny and glorious all the time.

Kathy:
It’s been cold, but we were supposed to be in Amsterdam right now. We at least had talked about it, so what’s the weather like? Would we have enjoyed it?

Dave:
Yeah, it’s super nice out right now. Actually, as your daughter knows, I just had lunch with Kathy’s daughter who is here visiting, which was super fun to see her, but yeah, it would’ve worked out great. I think we’re going to have to do that next year for our two-year On the Market anniversary. We’re going to have to do an Amsterdam trip.

Kathy:
Yes.

Dave:
Maybe we’ll do a meetup.

James:
Oh, a European takeover?

Dave:
Everyone listening, everyone come to Amsterdam. We’re going to do a European party and Amsterdam’s a good place to party. We’ll have a good time.

Kathy:
That sounds like a great party.

James:
Can we do it on Yacht Week though?

Dave:
Oh, we got to go to Croatia for Yacht Week. That’s where you want to be, so let’s do that next summer. All right. Well, we are here to talk about real estate and we have a really cool show for you today. We’re going to do a roundup on the housing market and some of the economic indicators that we are watching and that you can be watching to make sense of the very confusing market that we’re in. And honestly, a pretty changing, rapidly changing market right now, even faster than normal. And just so you all know, we’re going to be talking about a report I wrote, and if you want to follow along, download it, read it, get my full thoughts about what happened in the housing market in the first quarter of 2023, you can download that for free. It’s at biggerpockets.com/q2report, it’s Q2, like quarter two, report. So go check that out and you can see everything that James, Kathy and I are going to be talking about today. We are going to take a quick break, but then we’re going to dive into our Q1 roundup of the housing market.

Dave:
All right, let’s get into this thing. There’s so many things to talk about, and I know we talk about some of these things a lot, but if you, Kathy, had to pick one indicator that you think summarizes or epitomizes the Q1 housing market, what would it be?

Kathy:
Ooh, one indicator. If we’re talking about housing in general, I’ll pick multifamily housing and say that the indicator that I’ve seen, because I just got back from a couple of conferences, it’s interest rates again, I mean, what a boring thing to say, but interest rates are really causing complete devastation in multifamily, not in all, but in many. And we did see a 229-million dollar foreclosure in Houston.

Dave:
Whoa.

James:
Whoa.

Kathy:
Yeah, as in perhaps one of the first ones to go down. If you were looking at 2% interest rates and now, most of those multifamily are adjustable if they didn’t have rate caps, most did, but some didn’t, they are dealing with payments that are unsustainable, they just can’t pay them. So I was just at a multifamily conference literally a few days ago and there was a lot of pain, a lot of people trying to figure out how they’re going to avoid foreclosure.

Dave:
Wow. All right. Well, that is foreboding and very interesting to hear because when I see interest rates now, they’re down from where they were in November and in February. And from everything I’ve heard in the residential side of things, it seems like now that rates are down in the mid-sixes, some buyer activity is coming back.

Kathy:
There was a huge difference because I was actually at two events in Dallas, one was a multifamily conference and the other was my event, which was single-family and also a focus on our single-family fund and they were about 20 minutes apart, so I was running back and forth between the two events. And the sentiment couldn’t be more opposite because people in the single-family sector are not feeling the pain because either the portfolio that they already own is locked in generally in 30-year fixed rate or even if it’s five or 10-year, they were not feeling any pain in their buy and hold properties. And in fact, they were there, it was 150 people there and a packed bus of people ready to buy more and very excited to buy more because of the fixed rate debt. It has come down, mortgage rates for single-family is tied, it’s different than on the short-term.

Kathy:
So over at the other conference, with multifamily, they are tied to the SOFR and they are definitely more tied to what the Fed is doing, whereas the single-family mortgage rates are tied to more what the bond market is doing. So to see the dramatic difference of how the multifamily investors, their world has changed so dramatically if they’re not on fixed rates, and for many of them where their rate caps are due and the bill is really just nothing they could ever have imagined, it could be the difference of 20,000 to 200,000 a month or even more. And then some of the people who bought coastal also saw massive increases in insurance, so it was really devastating to see how they’re feeding these properties.

Kathy:
They’ve stopped doing distributions and putting all that money into just trying to keep the property afloat, but with the first major foreclosure, I don’t know if it’s the first, but the one that have really hit headline news because it was a syndication, it was people, a lot of investors lost everything in that, including the bank. The bank lost about 20 million as well. So it was two completely different worlds that I experienced, in the single-family not feeling the pain and in the multifamily feeling a world of hurt.

James:
Doesn’t this remind you a little bit of the 2008 liar loans and that’s why we’re not seeing the issues? They did such a good job verifying people’s income the last five, 10 years to buy your single-family house that you had to be under a certain DTI, they really verified the income so you could weather a storm if you had consistent income, whereas, the multifamily space became the liar loans the last three years. A lot of these banks, they were signing off on really juiced up performance and they were giving them credit for that. People were forcing the deal to get paid and so they were maybe under budgeting these properties and getting too aggressive in there. And I feel like that’s why this is coming to fruition in a bad way because people were buying on greed for the multifamily.

James:
They weren’t buying to invest, they were buying to get a deal done, and that’s never a good thing, right? The best deal you can ever do is the deal you pass on sometimes, but when you’re ready to go and people, there was so much greed in the market, were starting to see the pain come around now. And I think it was also just a bunch of over [inaudible 00:08:06] performers that they were not accurate. Even with the rates changing and everything, they were going in already very, very slim and there was zero room for error. And this cost of money and these insurance and the rents declining a little bit, it can be very detrimental.

Dave:
Yeah, it seems like generally speaking, if you had to summarize Q1 in terms of interest rates, I would say the residential market adapted quicker than I thought, I’ll just say that. And I do still think prices nationally are probably still going to come down a little bit this year, but the bottom is not falling out and we’re starting to see things actually start to pick up seasonally. But to me, everyone I talk to in commercial is just waiting for the shoe to drop. We haven’t even seen really the beginning of the pain that it seems like everyone is expecting. Well, I guess Kathy, as you’re saying, we’ve seen the beginning of it, but it seems like there’s a long way to go.

Kathy:
Yeah, and I did actually talk to a few lenders and I don’t know how bad it will be because it may be that the lenders decide to do something creative and extend the loans, or I don’t know what they’re capable of being able to do in a situation where the cash flow of the property is not enough to cover the debt service, right? I don’t know what you do besides foreclose, so I think there are more. And it was hard to watch. I could not agree more with James that it feels like the same thing, only this time with multifamily and not single-family, I still am a strong believer that single-family’s on, or one to four units, conventional is on solid ground because of the loans.

Kathy:
It’s the adjustable loans that took down the housing market in 2008 because when those loans adjusted, people couldn’t pay, very different situation. It was a credit bubble, but, well, I guess similar, it was a credit bubble. The bridge lenders were giving money for the renovation too, so yeah, so you could get I think up to at least 80% LTV, maybe more, plus renovation costs. So that my mentor was really firm with me. He’s an older guy and he’s like, “Do not go over 65%”. Well, I couldn’t get a deal at 65% that, but he said there’s reasons why you want to stay at 65% LTV with multifamily because it can be volatile.

Dave:
Yeah. So I guess we’re going to have to see how that goes, but thank you for the insights. That’s super helpful. Let’s move on to a second indicator, which is the reason we’re in this situation, which is inflation. And as everyone knows by this point, inflation is why interest rates have been hiked, that’s what the Fed is trying to get under control. And as of this recording, which is in the middle of April, we have data now for the first quarter of the year and what we’re seeing is that inflation, at least the headline CPI has come down to 5%. It was peaked back in June at 9.1%, which is good. That is good and encouraging.

Dave:
The flip side of that though is the “Core CPI”, which is what the Fed honestly really cares about because it’s a better prediction of future inflation, is at 5.5 or 5.6% actually and is not coming down nearly as much. It was at 0.4% last month, so even if you annualize that out, that’s still almost nearly 5%. So I’m curious, how are you guys seeing inflation right now? In one respect, the numbers are coming down, but I’m not quite sure this is enough for the Fed to take their foot off the gas.

James:
I’m happy to see that the trends in the reporting are shifting the right way. As a consumer that buys a lot of products for real estate construction and just in general, I’m not-

Dave:
Boats.

James:
… boats, but yeah, I don’t even want to talk about the boat bills right now. I don’t think that’s an inflation issue, that’s just a boat owner issue, but it’s… I mean, I’m still paying a lot right now. Everything is expensive. I mean hotels, flying, buying materials. The only thing I am seeing a little break on is the labor market a little bit, but it’s-

Dave:
Okay.

James:
… but materials in general are… Now, we can get them a lot quicker now and we’re not in this like, we can’t get a product and we’re having to pay outrageous product just to get it, but everything is substantially more money. I mean, all my building material costs are 20%, 30% more and there’s not a lot of ease going on and we’re trying to negotiate and we still can’t get it down.

Dave:
And is it higher than it was but stable, or is it still going up?

James:
I would say it’s stable. We see where it goes like little dips in valleys, right? It’s almost like the housing market right now. It’s like teetering, but it’s staying flat. It dips and then goes up, it’d come with the interest rates. Same thing’s happening with material costs. And we are doing certain things, like we are just ordering in advance, buying out stuff early. We just bought 10 sets of appliances all at one time just to lock a price in. And so you just have to get a little bit more creative, but I’m not seeing it on the pricing. And honestly, I think part of it too is the vendors, they can sell it cheaper, but the demand is still there and so the pricing is just fixed right now. I do think there’s some things that are never going to come back down.

Dave:
Oh, for sure.

James:
It’s just people have realized that they can get that much money and it is, especially your mechanicals in construction, those costs are stuck. I don’t think they’re moving.

Dave:
Yeah, it’s pretty rare for prices to go back down once they go back up. I mean, yeah, like food, energy, those things tend to fluctuate, but in terms of durable goods, that’s why the Fed is more concerned about these sticky prices, like this kind of stuff you’re mentioning James, because it doesn’t really go back down and they really have to get it under control. Kathy, do you think, given what you know about Fed policy and inflation, do you think we’re in store for more interest rate hikes?

Kathy:
The Fed has made it really clear what their target was and it was to get over 5% in the overnight lending rate and we’re getting close, but not totally there where they said that we’d be. So I’ve expected that they were going to continue to raise rates until they get there, so I do think we’ll see another small rate hike, but based on some of the research and some of the interviews that we’ve had and people I’ve talked to, one is MBS Highway and he is very, very bullish on the idea that in May, we’re really going to see things change with inflation and that because of the year-over-year data, like you said in your report, inflation really peaked last summer. Now when we get to this summer and we’re comparing today’s numbers to last year, which were very high, everything’s going to look a little bit better on a year-over-year basis.

Kathy:
So it’s his very, very strong opinion that we’re going to see much, much better inflation numbers and that as a result, mortgage rates for conventional, not, again, this couldn’t be more opposite than multifamily or commercial loans, but in the residential that we will see rates come down in mortgage-backed securities for one to four unit. And when that happens, there could be another frenzy in real estate because we do, again, according to your report, inventory levels in housing just keep coming down and because it’s so stuck, like you said, and as soon as rates come down, there could be multiple offers again, there could be a buying frenzy, which is why we’re buying like crazy, but the opposite is true for the adjustable rates. If you’re tied to the Fed fund rate or the SOFR, you’re going to see rates continue to rise.

Dave:
Yeah. And just so people know, what Kathy’s talking about is if you’re getting a loan on a multifamily or office or retailer commercial, the bank’s underwriting and where they borrow from and basically how they consider rates is very different than it is in residential and so it is very possible and seemingly very probable that rates for commercial and rates in residential might head in different directions over the course of this year.

Kathy:
And they have been.

Dave:
Yeah, and they have been. Exactly.

Kathy:
Yep.

Dave:
Kathy, you hit on something that I want to move on to Another indicator, which is basically demand. It seems like every time there is a slight decrease in interest rates, mortgage rates, demand just keeps coming back to the market. It just seems like people are just waiting on the sidelines. And even when they go down, not even that much, it seems like demand comes back into the market. And I’ve heard this anecdotally speaking to agents and lenders, but the Mortgage Bankers Association does a survey every single week of how many people are applying for mortgages and you can see every time there’s a dip in residential mortgage rates, there is a spike in the number of applications, and I’m honestly surprised. I personally thought more people would be sitting on the sidelines of waiting it out, but James, I’m curious to see what, in your business, are you seeing this, especially in a market like Seattle that has seen probably one of the biggest corrections in the whole country?

James:
Yeah, I’m definitely surprised with the amount of buyers I’m seeing coming through housing right now because we saw on these West coast or expensive market cities, we basically saw a 15% to 20% compression off-peak pretty quickly. And then now, what we’ve seen, I think part of it has to do with rates because the rates have been swinging just a little bit, but it’s not that impactful for what we’ve seen over the last nine months. I think this is all psychological, it’s people are really… Because I’m seeing the inventory, like in Washington, there was a couple stats that came out this month that were very interesting to me. One is days on market went down by 35% last month, so homes are now selling for 35% faster. They went from 28 back down to 16, which is a big, big drop in a month.

James:
Inventory is back down to two to three weeks or two to four weeks worth of inventory, whereas it was creeping up more in certain neighborhoods. And so what’s happening is there is a lot of FOMO in the market where people are watching things sell and there was this stall out and they saw this sudden drop and now, they’re seeing things just trade and they’re also seeing things trade close to list price and people will wait that 90, 120 days. And so it’s a psychological thing to where, I mean, buyers are just getting back in the mix no matter what, but we are seeing, I mean, on some homes, I was getting two showings a month on that would’ve been like 90 days ago, we’re getting 20 to 30 showings a week.

Dave:
Oh my God. Whoa.

James:
It is crazy. The weirdest thing is people aren’t moving still. It’s like they’re still in this confused lamb.

Dave:
They just want to go see some stuff?

James:
Yeah. It’s like they either want to be opportunistic and low ball like crazy, or I don’t need to call it low ball. They’re offering what they think it’s worth. And the other thing is that they’re looking for any reason not to buy the house, but they’re still out looking. And so what that tells me is there’s buyers in the market no matter what, and if you’re putting the right product out, things will sell. But we did sell three homes over the list price last weekend.

Kathy:
Wow.

James:
It depends really on your price points. And so as you’re an investor or a flipper developer, focus on those markets, or not the markets, focus on the sale price that moves. We know where our two sweet spots are in Seattle. And if you’re listing below a million bucks and you’re a certain type of product, it is selling and it will sell very quickly. And so a lot more buyers, a lot more movement going on in the last 30, 60 days. It’s actually looking… I feel a lot better about the market after the last 60 days.

Kathy:
That’s why you need such a good real estate agent, if you’re using one, because you better be able to know how to list it properly.

James:
Yes. Yeah. And that’s key right now is putting that magical list price on it, there’s two approaches. You either go high because you know the buyers are coming in, depending on where your demographics and who your buyers are, they’re going to come in 2% to 5% off list just naturally, or you price it a little low. And if you price it low right now and you have a good product, the frenzy starts. I think we had six offers on one house and it was 800,000 in Snohomish County where the median home price is $670,000, so we were $130,000 above the median home price and we still had that much action, which is really, really promising.

Dave:
Wow, that’s unbelievable. Well, let’s talk about the flip side of demand now. We’ve covered inflation, we’ve covered interest rates, we’ve covered demand. I think as we’ve talked about before, but I want to revisit here, to me, the reason that the market is still showing some signs of life is just that there is such low inventory. It’s just remarkable to see that while people were saying it was going to spike and home prices were going to crash because inventory was going to surge, it’s just absolutely not happening right now. And that combined with strong demand seems to be creating a housing market that is pretty robust right now. Kathy, I know you’re in a single-family fund and buying single-families. Are you finding it hard to find properties right now?

Kathy:
Not at all.

Dave:
Oh, okay.

Kathy:
We’re trying to grow our fund as quickly as we can because there’s more opportunity than we can keep up with, but what we’re buying is not what a first time home buyer would buy because it’s got issues, right? We’re buying stuff that does need to be fixed up and that a bank wouldn’t lend on as is, and that’s why we’re getting massively steep discounts on them because what we’re noticing is that our competitor isn’t there today where our competitor is not the first time home buyer because we’re buying homes that need fixing. And usually, a first time home buyer doesn’t have the time, knowledge or money to do that. But what we don’t have right now is a lot of competition from other investors and I think that’s because our fund, we’re raising money, we’re raising cash and we’re buying these properties with cash, so we don’t need a loan.

Kathy:
So a flipper might say, “Wow, I don’t know if I can make these numbers work with today’s financing or with hard money loans” or maybe they can’t even get those loans. Whatever it is, we are really not seeing competition, wholesalers that just maybe wouldn’t have come to us before are coming to us now because they’re just maybe aren’t the buyers, or whatever it is, I feel like we’re the only ones out there playing the game in the area that we’re in where in addition to all these opportunities, there’s nothing but growth happening, so it’s just mind-boggling to me. I was, again, just there. There’s freeway expansions and there’s cranes everywhere and new development and chip manufacturing coming in and yet, we’re still buying stuff for under 100,000. My last purchase was 65,000. We had to put 20,000 in it, it’s worth 200. I can’t make this up. And every time I say this, I’m like, “Ah, why’d I say that? Because now, everybody heard it and now, I’m going to have competition”.

Dave:
Well, they probably don’t have cash.

Kathy:
Maybe.

Dave:
But just for context so people know, back in the fallout of the great recession in the 2012, 2015 timeline, inventory used to be right around 2 million housing units. Prior to the pandemic, it was about 1.5 million. Now, we’re at a million, so we’re still down 33% prior to pre-pandemic levels. And yes, they have come up a bit from where they were last year, but we’re still talking about insanely low levels. And I do want to be clear that housing prices can fall with low inventory, we’re seeing that in a lot of markets, but it does, at least in my mind, provide a backstop for prices. If there is demand and there is always some buyers and inventory is so low, it just can’t fall that much. Inventory, if there were to be a crash, has to go up. So I don’t know, I just think that this is fascinating, and we’ll get into one other topic about why this is going on, but James, first just wanted to get your opinion on inventory and what you’re seeing.

James:
I’m not in the same market as Kathy because it is hard to find a deal right now.

Dave:
You can’t find anything?

James:
No.

Kathy:
You can’t find a $65,000 house in Seattle?

James:
No, I’m finding a $65,000 permit fee, but [inaudible 00:25:16] then architect and plan fees, but I would say there’s deals… What it’s came back to for us is, and we’re just rebuilding our systems for it is like Kathy said, if it’s a hard project, it needs a lot of work. That stuff’s not moving that quickly because cost of money’s up, the people, they don’t have good control in their construction. And then also just the jurisdiction issues where things, these cities can take a really long time on things, which means your debt… So all the cost of money, timelines and construction costs has got people out, so we are getting really good buys on the major fixers. I just paid $740,000 for a house and the house next door sold for 1.4.

Kathy:
Wow.

James:
And they’re model match houses, and I’ll be nicer, and there was zero competition on that house because it just needed so much work. And so if it’s a clean product, there is no inventory, there’s nothing to buy. But if it needs work, we’re able to get some deal flow in, and we’re doing less deals but better margin deals, much, much better margins.

Dave:
That’s so interesting because I was a guest on a podcast the other day and the host asked me what strategies I thought were good and I’m not a flipper, but I was saying that I think it seems like a good time to flip because not all homes and prices decline and accelerate at the same rate. We on the show talk about home prices on a national level, which is far too broad, but even talking about it on a regional level is probably too broad because like you said, fix and flips tend to, in downturns, fall further than stabilized asset, which just gives you more margin just right off the bat even though expenses are high.

James:
Yeah, and it’s like the rules that got broken the last two to three years with the… The market was so hot, it was also people were breaking the rules. If you’re buying certain types of product, I would say that the margin shrunk 10% to 15% on all those products. And if you’re putting in that much, it’s like people are buying big fixers to make the same amount of margins they would on a cosmetic fixer, and that’s not how it’s supposed to work, right? The stuff that you have to rip down, reconstruct, deal with numerous… That you’re in that deal for a year, you’re supposed to be making more money because A, your capital’s outlaid for double the time and then B, it’s just substantially more brain damage.

James:
And so it’s gotten back to the stuff that’s hard work, you get rewarded more. And if it’s not that hard work, you’re not going to get rewarded that well because even the last 12 to 24 months or 24 to 36 months, the stuff that wasn’t hard was making a ton of money because the appreciation factor. And so I think those days are over, but you can get back to, if you want to put in the work, you want to put in the energy, you can get that good buy, and they are out there. I mean, we have bought then better deals the last six months, but we just bought fewer of them.

Dave:
Well, I do want to get to one of my favorite indicators of Q1. I think this, to me, is maybe the number one thing which is new listings. Basically, this is the number of people who put their house up for sale. It’s different from inventory just so everyone knows because inventory is how many things are for sale at a given time, so it factors in both how many properties go up for sale and how quickly they come off the market. But new listings just basically measures how many people decide they’re going to sell a home, and it is just absolutely in the gutter right now. It is down about 25% year-over-year and falling. It’s going down more and more and more. People just absolutely do not want to sell right now. And I’m curious what you guys make of this. We’ve talked about this, there’s the lock-in effect, there’s a couple other reasons that we’ll get to, but do you think this is sustainable? Do you think this is the new normal where people just aren’t going to be selling their homes?

Kathy:
I don’t know if it’s the new normal, but if you’re locked into a 2% or a 3% or 4% interest rate, it sure is tempting to just stay put versus looking at a very limited amount of inventory out there and having to pay more for it. A lot of people just did not realize that today’s homeowners are probably in the best position ever. Their payments, compared to their income, is the best it’s ever been, at least in the data that I look at because they’re locked in at a fixed rate, but we’ve seen wage growth and then of course, appreciation. So for them, for people to walk away, there would have to be a really good reason. Even if they’re moving, even if they’re going somewhere else for a new job, they might be thinking, “Maybe I should just keep the house and learn how to be a landlord” and just rent it out.

Kathy:
I’ve heard that from a lot of people saying, “I just don’t think I want to let go of this interest rate”. And like you said in your report, a lot of people don’t realize that buyers or sellers, it’s usually somebody who sells a house who buys another house. And if someone’s not selling, they’re not buying. So it’s just like this stuck inventory and I don’t really see it changing until rates get to a point where people are like, “Okay, maybe at 5.5”. There’s some psychological thing about 6%, I don’t know what it is, but when it gets into the fives, it’s like, “Okay, that’s acceptable. I could do that”. So could you go from a 2%, 3% or 4% to a 5%? Sure. Were you going to go to a 6%? Maybe not. And again, MBS Highway says that’s what he’s predicting is going to happen this summer is we’re going to get down into the fives, which is why he thinks that we will start to see things unlock a little bit this summer.

Dave:
Oh, yeah, that will be very interesting to see. If you listen to our last episode, we had Tim Birkmeier, who’s the president of Rocket Mortgage come on and he was confirming a lot of things Kathy just said. Number one, he told us, if you didn’t hear this, that the average American has $170,000 of equity in their home right now, which is a record, which is unbelievable. And he also said that they’re seeing a big uptick in HELOCs and Cash-Out Refis right now even at higher rates. And he said that when they talk to these people who are doing this, they’re taking out money to improve their own homes and do renovations because rather than doing a move up like they would normally do, in normal times, they’d sell their home and maybe trade up to a larger home, they’re just renovating their homes and staying in place. And this is a trend in how people are dealing with higher interest rates where they can’t really afford to trade up like they normally would.

James:
Yeah, I wonder if that the Cash-Out Refis though, because I don’t see a whole lot of inventory switching up or much movement in because there isn’t any pain in the market yet. It’s weird, we’re in this weird recession, on the in and out, but there’s still, like you talk to the day-to-day American that is the home buyer buying a lot of the product, they still, there isn’t that pain. The labor market’s good, the job market’s good. And so until something happens like that, it’s probably going to stay where it’s at.

James:
I mean, one indicator I would think, if they’re saying there’s a huge uptick in Cash-Out Refis is because there was so much liquidity in the market for two years and people got really drunk on the liquidity. They were drinking it, it was just like part of their day-to-day life. You look at how people spend money today, it is substantially different than it was 36 months ago. And I feel like a smart guy told me one time, once you turn that faucet on, he told me to stay frugal because once you turn the faucet on, it’s really hard to turn it off. And I feel like America turned the faucet on, on full blast-

Dave:
The whole country.

James:
… and they don’t know how to turn it down, but that’s why we’re seeing these Cash-Out Refis, and I mean, that would be the dangerous part, right? They’re pulling out more liquidity and it’s like this bandaid that is just going to float for another 12 to 24 months, but that’s going to end poorly typically and so that’s actually a stat I want to track now, like how many Cash-Out Refis were going on, and is that constantly increasing?

Dave:
He did say that some of it was for debt consolidation, like to pay off credit card debt because you can get a Refi at a lower rate than a credit card debt, but that’s not a great position to be in.

James:
That just goes back to over-leveraged.

Dave:
Yeah.

James:
America is over-leveraged. Credit card debt is at its all time high. People, they’ve shredded budgets, budgets that Dave Ramsey would be very sad. People, they’re loose with their funds right now.

Kathy:
Well, I wonder, I’m wondering, we got a credit line or an equity line on our house and it was 9% or something like that. So it was one of those things we got just in case we need it, but we’re not using it, but I think it shows up as if we did. So I’m curious if some people are just getting these equity lines and not using them but just keeping them.

Dave:
That’s true.

James:
That’s a valid point.

Dave:
Yeah.

Kathy:
Yeah. I’m not sure how much on the credit report it shows whether it’s been used or not, but when I was in mortgages, it would show up as you’ve used it because you’ve got that credit available. But I had this really interesting conversation with one of our investment counselors at RealWealth, who honestly, these people, they know more than me at this point, but Leah, one of our investment counselors, said she just refied some of her investment properties that she had at very low interest rates and she refied at a higher rate to take the Cash-Out because she had so much equity in this fourplex that she had bought a few years ago in Florida, and I’m like, “You got to be kidding me. You went from a three to a six and took the Cash-Out, why would you do that?”

Kathy:
And she enlightened me on her thinking there, is that if you have several hundred thousand of equity sitting there making zero and you average it out, even if you’re borrowing at 4% on half of the property but you’re getting zero on the other half, in her mind, she’s like, “I’m better off just paying a little bit more, getting that money out and reinvesting” because she’s at a phase in her life where she’s an acquisition, she’s in her early 30s and she’s not looking for the cash flow.

Kathy:
And I told her, “Good, because we want to keep you as an employee so don’t get cash flow today”. That she’s really looking at acquiring in markets that are growing because that’s her plan, and that was really enlightening to me. I would never have done that, just cash out in a higher rate, but when she added up all the numbers and put it in her spreadsheet for what her 10-year goal is, it made sense.

Dave:
That’s super interesting. Yeah, I mean, as opportunities increase, you might see that a little bit more just because if there are deals like the both of you are talking about, you probably want to get a little liquidity even if you’re sacrificing cash flow.

Kathy:
Yeah.

Dave:
All right. The last indicator I want to talk about was rent. Rent is still up year-over-year 7%, but the pace of change is coming down pretty consistently. In a lot of markets, we’re starting to see that rent is flat or even starting to decline, particularly in multifamily. Curious what you both are seeing. James, are you seeing any changes to rent in your market or your business?

James:
No, the rents have stayed pretty… We saw it in the luxury condo market where if stuff was like 5,000 it came down into the low 4000s, which definitely could be detrimental. Luckily, we don’t buy a lot of that product. Our rent growth is actually still stable. We’re staying 97% full in our whole portfolio and we’re still getting our steady increases. And I think that just comes back down to the cost of rent is substantially cheaper than the costing to own right now in Washington. And until I see that metrics close, I think we’re… Now, I don’t think we’re going to see the rapid growth we’ve seen in the last 24 months, but we haven’t seen much adjustment at all. It’s very stable, there’s still way more demand than there is product, and as long as you’re in that right wheelhouse, things are leasing up pretty quickly.

Dave:
Nice. What about you, Kathy?

Kathy:
We were way too conservative in the underwriting for our fund because the rents are coming in much, much higher and they continue to climb, and that’s been the case that we’ve seen in all the markets that we focus on at RealWealth. I think the reason for that is we’re already looking for… That’s just part of our metric. We’re looking for areas that have job and population growth, but that are still really affordable for the average person in that area. So because it’s still affordable but there’s growth, we’re seeing prices increase and rents in those markets, which has surprised me.

Dave:
It is surprising me. I still think it’s going to slow down, but in certain markets, obviously, like Dallas has such strong population growth and I’m not surprised to hear that, but on a national basis, it’s still higher than I at least expected it to be.

Kathy:
Yeah.

Dave:
All right. So that is where things stand in terms of some of the major indicators that we are watching. Of course, interest rates are pretty volatile, inflation is falling, but is still higher than I think anyone wants it to be. Prices are down a little bit, inventory is not budging, demand is still pretty good, so we’re in a really interesting time for the housing market and I’m fascinated to see Q2. I think this is going to be really interesting to see. We had a little bit of correction, now we’re showing signs of life. I think it’ll be really fascinating to see what happens. James, I’m curious if you had some advice for people how to navigate, let’s say the next three months. Usually, we talk about 2023, but given the way things are, I think you have to look even almost at a shorter time period for some decisions. So how would you recommend people navigate the next couple of months?

James:
I mean, the biggest thing for any, and I know for me is always just staying on top of what my buy box is. It changes from quarter to quarter based on what I’m seeing in the market, right? As the market changes, you have to change up what you’re going to buy and why. And so for us, it’s about we just redid our buy box again, what fix-and-flip properties are we going to buy? What kind of development product are we going to buy? What is our expected returns? And as long as we know, if everything hits that return, we are pulling the trigger on it so just stay on top of it. But I would just say, don’t be greedy, run your numbers very conservatively, and if it hits all the numbers, then buy on that. I think where people are getting in trouble, like we were talking about earlier with the multifamily, is people are being too aggressive on their performance.

James:
So just go with the median. Like for us, when we’re pulling comparables or even rent comps, sale comps, whatever it is, we’re using the median, not the high. And so as long as you’re staying in the middle, we’ve seen a lot of stability the last three to four months, you’re not going to get hurt that bad. I mean, there’s going to be a little bit of upside, little bit of downside, and then try to time what you think’s going to happen in the market. We do think, I don’t think rates will be in the fives in the summer, but I do think they could be in the high of fives by the end of the year.

James:
And that’s why I’m going after big projects because they’re huge margins and then the timing works. By the time I go to sell that, my rate will be cheaper to my next consumer. And so it’s funny, we were getting out of the big projects and now, we’re going right back in because it works best with the buy box in addition to it goes to my core beliefs of I think rates will fall. And if you’re timing that right, it’s going to click out a lot better.

Dave:
That’s great advice. James, I’m just curious, is your buy box, is that something [inaudible 00:40:58] you said quarterly or do you do it even more frequently than that?

James:
I mean, it depends on the trends. And I would say right now, we can go more quarterly because the market’s very stable for the… I would say from May until October, we were checking it every 30 days because there was so much more volatility in the market. The money went up what, 40%, 50% during that time. It was when there was that much volatility in the market, you want to do it constantly. But right now, we’re doing it about quarterly. And then me and my business partner get together, we figure out what we also are evaluating what’s working best for us, and actually randomly right now, building homes is more consistent than flipping for us because it has all and it has everything to do with the labor market, has nothing to do with the product, what we’re buying, the margins, it’s the professionals that we’re working with and the timelines they can get things done in.

James:
And in addition to as inflation, like we’ve been talking about, has been starting to go down, they’ve been more consistent with the pricing coming down with that trend, whereas, your remodel contractors are a little bit flying by night, so they’re not. And so just based on that one principle alone in efficiencies and cost, we’re buying a lot more dirt than we are fix-and-flip. And so it’s your buy box, there’s so many little indicators to form that. And I would say if you want to buy anything right now, buy what you’re good at and then you will be safe.

Dave:
All right. Great advice. Kathy, what’s your advice?

Kathy:
Very similar, not surprisingly, but I’m going to compare it to yoga and the tree pose, and if anybody knows what I’m talking about, it’s where you stand on one foot and you’ve got the other foot up and then you’ve got your hands up to make it a tree, and it’s a really easy way to fall down and wobble a lot, right? And the whole, the key to doing tree pose correctly is to look far away in the distance and focus and not look around you or anyone around you who’s wobbling because you’ll probably fall.

Dave:
I was wondering where that was going, but you brought that one around. That was good.

Kathy:
Bringing it back. You’ve got to be super clear what your long-term plan is and focus on that and don’t let all the wobbliness around you affect that plan. Know what you want. And again, in the case of Leah, our investment counselor, she knows what she wants, she’s building a portfolio. She’s young, she doesn’t need the cash flow right now. She knows what she’s looking for and she runs it through the spreadsheet and it works, even at a higher interest rate. She’s leaving a low interest rate for a higher one because she can deploy more cash that way. So have your focus, be clear about it, and don’t look at anything else, just focus. Keep your eye on the horizon, as they say it, Marcus & Millichap. That’s the big one. And it all really depends on what you’re trying to do. If you’re trying to buy your first home, maybe it’s a home you live in, does it matter what’s happening?

Kathy:
Again, does it matter what’s happening? If you need a place to live and you can still rent out rooms and house hack, you’re going to have to pay somebody something. So knowing that there’s a possibility that mortgages could go down, if you’re just trying to buy your first home, please get active in the next couple of months because it could get harder very soon, whether it’s your primary or an investment property. And I know a lot of people and I can already see the comments, “Oh, well, you’re in real estate, so of course, you’re going to say, ‘Oh, now is always the time to buy’”, but really, it really is. And we could talk next summer. Even if I’m wrong and let’s say rates go up, well, then you got today’s rates.

James:
That’s true.

Dave:
Yeah, that’s a very good point. All right, I love that. B, do your tree pose and look beyond all the instability right now and try and focus on your long-term goals. I think that’s always a good advice for real estate investors. All right, thank you guys for, first of, all reading my report. If anyone wants to check this out and wants to understand some of the more nuanced data and information that is dictating the performance of the housing market right now, highly recommend you check it out. It’s completely for free on BiggerPockets. Just go to biggerpockets.com/q2report. Before we get out of here though, I have one question from our audience that is very relevant for our conversation today. This question came from the BiggerPockets forums, and if anyone listening wants to ask us questions, that is a great place to do it. This question comes from Mathias Yonen who said, “What websites or sources do you guys use to inform yourselves about the market in any shifts and trends that occur?” James, what about you? What sources do you use most?

James:
So I use a lot of local sources because I think that depends on what kind of investor you are. I’m a backyard investor, so everything that I’m doing is very localized because we’re tracking really counties and cities. I mean, I reference the national, but I mean, and because I’m a broker, I use a lot of Northwest MLS. We use MLS data. I don’t really want to get people’s opinion on data, I just want the core stats so I can then interpret them myself. So most of the time, it’s done through the MLS or NAR, just stats and trends rather than someone telling me what they think. Maybe I’m just [inaudible 00:46:25] and I want to make my own opinion.

Dave:
That totally makes sense. What about you, Kathy?

Kathy:
I’m the opposite. I like to listen to what other people think and how they interpret the data. And so far, my two favorites are HousingWire and Marcus & Millichap, they both offer a lot of data and they take that data and interpret it. And sometimes I agree, sometimes I don’t, but I love that. And then the third way is just boots-on-the-street. Like I have said before, we’ve got property management companies that we work closely with in 15 to 20 different markets, and we have regular weekly conversations with them to see what’s going on, so we know real time what’s happening out there, and that’s important to us because the local market is not the national market, right? So we get that local information combined with the more broad.

Dave:
Great, both excellent advice, local information and getting those expert opinions about from people who really understand the data are great. If you are the kind of person who likes to check out data, some sources that I recommend are, the FRED website is great, but it’s not really up to the minute. You usually get things, some things, a month or two late, but it really does have good information on a localized level if you want to understand macroeconomics. If you want to understand housing dynamics, I think Redfin offers really good data as well. They have a data center where you could download all sorts of information about a lot of the indicators that we were talking about today, like inventory, new listings, that sort of thing.

Dave:
And then the last thing I’ll say is we had Mike Simonsen from Altos Research on I think episode 98 a couple weeks ago, and he now works with HousingWire and his company is all about tracking data in real-time for the housing market. And if you go on HousingWire, they have active inventory home sales data for the current week, which is just about as fast as data as you can get for the housing market. So those are just a couple of the sources that I personally use. And you can always follow me on Instagram @thedatadeli. I put out lots of content about where to find data.

Kathy:
I was just going to say that. I was like, “Wait a minute, and you”, I mean, your most recent report was so in-depth and it had the mixture of the data with the interpretation of it and wow, definitely make sure people know where to get that and all of your reports because they’re like little books. I don’t know how you’re writing so many of them, but it’s really packed full of information.

Dave:
Oh, well, thank you. All right, well, thank you both. I appreciate you being here. This was a lot of fun. Kathy, if people want to connect with you, where should they do that?

Kathy:
Realwealth.com or @kathyfettke at Instagram. And if you’re interested in learning more about the fund, it’s growdevelopments.com.

Dave:
Sweet. I love your new studio, by the way. It looks good.

Kathy:
Do you like it?

Dave:
Yeah.

Kathy:
Rich chose the color, pink.

Dave:
It’s perfect.

Kathy:
Representing the ladies over here.

Dave:
Yeah, it looks very nice. Very professional.

James:
I thought that was representing his underwear color.

Dave:
James, what about you? Where can people find you? Just come to the boat or-

James:
Yeah, just come to the boat whenever it’s open, you can hang out, but it’s-

Kathy:
Good to know.

James:
… best way is just Instagram, @jdainflips or jamesdainard.com.

Dave:
All right, great. Well, thank you both. And if you want to connect with me, you can find me on Instagram where I’m @thedatadeli. Again, if you have questions for us, like the one that we answered today, BiggerPockets has forums, we have an On the Market forum. Just tag any one of us and we will review any of them and might select some of yours for our parting thoughts here on the show. Thank you all so much for listening. We’ll see you next time for On The Market.

Dave:
On The Market is created by me, Dave Meyer, and Kaitlin Bennet, produced by Kaitlin Bennet, editing by Joel Esparza and Onyx Media, researched by Pooja Jindal, and a big thanks to the entire BiggerPockets team. The content on the show On the Market are opinions only. All listeners should independently verify data points, opinions, and investment strategies.

 

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


You may have heard the good news: In recent weeks, several mortgage and real estate brokerage execs have exclaimed that we may have already reached the bottom of the market. For prospective home buyers and sellers, that could mean a gradual decline in mortgage rates, which would unlock inventory and—dare I say—sales activity. 

But there are still ultra-competitive markets in America where those conditions will simply be offset by rising prices. 

You may have seen a picture making the rounds on Housing Twitter and LinkedIn recently. It shows about 50 people waiting in line at an open house in Mount Laurel, New Jersey. The house ended up having five offers and sold for $50,000 over ask. 

In much of suburban New Jersey, where new construction is rarer than cheap Bruce Springsteen tickets, the pandemic-era conditions never left. There’s still plenty of money and demand emanating from New York City and Philadelphia and very little inventory. I mean very little inventory.

New-Jersey-market-report

In New Jersey, the median list price last week of a single family home checked in at $565,000, according to Altos Research data. In May 2020, it was $425,000. Single family inventory last week fell to 8,556; three years ago it was 21,874.

New-Jersey-inventory

This has serious consequences for real estate agents and loan officers alike, since it’s usually a zero sum game. You land the client and get a commission, or you don’t and you get bupkis.

“I sent pre-approvals two-to-three times a day, and then there are 30-plus offers on the homes and I virtually never get contracts,” one veteran loan officer told HW in late March. “One home recently had over 60 offers! Incredibly frustrating, and I know and have spoken with multiple $100 million-per-year originators/friends who are writing nothing here as well.”

If mortgage rates were to fall into the 5% range and stay there for a period, I think we’d see some supply shake loose in New Jersey. But for markets like suburban New Jersey, the demand will still vastly exceed the supply for years to come. There’s simply no easy or fast way to overcome two decades of underbuilding, NIMBYism and poor housing policies. It’s great for existing homeowners whose properties become more valuable due to scarcity. But it’s bad for everyone else, agents and loan officers included.

According to Altos data, the housing fever is even higher in Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut. In Connecticut, single-family inventory has dropped 80% in the past six years while prices have increased by 44%, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. And this is just the Northeast – try finding a home in Los Angeles for under $1 million.

What’s it like in your neck of the woods? Share your story with me at james@hwmedia.com and we’ll look at supply and demand in your market.

DataDigest is a newsletter in which HW Media Managing Editor James Kleimann breaks down the biggest stories in housing through a data lens. Sign up here! Have a subject in mind? Email him at james@hwmedia.com.





Source link


Barbara Corcoran understands real estate arguably better than anyone else. And while most of us know her from Shark Tank, Barbara swims in a league of her own as one of the most successful real estate investors and brokers in New York City. She knows the up-and-coming areas, the overpriced hipster neighborhoods, the streets to stray away from, and which will make you rich when owning real estate. And while Barbara has made a killing, she’s done it in a way foreign to almost any other real estate investor.

If you want to know the “formula” for making a fortune, this is the episode to tune into. In it, Barbara uncovers the exact way she finds the hottest rental markets before anyone else, why she consistently overpays for properties, the reason you should partner on almost EVERY deal you do, and why small-time investors are MUCH more likely to succeed than the big players.

Not only that, but Barbara also shares her past failures and why falling flat on her face was what she needed to see great success. She talks about her infamous word-of-mouth campaign that sold out an eighty-unit apartment complex in hours, the “Corcoran Report” that landed her on the front page of The New York Times, and why you MUST talk to waiters whenever investing in a new area.

Click here to listen on Apple Podcasts.

Listen to the Podcast Here

Read the Transcript Here

Watch the Episode Here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e8K2VaM1CU123???????????????????????????????

Help Us Out!

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

In This Episode We Cover:

  • Barbara’s investing formula that will make you a FORTUNE (if you take the risk!)
  • A terrible first real estate investment and a crucial finding Barbara learned from failing
  • Overpaying for properties and why savvy investors don’t worry about the purchase price
  • Cash-out refinances and why Barbara is ALWAYS taking money out of her properties
  • Almost unbelievable marketing moves that Barbara made to boost her business
  • Whether or not buying with today’s “high” mortgage rates is a mistake
  • Why taking a night drive could be your key to finding the best real estate markets 
  • And So Much More!

Links from the Show

Connect with Barbara:

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


Mortgage lender and servicer NewRez on Monday launched a special purpose credit program through Freddie Mac that will provide $3,000 or more in closing cost assistance to qualifying first-time homebuyers.

Freddie Mac’s BorrowSmart Access program will be available to NewRez borrowers through Caliber Home Loans‘ national network of branches.

The program offers $3,000 or more in closing cost assistance if borrowers in select metropolitan areas meet a minimum 3% downpayment, complete a one-on-one homeownership counseling, and earn less than or equal to 140% of the area median income (AMI).

“Our mission is to expand access to mortgage credit and advance economic opportunities for minorities and low- to moderate- income communities,” Baron Silverstein, President of Newrez said in a statement. “With BorrowSmart Access, we’re delivering on that mission by providing ways to reduce cost in the homebuying process.”

Borrowers can utilize additional sources of funds from gifts, family, and other approved down payment assistance programs to gain even more purchasing power, NewRez said in a statement.

BorrowSmart Access is available in 10 metropolitan areas across the United States, including:

  • Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta, Georgia
  • Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin
  • Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Michigan
  • El Paso, Texas
  • Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas
  • McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Texas
  • Memphis, Tennessee-Mississippi-Arkansas
  • Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, Florida
  • Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Delaware-Maryland
  • St. Louis, Missouri-Illinois

Program borrowers also need to meet the lender’s eligibility requirements, which typically include a minimum credit score of 620 and a maximum debt-to-income ratio of 50%.

For those who make between 50.01% and 80% of AMI, there is up to $1,250 worth of assistance available. The credit goes up to $2,500 if a borrower makes 50% or less of AMI. The special purpose credit program is an extension of the government sponsored enterprise’s equitable housing finance plan.

As part of its commitment to help low-income borrowers, Freddie Mac in April pledged to expand the use of special purpose credit programs (SPCPs), increase the availability of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and manufactured homes, and launch a correspondent lending program to assist smaller financial institutions with access to Freddie Mac’s multifamily financing.

Freddie Mac’s DPA One, a down payment assistance digital platform, will also be made available broadly this year and complements Freddie Mac’s SPCP efforts.

Rocket Mortgage began offering the recently revamped BorrowSmart Access program in March. CrossCountry Mortgage, Guild Mortgage and several other lenders also began offering the program this year.



Source link


Just when I thought it was safe to say we were getting more traditional spring housing inventory , we hit a snag last week, as active inventory and new listings declined. Hopefully, this is just a blip, which can occur from time to time with weekly data. We had a lot of drama over the week between Federal Reserve meetings and banking stress, and mortgage rates and purchase applications both fell.

Here’s a quick rundown of the last week:

  • Total active listings fell by 2,545, and new listing data also fell week to week, continuing the streak of the lowest new listing data ever recorded in history.
  • Mortgage rates fell last week as we started the week at 6.73%, got as low as 6.43% to end the week at 6.5%.
  • Purchase application data fell 2% weekly as the streak of higher rates impacting the weekly data continues.

Weekly housing inventory

The numbers this week are unfortunate: inventory should be growing like it does at this time every year. But, the weekly inventory data can occasionally have big moves up or down that can deviate from the longer seasonal trend so I need to see a few more weeks of inventory declining before I make too much out of one week.

However, one thing is for sure, housing is not going to crash due to large-scale panic-selling — a scare tactic of late 2021 that didn’t work then or now. New listing data was trending at all-time lows in 2021 abd 2022 and now it’s creating a new all-time low trend in 2023.

  • Weekly inventory change (April 28-May 5): Inventory fell from 422,270 to 419,725
  • Same week last year (April 29-May 6): Inventory rose from 287,821 to 300,481
  • The bottom for 2022 was 240,194
  • The peak for 2023 so far is 472,680
  • For context, active listings for this week in 2015 were 1,081,085

Weekly housing inventory

image-14

According to Altos Research, new listing data declined weekly and is still trending at all-time lows in 2023. This data line can have some wild swings up and down, but for the most part, we do see the traditional seasonal increase in new listings data. We are roughly two months away from the seasonal decline in new listings.

Since the second half of 2022, after the big spike in mortgage rates, this data line hasn’t gotten much traction. Last year at this time, we saw some growth year over year, but this year it’s been different.

New listing weekly data over the past three years:

  • 2023: 58,432
  • 2022: 76,691
  • 2021: 73,291

New listing data from previous years to give you some historical perspective.

  • 2017 99,880
  • 2016 88,105
  • 2015 94,101

As you can see in the chart below, new listing data is very seasonal; we don’t have much time to get some more growth here.

image-15

The NAR data going back decades shows how difficult it has been to get back to anything normal on the active listing side since 2020. In 2007, when sales were down big, total active listings peaked at over 4 million. We had high inventory levels while the unemployment rate was still excellent in 2007.

This proves that the mass supply growth we saw from 2005-2007 was due to credit stress, not because the economy was in a recession; the U.S. didn’t go into recession until 2008. Even though the labor market is currently showing signs of getting softer, there is no job-loss recession yet. 

The total NAR inventory is still 980,000. As you can see in the chart below, there is a big difference between the current housing market and those looking for a repeat of 2008.

NAR total active listing data going back to 1982  

image-16

People often ask me why there is such a difference between the NAR data versus the Altos Research inventory data. This link explains the difference and is worth a read.

While this was a disappointing week on the inventory growth side, I hope this is just a one-week blip. We can see what a difference a year makes in inventory data. For example, last year, from April 22-29, weekly active listings grew by 16,311. So far this year, after the seasonal bottom in inventory happened the week of April 14, the total growth in active listings since that week has been only 14,257.

Traditionally, we would see active listings starting to grow at the end of January. However, that growth has taken longer in 2023 than any other year in U.S. history and so far the active listing growth from April to May has been mild.

The 10-year yield and mortgage rates

Last week we had multiple land mines for the 10-year yield and mortgage rates to rise or fall with the Fed meeting and four labor market reports. Although the Fed raised the Federal funds rate, the bond market is sensing a slower labor market and mortgage rates fell.

Tracking the 10-year yield and mortgage rates are essential for housing inventory because when rates fall, buyer demand gets better, allowing more homes to be bought and getting a lid on inventory growth, which we have seen since 2012. The only two years we have seen the active inventory grow were 2014 and 2022 when softness in demand allowed inventory to grow.

The big difference between 2022 and 2014, as you can see in the chart below, is that the bottom in 2022 was an all-time record low; we can see year-over-year growth in total active listings. However, the increase in inventory this year from last still puts active listings near all-time lows.

NAR Total Active Listings

image-17

We have seen from 2022 that the monthly supply of NAR data has grown more visually in the data lines; this means homes are taking longer to sell than before. I wrote about this last week and talked about it in the HousingWire Daily podcast.

NAR Monthly Supply Data

image-18

Mortgage rates started last week at 6.73% and fell as the labor data and banking stress drove money to the bond market. We briefly broke under my key Gandalf line in the sand (between 3.37%-3.42%) intraday, only to close right at the line and rise by the end of the week. This line has been truly epic.

image-19

Mortgage rates fell to a low of 6.43% then ended the week at 6.5%. The spreads between the 10-year yield and 30-year mortgage rates have been terrible for a long time and have gotten worse during the banking stress. While credit is stlll flowing for conventional loans, mortgage pricing has been bad. Mortgage rates in a regular market should be 5.25% today but are at 6.5%. Can you imagine the housing market at 5.25% today when we found stabilization with rates ranging between 5.99%-7.10% this year?

In my 2023 forecast, I said that if the economy stays firm, the 10-year yield range should be between 3.21% and 4.25%, equating to 5.75% to 7.25% mortgage rates. If the economy gets weaker and we see a noticeable rise in jobless claims, the 10-year yield should go as low as 2.73%, translating to 5.25% mortgage rates.

Of course, the banking crisis has added a new variable to economics this year. However, even with that, the labor market, while getting softer, hasn’t broken yet. We have been in the forecasted range all year, even with all the drama from the banking crisis, which isn’t good news for the economy.

My line in the sand for the Fed pivot has always been 323,000 jobless claims on the four-week moving average. This has been my big economic data line for the cycle since I raised my sixth and final recession red flag on Aug. 5, 2022. While the labor market is getting less tight, it’s not broken yet.

From the Department of Labor: Initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits increased by 13,000 in the week ended April 29, to 242,000. The four-week moving average also rose by 3,500 to 239,250.

image-20

Purchase application data

Purchase application data has been the main stabilizing data line for the housing since Nov. 9, 2022, with 16 positive prints versus seven negative prints, after making some holiday adjustments. For 2023, we have had nine positive prints versus seven negative prints.

The MBA purchase application data line has been very rate-sensitive: when the 10-year yield and mortgage rates rise, it typically produces a negative weekly print, and when they both fall, we get a positive print. This past week we saw a 2% week-to-week decline in the data line.

image-21

The year-over-year decline in purchase application data was 32%; as I have noted, we are working from the mother of the all-time lowest bars in 2023. As we can see in the chart above, just having 16 positive prints since Nov. 9 has stabilized the data — it’s been hard to break lower than the levels we saw back in 1996.

The year-over-year comps will get noticeably easier as the year progresses, especially in the second half. This data line looks out 30-90 days for sales, and we are almost done with the seasonality. I always weigh this report from the second week of January to the first week of May. Next week for the tracker, I will report on how 2023 demand looks based on this index.

Traditionally, purchase application volumes always fall after May. Now, post-COVID-19, this index has had some abnormal late-in-year growth data. So, after May, I will address this issue with seasonality and whether we will see some growth later in the year, as we have seen in previous years.

The week ahead: It’s Inflation week!

All eyes are on the CPI report this week, coming on Wednesday, and we have the PPI inflation report on Thursday. The entire market knows the headline inflation growth rate peaked last year, so watch out for the core inflation data, excluding shelter inflation. Of course, core CPI is primarily driven by shelter inflation, and we all know by now that it will cool off, especially as the year progresses. However, the Fed and the markets focus on service inflation, excluding shelter.

I am keeping an eye on the car inflation data as that might be stubborn this week, keeping core inflation higher than it should be.

The bond market never bought into the 1970s inflation premise, so the 10-year yield is closer to 3% than 5%. Since the entire marketplace is keeping an eye out on credit getting tighter, I will be watching the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices on Monday. This will provide more clues into how fast credit is getting tighter in the U.S. economy, which is key at this expansion stage.

So, we will have some economic data to see if the 10-year yield can break lower and send mortgage rates lower as well. So far, the Gandalf line in the sand has held up against some brutal attacks this year, but we shall see if we can break under that line of 3.37% and head lower in yields. Why is that important? Because the 10-year yield and mortgage rates have always danced together, and if the 10-year yield heads lower, mortgage rates will follow it. 



Source link


Still waiting to buy your first rental property? Everyone’s been there. It can be nerve-racking not knowing where to buy, what makes a “good deal,” and whether or not all your hard work will go to waste. Even investing experts like Ashley and Tony were nervous about taking their first step, which is exactly what they’ll walk through on today’s episode! If you’re a rookie sitting on the sidelines, waiting to get into real estate, this is the episode for you!

Welcome back to another Rookie Reply! In this episode, we share exactly how to close an off-market deal when there’s no real estate agent involved. Ever wondered how our hosts went from real estate rookies to real estate pros? Today, they share their first deal diaries. Learn how Ashley ended up buying the first property she EVER looked at and how Tony bought his first two properties with ZERO money down. Finally, we touch on the struggles of analyzing deals when you’re just starting out, as well as choosing the right insurance policies for short-term rentals!

If you want Ashley and Tony to answer a real estate question, you can post in the Real Estate Rookie Facebook Group! Or, call us at the Rookie Request Line (1-888-5-ROOKIE).

Ashley:
This is Real Estate Rookie episode 284.

Tony:
I really focused in on not just one city, but I was looking at specific zip codes within that city. Within those zip codes, I knew the street boundaries that I wanted to stay within to make sure I was super laser focused on one little niche. That allowed me to get much, much better, much faster, and much more accurate at analyzing deals in those markets, because instead of looking at this big, large set of potential properties, it was this smaller micro set that was easier to digest.

Ashley:
My name is Ashley Kehr, and I’m here with my co-host, Tony Robinson.

Tony:
Welcome to the Real Estate Rookie Podcast, where every week, twice a week, we bring you the inspiration, motivation, and stories you need to hear to kickstart your investing journey. I love the rookie replies because it takes… Obviously, we’ve got amazing guests on all the other episodes, but it’s cool to hear what our Rookie audience is thinking about, and what’s stopping them from getting started or keeping going, and being able to dive into those questions head on.

Ashley:
So today’s question, we talk about a lot of different things for our Rookie replies. If you guys want to have your question submitted on here, you can always leave us a voicemail at 188-85-rookie. You can write your question in the Real Estate Rookie Facebook group, or you can send myself or Tony a DM at Wealth from Rentals or at Tony J. Robinson on Instagram, and we may play your question on the show. The first thing we’re going to do today, the question is our first deal diary, as Tony had called it. We break down the first deals that we ever did. We talk about partnerships, and then we also talk about closing off-market versus on-market deals. What’s the different paperwork you have to do? How do the processes vary?

Tony:
Then our last one here is actually about Short-Term Rentals, my bread and butter, and the liability that comes along with that and how to protect yourself, and get things set up the right way, so lots of good questions. Before we keep rolling here, I just want to give a quick shout out to someone by the username of Mrs. placidChaos. I’d love to say five star review, and the review says, “Real estate is something I’ve wanted to invest in for several years now, but I’ve been intimidated by the thought that I couldn’t financially make it happen, but this podcast has shown me so many different avenues that can be taken, and I’m confident I’ll have my first property before the end of the year.”
We are confident that you will as well, Mrs. placidChaos. If you’re listening to the Rookie Show, and you’re part of the rookie community, and you haven’t yet left us an honest reading review on Apple Podcast or Spotify, please do. The more views we get, the more folks we can reach, and the more folks we can reach, the more folks we can help.

Ashley:
With that, let’s jump into our Rookie Reply questions.

Tony:
All right, so jumping into our first question, this one comes from Sean Gallagher. Sean’s question is, “I’m new to investing, and was wondering what your first deal was. If you don’t mind, also tell me how did you analyze the deal to determine if it’s good or not?” So first, deal diaries is what we’re doing on this question, Ash. Why don’t you go first? Give us the details of that first deal.

Ashley:
My first deal was the first property I ever looked at. When I decided I want to be a real estate investor, there was one property that I saw on the MLS first, and so I contacted the agent that had listed it, and set up a time to go see it. She said, “I just want you to know there are a lot of foundation issues and flooding that has happened on this property, and that’s why it’s been sitting on the market.” That right there gave me cold feet, and I was like, “You know what? Nevermind. I don’t want to see it.” Then that’s when I actually contacted my parents’ friend who was a real estate agent, and said, “This is what I want to do.”
So, I found a duplex in a market that I knew, because I was already a property manager there, and went and looked at it. I called the person who had already agreed to be my money partner. They wanted to start investing in real estate too, but didn’t have the time, didn’t have any knowledge about it. So, we both went together to look at the property. I ran the numbers, and when I say I ran the numbers, it was a pencil and a piece of paper and me being like, “Okay, I know I can rent each apartment for $700 per month. My water bill is going to be this, because I contacted the village to ask approximately what the water bill would be.”
I got some of the utility cost from the seller. I had my agent ask for that. Then I tried to think of any other expense, property taxes, insurance, and I was like, “Okay, this will work.” My payment was going to be to my actual partner. He was going to pay cash for the property, and then he would receive a mortgage payment from our LLC, so we were paying him directly, and we weren’t paying a bank, which… Then he got 50% of the cash flow, so 5.5% on the capital he put into the property, and he was getting it fully paid back, amortized over 15 years plus the 5.5%, 50% of the cash flow. He was actually making out pretty good.

Tony:
Yeah, it’s a good deal.

Ashley:
I would never do that deal now, but it got me started. He put a lot of trust in me. He took his life savings, and dumped it into that property, so we created an LLC together. Once we got that property under contract, we started an LLC where we were 50/50 on the LLC. Then we went to close on the property. I put in a little money for the rehab. It needed a split unit for AC and heat in the upstairs, so I ended up paying out of pocket for that, and then I think maybe the flooring I paid for. Then we had a couple other… We put new cabinets in, things like that, where he put in the money for that. Then that was just money put into the deal that we didn’t actually pay ourselves back for.
We eventually sold the house, and made a good profit on it. The property did cash flow. I did make one mistake on that property, and that was I did not account for snowplowing. This property was outside of Buffalo, New York, and snowplowing is definitely something you need to pay for, or even if you have a tenant do it. So, I ended up, I think, discounting the lower tenant’s rent. I can’t even remember the amount, but they were in charge of shoveling the driveway since the driveway was used by both tenants of the duplex. That definitely hurt the cash flow a little bit.
It definitely wasn’t a deal breaker, but… That was my first deal. It was definitely not my best deal, but after I got that first one, we closed on our second one, I think, maybe three months later. It was just from there, just really that propeller-

Tony:
Snowballs.

Ashley:
Yeah.

Tony:
When did you close on that first deal, Ashley? What month? What year?

Ashley:
It was September 2014.

Tony:
2014. Man, I didn’t know it was in 2014. I didn’t realize that. That’s awesome. Then do you remember what the cashflow numbers were on that deal? How much were you making while you guys owned it?

Ashley:
Oh God. When we first started out, it was only a couple hundred dollars we were getting in cashflow, because we were basically leveraging the whole thing. We paid, I think, 72,000 for it, and the mortgage was for 72,000 because we were paying my other partner back, so it was 100% leverage by him. I would never do that with a bank or whatever, but it was very minimal cashflow. Then we did the rehab and the upstairs, and then over the years, we were able to increase the rents. We didn’t have a ton of capital expenditures on that property at all, but the lifetime we held it, we actually sold it in… 2020, I think, is when we sold it, and we ended up selling it for 130,000, I think.

Tony:
That’s pretty good.

Ashley:
That property was definitely a great play for appreciation.

Tony:
Did You ever refi, or did you keep it with that debt to the partner?

Ashley:
After we bought that property in February of 2015, we bought our second property, and that one, we used his cash again to purchase. Then when we bought our third property, we went and did a portfolio loan putting those two properties under one mortgage. We used that debt then to go and buy our third property. So, we had a mortgage on them, but we were still paying the partner. It was just… We just kept rolling over like that. The mortgage on property C, that ended up paying for the property D, and it just went through the line. That’s how we had acquired our units at that time.

Tony:
So you’re almost like… I mean, you were BRRRRing basically, right?

Ashley:
Yeah.

Tony:
The true BRRRR where you’re paying cash for it up front, and then refinancing and using that capital too.

Ashley:
Yeah. So basically, we’re just reusing and over… That same capital, we just kept reusing over and over again. So, we’ve actually kept that loan going, and so throughout the years as the cashflow has done well on the properties, my partner would go to Vegas or different things like that. He would take some of that cashflow out, because we’ve always just held it in there, or it would be he wanted to buy something expensive or whatever, and I would pay part of his mortgage off like, “Here’s 20,000. We’re just going to take it off the mortgage over for you.”
I looked the other day, and there’s less than a year left on that mortgage, because we’ve just accelerated the mortgage paydown on that. He is so bummed that he’s not going to be getting that mortgage payment anymore.

Tony:
He’s like, “Slow down. Slow down. Slow down.”

Ashley:
But I’m like, “You do understand. You’re still… We end up getting more cash flow now, because we don’t have your mortgage payment.”

Tony:
That’s awesome. Well, it sounds like a solid first deal. My first deal was back in October 2019. It was a single family house in Shreveport, Louisiana. Not Freeport, not Shreveports, but Shreveport.

Ashley:
I’ll still never remember.

Tony:
You’ll never remember. I actually broke down the numbers in pretty excruciating detail back in episode 10 of the Rookie podcast when I was on as a guest, but I’ll give you the cliff notes version here. So essentially, I found a bank in Shreveport that had a really cool loan product, where if you found a property where the purchase price and the rehab costs were no more than, I think, it was like 72.5% of the after repair value, they would fund the entire purchase and the rehab with a year-long note interest only, and then they would do the backend refinance to put you on permanent debt. So, I did that. I found a property. It was on the MLS listed for $100,000.
I locked it up, got under contract. We closed on it, spent another 60 or so thousand dollars to renovate the property, and then we refied it out, and appraised for $230,000. So, I was just was under that 72.5% on the refi, and I was basically into that deal for literally $0 out of pocket, and it was pretty cool. Then I found a property manager out there. I lived in California. The property was in Louisiana, so I found a property manager that got it leased up for me. I don’t remember what we were renting it for anymore. I had the property for a year, and I ended up selling it, but I want to say the cash was pretty minimal.
It was $150 a month, I think, I was making after accounting for property management, some of the other fees. But again, it was $150 on $0 invested. So even though the actual dollar amount wasn’t all that high, it was an infinite return, because I put no money into the deal. I did that same deal with that bank on two properties there in Louisiana.

Ashley:
Tell us the rest of the story on that first one. So, what happened with it?

Tony:
I mean, so that first deal actually turned out really well. It was the second deal in Shreveport where we had the flood.

Ashley:
We have many, many episodes talking about that second property.

Tony:
That’s second property.

Ashley:
But For the first one, what happened?

Tony:
I mean, so I held the property for a year. We had one tenant in there the whole time. There’s a military basin in that city, and it was a military family that was there on assignment. They ended up getting orders to deploy somewhere else. So, they gave us notice. After that year, we’d already transitioned into the short-term rentals. I was like, “Ah, I think I’m just going to take my money, and sell the property.” So, we ended up selling it, I think, for… It wasn’t 230, even though it appraised for that much. I think we sold it for 215 or something like that.
I still got the check when I sold it, plus all the cashflow, plus the tax benefits. It was honestly a really good… I got on base with that first property, and it was a really good proof of concept for me that I could actually buy real estate, and collect money.

Ashley:
So if you are doing that same thing, and say you’re starting over but in today’s market, do you think you’d be able to find that same loan product, and make that same deal work?

Tony:
I don’t know, because I actually contacted that bank. It wasn’t even until I asked him about the loan products. I think I needed some paperwork or something for my taxes, and I was just chatting with the person at the bank. They’re like, “Oh, actually, since COVID, we stopped doing that type of loan product.” I don’t even know if they offered that anymore. But if they did, I would’ve 100% go after that deal, because it’s such a low risk way to get into it. What was really cool was that the bank, they funded the entire purchase, but they also funded the rehab, but they funded the rehab in draws. So, it was four different draws that they allowed for the contractor to take.
The way that it would work is they did an appraisal before. Then they looked at the bid that the contractor gave me, and said, “Based on the current condition of the property, and if you combine this with the bids the contractor gave you, here’s what we think the property will be worth after you’re done.” So, they almost validated my ARV for me. Then during the construction process, before they would release a draw, they would send an inspector out to the job site to confirm that the work that the contractor said he was doing was actually done.
So, it was this second layer of like… It was almost like training wheels for my first deal, because I had this bank who had a vested interest in making sure that the project went well, who was… They were validating my numbers. They were inspecting the contractor’s work. They were managing all the draw payments. They made it super, super easy for me. So if I could go back and do it again, I probably would.

Ashley:
One thing I did learn about that, I met with this hard moneylender in Texas one time, and just he broke down everything about how hard money works and operates in all these different things, but they did the same thing, where they would have somebody inspect the property, and he kept pushing it and selling it. He’s like, “This is a huge advantage to you,” and it was. But the person that I was there with, he’s like, “Ashley, keep in mind they’re charging you for this service. They’re charging you to send an inspector out. They’re charging you all these fees for them to oversee the project. They’re charging you a fee for a draw.”
I don’t know if it was exactly the same for your bank, but that’s definitely something to be cautious of. That shouldn’t be the only reason you’re going to that bank to do that hard money, or to do that loan because of having that resource as an advantage. You may be able to pay a contractor or a real estate agent, or somebody else to be that oversight for you too, where it may be cheaper, more affordable.

Tony:
That’s a great point. I think I was in a unique position, because they were just a local credit union, so they weren’t a hard moneylender who needed to make their points on fees and all these other things. This is a person who’s nine-to-five employee. They’re just running out at their job, and the inspections and everything didn’t come with any additional cost, because for them, they just wanted to make sure they were protecting the asset. So, it was a fantastic way for me to get started. Honestly, like I said, if that loan product still exists, I might go back to that city to buy another one. It wouldn’t be in a flood zone, but I might go back to that city just to keep that ball rolling.

Ashley:
I think my advice for somebody listening that maybe can’t do the deal that Tony just did, because they can’t find that loan product, is to go back to episode 280, which would’ve been, I think, two weeks ago, we did a Pace Morby. We had him on for a Rookie Reply, and he breaks down creative financing, how to do subject two, and how to do seller financing. I think that is a great alternative in today’s market to be able to get some zero-money-down deal by using those two strategies.

Tony:
Ash, we should also answer the second part of Sean’s question is how did you analyze the deal to determine if it’s good or not? I think Ash and I both have similar… Well, maybe not for your first deal, Ash. I know maybe yours is a little bit different, but for me, that first deal, I was already well entrenched in the bigger pockets community as just like a consumer. So, I was already listening to the OG podcast. I had read several of the BiggerPockets books. I was a pro member with my calculator, and I used the BP calculator to analyze every single property that I was looking at.
I think this was before BP had the BP Insights. So, I was using tools like Rentometer. I was looking on Craigslist and Facebook marketplace, and just trying to analyze what the potential rental revenue would be. I used those numbers to plug them into the BP calculator. Then I actually met with the local property manager, the one that I ended up hiring. I had them give me numbers on potential expenses for a property of that size. That gave me a lot of confidence. I feel like what helped me a ton as well, Sean, was that I really focused in on not just one city, but I was looking at specific zip codes within that city.
Within those zip codes, I knew the street boundaries that I wanted to stay within to make sure I was really just super laser focused on one little niche. That allowed me to get much, much better, much faster, and much more accurate at analyzing deals in those markets, because instead of looking at this big, large set of potential properties, it was this smaller micro set that was easier to digest.

Ashley:
Mine is different actually. I didn’t… I bought that property the end of 2014, and I did not discover BiggerPockets until 2017. For me, my only knowledge of analyzing a deal was because I was managing a 40-unit apartment complex in that same town. I had also previously worked as an accountant. I was an intern at an accounting firm all throughout college. I had graduated with an accounting and finance degree, and so I had a basic understanding or maybe more than basic understanding of financials, of the profit and loss statement, how to calculate cash flow for any business. So, I basically just took what I knew from accounting, and I looked, “Okay, what’s my income? What are my expenses?”
Then to determine what my cash flow would actually be is, “Okay, what’s going to be my principal mortgage payment? Any other loans I’m going to need to be paid back?” That was the only way I knew how to analyze. As the property manager of that 40-unit apartment complex, I saw other expenses that may come up, what the property taxes were like for that town, just different things. So basically, experience from my accounting job and experience from being a property manager is I just figured it out how to analyze the deal.
Obviously, now, I don’t analyze deals that way. I realize there’s a lot more that goes into it, but at that time, I didn’t know what cash on cash return was. I didn’t know what ROI was. I didn’t know what price to rent ratio was. I was just, “Is this going to cash flow?” That was basically it. That was my only metric, I guess, if the property would be a good investment or not.

Tony:
But you got to start somewhere, right? That first deal is one that got you going. Obviously, everyone listening to this podcast has the benefit of already being exposed to everything that BP has to offer, so leverage the podcast, leverage the calculators, leverage the community, leverage the books, leverage the YouTube channel. That’s really going to give you the confidence to move forward and analyze correctly. Sean, hopefully that gets you started off on the right foot. Man, we’re excited to hopefully see you get that first deal closed, and you either be a rookie rockstar maybe a guest on the podcast one day.
All right, so next question here. Aaron J. Nygaard is the person asking this question. I’ve only heard the last name Nygaard one other time. Have you ever seen the show Fargo, Ashley?

Ashley:
No, I haven’t. I have at least heard of it. I’m pretty sure that you and I have never ever watched the same show or movie except for Tommy Boy, only because I except made you.

Tony:
Except the Tommy Boy because you forced me. Fargo is… I think it was on FX. I watched it on Hulu. You can watch the whole first season, but it… I’m not going to spill the beans, but it’s literally probably one of my most favorite shows that I’ve watched recently.

Ashley:
Oh, really?

Tony:
The main character, his last name is… His name is Lester Nygaard. Anyway, not what today’s question is about, but Aaron Nygaard, he says, “What paperwork do I need to close an off-market deal, and why? If there are cash offers, can it all be done between me and the seller? Do you typically ask for an inspection period? Any help with these questions would be great. Thanks.” Ash, I think we’ve both purchased properties both on markets and off market. So, I guess, what paperwork do you typically use to set up your deals when you’re going off? Actually, I guess we should take a step back, and just define…
Pace actually did this when we interviewed him on whatever episode that was. I think it’s maybe important for folks to understand what the difference is between on market and off market. So when you talk on market, those are properties that are typically listed by real estate agents that are on the MLS. So when you open up your phone on Zillow or Redfin or wherever, and you see all of those properties that are listed there, those are on-market properties. The vast majority of which have been listed by real estate agents. Off-market deals are properties that are not found on sites like Zillow, Redfin, et cetera, or are not listed on the MLS. Instead, there’s some direct connection between the buyer and the seller.
It could be that she was a buyer. Maybe it’s a neighbor of yours who’s selling their property next door, and the two of you are just having a conversation. Maybe you’re using a third party like a wholesaler, and the wholesaler is a person that’s found the seller. Now, they’re connecting you, the buyer, with the seller. But typically, it means that the properties are not listed publicly anywhere, and there’s no real estate agents involved typically. That’s the difference between on market and off market. The challenge with off market is that because there is no real estate agent, there is no one there to really guide the transaction to make sure that everything’s done correctly, so that’s the challenge.
Ash, what is your experience typically on the off-market stuff?

Ashley:
I think it’s also we should discuss… Depending on what state you’re in, there’s different ways to close on a property too. In New York State where I’m from, you have to have an attorney to close on a property. In California where Tony is, you do not have to. You can go directly to the title company. In New York State, the attorney is the facilitator between you and the title company along with you and the seller’s attorney. So for me, when I am purchasing an on-market deal, I have my real estate agent drop the contract. If I am purchasing an off-market deal, I have my attorney, usually her assistant, drop the contract.
So, she uses the same exact contract that a real estate agent would use, and fills it in for me. I just send an email with the information, so the property address, the seller’s name, what LLC I want to put the property in, the mailing address I’m going to use, what my offer is, any terms on the property. Then my attorney’s assistant will go in and fill in all of that information, send it to me to look over, and then I usually DocuSign it. Then that’s when I can present it to the seller, or send it over to the seller to sign. From there, I give my attorney the executed documents to sign documents. The seller gives their attorney those documents.
We have also put on the contract as to who each of our attorneys are. Then from there, the attorneys pretty much take over. They order the title work. They handle escrow, and they basically make sure each party is doing their part. Do I need proof of funds? Do I need a commitment letter from the bank after a certain date? Then they set up the closing date, and do the closing. That’s the difference for me when doing on market as off market is I’m just using a different facilitator in a sense, and I’m really not… I’m still pretty hands off in each situation. The big difference I see is if I do an off-market deal, is it just me, the negotiation with the seller, and being able to talk to the seller directly?
I actually think it’s a huge advantage than having to tell my agent to tell their agent to tell the seller. I feel like sometimes it’s playing telephone as to doing that. But whether I’m doing on market or off market, usually, after the real estate contract has attorney approval in either situation and assigned and both attorneys approve, any situations that may come up before the property actually closes, I have found that it’s best to have my attorney negotiate with their attorney to figure out a resolution for that instead of having my agent and their agent figure something out, or go back to the negotiation table or anything.
For example, if I have an inspection done, here are the things that I want fixed. I’ll usually send it to my attorney to just say, “Can we ask for five grand off because these are the things that are result of the inspection, whatever.” Then they ask their attorney and things like that. So, I do try to keep it to one person instead of having my attorney and my agent trying to figure things out throughout the closing process.

Tony:
Ash, what’s the typical cost if for your attorney? What fees do they charge on a usual transaction?

Ashley:
Usually, around $1,200 is what I’m paying right now to close on a property, and that includes the title work. I think my… The title insurance on that too, so I don’t know exactly offhand what is the actual attorney fee on it.

Tony:
That’s about what we pay our escrow company. Our process is super similar to you, but instead of using an attorney, we have a really good relationship with an escrow company that we like to use here in California. Whenever we have an off-market deal saying, “We just send them the details of the transaction, who the buyer is,” if we’re selling the property or who the… vice versa, just the details of both parties. They draft up all of the agreements, the documents. Typically, it’s the same what we would get from a licensed agent here in California as well, because California has a California version of a purchase and sell agreement.
They draft it all up. They send out all the DocuSigns. They collect all the earnest money deposits. They’re coordinating with title to get all the title work done and make sure everything’s clean and clear there. They almost act as almost like a transaction coordinator, but for me personally for each deal that we do. I would encourage anyone that’s listening, if you are doing an off-market transaction, even if you’re not using a real estate agent, still find that qualified third party, whether it’s an attorney if you’re in a New York, or escrow company like how we use, or a title company, whatever it may be.
Find that company to help facilitate that transaction, and that’s how you can make sure that you’re checking all of the right boxes.

Ashley:
One thing I do want to mention too, as far as the process, if you’re buying commercial property, you most likely won’t use the contract that real estate agents use like the statewide contract where real estate agents are just filling in the blanks. Usually in my situation, I use a commercial broker for commercial properties. Even though I’m using him, he doesn’t usually put together the contract. He will, but I usually have my attorney create the contract, because it’s usually so specific as to what’s included, what’s not included, and different things like that.
That’s also something to be cautious of where usually on the commercial side, there’s not just that general generic contract where you’re just plug and play the information. So, keep that in mind too if you’re buying commercial property.

Tony:
Super valid point. There’s just one other part of Aaron’s question here. He says, “Do you you typically ask for an inspection period?” Aaron, typically, all of the things that you would have in a regular real estate purchase and sell agreement, you should also include when you’re going off market. Obviously, it’s really whatever you and the seller agree to, but you can include all those same things. So if you need an inspection contingency, if you want a financing contingency, whatever other things you want to include in that contract, you’re more than welcome to.
You aren’t limited to doing that just because it’s an off-market transaction. So even for us, if we’re buying something off market, depending on who the seller is or what the situation is, we typically still do include an inspection period, because we want to make sure that we’re protecting ourselves, and buying this asset. We do have some wholesalers that we buy from where the EMDs are non-refundable on day one, but in those situations, we still want to make sure that we get eyes on the property before we put that EMD up to make sure that we’re not walking into any unforeseen issues. But yes, you can totally, and you should, include an inspection period when you’re going off market as well.

Ashley:
For me, I haven’t done an inspection in a long time, but I recently put an offer in on a property that I didn’t get unfortunately, but it was the first time I put an inspection in a long time just because it was outdated, but it was very well taken care of. It just didn’t look like it needed extensive rehab where properties have banned the last couple years have needed extensive rehab, and the market was just so competitive that I would skip the inspection on those, because I knew that I was going to be redoing everything anyways. It just gave me a leg up. I feel like the market is shifting, where you have that ability now to put that inspection period back in, and still be competitive in the market. But also, I think it very much varies on what kind of property you’re going in and purchasing too.
When I flip the house in Seattle, Washington, one thing I learned there is if there is something wrong with the sewer line that goes from the main to the house, for some reason, there’s… I can’t remember exactly if it’s a permit issue, or if it’s something, but it has something to do with the cost of repairing that septic. So if Tony sold me a house in Seattle, and there ended up being something wrong with that sewer line, it would cost me a lot more to fix it than it would if Tony, as the current homeowner, went in to fix it. I can’t remember exactly what that detail is, but you guys can ask James Dainer, because he’s the one that I learned it from. He’ll be able to rattle it off the top of his head the specifics.

Tony:
I wonder if it had something to do with maybe the assessed tax value of the property or something like when a property changes hands, they reassess it. Maybe that’s how… I don’t know. I’m shooting in the dark here.

Ashley:
Well, I’m pretty sure it was the direct cost, the cost too, so I don’t know if it was like you had to get a more expensive permit, or you actually had to get a permit where if you were the current owner, and you had already owned the property for so long or something, I don’t remember, but it’s just like those are little things you would never think of. So every single property, he does a sewer scope. He scopes that line, and what he does is he’ll just say, “Okay.” He’ll negotiate with the seller, and maybe one option is it’s going to cost five grand for this to be replaced.
We will actually add five grand onto the purchase price if you go ahead and just do this repair before we close and pay for it, because it’s going to cost us more. So, it’s worth it for us to just pay you to get it done.

Tony:
Cool. Well, let’s move on to our next question here. This one comes from Michael Bafudo. Michael’s question is, “Just went into contract on our first STR.” Congratulations, Michael. “But we went into it as a second home. Wondering if I should take out renter’s insurance or regular homeowners. If I take out renter’s insurance, will it mess up my mortgage? If so… I take out regular homeowners. Does it cover renters in it anyways? Thanks.” Michael, this is a great question. Renter’s insurance is…
Ashley, you can probably speak to this better than I can, but if I’m understanding the question correctly, Michael, renter’s insurance is typically what you make your tenants take out when they move into your property, not necessarily what you as the owner needs to take out on behalf of your tenants. I know every apartment I’ve lived in, and even the long-term rentals that we did have, we had our tenants get their own renter’s insurance, which covered the goods of theirs that were inside of that property. Now, what we do for all of our short-term rentals is we notify the insurance company that it is going to be used as a short-term rental. Even if you have a second home mortgage, you can still do that, because the short-term rental or the second home loan still allows you to rent out that property when you’re not using it for personal use.
So, we still let our insurance companies know that it’s being used as a short-term rental. They add some additional coverage to make sure that it accounts for the increased risk that comes along with having short-term rental occupancy. But in addition to that, what we also do is we got an additional umbrella policy to help with any potential liability that might come from that property. There are two resources I’m going to give you, Michael, to help with the insurance piece. One company is called Steadily. They’re an insurance broker in the short-term rental space. We’ve heard really great reviews from folks in the space about being able to get pretty competitive short-term rental focused insurance policies through Steadily.
Then another company is called Proper Insurance. They specialize in short-term rental home insurance. They offer some additional things like revenue protection. So if you have an instance where your property goes down for some reason, they can recoup your revenue for you, but they also have liability protection for short-term rental host. That’s my initial take. Ash, I don’t know, what are your thoughts for Michael here?

Ashley:
You said it exactly like you’ll have to get the homeowner’s insurance, because first of all, your mortgage is going to require it. If you don’t have a mortgage on the property, you don’t have to have insurance on it, I guess. You can be self-insured. I have actually bought a couple duplexes where the owner’s like, “Oh, I don’t have insurance on it. I’m self-insured.” So, you do have that option, but if you do have a mortgage on the property, the lender is going to require you to show proof of the insurance, and that it is paid every year, and you keep that policy in place.
They may have requirements too as to what kind of insurance you need to have, what kind of limits, what kind of coverage you actually need. As far as the short-term rental, I think, Tony, you couldn’t have explained it better, is going to talk to an agent or a broker who is experienced in putting insurance on short-term rentals. Where I have seen it is that you have your homeowner’s insurance, or maybe it is just an investment property for you. It’s not even a primary home or a second home. It’s just an investment property where you go and get a landlord policy with almost a short-term renter rider agreement that’s added on to your policy. That’s an extra cost.
That’s one way I’ve seen it written up too, but highly recommend having some coverage. For the LLCs, I don’t have that umbrella coverage, but for anything that is in my personal name, I do have umbrella policies on those to go above and beyond any policy or any coverage that my regular homeowner’s insurance coverage may not cover.

Tony:
Yes. You hit the nail on the head. The reason why we did that is because the majority of our short-term rentals are titles held in our personal name. So, we needed that extra layer of protection, because we don’t have that LLC on title to separate everything there, so makes us sleep a little bit easier at night with that additional umbrella. But, have you ever actually had a claim against any of your insurance policies at any of your properties?

Ashley:
No, knock on wood, I haven’t. Good thing I’m sitting at a wood table. But no, I have never had to make a claim. I did have to at the 40-unit apartment complex that I started out managing. We had severe water damage from an ice storm where ice built up on the roof, and then the ice started to melt, but the water had nowhere to go but into the roof and into the eaves. Then it caused $100,000 worth of damage for, I think, it was maybe eight apartments total that were all along this wall. It was an extensive project. We called a home remediation company where they come in. They rip out the drywall. They dry out the…
Basically, you’re down to the studs. They dry it out, and then they go back and rebuild the walls. What we did was we had hired somebody. I can’t think of what the name is, but it’s some kind of… It’s not an insurance broker, but what he does is he’ll come in, and he’ll try and get you more money from the insurance company, so loss rents. If we have to put people up at a hotel, make sure that you’re getting the maximum benefit from your policy. So, the insurance company originally offered to write a check for this to cover it, and we had him come in and actually get us more money from the insurance company, and then we had to pay him a percentage of what he got us over what we had originally got.
I can’t think of what his job title was called, but if you do find yourself in a situation where maybe your policy isn’t going to be covering what you thought it was going to be, it may be worth hiring someone like this, and giving them a cut because it’s better to get a little bit more than no more at all.

Tony:
Ashley, what was the episode where we had the asset protection guide?

Ashley:
I can’t believe I don’t know this offhand, because I give it out all the time.

Tony:
All the time.

Ashley:
I’ll look real quick.

Tony:
Look it over. Look. I’ll share really quickly. We actually haven’t had any claims against any of our insurance policies either, thank God, but I always do get somewhat nervous because obviously with the short-term rental space, we get people coming in and out. We have hot tubs at the majority of our properties. We have now an indoor pool at one of our properties, and those by themselves are just high-risk things to have. I’m just always nervous of those things. That’s why we wanted to make sure that we’re really beefing it up. Did you find it?

Ashley:
Yeah, it’s episode 106, Brian Bradley. He’s a asset protection attorney. He did two episodes with us, so I think it was 105 and 106 or 106 and 107. It was just such a wealth of information. We had to break them up into two episodes there.

Tony:
So if you want to be scared out of potentially ever buying your first long term or short-term rental, then definitely listen to those episodes. All right. Well, I feel like we got through a lot today already, right?

Ashley:
Yeah. This is good. Thank you guys so much for joining us for this week’s Rookie Reply. My name is Ashley at Wealth from Rentals, and he’s Tony at Tony J. Robinson. We will be back on Wednesday with a guest.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZepKCI0YWfk?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email: 

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link