Need rental property financing? What about an investor loan that won’t stop your cash flow? It’s tough in 2023. With high mortgage rates and many veteran investors predicting a commercial crash, finding funding for your deal might seem impossible; but you’re probably looking for loans in the wrong place. Novice investors run off to the same lender that helped them get their primary home loan, while experienced investors know of loan products that most couldn’t even dream of. 

To help get you a better mortgage, at a better rate, with less financing fatigue, is Caeli Ridge from Ridge Lending Group and Tim Herriage from RCN Capital, two of the most prominent investor lenders in the nation. Caeli and Tim know which loans work best for which investor, property, strategy, and price point. In this episode, they’ll review loan products that could help you score better deals with fewer headaches, explain why today’s high interest rates won’t last, and uncover the REAL reason investors are giving up their low mortgage rates for more expensive mortgages.

Caeli also goes in-depth on a new type of HELOC/home loan with lower interest costs that could benefit you IMMENSELY over the life of your loan. Tim also shares why he believes there WON’T be a commercial real estate crash and how financing investment properties could get even easier. If you’re waiting to invest or want some signal that lower mortgage rates are returning, this episode is for you!

Dave:
Hey, everyone. Welcome to On The Market. I’m your host, Dave Meyer, joined by Kathy Fettke today. Kathy, how are you?

Kathy:
I’m doing great. Excited for this conversation.

Dave:
Me, too. You’re wearing a shirt today. I think I just bought a shirt that perfectly matches that shirt, and I think next time, we’re going to both wear it.

Kathy:
Absolutely. I can’t picture you in green and flowers, but I would love to see that.

Dave:
It’s like a Hawaiian-y kind of shirt, dark green, but you’ll see. I think we’ll match well together.

Kathy:
That episode should probably be filmed in Hawaii, I think.

Dave:
Oh, okay. I’m into it. I think that’s the furthest possible place I can fly from Amsterdam. I think it’s directly halfway around the world, but maybe I’ll meet you somewhere else tropical, and we’ll have a good time.

Kathy:
There we go.

Dave:
All right. Well, today, we are bringing on two lenders to help everyone navigate the confusing housing market and some of the challenging lending conditions that are out there today. Both of these guests are friends of yours. Is that right, Kathy?

Kathy:
Yeah. I’ve been doing this a long time, and I’m pretty familiar with lenders who specialize in working with investors in the one to four-unit world, and they’re able to bring a commercial loan product to that residential industry, which one to four-unit is considered residential. So it’s helped me. It’s helped a lot of members at Real Wealth. So I can vouch for these two. They’ve helped a lot of people.

Dave:
All right. Well, I think everyone is going to love this show because it helps explain a lot, like how important interest rates even are. Everyone wants to know what interest rates are, but we talk a lot about the different variables that actually impact the profitability and positive or negative leverage of your loan that go beyond interest rates. We go into a lot of different types of loan products. I think a lot of new investors think there’s just one kind of mortgage. There are plenty of different types of loan products out there for investors, and so if you are considering buying in this market, which is getting hotter and hotter right now, I think you’re really going to like this episode with Caeli Ridge and Tim Herriage. Caeli, just so you know, is the president and CEO of Ridge Lending Group. She’s a real estate investor herself. Tim is also an investor and is the executive director of RCN Capital. We are, of course, going to take a quick break to hear from our sponsors, but then we’ll be back with Caeli and Tim.
Caeli Ridge, welcome to On The Market. Thanks so much for being here.

Caeli:
My pleasure, Dave. Thanks for having me.

Dave:
Of course. Tim Herriage, thank you for being here as well.

Tim:
Thank you. I’m looking forward to it.

Dave:
Great. Well, Caeli, let’s start with you. Can you tell us a little bit about yourself and what you do at Ridge Lending Group?

Caeli:
Yes, sir. I would love to. So in addition to being a lender that really focuses a lot of its attention on investors, people find it unique that I am a fellow real estate investor. So I would want to share that with the listeners first and foremost. We have a nationwide platform, so we’ve got lots and lots of different options all over the country that we provide for our real estate investors. I’ve been in this space and working with investors for about 25 years, so I have a good amount of experience. I think some of that adds to the credibility and what we offer because I can see it from both lenses, right, being an investor and a lender focusing on investors. Because we focus so much of our attention on our clients’ education, they know that it’s coming from a place of experience, right? My personal firsthand, wins and losses, good and bad, I think that that helps with who we are and what we can do for our clients.

Dave:
What came first, lender or investor?

Caeli:
Lender came first, and organically, we got into non-owner-occupied and maybe not so much organically. I think early on… We’re a second generation company. I don’t think I mentioned that. My father founded the company, but together, we identified quickly that we didn’t want to be in the mix with just all the owner-occupied. The competition was very, very fierce, so we thought, “Okay. How do we reinvent ourselves or make ourselves unique?” So investors was something that we got hooked up in. Quickly, we could see, right? As the lender seeing it from up here, we get to see the rents, and appreciation, and all the different factors, tax benefit, so we thought, “Okay. This is something that we want to get into, too.” So lender first, but very, very quickly, we transitioned into investors ourselves.

Dave:
Tim, what about you? Can you tell us a little bit about yourself and your work at RCN?

Tim:
Yeah. Absolutely. So, about 21 years ago, I started in real estate investing, started out as a project manager for a house flipping company here in Dallas, quickly moved out on my own, started buying and creating owner-financed notes, keeping some rental property, flipping houses. I’ve been a home investor’s franchisee a couple times. The Great Recession was a little road bump there, but got into lending about 10 years ago when I formed and created B2R Finance with Blackstone, which then became Finance of America, which we took public in 2021. Then, now, I’m the executive director at RCN Capital. Really, just focused on strategy, but also making sure everything we do aligns with the customer needs versus our needs. So really just trying to marry that boots on the ground mentality with what’s happening in the boardroom.

Dave:
Great, and what type of loans does RCN specialize in?

Tim:
We only finance investors. So like this month, we’ll do about 700 loans. I would say probably 550 to 600 of those will be DSCR 30-year mortgages for investors. There’s still a lot of BRRR activity out there that we’re capturing on a weekly and monthly basis. We do fix and flip loans. We also do ground-up construction loans. We’re in 45 states, so almost national, but not quite.

Dave:
Chile, how does that compare to the type of loans that you offer investors?

Caeli:
So it’s not entirely different. Though that’s his wheelhouse and exclusively what he’s doing, it is, in some ways, part of what we offer. We have a very diverse menu of loan programs for real estate investors. I would say just as a quick overview, you’ve got your conventional Fannie/Freddie, and most people are familiar with those golden tickets as we call them, highest leverage, lowest interest rate. But we also have debt service coverage ratio on the non-QM product side, bank statement loans, asset depletion, commercial for residential if that was applicable for some kind of cross-collateralization or blanket loan, some investors look at that for scaling, recourse, non-recourse, some bridge products for fix and flip and BRRR, like Tim mentioned. That would be Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refi for any of those that aren’t familiar with that. Then, my favorite, my very favorite, least I forget is the all-in-one First Lien HELOC. That is, I think, an incredible tool, but that would be a high-level overview of the products that we offer.

Kathy:
What kind of interest rates are you seeing today for one to four-unit product?

Caeli:
I know that interest rates are a really hot topic. I totally get it, but I want to preface and maybe add something that interest rates are very subjective, and they’re not created equal like anything. Okay? As you can imagine, Tim and I are both having this conversation every day. In fact, it’s probably the first thing that people want to talk about. But unless you have some baseline information, it’s very difficult to put an actual number to a question, “What are rates today?” To quantify that, I will just say that we want to understand what the transaction type is. Is it a purchase? Is it a refinance? is it a rate and term refinance? Is it a cash-out refinance? Is this for a primary mortgage? Is it for a rental, which we’re talking about today? What’s the loan size? What’s the credit score? All of these variables will ultimately dictate what an actual interest rate would be. But instead, without having those details or that baseline, we can give a range, and I would say that a one to four-unit, 30-year fixed, depending on the variables, we’re probably going to be six and a quarter to seven and a half is where we would be right now for a conventional type loan, which is also important to mention.

Dave:
I just want to caveat so everyone knows we’re recording this at the end of June because things do change quickly.

Caeli:
Yeah. Good point.

Dave:
So I just want to timestamp this before you answer, but go ahead, Tim.

Tim:
Yeah, and important delineation there. So we don’t do any of the Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac products, and so our leverages or the loan amounts, the loan-to-value is going to be lower than some, and that’s what she was saying. Of course, Kathy led with the interest rate question, but-

Kathy:
I know. Sorry about that, guys. I was a mortgage broker. I hate that question, too.

Tim:
It’s subjective. I mean, on the 30-year fixed, if you’re looking for a 55 or 60 loan-to-value and you have a 750 FICO, we’re seeing some rates in the high fives. If you have a 680 credit score and you want a 75% cash out refinance, you’re probably going to pay in the high sixes or even low sevens, so I think that’s… Ultimately, my whole point all the time on lending is you need to talk to someone that can answer your questions and run the scenarios because the higher rate loan may be a better loan for your situation or what you’re trying to accomplish in your business.

Kathy:
Yeah. Tim, when you said that you… I forget how many loans you said you did this month.

Tim:
700 last month in May. So we’ll do about 650 in June.

Kathy:
Yeah. So I often hear complaints from investors saying, “Oh, it just doesn’t make sense anymore with rates so high and cash flows low. If you can’t get cash flow as high as the debt, why are you doing it?” So I’m curious about the volume. That seems like high volume to me. What kind of loans are they getting, and what are those kinds of deals that they’re getting?

Tim:
The primary loan right now, over 65%, are refinances, and more than half the investors say that they are refinancing so they can buy their next property. It’s interesting. I think the investors out there that, number one, don’t have so much recency bias, they actually remember six and a half on an investment property loan is actually pretty good over our career. They’re looking at some of these major metros where you can buy a house for 15% or 20% less than you could this time last year. So I think the investors that see… The Chinese symbol for chaos and opportunity are the same. I think the investors that see the opportunity in today’s market are full bore chasing the good deals that are mark-to-market discount from last year.

Kathy:
100%. Yeah. Caeli, what about you?

Caeli:
I would probably add to that that it’s going to be specific to the transaction or the investment strategy itself. I know everybody focuses on interest rate, but I’m the first one to stand up and say that it is a lot less materially significant than I think people place importance on. Interest rate has its place, but it’s really the math that they need to be looking at. If they’re not doing the actual math, then they’re not doing it right. So here’s what I would add about interest rates. They’re fluid, obviously. When they go up, they don’t stay up. When they go down, unfortunately, they’re not going to stay low indefinitely. So we know that there is a wave of up and down that we have to contend with.
Real estate investors that are serious about real estate investing aren’t going to focus too much of their attention on that actual number. They’re going to be looking at the rate of return. Remember, too, you guys, there’s so many other facets related to the rate that we need to be accounting for. As an example, what happens… tax-benefit-wise, what happens to our deductions when we have a higher interest rate? Our interest deduction is going to be much higher if we were paying 8% than, say, 6%. So if you’re really going to do the math and stretch it out to its conclusion, you need to be factoring in that piece, too. I think that where rates are concerned, the nice thing for investors is it’s a much smaller part of the big picture if you’re really looking at it from that overview lens.

Tim:
Yeah, and I’ll just add. You also have to look at some of the prepayment features that a lot of these loans have. Our primary loan, the DSCR, the 30-year rental loan, it comes with as little as three, as high as five year prepayment penalty, and so that may be why the rates are low, a little lower sometimes on the DSCR product than a Fannie or Freddie because there’s no call, there’s no prepayment there. So I think we also do see a lot of investors that would rather go the route of no prepayment in the hopes of rates coming back in in a couple years, and then being able to refinance. So I think, like Caeli was saying, you have to really balance out your strategy and all the products available to you when making those decisions and don’t let the rate be that primary driver.

Dave:
Tim, you just hit on two things that I’m hoping you can help explain to us and our audience. The first is you said DSCR. Can you just explain that one? Then, secondly, I think one of the most overlooked elements of these types of loans or commercial loans, people talking about pre-payment. Can you just help us understand the implications of pre-payment and why you would want to avoid that or why you might be comfortable with that?

Tim:
That’s a great question. I think we all have to realize how lucky we are that this time around, during a financial crisis, there is still money available for real estate investors because in ’08 and ’09, there was no money for us normal people that are trying to build a legacy, and that’s ultimately what opened the door for the big hedge funds. So these DSCR, Debt Service Coverage Ratio loans are loans that are basically… You qualify for them based off the cash flow of the property. The easiest example I always say is you’ll hear some of the DSCR ratio, right?
So if they say a 1.2 DSCR, you have to think of it like this. The loan you’re taking from a lender like RCN… Let’s imagine that your principle, your interest, your taxes, your property taxes, your insurance, and your homeowners associations all equal $1,000. Well, we want to see that house rent for $1,200. So 1.2 times that PITIA, Principal Interest, Taxes, Insurance, and Any Associations. You may be thinking it’s hard to get $1,000 mortgage payment, so we’ll just say if your mortgage payment is $2,000 in this case, including all your escrows, we would want to see the house rent for $2,400 on a 1.2 DSCR loan.
So it’s almost like a debt-to-income ratio for the property because on the typical DSCR loan, it’s made to a business, not an individual, big differentiating fact from some of the Fannie/Freddie stuff, and it’s based on the cashflow of the property, not… We don’t look at your W2 income or your personal tax returns. So those two things are really important, and that’s what makes it a commercial loan, and it’s so confusing. It has been for 10 years. We say commercial loan. They’re like, “Oh, for commercial property?” You’re like, “No, for residential property.” “So it’s a residential loan?” “No. Actually, it’s not.”
Anyway, what we did 10 years ago, we took, basically, the same type of loan that a hotel would get, and we changed the paperwork to make it where an investor could get it on a cash flowing real estate piece of residential real estate. So that’s where that DSCR thing is. So some of the other differences. It’s in your company name, typically, not to your personal name. You can do it in a trust. You can do it if you’re a foreign national. Let’s see. What’s the other… Oh, and there’s always a prepayment. There’s a prepayment because the loans are all bundled up and sold to commercial real estate investors and bond buyers, and those commercial real estate bond buyers, they like and need there to be a prepayment, a call protection is what they call it, the prepayment penalty in there.

Caeli:
I can add to that. So for our Debt Service Coverage Ratio, an easy way that I try to explain it to investors is gross rents divided by the PITIA like Tim had described. But if you know what your gross rents are and you have an idea of what your total mortgage payment is, divide those two numbers, and it’s going to give you your ratio. Similar to probably what I assume Tim has, we’ll go as low as 0.75 on that debt service ratio. So if the rents gross rents were 750 and the PITIA was 1,000, that actually is a viable product. The higher the debt service coverage ratio, the more attractive the rate and terms are going to be, right, the lower. So, keep in mind. If you have a lower Debt Service Coverage Ratio, you’re going to need to expect a higher interest rate as a result of that, but you still have options that will go, in some cases, to the 0.75.

Kathy:
Caeli, I just want to give one example of how a DSCR loan really helped one of our members at Real Wealth where when you do a 1031 exchange, you have to get replacement property of the same value of what you sold or more, and you also have to have the same amount of debt or more, or you get taxed. Now, a lot of the conventional loans, they max out at 10, so a lot of people forget this little piece. They want to do the 1031 exchange, but where are they going to get the debt for that if they’ve already maxed out? Caeli, I could just say, personally, you came in when somebody was really panicking and were able to close those loans really quickly, more quickly than a conventional loan. Do you remember that?

Caeli:
I remember vaguely, but yeah, we have both options so we can evolve with our investors as they max out. We have those other options that go beyond because you’re right, Kathy, on the commercial end, the debt service coverage ratio products or non-QM products, they don’t have the same rules as a conventional Fannie/Freddie, and they don’t care how many finance properties you have. You could have 100 finance properties. As long as the property pencils, that’s a loan. I mean, credit and assets still have to be in place, but yeah.

Dave:
Just so everyone understands. Super useful, very popular loan product right now among investors, and I think I heard you both starting a little bit of a debate here that I want to expand upon.

Kathy:
Ooh, a lender debate.

Dave:
From my understanding, the higher the DSCR, the lower the risk to the lender, right? Basically, there’s more income, there’s more revenue coming in to cover the debt service, and so Tim, it sounds like you bottom out at one, which is basically you would have an even revenue to debt service. Caeli, you said that you go even… You would write loan even below the total revenue. Can you explain why you would do that?

Caeli:
So, a lot of times, it might have more to do with the current market rent versus what’s coming from an appraisal, the 1007 on an appraisal. That’s just the number on the form that gives us the median rent, so maybe what real market it hasn’t caught up to itself. So it can have something to do with that, but then also, the strength of the individual. If the individual has really high credit scores, they’ve got 30% down, skin in the game, real strong assets, that’s going to be a safe bet for them.

Dave:
So you’d lend to Kathy on a [inaudible 00:20:35]?

Caeli:
I would lend to Kathy at no debt service coverage ratio.

Kathy:
All right.

Dave:
Okay. All right. At zero? Okay. Kathy gets it at zero. Tim, why do you bottom at one?

Tim:
We know what we’re good at, and we stick with that. We know of the products out there that we could originate, but we’re a balance sheet lender, so we use our own cash to fund every single one of our loans, and we own our loans for a good period of time. So it’s when you look at the risk profile, specifically in nationally, right now, I mean, look, we have declining rents in some markets and declining values in some markets. If someone gets upside down on their monthly cashflow, it presents a risk, and we take a lot of pride at RCN of not being a loan-to-own company. We don’t want to go through that. So it’s just a risk profile that we approach, but it’s also… It’s about scale.
We’ll do more than one and a half billion this year in loans. I think we should do two, right? We’ll do over two next year. I think we should do five. So, to achieve scale, sometimes, I think in all businesses, you just have to take some of the options off the table and get really good at what you’re good at. I mean, that’s really why. As an investor, I love the 0.75 DSCR loan. I mean, I’ve got an Airbnb property, 150-year-old historic house that I’m sitting over here like, “I’m going to give her a call tomorrow.”

Kathy:
Ooh, it sounds like Tim is going to call Caeli. I love it.

Dave:
I love it.

Caeli:
If I could just add a piece to that really quickly, and the difference is that what… so those out there listening can understand more from a basic level. If Tim is holding this paper for a longer period of time, that’s probably a big reason if… So we fund on our warehouse lines, right? It’s our money, but we’re not holding these. We’re bundling these mortgage-backed securities, and we’re reselling them on the secondary market to investor servicers. If we weren’t doing that, we’d probably be in Tim’s camp where we would have that benchmark minimum, but we have access to sell them off our warehouse line and free up our capital again. So that’s probably the difference between why we’ve got the 0.75 versus just the standard one.

Kathy:
Now, a lot of people don’t understand what QM is, and that’s Qualified Mortgage that’s conventional, and there’s all kinds of other loans out there that investors need to know about. I know one of you mentioned blanket loans. What is that? How does that work for someone’s portfolio, and how can that help people increase their portfolio?

Caeli:
Tim, do you guys offer that?

Tim:
Yes, we have a portfolio loan product. Fun fact, I was part of the team that created those in 2013 with Blackstone through B2R Finance, and we did this first ever securitization of those portfolio loans in April of 2015. It’s been fun to watch the product evolve, but when you look at these portfolio loan products, if that’s what you’re referring to as a blanket loan, it’s, in general, a commercial loan. It’s going to have 10-year features. Most of them are going to have a 10-year balloon payment. There are some 30-year options out there. We originate the 30-year ones. Depending on how many properties you’re trying to do at a time, that can change. I think if it’s over like a hundred properties, then you can’t do the 30-year fixed. I can’t remember the exact number, and rates are a little higher, but then you can really get into non-recourse. You can get into cash management where… I mean, they get really complicated, but they’re a great tool for people.
We have a good friend of mine. He does about a hundred of these a year with us, and he fills up his bank line for all of his fix and flips, and gets all the houses rented up, and then just moves 50 to 80 houses at a time over into a portfolio loan. So you save on closing costs, you save on appraisal cost, you save on… Frankly, you only have to write one check instead of 80. So there’s a lot of scale and efficiency that goes into it. Personally, anytime I can, I try to talk people out of them because they, in general, are complicated, and if it’s not something that you feel really… I don’t like them. I’ve been doing this 20 years. I’ve done billions of dollars in real estate. I bought thousands of houses, and I hate the portfolio loans, and I wouldn’t take one.

Caeli:
I would add just one thing. I’m curious though. Tim, the 30-year, is it a fixed, or is it just the 30-year am? Are you guys fixing those for 30?

Tim:
There are some smaller portfolio loans that we can fix for 30. Yes.

Caeli:
Wow. Okay. Very cool. So here’s what I would add in terms of the education and the strategy that we try to support our clients with from that cross-collateralization blanket commercial loan perspective. As long as it’s a non-recourse product, and there may be some other reasons to look at this product on a recourse, and just to identify or to define that for the listeners, a recourse blanket loan means you’ve signed a personal guarantee. It is a business loan, it is to your LLC, et cetera, but you have personally guaranteed that loan. A non-recourse is the flip to that. There is no personal guarantee associated with it.
So one of the strategies for those that want to maybe free up more golden tickets. Let’s say they’ve got 20 properties. Okay? They’ve stabilized. They’re doing well. If the numbers work, a non-recourse cross-collateralization product, we might be able to take 15 of those 20 and put it into this blanket loan as a non-recourse. It will now free up more golden tickets, Fannie/Freddies, for this next phase of acquisition. Tim had touched on this earlier, and I still believe that this is, in some markets, what we’ll see. We haven’t seen it yet to the degree that many had predicted, but I think that some values are going to come down. So I think a lot of investors are going to be in a great position to be purchasing, right, again, at the lower price point levels. If they wanted to do that using Fannie/Freddies, that would be a good tool or a good strategy in which to open up if they had maxed them out. Just something that we talk about on occasion with our clients that have bigger portfolios.

Kathy:
Caeli, Is there something you know that I don’t know? Why did you say that you think values are going to continue to decline because we are seeing the opposite?

Caeli:
In some markets, I think that the consensus that a lot of people predicted that home values will start to decline because of the higher interest rates and all of the variables that come with that inflation, et cetera, I think that there is an inevitability to it. I don’t think that… and I don’t know that I agree that it’s healthy to continue to see the way we saw home values increase at the pace that we saw. I think that it’s fantastic that they started to level a little bit and that the trajectory is more sustainable, but I still do think there are some markets that are going to start seeing some devaluation of value. I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing. I think that that’s the cyclical nature of real estate, and it’s going to be necessary in some cases. So anytime I hear someone blanket statement or just give an over… let’s say the entire nation, and they just make one statement, I know that they’re not very well-informed because it’s very specific to the market, and every market is going to be different.

Kathy:
Which markets are you more concerned about, and are you not lending in some as a result?

Caeli:
We are lending in all. Well, 47. There’s three states that we’re not in, New York, North Dakota, and Vermont. But I think in some cases, there’ll be many markets that might see some of this, and then it’s going to be specific to the areas in the states. The ones that typically we see decline are the ones that have the hottest and the fastest appreciation. A lot of the Sun Belt states are typically… I hesitate to try and zero out on one because if I say one state, everybody is going to… There’ll be riots in the streets.

Kathy:
Panic.

Caeli:
Yeah, and it isn’t going to be subject to the entire state. I think that there are hotspots where we might start to see some values level off and come down a little. I’m not talking to the level that we saw ’08, ’09. Okay? I survived barely ’08, ’09, and I had million dollar properties that we purchased that I could not short sell for $300,000. I’m not talking numbers like that, but I do think that we’re going to start to see some relative decreasing in value in some markets, and I think that’s good.

Kathy:
Do you agree, Tim?

Tim:
Yeah. I mean, look, we have certain loan-to-value overlays in certain markets. It’s no secret that Austin, Boise, Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Denver, San Francisco… I mean, look. I mean, there’s definitely pockets of every market that are struggling. There’s definitely pockets of every market that defy trends. I completely agree that painting a broad brush of real estate is always the wrong thing to do. One of my favorite things to do is every month when the National Association of Realtors Report comes out, say, home values went up by one-third of a percent or whatever, or went down by 1%, well, the next page, it breaks it down regionally, and you may see the Northeast is down 2% year over year for that month, and then Midwest is up 5%, and the South is up 5%, and the West is down 5%. Right? But then, you drill in even deeper, and you find out that San Diego and Orange County are doing great. LA is pretty okay, but San Francisco isn’t.
We’re still lending everywhere that we’re licensed. Just like she said, we’re not in Vermont or North Dakota. I guess we need to get a lender on the show up there. We’re not in South Dakota, or Nevada, or Alaska, and that’s just by choice. So, look, I think in general, prices continue a gradual incline, nowhere near the pace they were at. There will be pockets that are not good, and there will be pockets that are fantastic, and that’s why I’m just such a huge proponent of education and information.

Caeli:
For the pockets that are going to come down because I strongly believe that that’s going to happen in some markets, that’s good news for us. I don’t think that that’s a bad thing. Some investors may lose a little bit of equity, but they should have been preparing for that. They should have been paying attention to the signs, and pulling out the equity, and harvesting that equity prior to this happening because we’ve been beating the drums. For the rest of the investors, guess what? Now, we get to take advantage of the lower price points and get in at those lower levels. I think that it benefits all the way around personally.

Dave:
I want to get back quickly to some of the loan products we’ve talked about. You guys have shared some really interesting information about different loans. Tim, let’s start with you. I’m curious. What is the most popular loan you’re seeing right now, and has that shifted recently?

Tim:
I have been shocked at the market share… When I look at our loan book on a monthly basis, I have been shocked how many less fix and flip loans we’re doing versus refinances on 30-year fixed. We run some customer surveys, and I talked to a lot of investors. I go to trade shows everywhere, and it’s interesting. There’s a lot of investors that got caught with some inventory that they refinanced and even bringing cash in, but it has been very, very interesting how many people are still refinancing their investment property and even pulling cash out at 6.5, 6.7, even in the low sevens was about as high as we got at RCN because they’re just bullish. They are excited about the market, and they want to go buy more houses. By far, I think 82% of our volume last month was 30-year rental loans, and of that 82%, if I remember correctly, more than 60% of that was refinanced, not purchased. The investors, overall, they say they’re going to buy more houses. They feel like real estate has already been discounted.

Dave:
Caeli, are you seeing this similar… Any changes in what loans are most popular among investors?

Caeli:
Everybody’s circumstances, and needs, and goals are going to be uniquely different, so no, not necessarily, Dave, but we see a pretty steady stream of… and because we’ve got so many, I think from all of those different facets, we’re still doing a lot of that business. I would like to touch on what Tim was saying. A lot of people will listen to that, and they’ll think, “Who didn’t refinance in 2020-2021? Is there anybody that didn’t refinance and get 2% interest rates or 3% interest rates?” I think pretty much everybody did, and to hear Tim say that people are refinancing out of those 4% interest rates or 3% interest rates into a five, or six, or whatever, they’re going to say, “Nah, probably not.”
I absolutely believe that, one, because I’m doing it, and two, because statistically speaking, guys, the percentage of people… I don’t care what the interest rate was that you secured originally. The percentage of people that start with a 30-year fixed mortgage and make 360 payments later to pay that mortgage off is a fraction of a percent, especially for real estate investors. I think that the current shelf life… and we have some historical atypical non-norm things that happened over the last couple of years, but I think the shelf life for a 30-year fixed investment property loan right now is five years.
I think that that’s going to probably come down in the coming months because I do think that we’re going to start to see interest rates, that might be a good segue, start to fall back off a little bit. But if the investor is a true investor, and they’re smart, they don’t care that they gave up a 4% interest rate to get a 6% interest rate. Borrowed funds are non-taxable. They’re going to take that equity, and they’re going to put it into something else that’s going to yield a higher return to make up for what they lost, and maybe that means that diversification, which I am huge on preaching about. For a long-term rental, maybe they’re going to start looking at a mid-term or a short-term, or maybe they’re going to look at real estate notes. I mean, there’s so many different variables, and facets, and strategies of real estate that the educated investor is not going to worry about giving up some golden 4% interest rate.

Dave:
So last question before we get out of here. We’ve been hearing a lot about liquidity issues or potential, let’s say potential liquidity issues in the market. Tim, do you think there’s any risk of liquidity drying up, like you said, in 2008, or what are you seeing?

Tim:
So, a couple weeks ago, I was in New York, and I was having lunch with a fellow from one of the top five investment banks, and he’s predicting that even more liquidity is coming to the single family investment space, and here’s why. There are a lot of large institutions that have raised a lot of money for commercial real estate debt and acquisition. If you open the newspaper or your app these days, all you see is commercial doom and gloom. Well, the way it works, if you’re a bank, you make money off of having other people’s money, so you don’t want to give it back to them.
So it’s our prediction that there will be more, and more, and more capital coming to the space for real estate investors. There will be more capital that comes to the industry for the iBuyer and large institutions. It’s just happening. So, personally, at RCN and me personally, after 21 years of doing this, there’s no crash coming. That’s our opinion, and we think rates are going to go down this year. We think values will be up. In general, there will be some markets that are not, but in general, values and rents in the good markets where there’s people that need a job and live are going to keep going up, and there’s never been a better time to invest.

Caeli:
I like that answer.

Dave:
Caeli, what do you think? Is there any risk of liquidity?

Caeli:
Well, I’m going to agree. Yeah, I agree with what Tim said, but I’d also add that real estate investors from a lending perspective, we take it in shorts a lot. When they make oversweeping, overhauling legislative changes and stuff, it’s the investors that usually get cracked down on first, and I find that interesting because we tend to be the lower risk. If you think about what’s being lent out there and liquidity for an owner-occupied, they’re constantly trying to open up for the minorities and disadvantaged, which I get, but those are higher risk borrowers. Okay? It’s not an opinion. It’s a fact. Very low down, much lower credit score requirements.
The playing field in which investors are made to play is that we have to have a lot more skin in the game, our credit profile has to be a lot more substantial, credit scores have to be higher, assets and reserves have to be way more substantial than you would have over here. So, in terms of liquidity and what’s going to be available for investors, I believe, is only going to continue to grow because I really feel like, in fairness, we are probably a safer bet in most instances.
Secondary markets, I think, look at risk from an investment standpoint based on much older criteria to qualify. I don’t feel like they’ve come online to what the new standard is. Right? I think that their ideals and their thinking for risk for investment or investor loans comes from 15 years ago where 5% down was okay, and those stated incomes, stated asset loans were okay. That’s no longer been the case. It hasn’t been the case for many, many years. Right? You have to walk on water to get mortgage loans, go through the process of underwriting, et cetera these days. So that was a long-drawn-out way to say I think liquidity is only going to increase. I agree with Tim, and I think for those additional reasons, we’re going to continue to have lots of options on the loan side of real estate investing.

Kathy:
That’s fascinating because Realtor.com just came out with an article saying that loans for… and maybe this is true or what you just said, but loans for properties under $150,000 are getting harder to find the liquidity. Are you seeing that?

Dave:
Are there properties for under $150,000?

Kathy:
I mean, we’re still buying them. Not very many.

Caeli:
I have not seen anything to the sort, Kathy, and I’ll tell you. Conventionally speaking, when we look at interest rates, not to go back to interest rates, but the LLPAs, Low Level Price Adjustments, for us, seem to be less harsh on a smaller loan size conventionally than on the bigger loan sizes. So I’m not seeing that in any regard on my end. My spectrum doesn’t show that.

Kathy:
Tim, why did you say you think rates are coming down this fall?

Tim:
Well, not to be too nerdy, which you know I can be, Kathy. The spread, the markup on the 10-year treasury is normally around 1.6% to 1.8% higher than the 10-year treasury for the 30-year mortgage. So the way that works here at the end of June, right, the 30-year fixed mortgage rates should be in the fives. It’s not because right now, the spreads, what the bond buyers, the markup, that’s a… Just think of a spread as a markup. The bond buyers, they want that to be a 3% markup. So that’s what has a lot of the rates in the high sixes, low sevens right now because the 10-year treasury is hovering in the high threes right now. We should realistically… In a good market of markups or spreads, rates should be in the fives right now, and so what we believe is going to happen is over the next three to six months, the Federal Reserve will definitely not hike aggressively, but they should slow down.
I mean, I think there may be another hike or two just to prove a point coming, but I think we’re pretty much done with that. As soon as that stabilizes, it’s the best… We don’t need the Federal Reserve rate to go down. We just need it to stop going up. If it will stop going up, it gives these bond buyers a little more confidence that the rates they’re seeing now are good for 5 or 10 years, and then they can reduce that markup or that spread. So we think even though the Fed rates may go up another quarter point or even a half a point by the end of the year, we think that the spreads will come down, which should lower the 30-year homeowner rates into the fives, and it’s just going to be just like 2018 again.
Every time it dips below six, there’ll be a mad rush to buy houses, and then it will go back up, and it will slow down, and then it will dip again. So we’re back to normal. We’re excited about it. I mean, rates in the fives are great. 4% is never coming back. We’re done with that. It’s gone. It’s over. Just kiss it goodbye, but rates in the fives would be historically 2.5% less than the 50-year average. So I think homeowner loans get down to the fives at the end of the year. I think the investor loans stay in the mid to low sixes, and that’s great for everybody. That’s a healthy market, and we can all go make money.

Caeli:
Agreed.

Dave:
I hope you’re right. You are more optimistic than I am about rates this year.

Caeli:
I think Tim said that beautifully. I would add that the markets where rates are concerned, secondary markets, there’s always that lag, right? Tim touched on this. The Feds went as fast and furious as we’ve ever seen in the history of this country from last year until what? A couple of months ago in terms of the severity in which they were putting their feet on the gas for higher interest rates. We’ve never seen anything like that. So I think that we’ve leveled out even if they… They’ve really started to slow in the capacity of how much they kept jacking those rates, and as you guys remember, they took a pause or a skip, whatever you want to call it, last month. July? Maybe there’s another one, but maybe it’s only a quarter. They were jacking those things a half and three quarters, et cetera.
So I agree with Tim that we’re probably right on the precipice of seeing interest rates come back down, but remember, like I said, they come down a lot slower than they go up, so I wouldn’t expect. Even if we start seeing them come down a little bit, I wouldn’t expect them to just fall through the floor. The other thing I just want to mention so that people put this into perspective because everybody is so consumed with interest rates, very largely dependent on your loan size guys. A quarter of a percentage point or a half of a percentage point on $100,000 is probably 25 bucks a month, but you have to be doing the math. Do the math, and try to not get so fixated on just that one little piece of real estate investing.

Tim:
Well, and the biggest impact that we’re seeing on DSCR loans specifically this year and that we’re watching heavily in third quarter is property taxes and insurance rates because in taxes, Kathy, I know you have a lot of houses here, the certified tax rolls come out in July, and my personal portfolio… I mean, my tax bill is going up 20% or 30% next year, and I couldn’t argue with them. Some of them were still underappraised. So property taxes are going up, rents are… I mean, insurance rates are going up across the board, and that’s going to have a lot larger impact on investors’ ability to cash flow than interest rates.

Dave:
All right. Well, thank you both so much for being here. Tim, if people want to learn more about you and RCN, where should they do that?

Tim:
Yeah. I’m super easy to find. I think I’m the only Tim Herriage in existence, so I’m @timherriage on all those social media platforms, and then @rcn_capital on all the social media platforms or rcncapital.com.

Dave:
Great. Thank you for being here. Caeli, where can people learn more about you?

Caeli:
They can check us out on our website, ridgelendinggroup.com. They can email us, [email protected] Toll-free is 855-74-RIDGE, which is an easy way to remember. Of course, like Tim, we’re on all the media platforms. You can just google “Ridge Lending Group.” You’ll find us.

Dave:
All right. Well, thank you both so much for being here. This has been a super helpful conversation. We appreciate it, and hopefully, we’ll have you both back on sometime soon.

Caeli:
I’d love it. Thank you, Kathy. Thanks, Dave.

Tim:
Thank you for having us.

Dave:
Well, that was a lot of fun. I learned about some new loan products. How do you feel about it?

Kathy:
Oh, it’s always confirming to hear mortgage people talk about rates coming down because I believe the same thing with this, the margin, the spread being so wide right now that people… Investors are just so nervous about what the Fed is going to do next, but I am holding the faith.

Dave:
I am not as convinced.

Kathy:
I know.

Dave:
I know the spread needs to come down, but I think the reason that the spread comes down is because there’s more stability in the market, right? There’s less risk of recession. There’s less inflation. If that happens, then yields could rise. So even if spread comes down, yields go up, that still equals higher interest rates. So I think it will come down. I actually think through 2023, it’s going to remain somewhere near where we are now. I do think it will come down, but I’m not sure it’s going to be this year, maybe next year, but hopefully, Tim is right. Hopefully, you’re right. I would like that, but I also like… I guess I don’t know what I want because I agree with Caeli that I think some price decline is healthy in some markets. Some prices are really unaffordable, and I don’t think it would be the worst thing if we saw some easing of prices throughout the rest of this year.

Kathy:
Yeah. Just selfishly, I prefer rates be higher right now because it just makes buying easier. There’s less competition, especially when you’re coming in with cash like our fund, so I agree with you. On the one hand, for my own personal portfolio, it would be fun to be able to refi into better rates. But on the acquisition side, they can wait a little bit because I just know if mortgage rates come down, it’s going to be another frenzy.

Dave:
Yeah. Yes, that’s definitely true. All right. Well, regardless of rates, we always have to talk about rates. I thought this was just a lot of fun, this show, because just super knowledgeable lenders explaining some really cool loan products. Hopefully, people out there learned a bit. I have never done a DSCR loan, but I’ve always been interested in it. I think it’s super beneficial and something people should definitely consider if they are up, they’ve already used 10 conforming loans, or maybe that they want to buy a property that won’t qualify for a conforming loan. So, hopefully, everyone learned a lot about that. Have you ever used one?

Kathy:
Yeah. I mean, if you just want more privacy, you can get the loan in an LLC so nobody knows it’s you, and that’s hard to do unconventional. That’s impossible. I mean, I think you can put it in a trust potentially, but anyway, yes, there’s a lot of reasons why people do it. A lot of people I know just prefer that.

Dave:
Well, hopefully, this convinced all of you that finding a very knowledgeable and investor-centric kind of lender is very valuable. If you want to find a lender that knows how to work with investors, BiggerPockets recently just released a new lender finder tool which helps match people for free with really qualified investor lenders just like Tim and Caeli. You can find that at biggerpockets.com/lenders, and go check it out if you’re interested in finding a loan.
Kathy, thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate it, and thank all of you for listening. We’ll see you for the next episode of On The Market. On The Market is created by me, Dave Meyer, and Kailyn Bennett, produced by Kailyn Bennett, editing by Joel Esparza and Onyx Media, researched by Pooja Jindal, copywriting by Nate Weintraub, and a very special thanks to the entire BiggerPockets team. The content on the show On The Market are opinions only. All listeners should independently verify data points, opinions, and investment strategies.

 

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


Zippy, a “community-focused” chattel lender, just raised additional investment from Brand Foundry and repeat investors, addressing growing demand for manufactured home loans. 

Since its foundation, the company has been on a steady path to becoming one of the largest lenders in the manufactured housing industry, which has struggled to take off in part because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac haven’t provided liquidity for loans on manufactured homes titled as personal property, and private lenders tend to charge high interest rates and offer few protections. (Borrowers of chattel loans often pay double the rate of real estate loans psecured by

It has raised a total of $26 million in venture funding and is already active in 17 markets. The company didn’t disclose the amount of the latest round. Earlier this year, Zippy announced another round of investments from Nashville-based FirstBank.

The company says its online platform can originate competitive loans in a matter of days.

“Zippy is providing an integral part of the equation to increase access to affordable housing by giving homebuyers more competitive financing options,” said Wesley Gottesman, partner at Brand Foundry. “We are thrilled to continue to support them in democratizing access to home ownership while pushing the entire manufactured housing industry forward.”

Recently, Zippy welcomed the appointment of a new VP of Sales, Jesse Field, formerly of TrueCar. The company also initiated new partnerships with owner-operators of manufactured home communities, fueling the company’s exponential growth.

This investment will allow Zippy to continue to offer community partners the technology needed to sell competitive loans to homebuyers, the company said Thursday. A new influx of chattel houses might be one of the solutions to remedy the affordability crisis

“This investment will fuel Zippy’s expansion in both sales and engineering capabilities and allow us to expand our footprint across the country,” said Jordan Bucy, Zippy co-founder & COO. “We’re excited to strengthen our presence and offerings to increase more opportunities for affordable housing as we march toward the immense opportunity in front of us.”

As part of its duty to serve plan, Freddie Mac aims to purchase 1,500 to 2,500 chattel loans by 2024. Fannie Mae is weighing buying chattel loans in the future as well.



Source link


We finally got a break on mortgage rates last week as the 10-year yield hit a critical level and quickly reversed lower, sending mortgage rates down. Active listings showed growth, week to week, but much smaller than I would like to see. Purchase application data showed some growth weekly, keeping alive the streak of more positive data than negative data year to date.

  • Weekly active listings rose by 5,569
  • Mortgage rates fell from 7.12% to a low of 6.87%, the recent high was 7.22%
  • Purchase apps were up 2% from week to week.

The 10-year yield and mortgage rates

What a crazy few weeks for the 10-year yield and mortgage rates. Last week showed why technical levels matter at certain key stops. As shown below, we hit a key level on the 10-year yield and bounced lower as the CPI report came in as expected.

In my 2023 forecast, I said that if the economy stays firm, the 10-year yield range should be between 3.21% and 4.25%, equating to mortgage rates between 5.75% and 7.25%. The labor market remains healthy as long as jobless claims trend below 323,000 on the four-week moving average. So far, as we can see in the chart below, the 10-year yield channel and mortgage rates have stayed in that range.

If it weren’t for the banking crisis this year, the spreads between the 30-year fixed rate and the 10-year yield would be much better, but that is the reality of the world we live in today. In a normal market, mortgage rates would easily be under 6% with the 10-year yield where it is.

Weekly housing inventory

We had mild inventory growth last week and new listing data is trending at the lowest levels ever. It has truly been the walking dead for inventory growth this year. In fact, last week we were still below the low inventory levels we saw in January, which is crazy because our seasonal increases in spring and summer should always be much higher than in January. 

  • Weekly inventory change (July 7-July 14): Inventory rose from 464,889 to 470,458
  • Same week last year (July 8-July 15): Inventory rose from 487,319 to 508,633
  • The inventory bottom for 2022 was 240,194
  • The inventory peak for 2023 so far is 472,688
  • For context, active listings for this week in 2015 were 1,197,641 

As we can see below, the slope of the inventory curve from the seasonal bottom on April 14, 2023, has been so slow that we have negative year-over-year inventory data this year. It also took the longest time ever in 2023 to find the seasonal bottom.


In a few months, we will see the seasonal decline in active listings inventory that we see every year. The new listing data is also seasonal, but its decline happens much earlier, and it looks like we’re entering that period already.  

We have had five straight weeks of declines, but they have been mild. This is key because the last thing we want is for new weekly listings to decline significantly when this data line has already been trending at the lowest levels ever for the past 12 months.

  • 2023: 57,894
  • 2022: 72,553
  • 2021: 83,641

Purchase application data

Purchase application data was down 2% weekly, making the count for the year-to-date data 14 positive and 12 negative prints. If we start from Nov. 9, 2022, it’s been 21 positive prints versus 12 negative prints. The recent push higher in mortgage rates hasn’t created the downfall in this data line like it did last year.

Of course, the big difference in housing this year from last is that home sales aren’t crashing. Since Nov. 9, housing demand has stabilized, and the new home sales sector has shown good growth year over year. The existing home sales market hasn’t gotten much traction as mortgage rates are too high for growth after the one big sales print we had in February.

The week ahead: Housing reports

The week ahead has a host of housing reports: the builder’s confidence index, housing starts, and the existing home sales report will give us a dose of what is happening with the national housing market. On the economic side, we have retail sales on Tuesday and the Leading Economic Index and jobless claims on Thursday, so it will be a busy week on the housing and economic side. I will be interested to see where the 10-year yield and mortgage rates land this week with all these reports coming off the recent highs. 



Source link


One real estate market is ready to explode, haunted houses and “dark tourism” become all the rage, tiny homes are the new affordable housing, and multifamily investors find colossal cash flow with homeless housing. It’s halfway through 2023, and no real estate investing opportunity can be taken for granted. Long gone are the times of buying any house and counting on cash flow to come through every month. If you want to know the REAL ways to make money in real estate, this is the episode for you!

We’re back with the full On the Market podcast panel, as Henry, James, Jamil, and Kathy bring in news stories affecting real estate investors nationwide. First, Henry talks about a “micro-home” community of tiny houses helping home buyers lock in a mortgage for almost half the average cost. Then, James touches on California’s consistent struggle with homelessness and how multifamily investors can profit by building safe spaces for those that need a helping hand.

Kathy brings the inside scoop on a new resort development that could shoot one city’s home prices through the roof. Finally, Jamil makes us all feel slightly uncomfortable by mentioning “dark tourism” and how buying haunted houses could give you a huge ROI as tourists beg to be terrified. If you want to know about all the unconventional yet high-profit housing market opportunities, stick around!

Dave:
What’s up everyone? Welcome to On the Market. This is Dave, your host, joined with everyone today, Jamil, James, Kathy, Henry. Everyone, how are you?

Jamil:
Good. I answer for everyone, I guess.

Henry:
We’re good.

Kathy:
So happy to be together.

Dave:
All right. Jamil, are you and Henry recording from the same place?

Jamil:
He’s actually just in the other room. No, we’re both in Phoenix, Arizona. He’s at Hot Bobby’s studio, which as you can see by the sign is mediocre at best. Mine on the other hand is not.

Dave:
Bobby, how would you describe Bobby, Jamil?

Jamil:
Hot.

Dave:
What is his job though?

Jamil:
His job is videographer and motivational speaker.

Dave:
Okay, all right, got it.

Jamil:
He pep talks me, he’s like, “It’s okay. It’s okay. Yes, you are built like a bag of milk, but people like you.”

Dave:
That’s great, I need a Bobby in my life. That would be nice.

James:
Did you say built like a bag of milk?

Jamil:
Somebody actually said that to me on a live stream last week, and I was stumped.

Dave:
What?

Jamil:
Somebody said, “Hey, Jamil, congratulations on the weight loss. You’re looking great.” And then somebody else was like, “What are you talking about? He’s built like a bag of milk.” And I’m like, “Wow, I haven’t heard that one before. Geez.

James:
All right, that’s a first.

Dave:
I think you’re looking great, man.

Jamil:
I actually went… I tracked down a bag of milk very soon after that and I was poking it, and I’m like, man, what?

Henry:
At least 2%.

Dave:
Such a mean thing to say.

James:
I’m saving that one.

Dave:
I think you’re looking great.

Jamil:
Thanks.

Dave:
They’re straight up wrong.

Kathy:
Well, everybody loves milk, so let’s get [inaudible 00:01:42].

Dave:
I don’t know. I’m lactose intolerant.

Kathy:
Me too. Me too. Sorry.

Dave:
Yeah, so we both [inaudible 00:01:51]

Henry:
Nobody actually likes milk.

James:
Now that we’ve lost our farming sponsors.

Dave:
Cheese. I can get on board with cheese. All right. Well, Bobby nailed the Henry Washington purple, for anyone who’s not watching it.

Henry:
He did that just for me.

Dave:
[inaudible 00:02:04] he’s got your perfect hue going on.

Kathy:
Yeah.

Dave:
All right. Well, for today’s show, we’re going to do our correspondence show, which if you listen to this podcast regularly, you know it’s our format where each of the cast members brings an article that they found interesting and pertinent to the real estate investing community. But today we’re focusing it a little bit on opportunities in unique markets. So each panelist is going to bring a story about a unique place in the country that has some sort of potential for real estate investors.
Before we get into that, Kailyn has teed up a pretty hard game for us. I don’t know how you guys are going to do on this. It is a history game. So I’m going to ask you all questions about the history of the housing market, and I want to see how well you guys understand this. The first question I’m going to direct at James, because he looks the most nervous. The question is, when was the first mortgage issued in the United States?

James:
I have not the slightest clue.

Dave:
All right. Give me a century. What century do you think it is?

James:
I’m going 1900s.

Dave:
Okay, that’s a good guess.

James:
And I’m going to go with 1918, final answer.

Dave:
Okay. All right. 1918, world War One. Okay. Kathy.

Kathy:
1776. Because I just feel like people-

Dave:
Whoa.

Kathy:
Yeah. I’m just going there.

Jamil:
Alexander Hamilton.

Dave:
They just came out the gate, Declaration of Independence, mortgages, next thing.

Kathy:
And then banker was like, “Dude, I can so take advantage of this situation. Yes.”

Henry:
That actually sounds right.

Dave:
Okay. Henry, what do you got?

Henry:
1802.

Dave:
Ooh, okay.

Henry:
For absolutely no reason.

Kathy:
That’s a good number.

Dave:
Jamil.

Jamil:
Well, I’ve looked at a lot of houses and I’ve seen a ton of construction in the late 1800s and early 1900s, and my opinion would be that you’d see more construction as affordability or more mortgages became available to people because they need to borrow money. So I’m going to say 1890.

Dave:
1890 is similar to what I was going to guess. I just think maybe it was like a post civil war reconstruction effort to stimulate the economy. I’m going to go 1872. And let’s see what we’ve got. Kailyn, on the big board. Whoa. Okay. Kathy, pretty close. 1781 was the first ever mortgage issued.

Jamil:
Wow.

Dave:
God, there’re bankers always.

Kathy:
What took them so long?

Jamil:
So you’re telling me that the republic is interwoven with credit?

Dave:
Yeah. It’s remarkable to think about Jamil.

Jamil:
Wow. Can’t believe it.

Dave:
All right. Second question, in what year did the US federal government start selling off land? Henry.

Henry:
1802.

Dave:
18… I like it. He’s just going to keep… Kathy, you started this on the very first episode, we started guessing. You just said seven and a half for everything.

Kathy:
I was wrong.

Dave:
Henry’s just going to say 1802 for everything. All right, Jamil.

Jamil:
Well, I think we probably needed to start selling stuff pretty soon after the formation. So my guess is going to be 1790. I like 90 for some reason.

Dave:
James.

James:
I’m with Jamil. I’m going 1777. They started trading dirt right out the gate. Think of how much potential there was to sell dirt back then. It was just an open canvas.

Jamil:
Oh, that was a wholesaler’s dream. Except there’d be no comps. There’d be no comps. I could just make up… Hey, that’s just like today, people just making up ARV. Right? That’s like, “Hey, you buy this. Who knows? It might… White House over here, it could be worth a lot one day.”

Kathy:
If someone buys it, you’ve just established value. So yeah.

Dave:
Kathy, what’s your guess?

Kathy:
Well, since you said I like sevens, then we’ll go with 1777. Why not?

Dave:
All right. I’m not going to guess because I just saw the answer. But Henry, his strategy’s working, it was 1802. No, it was 1800.

Jamil:
Wow. Oh, wow.

Dave:
It was 1800, but extremely close. All right, last question. When was the lowest annual mortgage rate ever recorded in the United States? Jamil.

Jamil:
2020.

Dave:
Henry. Don’t say 1802.

Henry:
1801.

Dave:
Okay. Pushing your luck. All right, Kathy.

Kathy:
Can I tie with Jamil? 2020.

Dave:
All right. James.

James:
April of 2019.

Dave:
Okay. Pre-pandemic, huh? It was in 2021.

Kathy:
Oh.

Dave:
Well, we’re going to take a quick break and then we’ll be back after the break.

Henry:
After these messages.

Dave:
We’re going to take a quick break and we’ll be right back with our correspondence show.
Welcome back, everyone for our correspondent show. Today we’re going to be talking about unique opportunities and situations in given markets across the US that we think that you as investors should know about.

Henry:
So look, I brought a story that I thought was super cool. So affordable housing is a problem all across the country. You also have the problem of impoverished communities feeling like they don’t have access to homeownership. And I am privileged to have met this developer who did this project, and I thought, what a cool opportunity to be able to share this because I feel like this is a play that can be run in many larger cities and an opportunity that other developers across the country could take advantage of.
So there is a Black developer by the name of Booker T. Washington who built a 29-home, micro-home community. So these are larger than tiny homes. They’re going to be between 330 feet and 630 square feet. So larger than tiny homes. So 29 micro homes in College Park in the Atlanta area. And so this is a predominantly Black neighborhood where a lot of working class individuals live, and there’s not a lot of access to affordable housing, nonetheless, homeownership. And what they were able to do by building these micro homes was to build… And they’re really nice, modern-looking homes that they’ve built.
And what they did was they were able to build these homes and then build them at an affordable price. So the purchase price for these homes were between 200,000 and 230,000. And if you look at the average home price in Atlanta, it’s around 400,000. So you’re getting a house for essentially half the price, albeit it’s a little smaller, but it’s still a home. So you’re getting a house for about half the price, which puts your mortgage somewhere between 13 and 1700. So call it $1,500 for a mortgage, which is less than rent in a lot of places in Atlanta.
And so people now had opportunity to own homes in their community. They didn’t have to leave their community to find something nice. They didn’t have to leave their community to spend their money somewhere else. They could keep the money in the community, they could keep their jobs in their community. And what I thought was really cool about this was the land that they built this community on was vacant, abandoned land. It wasn’t producing any tax revenue for the city. And so they were able to take land that wasn’t producing anything for the city, and now, that land is producing tax income, the houses are providing affordable homes. It’s a nice community. People don’t have to leave their community. And it was also a profitable venture for the developer.
And so I feel like that’s a win all the way around. I think we talk a lot about affordable housing as a problem. And really that problem just means what? Problems mean opportunities. When I was in the corporate world, they didn’t let us say the word problem. They made us say the word opportunity instead of the word problem, because every problem is just an opportunity to solve something. And so I think this was a creative way to create affordable housing and keep people in a community rather than feeling like people have to be forced out.

Dave:
That’s awesome. Wow. Very cool story. So is it the public private partnership that allowed that property to be built at such a low cost?

Henry:
I’m not sure. Now, he’s a seasoned developer. He’s been building other communities before. And so I’m sure he’s got… I’m sure the build cost wasn’t anything different than what he’s normally building, but the size of the house is also smaller than a typically normal house. So you’re not spending as much on the build either.

Dave:
Was this the first time this guy did a development like it?

Henry:
I believe it’s the first and only Black-developed, micro-home community in the country.

Dave:
Wow. Cool. Well, hopefully with all the success it will be a sort of blueprint for future opportunities.

Henry:
That is what I hope as well.

Dave:
All right, great. Well, thank you for sharing that story. Super cool. All right, James, what story do you have?

James:
Mine, it’s similar to Henry’s. I pulled an article that talks about the amount of money that’s being spent to develop homeless shelters in Sacramento. Sacramento has allocated over 50 to 60 million dollars to develop anywhere between 2 and 300 affordable housing… not really affordable housing, more for shelter, for living, where they’re going to provide food services. And this is all based around fixing the homeless situation. And the reason I found it so interesting is A, there’s opportunities that come with that. We currently own a 68 unit rooming house in Capitol Hill in Washington. And because of the demand, and the city has been spending so much money on homelessness or also on just subsidizing people that need help, what it’s done for us on that specific building is it actually turned our building into a 40% cashflow building. Because we were approached by the state and they offered us a ridiculously high rent to secure the building, and they locked it up for a long period of time.
So as an investor, sometimes we look at this and we’re like, okay, that’s not really good for the market. You’re bringing in homeless shelters that in theory, the New York Times reported that on average that drops your property values by 15 to 20%. So it’s definitely something you want to be aware of that’s being planned in your neighborhood because it could reduce your value. But as a buy and hold investor, if you’re buying multifamily in that area, at the end of the day, they don’t have enough units. They’re spending 50 to 60 million dollars and it’s only going to help about 5% of the total homeless. That’s going to get about 2 to 300 people into housing. There’s 4 to 5,000 that need housing in Sacramento alone. So it’s barely moving the needle.
And one thing I did want to point out, because I think Henry’s article is really good because it shows working with the private sector in how they made something that works financially for everybody. But if you really break down the cost of what’s being allocated right now, they’re developing 2 to 300 tiny houses. Those on average cost, 40 to $60,000 to create. They are spending 200 to 300,000 to put every one of those units in. And it’s completely inefficient. And if they could become efficient they could help three times more people, if not more, at that point.
But it’s always something, as investors, you want to be paying attention to what’s going on in your city, what’s going on in your jurisdiction. Because as stuff like this is happening in our major cities, it’s happening in Seattle, it’s happening in L.A., Sacramento, across the nation, it’s a need that must happen. We have people living on the streets, they need to get in housing, they need to get help, but they need to do it in the right way. But as investors, you have to pay attention to this because if you’re looking at buying a single family rental property in that area, the value could go down.
Now, if you’re buying multifamily in there, you start reaching out to states and you can actually get some state contracts that will actually help you substantially. And it will save the state money at that point. By them renting our huge rooming house, they’re paying a fraction of what they’re spending in Sacramento on these housing… to house these people.
And so the private sector, it actually makes more sense financially, like what Henry was just talking about, that the government works with the private sector because they actually can reduce the cost. And it’s good for the private sector because you actually get paid a little of a higher return too. So it’s win-win if they can put it all together. But it’s definitely something as this homeless crisis across the United States is happening, you need to pay attention to what’s being developed, where’s the money being allocated, and what pivots do you need to make as you’re putting together your portfolio.

Dave:
Yeah, it’s super interesting. I hadn’t really heard some of the stats about property values and how they’re impacted by this type of stuff. You hear a lot about sort of NIMBYism, where it’s like people don’t want it in their backyard. So it’s a really challenging problem to try and correct because we do need housing and to be able to provide options and services to these people. But obviously it seems like most people don’t want the services provided anywhere near where they live. So it creates a really difficult situation for these governments.

James:
We got toasted on a house one time. It was in 2013-ish, around there. We bought this property, great craftsman home, great area of Seattle. And then after we closed, we were waiting on permits, a sign goes up that there’s a tiny house development going in across for homeless. And it was a year-long contract. Basically, they were doing these pop-up, tiny homes around the city of Seattle for a while-

Dave:
They used to do that in Denver.

James:
The house became unsellable. When we were done, not one person would buy that house. And this is back when pricing was a lot more affordable too. And we ended up having to keep that as a rental for two years because it just would not trade. So you do want to pay attention as you’re buying your investments. I don’t think it’s bad to have rental property in the area, but if you’re doing short-term development flips, you want to be a little bit careful. You don’t want that extra objection in your deal.

Kathy:
Yeah, I mean, we’ve tried all kinds of things in California. And Malibu became, I don’t know if you guys know this, but became a sanctuary city. And over Covid, all of the beachfront parking became homeless homes and they would park RVs and their cars and LA passed a law saying that you could live in your car. And of course, the people of Malibu actually wanted that. They want to find a solution for the homeless. What we discovered is that crime increased dramatically and there weren’t really the services for people. There were no bathrooms. So it’s just bad. Bottom line is a homeless problem is different than an affordability problem. To me, the homeless problem is more of an opioid or mental health issue and just providing some housing isn’t going to fix it. But I’ve talked about this before.

James:
No, or at least figure out how to provide housing that works for the masses. These plans are half plans. They’re not even half plans, they’re 10th of a plan because they’re spending all the budget and then making minimal impact. And it’s like, you spend the budget, help the people, but make the impact. And it really comes down to government waste, government spending, they don’t know how to develop stuff. They don’t know how to build things.
I heard they were building 80 Us for 800 grand in L.A. How do I get the contract for that? I will build those all day long. For us, it costs us 340 grand to build that. The inefficiency and wasted dollars means no one’s getting help. It’s a nice theory, but they need to put the right plan behind it, just like everybody has to do for building out a business. If you want to build out a business or build out something that’s going to be successful, you’ve got to think it all the way through, where I feel like it’s just this splash drop in. And at the same time, it’s going to affect people. If you own housing in that space, your property could be worth less. You might want to sell and relo out. It’s definitely something that has to be addressed, but they need to refine how they’re doing it because it’s not working.

Dave:
All right. Kathy, what is your opportunity that you’ve been looking at?

Kathy:
We’re going to go in a very, very different direction from the first two. I tend to love getting into areas before something big happens, but you kind of know it’s coming. It can be a little bit risky because that big thing may actually never happen. But if it does, that’s where you can really make a lot of money. If you buy an old property in an area where, again, something huge is coming in.
So you all know that I love the Park City area. I love Utah. I think they’re creating massive jobs there. And a lot of the tech industry, they’re calling it Silicon Slopes. What a lot of people don’t know, and now the word is out, as of this moment, that right behind Deer Valley, they are building a brand new ski resort. It’s called the Mayflower. Mayflower Mountain Resort. And for years, they didn’t think this thing was going to happen. So if you bought in the area and it didn’t happen, then… I don’t know. Do you guys know where Heber Valley is? It’s not a well-known area unless you’re a fan of Park City.
So the houses out there have been fairly cheap. But when this ski resort gets built and it’s going to be… Just look at this, the Mayflower Mountain Resort will be North America’s newest world-class Alpine Village to be developed since 1981. So to me, this is a huge deal in an area that’s already growing. You know that Utah’s growing, you know that Salt Lake is growing, and there’s this new resort. So if you wanted to invest in the resort, you’re going to have to have some deep pockets. I imagine the homes are going to be in the millions for this if you want to be ski and ski out.
However, if you still want to buy one of the older homes nearby, I think there’s a huge opportunity close by. There is a development where there’s going to be a Tiger Woods golf course, and then where I’m investing is a brand new development that’s not mine, but could be. We may partner with these guys. But a friend of mine, actually who I met through Ken McElroy, bought my dream. He bought a hot springs.

Dave:
Whoa.

Jamil:
Wow.

Kathy:
Yeah, he bought… Like how do you buy a hot springs? But he did it. And he’s going to have all these houses so you can go ski at the Mayflower, this brand new resort with all new equipment, all new cool stuff, and then go home and just jump in the hot springs. So I love the idea. I think it’s really cool. I think you could go in anywhere in the area and make money if you wanted to buy in this hot Springs development. The way he’s selling it is the way I’ve been talking about selling in our Park City development, which is the fractional shared vacation ownership.
Because one of the biggest wastes of property, and I see it all the time where I live, is rich people come in and buy vacation property and never use it. So you’ve got world-class property that sits empty and it’s awful. It’s disgusting. But if you’re able to share it with several owners, so it’s always being used, but how often are you going to use it if it’s a vacation home? And in this case it’s six to eight weeks, which is more than most people vacation. And I think the buy-in for one of those four bedroom homes, it’s in the two or 3 million dollar range, is 300,000 for your share. So it’s not for everybody, it’s not out of range for everybody, but it’s also not in range for everybody. But it’s cool. But again, you could buy an old house in the area and do very well.

Dave:
James, what do you think?

James:
I like this.

Dave:
You’d probably be… Yep, exactly. He’s the only one who could afford it. So I think…

James:
I had the privilege of staying at Kathy’s, one of Kathy’s units or one of the units that they developed in Park City, and it’s an amazing place. There’s so much growth there. And then what kind of blew me away was the amount of bodies that were on that mountain and in that city.

Dave:
James is scarred by this experience.

James:
Oh, I turned around and left all the way out there. I got there, I looked at the line, I’m like, no, I don’t do lines.

Henry:
Me either, buddy.

James:
But this is really needed. And then it was like this, you could hear the chaos in the ski lines. People are like, “Do we go to Deer Valley?” They’re like this quest to find a good mountain. So I mean, the demand’s definitely there. And I mean, around that city, you could see how much in Park City was developed in the last 10, 20 years. And the fact that it’s so close to that downtown city too, it was a really cool experience. But I think it’s really needed. It’s in high demand and it is definitely going to do what Kathy said, and that’s bring property values up because that’s where the money’s going. Money is going to raise the values, and amenities are going to raise the values, along with this hot springs Tiger…
It seems like Tiger Woods is doing golf courses throughout the nation. He’s just selling his name. I read on three articles with him on the golf course, but it’s going to bring money in and values will go up.

Kathy:
Oh, I forgot to add, there’s also Deepak Chopra in the development that I’ll be investing in, possibly partnering and syndicating in. He, Deepak Chopra’s going to create a wellness center there. And wellness centers are really on the rise. People want to live longer. There’s a huge generation of baby boomers who want to be healthy. And so there’s just a lot of big names tied to the area. And again, that’s always good for arising real estate values.

Dave:
All right, cool. That’s a good one. I like it. Jamil, what did you bring?

Jamil:
Okay, so before I get a bunch of hate mail from people about this, I just want to say that I chose something really outside the box, and it’s about dark tourism. And the article that I brought, and where I found it was… It actually listed for sale, JonBenét Ramsey’s home, where she was found dead. And again, it’s never a tourist attraction when something happens to a child. However, what I do want to say is dark tourism is alive and very, very, very, very lucrative for people who are willing to invest in properties where gruesome crimes have happened. For whatever reason, we have an obsession as a nation to want to see these places.
And so if you look up the Texas Chainsaw Massacre house, I mean, it’s a massive draw. If you’re ever in Los Angeles and you want to see the, what’s that TV show that Ryan Murphy does, American Horror Story House, the American Horror Story House, there’s always people outside. There’s always people wanting to get in. It’s a huge draw. And so I’m thinking it’s pretty well known that if something really gruesome happens in a house, that it’s hard to sell right away. So hear me out. So let’s just say for instance, you’re tracking these gruesome crimes and you decide, okay, what I’m going to do is I’m going to offer 30 cents on the dollar for these things, and I’m just going to hold on for a little while. Once the emotions settle, I can put it on Airbnb or something like Accord and possibly cash in.
So today, I think there’s a unique opportunity in dark tourism. I want to button this by saying right now at that house is worth 8 million dollars, or almost 8 million dollars. They’re selling it for just under 8 million bucks. And when the crimes happened and when it was sold, it sold in the 400 thousands. So we’re talking a massive appreciation from purchase and it’s way beyond the appreciation of the neighborhood. It’s way beyond the appreciation of other homes in the area. And I believe the reason for it is because of the story attached.

Dave:
That’s interesting. I mean, Boulder is a very expensive market. I’ve driven by this house. It’s in a very nice area, in a very expensive market. But are you saying people should buy it and then turn it into a museum, or you just think someone else is going to buy it even for more because of the history to it?

Jamil:
I think that you could monetize it by turning it into a museum. Which again, look, the ethics around that are questionable. But I mean, I just think there’s a fascination. I think there’s an opportunity. Look, I’ve driven down Bundy Drive before in hopes of being able to find the OJ House and learned that they’ve demolished it. So I mean, why would I even want to drive by? I’m not a weirdo or a sicko. But I was like, “I’m on Bundy Drive. I think something really crazy happened there.” And I Googled it. I’m like, “Oh my God, OJ Simpson, let’s find the house.”

Dave:
All right. Well, thank you all for bringing these stories. We greatly appreciate it. And thank you all for listening. I’ll see you for the next episode of On The Market.
On The Market is created by me, Dave Meyer, and Kailyn Bennett. Produced by Kailyn Bennett, editing by Joel Esparza and Onyx Media, researched by Puja Gendal. Copywriting by Nate Weintraub. And a very special thanks to the entire BiggerPockets team. The content on the show On the Market are opinions only. All listeners should independently verify data points, opinions, and investment strategies.

 

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link


Non-qualified mortgage (non-QM) lender NewFi Lending has launched a correspondent lending channel at a time when originators are fighting to grab production volume. 

“Non-QM product offerings are critical to any mortgage bankers’ offerings in today’s market. Newfi is leading the way in terms of innovation and service for these originations,” Dan Bayer, SVP of non-QM development and strategy, said in a statement.

As an affiliate of Apollo Global Management, Newfi can offer mortgage bankers the benefit of Apollo’s expansive resources and mortgage expertise, the company added.

The market for non-QMs, which doesn’t meet the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau‘s requirements for qualified mortgages, only represents about 4% of the first mortgage market, according to CoreLogic

But at times when overall industry transactions are dwindling, non-QM loans allow originators to serve a largely untapped market and expand their offerings to realtors and borrowers.

Correspondent lending is also a relatively bright spot for a mortgage industry that’s suffered from low origination volume. That’s partly due to the correspondent channel relying on small lenders’ production, such as community banks and independent mortgage banks that generally have a salesforce that works closely with local borrowers and realtors over the long haul. 

As of the first quarter of this year, market share for the correspondent channel rose to 29.5% from the last quarter’s 28.6% and from Q1 2022’s 22.1%, according to Inside Mortgage Finance data. The retail channel’s market share slipped to 54.9% of the overall originations pie in Q1 2023 from the previous quarter. The wholesale channel, meanwhile, rose to about 15.6% from Q4 2022. 

Founded in 2014, Newfi offers other specialized lending options, including debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) investment property loans, 40-year interest-only loans and alternative income loans — bank statement, 1099 and asset depletion loans. 



Source link


AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. entered into a dispute with Terra Property Trust, Inc. for Western Asset Mortgage Capital Corp., the company announced on Thursday. 

AG Mortgage, a pure-play residential mortgage REIT controlled by Angelo Gordon & Co. and owner of mortgage lender ARC Home, made a stock-and-cash offer for its peer Western Asset, managed by Franklin Resources, Inc. 

The publicly traded REIT is offering $9.88 per share, representing $60.5 million in aggregate and an 18.2% premium to Western Asset’s closing stock price as of July 12. The deal values Western Asset at $300 million, including debt.

The bid includes an implied value of $8.90 per common share ($54.5 million in total) and $0.98 per share in cash to shareholders ($6 million in total). In addition, AG Mortgage is waiving $2.4 million in management fees in the first year after closing. 

AG Mortgage would issue newly listed common shares to Western Asset shareholders on a book-for-book basis, consisting of 31% ownership of the combined company. The REIT would also expand its board to include up to two members from Western Asset’s independent directors. AG Mortgage has Piper Sandler as its financial advisor.  

“Our complementary core competences in residential mortgage credit would establish an even more efficient and competitive company,” T.J. Durkin, president and CEO at AG Mortgage, said in a letter to Western’s board. “Our proposal provides closing certainty and does not accelerate WMC’s convertible notes while also benefiting WMC stockholders.”  

The AG proposal comes a few weeks after Terra Property, managed by Mavik Capital Management, and Western Asset announced that they entered into a definitive agreement to combine in a book-for-book deal. 

On June 28, the companies announced the transaction would create a REIT with $1.2 billion in assets and $436 million of adjusted book value upon completion of the merger. The deal represents a private-to-public transaction for Terra Property.  

The transaction valued Western Asset at $17.30 per share, but the REIT’s stocks have been trading down since the announcement. Investors have been skeptical about Terra Property’s shares value as it’s a non-traded REIT. 

When announcing the deal with Terra Property, Bonnie Wongtrakool, CEO of Western Asset, said the transaction provides a greater market capitalization for the REIT based on recent trading levels. 

“With reduced leverage levels and increased liquidity as a combined company, we believe WMC shareholders will greatly benefit from the partnership of a well-capitalized institutional partner in TPT, which brings a proven track record and has developed broad and deep expertise investing across cycles, property types, and markets,” Wongtrakool said.   

Western Asset, a non-QM player, announced in 2022 it was exploring a potential company sale or merger in the wake of posting a $22.4 million net loss for the second quarter that ended June 30, 2022.

A spokesperson for Western Asset did not immediately reply to a request for comment. 



Source link


United Wholesale Mortgage (UWM) on Wednesday announced two new home-affordability mortgage products designed to help underserved borrowers become homeowners.

UWM, America’s top mortgage lender, is offering Special Purpose Credit Programs (SPCP) for Fannie Mae‘s HomeReady and Freddie Mac’s BorrowSmart Geo-Target programs.

These offerings will be available in select metro areas including Detroit, Baltimore and Chicago for Freddie Mac’s BorrowSmart and Detroit, Baltimore, Chicago, Atlanta, Memphis and Philadelphia for Fannie’s HomeReady program.

The lender said qualified buyers will receive up to $10,000 toward their downpayment/closing costs with BorrowSmart Geo-Target, or $5,000 toward their downpayment/closing costs and up to $1,000 toward home warranty and appraisal costs with the HomeReady SPCP.

In early 2022, seven agencies, including the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, gave lenders the green light to develop SPCPs and increase credit access to historically disadvantaged individuals without worrying that they’d violate fair lending laws.

UWM is one among a growing number of lenders turning to Fannie and Freddie’s special purpose programs to narrow the homeownership gap. The programs are key to the GSEs’ equitable housing finance plans.

“The Equitable Housing Finance Plans represent a commitment to sustainable approaches that will meaningfully address the racial and ethnic disparities in homeownership and wealth that have persisted for generations,” Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Sandra Thompson said last year in announcing the landmark plans. “We look forward to working with the enterprises, lenders, and other housing industry participants to further develop the ideas described in these plans.”



Source link


BlackFin Group announced on Wednesday the appointment of Christopher Call as the principal consultant on the BlackFin Group Professional Services team. In this new role, Call will assume leadership of the expanding team.

The professional services team primarily focuses on providing assistance to lenders and mortgage technology vendors in implementing new systems, conducting quality assurance testing, facilitating requirements gathering training, managing change, configuring systems, handling system administration, integrating technologies, and undertaking custom development work.

As lenders strive to maximize the return on investment of today’s technology and gear up for major projects in the latter half of 2023, the presence of a team that can scale according to their needs and ensure efficient service delivery is crucial, according to the company.

“I am eager to serve our clients by delivering on their critical business needs,” Call said.

Throughout his career, Call has held similar positions at Mortgage Cadence, Source Point Mortgage Solutions, and Argent Mortgage. He also holds certification in QA testing.

“We are especially excited to have Christopher join the team and run our new Professional Services division as he is truly a seasoned mortgage banking executive and consultant who understands the careful balance between output and results while leveraging long-standing models and frameworks for efficient delivery of professional services support. I’m excited to now know that our clients will be in great hands with a seasoned professional who is committed to their success,” Keith Kemph, CEO of BlackFin, said.

Founded in 2019, BlackFin Group is a management consulting firm specializing in strategic guidance, operational expertise, and innovative solutions for the banking and mortgage industries.

This content was generated using AI and was edited by HousingWire’s editors.



Source link


On Tuesday, a group of eight Democratic senators introduced a new bill, the “Stop Predatory Investing Act,” which aims to restrict tax breaks for corporations buying homes. The new rule would affect big investors, such as private equity firms and real estate investment trusts.  

If approved, the bill will prohibit investors acquiring 50 or more single-family rental homes from deducting interest or depreciation on those properties. However, if an investor sells one of those properties to a homebuyer or qualified nonprofit, they can deduct the interest and depreciation for the year the property is sold. 

The bill is a way for legislators to limit these investors’ gains when buying and renting homes, which they claim has driven up local housing prices and rents. According to the legislators, the U.S. faces a shortage of 3.8 million homes, and potential homeowners are unable to find properties they can afford. 

The effort is being led by Senate members Sherrod Brown (D-OH), the chair of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, and Ron Wyden (D-OR), the chair of the Senate Finance Committee. It also includes Senators Tina Smith (D-MN), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Jack Reed (D-RI), John Fetterman (D-PA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI). 

The new bill would allow owners to continue taking deductions on properties financed using Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) that are still in their affordability period, and on build-for-rent single-family housing. 

The bill, an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, would not disallow deductions for single-family rental homes purchased before enactment. 

One example given by the legislators to introduce the bill is Ohio. They say two big investors own more than 12,000 homes in just three Ohio markets. Meanwhile, other investors don’t report how many homes they own. 

“In too many communities in Ohio, big investors funded by Wall Street buy up homes that could have gone to first-time homebuyers, then jack up the rent, neglect repairs, and threaten families with eviction,” said Senator Brown in a statement. “Our bill will help prevent corporate landlords from driving up local housing prices and put power back in the hands of working families, who need a safe, affordable place to live and raise their children.”

Housing trade groups, including the National Association of Local Housing Finance Agencies (NALHFA), supported the bill. 

“This legislation represents a critical step in safeguarding the long-term affordability and stability of our communities, empowering local governments to protect single-family affordable housing stock, and preserve the well-being of low-income individuals and families,” Jonathan Paine, NALHFA executive director, said in a statement. 

Groups supporting the bill recognize that small investors own a large number of rental homes. However, according to these groups, large institutional investors increased their purchases at the height of the pandemic and have continued to purchase a significant share of single-family homes. 

Moreover, these big investors are under scrutiny by Congress, accused of gentrifying minority neighborhoods and allegedly displacing large numbers of people of color — Black residents in particular.



Source link


Home prices are steady, if relatively high in terms of historical home prices, and homeowners are staying in their homes longer than ever before. The result? American homeowners currently have more tappable home equity than ever — a net $30 trillion in home equity that can be tapped right now, according to HousingWire lead analyst Logan Mohtashami.

“That’s bigger than the total GDP of China,” Mohtashami said. “There’s more tappable equity here than any other time in history, maybe.”

This increase in home equity means more borrowers are interested in tapping into that equity, resulting in growth in the home equity lending space. 

“We’re definitely seeing more customers come to the table and ask questions, such as, ‘What is a home equity loan? What do my payments look like?’” said Craig Austin, chief revenue officer at FirstClose. “It’s an exciting time for home equity, for sure.” 

Borrowers are looking for ways to use the equity in their home to their advantage for things like their kids’ college expenses or investment opportunities, said Virginia Wilson, AVP Consumer Processing at Space Coast Credit Union

Outlook for home equity loans is positive

“Our volume has definitely increased significantly from where it had been in the past, and we’re seeing it stabilize a bit,” Wilson said. “We’re not having a huge peak and spike in volume like we did last summer, but it has stabilized and it is growing.”

And it looks like the space could keep growing, if mortgage rates stay above 5%. As lenders struggle with declining purchase volume, new players may enter the home equity lending space due to the opportunities there.

Those lenders will then have to determine how to deliver customers a digital experience while maintaining the differences between a purchase mortgage and home equity transaction.

Streamlining the transaction

“There is a sizable difference between a first mortgage and a home equity loan,” Austin said. “I think there are a lot of players in the space that have tried to water down their first mortgage experience and make it more geared toward home equity, but it really doesn’t work that way. It’s two different worlds; you have to treat them as such.” 

Space Coast had to make changes to its own process when moving its home equity business out from underneath its first mortgage umbrella, Wilson said.

“The best and easiest example is our closing package went from 68 documents to 15,” she said. “We removed all of these documents that are required on first mortgages. We found opportunities like that all throughout the process.”

What made the biggest impact in streamlining the home equity process for Space Coast, Wilson said, was changing their loan origination system and partnering with FirstClose to facilitate home equity loans. 

“With partners we work with like FirstClose and MeridianLink for our loan origination system, we’ve added and changed things to make the process so much smoother,” she said. “Going from 45- to 60-day closings to an average of under 20 days — that’s a huge difference.” 

To learn more about home equity in 2023 and how the right technology partner can help streamline and optimize the home equity lending process, check out our webinar “A complete guide to home equity products.” 



Source link